andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1601 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

1601 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-01-A lifetime supply of . . .


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: This story reminded me of when I was planning my short course for Procter & Gamble: The question in my mind was: should I take the consulting fee they offered or should I try to get a voucher for a lifetime supply of P&G; products (assuming, of course, that such a voucher exists)? Wouldn’t that just be the coolest thing, to go into the supermarket, fill up the cart with Tide and Pampers, then flash the P&G; card? P.S. On an unrelated note, this is just sad. Uncle Woody is spinning.


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 This story reminded me of when I was planning my short course for Procter & Gamble: The question in my mind was: should I take the consulting fee they offered or should I try to get a voucher for a lifetime supply of P&G; products (assuming, of course, that such a voucher exists)? [sent-1, score-2.713]

2 Wouldn’t that just be the coolest thing, to go into the supermarket, fill up the cart with Tide and Pampers, then flash the P&G; card? [sent-2, score-0.826]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('voucher', 0.494), ('procter', 0.225), ('woody', 0.212), ('cart', 0.212), ('flash', 0.203), ('gamble', 0.203), ('coolest', 0.203), ('tide', 0.203), ('uncle', 0.196), ('spinning', 0.19), ('supermarket', 0.185), ('fee', 0.181), ('lifetime', 0.174), ('card', 0.159), ('fill', 0.157), ('exists', 0.15), ('unrelated', 0.15), ('consulting', 0.149), ('products', 0.142), ('offered', 0.131), ('course', 0.128), ('planning', 0.126), ('supply', 0.121), ('reminded', 0.113), ('assuming', 0.108), ('mind', 0.102), ('note', 0.093), ('short', 0.087), ('wouldn', 0.079), ('try', 0.066), ('story', 0.062), ('take', 0.058), ('question', 0.053), ('go', 0.051), ('thing', 0.051), ('get', 0.032)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 1.0000001 1601 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-01-A lifetime supply of . . .

Introduction: This story reminded me of when I was planning my short course for Procter & Gamble: The question in my mind was: should I take the consulting fee they offered or should I try to get a voucher for a lifetime supply of P&G; products (assuming, of course, that such a voucher exists)? Wouldn’t that just be the coolest thing, to go into the supermarket, fill up the cart with Tide and Pampers, then flash the P&G; card? P.S. On an unrelated note, this is just sad. Uncle Woody is spinning.

2 0.1101675 1597 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-29-What is expected of a consultant

Introduction: Robin Hanson writes on paid expert consulting (of the sort that I do sometime, and is common among economists and statisticians). Hanson agrees with Keith Yost, who says: Fellow consultants and associates . . . [said] fifty percent of the job is nodding your head at whatever’s being said, thirty percent of it is just sort of looking good, and the other twenty percent is raising an objection but then if you meet resistance, then dropping it. On the other side is Steven Levitt, who Hanson quotes as saying: My own experience has been that even though I know nothing about an industry, if you give me a week, and you get a bunch of really smart people to explain the industry to me, and to tell me what they do, a lot of times what I’ve learned in economics, what I’ve learned in other places can actually be really helpful in changing the way that they see the world. Perhaps unsurprisingly given my Bayesian attitudes and my preference for continuity , I’m inclined to split the d

3 0.088389181 504 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-05-For those of you in the U.K., also an amusing paradox involving the infamous hookah story

Introduction: I’ll be on Radio 4 at 8.40am, on the BBC show “Today,” talking about The Honest Rainmaker . I have no idea how the interview went (it was about 5 minutes), but I’m kicking myself because I was planning to tell the hookah story, but I forgot. Here it is: I was at a panel for the National Institutes of Health evaluating grants. One of the proposals had to do with the study of the effect of water-pipe smoking, the hookah. There was a discussion around the table. The NIH is a United States government organisation; not many people in the US really smoke hookahs; so should we fund it? Someone said, ‘Well actually it’s becoming more popular among the young.’ And if younger people smoke it, they have a longer lifetime exposure, and apparently there is some evidence that the dose you get of carcinogens from hookah smoking might be 20 times the dose of smoking a cigarette. I don’t know the details of the math, but it was a lot. So even if not many people do it, if you multiply the risk, yo

4 0.084923051 712 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-14-The joys of working in the public domain

Introduction: Stan will make a total lifetime profit of $0, so we can’t be sued !

5 0.069015019 1596 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-29-More consulting experiences, this time in computational linguistics

Introduction: Bob wrote this long comment that I think is worth posting: I [Bob] have done a fair bit of consulting for my small natural language processing company over the past ten years. Like statistics, natural language processing is something may companies think they want, but have no idea how to do themselves. We almost always handed out “free” consulting. Usually on the phone to people who called us out of the blue. Our blog and tutorials Google ranking was pretty much our only approach to marketing other than occassionally going to business-oriented conferences. Our goal was to sell software licenses (because consulting doesn’t scale nor does it provide continuing royalty income), but since so few people knew how to use toolkits like ours, we had to help them along the way. We even provided “free” consulting with our startup license package. We were brutally honest with customers, both about our goals and their goals. Their goals were often incompatible with ours (use company X’

6 0.068714112 1255 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Amtrak sucks

7 0.057037268 1770 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-19-Retraction watch

8 0.054972123 611 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-14-As the saying goes, when they argue that you’re taking over, that’s when you know you’ve won

9 0.053908791 439 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-30-Of psychology research and investment tips

10 0.051920455 1292 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-01-Colorless green facts asserted resolutely

11 0.050836172 546 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-31-Infovis vs. statistical graphics: My talk tomorrow (Tues) 1pm at Columbia

12 0.04981171 717 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-17-Statistics plagiarism scandal

13 0.046882957 1956 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-25-What should be in a machine learning course?

14 0.046341565 473 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-17-Why a bonobo won’t play poker with you

15 0.044799127 2009 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-05-A locally organized online BDA course on G+ hangout?

16 0.044523112 2206 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-10-On deck this week

17 0.043699268 395 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-05-Consulting: how do you figure out what to charge?

18 0.04357326 532 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-23-My Wall Street Journal story

19 0.041271009 1679 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-18-Is it really true that only 8% of people who buy Herbalife products are Herbalife distributors?

20 0.04053282 76 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-09-Both R and Stata


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.041), (1, -0.024), (2, -0.012), (3, 0.006), (4, 0.014), (5, 0.022), (6, 0.027), (7, 0.01), (8, 0.008), (9, -0.019), (10, -0.003), (11, -0.001), (12, 0.018), (13, 0.022), (14, 0.001), (15, -0.023), (16, -0.01), (17, -0.007), (18, 0.02), (19, 0.003), (20, 0.001), (21, 0.007), (22, -0.005), (23, 0.008), (24, -0.021), (25, 0.01), (26, -0.005), (27, -0.013), (28, -0.003), (29, 0.011), (30, 0.02), (31, -0.004), (32, -0.004), (33, -0.004), (34, 0.005), (35, -0.002), (36, -0.017), (37, -0.013), (38, -0.009), (39, -0.003), (40, 0.008), (41, -0.009), (42, -0.009), (43, 0.015), (44, -0.0), (45, 0.009), (46, 0.018), (47, -0.011), (48, -0.007), (49, 0.008)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.9544518 1601 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-01-A lifetime supply of . . .

Introduction: This story reminded me of when I was planning my short course for Procter & Gamble: The question in my mind was: should I take the consulting fee they offered or should I try to get a voucher for a lifetime supply of P&G; products (assuming, of course, that such a voucher exists)? Wouldn’t that just be the coolest thing, to go into the supermarket, fill up the cart with Tide and Pampers, then flash the P&G; card? P.S. On an unrelated note, this is just sad. Uncle Woody is spinning.

2 0.65536213 2175 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-18-A course in sample surveys for political science

Introduction: A colleague asked if I had any material for a course in sample surveys. And indeed I do. See here . It’s all the slides for a 14-week course, also the syllabus (“surveyscourse.pdf”), the final exam (“final2012.pdf”) and various misc files. Also more discussion of final exam questions here (keep scrolling thru the “previous entries” until you get to Question 1). Enjoy! This is in no way a self-contained teach-it-yourself course, but I do think it could be helpful for anyone who is trying to teach a class on this material.

3 0.64856023 515 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-13-The Road to a B

Introduction: A student in my intro class came by the other day with a lot of questions. It soon became clear that he was confused about a lot of things, going back several weeks in the course. What this means is that we did not do a good job of monitoring his performance earlier during the semester. But the question now is: what do do next? I’ll sign the drop form any time during the semester, but he didn’t want to drop the class (the usual scheduling issues). And he doesn’t want to get a C or a D. He’s in big trouble and at this point is basically rolling the dice that he’ll do well enough on the final to eke out a B in the course. (Yes, he goes to section meetings and office hours, and he even tried hiring a tutor. But it’s tough–if you’ve already been going to class and still don’t know what’s going on, it’s not so easy to pull yourself out of the hole, even if you have a big pile of practice problems ahead of you.) What we really need for this student, and others like him, is a road

4 0.63814873 644 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-03-The saber saw, the ashtray, and other stories of misbehaving profs

Introduction: This recent story of a wacky psychology professor reminds me of this old story of a wacky psychology professor. This story of a wacky philosophy professor reminds me of a course I almost took at MIT. I was looking through the course catalog one day and saw that Thomas Kuhn was teaching a class in the philosophy of science. Thomas Kuhn–wow! So I enrolled in the class. I only sat through one session before dropping it, though. Kuhn just stood up there and mumbled. At the time, this annoyed me a little. In retrospect, though, it made more sense. I’m sure he felt he had better things to do with his life than teach classes. And MIT was paying him whether or not he did a good job teaching, so it’s not like he was breaking his contract or anything. (Given the range of instructors we had at MIT, it was always a good idea to make use of the shopping period at the beginning of the semester. I had some amazing classes but only one or two really bad ones. Mostly I dropped the b

5 0.6347338 912 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-15-n = 2

Introduction: People in Chicago are nice. The conductor on the train came by and I asked if I could buy a ticket right there. He said yes, $2.50. While I was getting the money he asked if the ticket machine at the station had been broken. I said, I don’t know, I saw the train and ran up the stairs to catch it. He said, that’s not what you’re supposed to say. So I said, that’s right, the machine was broken. It’s just like on that radio show where Peter Sagal hems and haws to clue the contestant in that his guess is wrong so he can try again.

6 0.63330173 78 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-10-Hey, where’s my kickback?

7 0.62890047 1003 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-11-$

8 0.62550193 395 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-05-Consulting: how do you figure out what to charge?

9 0.62529236 1190 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-29-Why “Why”?

10 0.62227267 2300 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-21-Ticket to Baaaath

11 0.62043905 1417 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-15-Some decision analysis problems are pretty easy, no?

12 0.61985415 1428 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-25-The problem with realistic advice?

13 0.61927831 1553 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-30-Real rothko, fake rothko

14 0.61902529 2323 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-07-Cause he thinks he’s so-phisticated

15 0.61654741 641 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-01-So many topics, so little time

16 0.61525828 1616 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-10-John McAfee is a Heinlein hero

17 0.6116901 1619 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-11-There are four ways to get fired from Caesars: (1) theft, (2) sexual harassment, (3) running an experiment without a control group, and (4) keeping a gambling addict away from the casino

18 0.60994142 1255 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Amtrak sucks

19 0.60964447 1935 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-12-“A tangle of unexamined emotional impulses and illogical responses”

20 0.60921985 1822 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-24-Samurai sword-wielding Mormon bishop pharmaceutical statistician stops mugger


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(2, 0.024), (14, 0.032), (16, 0.07), (24, 0.075), (37, 0.375), (42, 0.022), (77, 0.026), (85, 0.031), (89, 0.07), (99, 0.13)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.9129132 1601 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-01-A lifetime supply of . . .

Introduction: This story reminded me of when I was planning my short course for Procter & Gamble: The question in my mind was: should I take the consulting fee they offered or should I try to get a voucher for a lifetime supply of P&G; products (assuming, of course, that such a voucher exists)? Wouldn’t that just be the coolest thing, to go into the supermarket, fill up the cart with Tide and Pampers, then flash the P&G; card? P.S. On an unrelated note, this is just sad. Uncle Woody is spinning.

2 0.63289928 1035 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-29-“Tobin’s analysis here is methodologically old-fashioned in the sense that no attempt is made to provide microfoundations for the postulated adjustment processes”

Introduction: Rajiv Sethi writes the above in a discussion of a misunderstanding of the economics of Keynes. The discussion is interesting. According to Sethi, Keynes wrote that, in a depression, nominal wages might be sticky but in any case a decline in wages would not do the trick to increase hiring. But many modern economics writers have missed this. For example, Gary Becker writes, “Keynes and many earlier economists emphasized that unemployment rises during recessions because nominal wage rates tend to be inflexible in the downward direction. . . . A fall in price stimulates demand and reduces supply until they are brought back to rough equality.” Whether Becker is empirically correct is another story, but in any case he is misinterpreting Keynes. But the actual reason I’m posting here is in reaction to Sethi’s remark quoted in the title above, in which he endorses a 1975 paper by James Tobin on wages and employment but remarks that Tobin’s paper did not include the individual-level de

3 0.56600404 5 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-27-Ethical and data-integrity problems in a study of mortality in Iraq

Introduction: Michael Spagat notifies me that his article criticizing the 2006 study of Burnham, Lafta, Doocy and Roberts has just been published . The Burnham et al. paper (also called, to my irritation (see the last item here ), “the Lancet survey”) used a cluster sample to estimate the number of deaths in Iraq in the three years following the 2003 invasion. In his newly-published paper, Spagat writes: [The Spagat article] presents some evidence suggesting ethical violations to the survey’s respondents including endangerment, privacy breaches and violations in obtaining informed consent. Breaches of minimal disclosure standards examined include non-disclosure of the survey’s questionnaire, data-entry form, data matching anonymised interviewer identifications with households and sample design. The paper also presents some evidence relating to data fabrication and falsification, which falls into nine broad categories. This evidence suggests that this survey cannot be considered a reliable or

4 0.56264204 81 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-12-Reputational Capital and Incentives in Organizations

Introduction: Rajiv Sethi offers a fascinating discussion of the incentives involved in paying people zillions of dollars to lie, cheat, and steal. I’d been aware for a long time of the general problem of the system of one-way bets in which purported risk-takers can make huge fortunes with little personal risks, but Rajiv and his commenters go further by getting into the specifics of management at financial firms.

5 0.51483172 1645 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-31-Statistical modeling, causal inference, and social science

Introduction: Interesting discussion by Berk Ozler (which I found following links from Tyler Cowen) of a study by Erwin Bulte, Lei Pan, Joseph Hella, Gonne Beekman, and Salvatore di Falco that compares two agricultural experiments, one blinded and one unblinded. Bulte et al. find much different results in the two experiments and attribute the difference to expectation effects (when people know they’re receiving an experiment they behave differently); Ozler is skeptical and attributes the different outcomes to various practical differences in implementation of the two experiments. I’m reminded somehow of the notorious sham experiment on the dead chickens, a story that was good for endless discussion in my Bayesian statistics class last semester. I think we can all agree that dead chickens won’t exhibit a placebo effect. Live farmers, though, that’s another story. I don’t have any stake in this particular fight, but on quick reading I’m sympathetic to Ozler’s argument that this all is wel

6 0.48395213 1593 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-27-Why aren’t Asians Republicans? For one thing, more than half of them live in California, New York, New Jersey, and Hawaii

7 0.48217046 157 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-21-Roller coasters, charity, profit, hmmm

8 0.46225989 2195 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-02-Microfoundations of macroeconomics

9 0.44755483 1280 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-24-Non-Bayesian analysis of Bayesian agents?

10 0.44138944 875 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-28-Better than Dennis the dentist or Laura the lawyer

11 0.44016516 1774 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-22-Likelihood Ratio ≠ 1 Journal

12 0.43851322 1231 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-27-Attention pollution

13 0.43830198 2352 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-29-When you believe in things that you don’t understand

14 0.43319893 1823 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-24-The Tweets-Votes Curve

15 0.42155078 1708 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-05-Wouldn’t it be cool if Glenn Hubbard were consulting for Herbalife and I were on the other side?

16 0.42047793 1160 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-09-Familial Linkage between Neuropsychiatric Disorders and Intellectual Interests

17 0.42039633 833 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-31-Untunable Metropolis

18 0.42009103 435 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-29-Panel Thurs 2 Dec on politics and deficit reduction in NYC

19 0.41924661 1305 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-07-Happy news on happiness; what can we believe?

20 0.41922724 1572 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-10-I don’t like this cartoon