andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2013 andrew_gelman_stats-2013-1647 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Tutu forecast and religion and torture (from the sister blog). P.S. For partisan balance, don’t forget this projection from 1961.
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 Tutu forecast and religion and torture (from the sister blog). [sent-1, score-1.356]
2 For partisan balance, don’t forget this projection from 1961. [sent-4, score-1.076]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('projection', 0.458), ('torture', 0.433), ('balance', 0.335), ('partisan', 0.327), ('religion', 0.322), ('forecast', 0.311), ('forget', 0.291), ('sister', 0.29), ('blog', 0.117)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0 1647 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-01-Neoconservatism circa 1986
Introduction: Tutu forecast and religion and torture (from the sister blog). P.S. For partisan balance, don’t forget this projection from 1961.
2 0.31237668 905 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-14-5 books on essentialism!
Introduction: At the sister blog .
3 0.25274128 130 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-07-A False Consensus about Public Opinion on Torture
Introduction: John Sides reports on this finding by Paul Gronke, Darius Rejali, Dustin Drenguis, James Hicks, Peter Miller, and Bryan Nakayama, from a survey in 2008:: Gronke et al. write (as excerpted by Sides): Many journalists and politicians believe that during the Bush administration, a majority of Americans supported torture if they were assured that it would prevent a terrorist attack….But this view was a misperception…we show here that a majority of Americans were opposed to torture throughout the Bush presidency…even when respondents were asked about an imminent terrorist attack, even when enhanced interrogation techniques were not called torture, and even when Americans were assured that torture would work to get crucial information. Opposition to torture remained stable and consistent during the entire Bush presidency. Gronke et al. attribute confusion of beliefs to the so-called false consensus effect studied by cognitive psychologists, in which people tend to assume th
4 0.21095747 1937 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-13-Meritocracy rerun
Introduction: I’ve said it here so often, this time I put it on the sister blog. . . .
5 0.19154985 1629 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-18-It happened in Connecticut
Introduction: From the sister blog, some reasons why the political reaction might be different this time.
6 0.17964076 900 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-11-Symptomatic innumeracy
7 0.13324668 270 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-12-Comparison of forecasts for the 2010 congressional elections
9 0.12269612 2344 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-23-The gremlins did it? Iffy statistics drive strong policy recommendations
10 0.090793565 1544 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-22-Is it meaningful to talk about a probability of “65.7%” that Obama will win the election?
11 0.089475714 611 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-14-As the saying goes, when they argue that you’re taking over, that’s when you know you’ve won
12 0.087813541 292 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-23-Doug Hibbs on the fundamentals in 2010
13 0.08117909 237 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-27-Bafumi-Erikson-Wlezien predict a 50-seat loss for Democrats in November
14 0.072773881 2296 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-19-Index or indicator variables
15 0.072578013 405 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-10-Estimation from an out-of-date census
16 0.071888246 1308 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-08-chartsnthings !
17 0.069014423 2167 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-10-Do you believe that “humans and other living things have evolved over time”?
19 0.065757491 1666 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-10-They’d rather be rigorous than right
20 0.06487973 1508 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-23-Speaking frankly
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.023), (1, -0.023), (2, 0.018), (3, 0.025), (4, -0.019), (5, -0.007), (6, -0.005), (7, -0.026), (8, 0.015), (9, -0.018), (10, 0.051), (11, 0.018), (12, 0.044), (13, -0.009), (14, -0.044), (15, 0.023), (16, -0.104), (17, -0.037), (18, -0.043), (19, 0.052), (20, 0.068), (21, 0.021), (22, -0.181), (23, 0.086), (24, 0.157), (25, -0.036), (26, -0.019), (27, -0.075), (28, 0.046), (29, -0.011), (30, -0.015), (31, 0.046), (32, 0.019), (33, 0.05), (34, 0.03), (35, -0.016), (36, 0.046), (37, -0.064), (38, -0.014), (39, 0.053), (40, -0.011), (41, -0.016), (42, -0.001), (43, 0.025), (44, -0.012), (45, -0.006), (46, 0.011), (47, -0.015), (48, 0.005), (49, 0.01)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99257016 1647 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-01-Neoconservatism circa 1986
Introduction: Tutu forecast and religion and torture (from the sister blog). P.S. For partisan balance, don’t forget this projection from 1961.
2 0.95723218 905 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-14-5 books on essentialism!
Introduction: At the sister blog .
Introduction: I put it on the sister blog so you loyal readers here wouldn’t be distracted by it.
4 0.95059443 900 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-11-Symptomatic innumeracy
Introduction: I put it at the sister blog so the politics-haters among you could skip it. . . .
Introduction: Recently in the sister blog . Yet another chapter in the continuing saga, Don’t Trust Polynomials. P.S. More here .
6 0.91309106 1629 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-18-It happened in Connecticut
7 0.8869974 1937 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-13-Meritocracy rerun
8 0.64905304 856 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-16-Our new improved blog! Thanks to Cord Blomquist
10 0.63583708 1567 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-07-Election reports
11 0.62008023 91 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-16-RSS mess
12 0.59218526 2126 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-07-If I could’ve done it all over again
13 0.53814405 1389 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-23-Larry Wasserman’s statistics blog
14 0.49846315 374 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-27-No matter how famous you are, billions of people have never heard of you.
15 0.47570041 1701 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-31-The name that fell off a cliff
16 0.46665242 871 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-26-Be careful what you control for . . . you just might get it!
17 0.46531013 1432 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-27-“Get off my lawn”-blogging
18 0.44687247 220 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-20-Why I blog?
19 0.44130263 104 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-22-Seeking balance
20 0.43306482 2002 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-30-Blogging
topicId topicWeight
[(14, 0.114), (16, 0.087), (20, 0.176), (23, 0.086), (30, 0.12), (89, 0.078), (99, 0.1)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.97866273 1647 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-01-Neoconservatism circa 1986
Introduction: Tutu forecast and religion and torture (from the sister blog). P.S. For partisan balance, don’t forget this projection from 1961.
2 0.72211862 2108 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-20-That’s crazy talk!
Introduction: Tenure track faculty opening at the Center for the Promotion of Research Involving Innovative Statistical Methodology, with Jennifer Hill, Marc Scott, and other world-class researchers. It looks like a great opportunity.
3 0.66841084 2344 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-23-The gremlins did it? Iffy statistics drive strong policy recommendations
Introduction: Recently in the sister blog . Yet another chapter in the continuing saga, Don’t Trust Polynomials. P.S. More here .
4 0.58776873 905 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-14-5 books on essentialism!
Introduction: At the sister blog .
5 0.57989311 479 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-20-WWJD? U can find out!
Introduction: Two positions open in the statistics group at the NYU education school. If you get the job, you get to work with Jennifer HIll! One position is a postdoctoral fellowship, and the other is a visiting professorship. The latter position requires “the demonstrated ability to develop a nationally recognized research program,” which seems like a lot to ask for a visiting professor. Do they expect the visiting prof to develop a nationally recognized research program and then leave it there at NYU after the visit is over? In any case, Jennifer and her colleagues are doing excellent work, both applied and methodological, and this seems like a great opportunity.
6 0.52402365 910 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-15-Google Refine
7 0.52388787 593 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-27-Heat map
8 0.52177244 1188 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-28-Reference on longitudinal models?
9 0.51497936 450 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-04-The Joy of Stats
10 0.51225507 179 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-03-An Olympic size swimming pool full of lithium water
11 0.50216413 480 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-21-Instead of “confidence interval,” let’s say “uncertainty interval”
12 0.49675569 755 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-09-Recently in the award-winning sister blog
14 0.49522728 1809 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-17-NUTS discussed on Xi’an’s Og
15 0.49365616 412 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-13-Time to apply for the hackNY summer fellows program
16 0.48751402 1724 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-16-Zero Dark Thirty and Bayes’ theorem
18 0.46980464 1265 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-15-Progress in U.S. education; also, a discussion of what it takes to hit the op-ed pages
19 0.46259305 1259 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-11-How things sound to us, versus how they sound to others
20 0.46126878 631 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-28-Explaining that plot.