andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2010 andrew_gelman_stats-2010-194 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: A great new blog-class by Shawn Allen at Data Visualization , assembling all the good stuff in one place.
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 A great new blog-class by Shawn Allen at Data Visualization , assembling all the good stuff in one place. [sent-1, score-0.74]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('shawn', 0.665), ('allen', 0.489), ('visualization', 0.347), ('stuff', 0.256), ('place', 0.242), ('great', 0.189), ('new', 0.119), ('good', 0.11), ('data', 0.09), ('one', 0.066)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0 194 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-09-Data Visualization
Introduction: A great new blog-class by Shawn Allen at Data Visualization , assembling all the good stuff in one place.
2 0.30081335 1112 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-11-A blog full of examples for your statistics class
Introduction: From Allen Downey .
3 0.27867255 6 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-27-Jelte Wicherts lays down the stats on IQ
Introduction: Good stuff.
4 0.14450178 153 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-17-Tenure-track position at U. North Carolina in survey methods and social statistics
Introduction: See here . Cool–it looks like they’re doing interesting stuff, and it’s great to see this sort of support for applied research.
5 0.14419147 1125 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-18-Beautiful Line Charts
Introduction: I stumbled across a chart that’s in my opinion the best way to express a comparison of quantities through time: It compares the new PC companies, such as Apple, to traditional PC companies like IBM and Compaq, but on the same scale. If you’d like to see how iPads and other novelties compare, see here . I’ve tried to use the same type of visualization in my old work on legal data visualization . It comes from a new market research firm Asymco that also produced a very clean income vs expenses visualization (click to enlarge): While the first figure is pure perfection, Tufte purists might find the second one too colorful. But to a busy person, color helps tell things apart: when I know that pink means interest, it takes a fraction of the second to assess the situation. We live in 2012, not in 1712 to have to think black and white. Finally, they have a few other interesting uses of interactive visualization, such as cellular-broadband infrastructure around
6 0.11926668 1811 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-18-Psychology experiments to understand what’s going on with data graphics?
7 0.11772489 304 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-29-Data visualization marathon
8 0.10682143 816 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-22-“Information visualization” vs. “Statistical graphics”
9 0.10330266 164 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-26-A very short story
10 0.10291807 407 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-11-Data Visualization vs. Statistical Graphics
11 0.095403932 1286 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-28-Agreement Groups in US Senate and Dynamic Clustering
12 0.0930169 208 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-15-When Does a Name Become Androgynous?
13 0.091895096 794 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-09-The quest for the holy graph
14 0.090342358 40 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-18-What visualization is best?
15 0.087542944 396 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-05-Journalism in the age of data
16 0.080114789 2206 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-10-On deck this week
17 0.078153782 2144 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-23-I hate this stuff
18 0.078070894 1014 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-16-Visualizations of NYPD stop-and-frisk data
19 0.077833332 1176 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-19-Standardized writing styles and standardized graphing styles
20 0.077619419 878 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-29-Infovis, infographics, and data visualization: Where I’m coming from, and where I’d like to go
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.06), (1, -0.023), (2, -0.053), (3, 0.039), (4, 0.053), (5, -0.028), (6, -0.04), (7, 0.013), (8, -0.013), (9, 0.011), (10, 0.02), (11, -0.013), (12, -0.007), (13, -0.002), (14, -0.018), (15, -0.004), (16, 0.015), (17, -0.001), (18, 0.006), (19, -0.021), (20, -0.018), (21, -0.032), (22, 0.027), (23, 0.014), (24, -0.003), (25, -0.031), (26, -0.071), (27, 0.075), (28, 0.007), (29, 0.012), (30, -0.003), (31, -0.042), (32, 0.054), (33, -0.05), (34, 0.013), (35, 0.059), (36, 0.01), (37, -0.028), (38, -0.01), (39, 0.012), (40, -0.034), (41, -0.051), (42, -0.028), (43, -0.058), (44, 0.182), (45, 0.086), (46, 0.091), (47, -0.042), (48, 0.016), (49, -0.038)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.96251357 194 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-09-Data Visualization
Introduction: A great new blog-class by Shawn Allen at Data Visualization , assembling all the good stuff in one place.
2 0.82720381 6 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-27-Jelte Wicherts lays down the stats on IQ
Introduction: Good stuff.
3 0.81866294 208 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-15-When Does a Name Become Androgynous?
Introduction: Good stuff , as always, from Laura Wattenberg.
4 0.71822208 1112 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-11-A blog full of examples for your statistics class
Introduction: From Allen Downey .
5 0.70231819 153 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-17-Tenure-track position at U. North Carolina in survey methods and social statistics
Introduction: See here . Cool–it looks like they’re doing interesting stuff, and it’s great to see this sort of support for applied research.
6 0.6767379 1006 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-12-Val’s Number Scroll: Helping kids visualize math
7 0.66820735 1738 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-25-Plaig
8 0.66775042 304 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-29-Data visualization marathon
9 0.65586764 436 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-29-Quality control problems at the New York Times
10 0.64162934 2144 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-23-I hate this stuff
11 0.62284327 1499 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-16-Uri Simonsohn is speaking at Columbia tomorrow (Mon)
12 0.61622953 1785 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-02-So much artistic talent
13 0.61135685 2024 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-15-Swiss Jonah Lehrer update
14 0.60983306 1193 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-03-“Do you guys pay your bills?”
15 0.60694355 1138 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-25-Chris Schmid on Evidence Based Medicine
16 0.60300052 764 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-14-Examining US Legislative process with “Many Bills”
17 0.5878551 2079 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-27-Uncompressing the concept of compressed sensing
18 0.56611514 747 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-06-Research Directions for Machine Learning and Algorithms
19 0.55459815 122 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-01-MCMC machine
20 0.54491335 500 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-03-Bribing statistics
topicId topicWeight
[(5, 0.1), (20, 0.206), (24, 0.082), (50, 0.14), (99, 0.207)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.82736778 194 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-09-Data Visualization
Introduction: A great new blog-class by Shawn Allen at Data Visualization , assembling all the good stuff in one place.
2 0.82411158 479 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-20-WWJD? U can find out!
Introduction: Two positions open in the statistics group at the NYU education school. If you get the job, you get to work with Jennifer HIll! One position is a postdoctoral fellowship, and the other is a visiting professorship. The latter position requires “the demonstrated ability to develop a nationally recognized research program,” which seems like a lot to ask for a visiting professor. Do they expect the visiting prof to develop a nationally recognized research program and then leave it there at NYU after the visit is over? In any case, Jennifer and her colleagues are doing excellent work, both applied and methodological, and this seems like a great opportunity.
3 0.77403772 2108 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-20-That’s crazy talk!
Introduction: Tenure track faculty opening at the Center for the Promotion of Research Involving Innovative Statistical Methodology, with Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott, and other world-class researchers. It looks like a great opportunity.
4 0.76849747 480 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-21-Instead of “confidence interval,” let’s say “uncertainty interval”
Introduction: I’ve become increasingly uncomfortable with the term “confidence interval,” for several reasons: - The well-known difficulties in interpretation (officially the confidence statement can be interpreted only on average, but people typically implicitly give the Bayesian interpretation to each case), - The ambiguity between confidence intervals and predictive intervals. (See the footnote in BDA where we discuss the difference between “inference” and “prediction” in the classical framework.) - The awkwardness of explaining that confidence intervals are big in noisy situations where you have less confidence, and confidence intervals are small when you have more confidence. So here’s my proposal. Let’s use the term “uncertainty interval” instead. The uncertainty interval tells you how much uncertainty you have. That works pretty well, I think. P.S. As of this writing, “confidence interval” outGoogles “uncertainty interval” by the huge margin of 9.5 million to 54000. So we
5 0.75804836 1937 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-13-Meritocracy rerun
Introduction: I’ve said it here so often, this time I put it on the sister blog. . . .
6 0.75118816 910 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-15-Google Refine
7 0.74975896 270 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-12-Comparison of forecasts for the 2010 congressional elections
8 0.7351529 900 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-11-Symptomatic innumeracy
10 0.72292209 818 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-23-Parallel JAGS RNGs
11 0.71693027 374 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-27-No matter how famous you are, billions of people have never heard of you.
12 0.70440739 1512 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-27-A Non-random Walk Down Campaign Street
13 0.70360184 391 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-03-Some thoughts on election forecasting
14 0.70306319 974 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-26-NYC jobs in applied statistics, psychometrics, and causal inference!
15 0.70056081 831 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-30-A Wikipedia riddle!
16 0.7003026 1270 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-19-Demystifying Blup
17 0.69904673 707 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-12-Human nature can’t be changed (except when it can)
18 0.69878054 1629 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-18-It happened in Connecticut
19 0.69730347 1287 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-28-Understanding simulations in terms of predictive inference?
20 0.69480377 1286 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-28-Agreement Groups in US Senate and Dynamic Clustering