andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1629 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: From the sister blog, some reasons why the political reaction might be different this time.
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 From the sister blog, some reasons why the political reaction might be different this time. [sent-1, score-2.173]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('sister', 0.569), ('reaction', 0.51), ('reasons', 0.428), ('political', 0.278), ('blog', 0.229), ('different', 0.204), ('might', 0.184), ('time', 0.168)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0 1629 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-18-It happened in Connecticut
Introduction: From the sister blog, some reasons why the political reaction might be different this time.
2 0.6132015 905 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-14-5 books on essentialism!
Introduction: At the sister blog .
3 0.45031548 1937 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-13-Meritocracy rerun
Introduction: I’ve said it here so often, this time I put it on the sister blog. . . .
4 0.3526383 900 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-11-Symptomatic innumeracy
Introduction: I put it at the sister blog so the politics-haters among you could skip it. . . .
Introduction: I put it on the sister blog so you loyal readers here wouldn’t be distracted by it.
6 0.24085486 2344 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-23-The gremlins did it? Iffy statistics drive strong policy recommendations
7 0.19154985 1647 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-01-Neoconservatism circa 1986
9 0.16821674 1464 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-20-Donald E. Westlake on George W. Bush
10 0.15674713 1252 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-08-Jagdish Bhagwati’s definition of feminist sincerity
11 0.11809871 1567 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-07-Election reports
13 0.11622107 1137 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-24-Difficulties in publishing non-replications of implausible findings
14 0.11482118 795 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-10-Aleks says this is the future of visualization
15 0.10682469 1932 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-10-Don’t trust the Turk
16 0.09774787 856 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-16-Our new improved blog! Thanks to Cord Blomquist
17 0.095877185 1705 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-04-Recently in the sister blog
18 0.095696166 1389 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-23-Larry Wasserman’s statistics blog
19 0.093300506 2015 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-10-The ethics of lying, cheating, and stealing with data: A case study
20 0.089964524 2048 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-03-A comment on a post at the Monkey Cage
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.084), (1, -0.058), (2, 0.009), (3, 0.03), (4, -0.042), (5, -0.015), (6, -0.003), (7, -0.037), (8, 0.024), (9, 0.004), (10, 0.056), (11, 0.04), (12, 0.068), (13, 0.002), (14, -0.046), (15, 0.045), (16, -0.233), (17, -0.066), (18, -0.11), (19, 0.1), (20, 0.143), (21, -0.029), (22, -0.329), (23, 0.144), (24, 0.272), (25, -0.064), (26, -0.031), (27, -0.134), (28, 0.057), (29, -0.075), (30, -0.107), (31, 0.054), (32, 0.025), (33, 0.066), (34, 0.062), (35, -0.065), (36, 0.051), (37, -0.084), (38, -0.03), (39, 0.097), (40, 0.065), (41, -0.071), (42, -0.022), (43, 0.051), (44, -0.041), (45, -0.023), (46, 0.07), (47, 0.007), (48, 0.045), (49, 0.005)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.98764372 1629 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-18-It happened in Connecticut
Introduction: From the sister blog, some reasons why the political reaction might be different this time.
2 0.95435315 900 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-11-Symptomatic innumeracy
Introduction: I put it at the sister blog so the politics-haters among you could skip it. . . .
3 0.95069206 905 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-14-5 books on essentialism!
Introduction: At the sister blog .
4 0.94668031 1647 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-01-Neoconservatism circa 1986
Introduction: Tutu forecast and religion and torture (from the sister blog). P.S. For partisan balance, don’t forget this projection from 1961.
5 0.94566876 2344 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-23-The gremlins did it? Iffy statistics drive strong policy recommendations
Introduction: Recently in the sister blog . Yet another chapter in the continuing saga, Don’t Trust Polynomials. P.S. More here .
7 0.90574259 1937 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-13-Meritocracy rerun
8 0.67035997 856 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-16-Our new improved blog! Thanks to Cord Blomquist
10 0.607077 91 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-16-RSS mess
11 0.59323573 1567 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-07-Election reports
12 0.5799647 2126 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-07-If I could’ve done it all over again
13 0.56290519 1389 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-23-Larry Wasserman’s statistics blog
14 0.50234759 805 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-16-Hey–here’s what you missed in the past 30 days!
15 0.50160635 1432 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-27-“Get off my lawn”-blogging
17 0.47565946 2002 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-30-Blogging
19 0.46965262 235 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-25-Term Limits for the Supreme Court?
20 0.46188661 1701 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-31-The name that fell off a cliff
topicId topicWeight
[(20, 0.141), (21, 0.172), (24, 0.054), (99, 0.363)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.97758698 900 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-11-Symptomatic innumeracy
Introduction: I put it at the sister blog so the politics-haters among you could skip it. . . .
same-blog 2 0.96480829 1629 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-18-It happened in Connecticut
Introduction: From the sister blog, some reasons why the political reaction might be different this time.
3 0.94423234 974 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-26-NYC jobs in applied statistics, psychometrics, and causal inference!
Introduction: The Center for the Promotion of Research Involving Innovative Statistical Methodology at the Steinhardt School of Education has two job openings ! One is for an assistant/associated tenure track position for an applied statistician or psychometrician. The other is for a postdoc in causal inference and sensitivity analysis. Jennifer Hill and Marc Scott at the Steinhardt school are just great! We’re working together on various research projects so if you manage to get one of these jobs maybe you can collaborate with us here at Columbia too. So I have every interest in encouraging the very best people to apply for these jobs.
4 0.94068003 854 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-15-A silly paper that tries to make fun of multilevel models
Introduction: Torkild Hovde Lyngstad writes: I wondered what your reaction would be to this paper from a recent issue of European Political Science. It came out already in March this year, so you might have seen it or even commented on it before. Is is a joke at the expense of the whole polisci discipline, a joke the Editors did not catch, or the sequel to the Sokal affair, just with quanto social science as the target? My reply: Yes, several people pointed me to this article. I don’t think it’s a hoax, it’s more of a joke: the author is making the point that with fancy statistics you can discover all sorts of patterns that don’t make sense. The implication, I believe, is that many patterns that social scientists do find through statistical analysis are not actually meaningful. I agree with this point, which could be even more pithily stated as “correlation does not imply causation.” I am irritated, however, by the singling out of multilevel models here, as the point could be mad
5 0.93475598 1857 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-15-Does quantum uncertainty have a place in everyday applied statistics?
Introduction: Several months ago, Mike Betancourt and I wrote a discussion for the article, Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling?, by Emmanuel Pothos and Jerome Busemeyer, in Behavioral and Brain Sciences. We didn’t say much, but it was a milestone for me because, with this article, BBS became the 100th journal I’d published in. Anyway, the full article with its 34 discussions just appeared in the journal . Here it is. What surprised me, in reading the full discussion, was how supportive the commentary was. Given the topic of Pothos and Busemeyer’s article, I was expecting the discussions to range from gentle mockery to outright abuse. The discussion that Mike and I wrote was moderately encouraging, and I was expecting this to fall on the extreme positive end of the spectrum. Actually, though, most of the discussions were positive, and only a couple were purely negative (those would be “Quantum models of cognition as Orwellian newspeak” by Michael Lee a
6 0.92420036 480 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-21-Instead of “confidence interval,” let’s say “uncertainty interval”
7 0.91507483 432 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-27-Neumann update
8 0.912314 1451 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-08-Robert Kosara reviews Ed Tufte’s short course
9 0.91166306 246 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-31-Somewhat Bayesian multilevel modeling
10 0.91090989 1864 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-20-Evaluating Columbia University’s Frontiers of Science course
11 0.91082031 62 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-01-Two Postdoc Positions Available on Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling
12 0.90767944 1912 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-24-Bayesian quality control?
13 0.90715545 1989 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-20-Correcting for multiple comparisons in a Bayesian regression model
14 0.9067409 1782 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-30-“Statistical Modeling: A Fresh Approach”
15 0.9051013 151 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-16-Wanted: Probability distributions for rank orderings
16 0.90461725 910 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-15-Google Refine
17 0.90300834 1937 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-13-Meritocracy rerun
18 0.90130305 1675 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-15-“10 Things You Need to Know About Causal Effects”
19 0.90119082 592 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-26-“Do you need ideal conditions to do great work?”
20 0.90101635 1735 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-24-F-f-f-fake data