andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1318 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Fun stories here (from Kliph Nesteroff, link from Mark Palko).
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 Fun stories here (from Kliph Nesteroff, link from Mark Palko). [sent-1, score-0.766]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('palko', 0.572), ('stories', 0.445), ('fun', 0.435), ('mark', 0.428), ('link', 0.321)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0 1318 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-13-Stolen jokes
Introduction: Fun stories here (from Kliph Nesteroff, link from Mark Palko).
2 0.29064482 533 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-23-The scalarization of America
Introduction: Mark Palko writes : You lose information when you go from a vector to a scalar. But what about this trick, which they told me about in high school? Combine two dimensions into one by interleaving the decimals. For example, if a=.11111 and b=.22222, then (a,b) = .1212121212.
Introduction: Mark Palko waxes indignant about corporate postmodernism.
4 0.1987102 1683 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-19-“Confirmation, on the other hand, is not sexy”
Introduction: Mark Palko writes : I can understand the appeal of the cutting edge. The new stuff is sexier. It gets people’s attention. The trouble is, those cutting edge studies often collapse under scrutiny. Some can’t be replicated. Others prove to be not that important. Confirmation, on the other hand, is not sexy. It doesn’t drive traffic. It’s harder to fit into a paragraph. In a way, though, it’s more interesting because it has a high likelihood of being true and fills in the gaps in big, important questions. The interaction between the ideas is usually the interesting part. In this particular example, Palko is telling the story of a journalist who reports a finding as new when it is essentially a replication of decades-old work. Palko’s point is not that there’s anything wrong with replication but rather that the journalist seems to feel that it is necessary to report the idea as new and cutting-edge, even if it falls within a long tradition. (Also, Palko is not claiming that this
5 0.19537313 1646 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-01-Back when fifty years was a long time ago
Introduction: New Year’s Day is an excellent time to look back at changes, not just in the past year, but in the past half-century. Mark Palko has an interesting post on the pace of changes in everyday life. We’ve been hearing a lot in the past few decades about how things are changing faster and faster. But, as Palko points out, the difference between life in 1962 and life today does not seem so different, at least for many people in the United States. Sure, there are some big changes: nonwhites get more respect, people mostly live longer, many cancers can be cured, fewer people are really really poor but it’s harder to hold down a job, cars are more reliable, you can get fresh fish in the suburbs, containers are lighter and stronger, vacations in the Caribbean instead of the Catskills, people have a lot more stuff and a lot more place to put it, etc etc etc. But life in the 1950s or 1960s just doesn’t seem so different from how we live today. In contrast, Palko writes, “You can also get
6 0.18253341 842 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-07-Hey, I’m just like Picasso (but without all the babes)!
7 0.17949721 1767 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-17-The disappearing or non-disappearing middle class
8 0.16410065 554 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-04-An addition to the model-makers’ oath
9 0.16384241 279 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-15-Electability and perception of electability
10 0.16011733 1927 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-05-“Numbersense: How to use big data to your advantage”
11 0.15184808 99 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-19-Paired comparisons
12 0.14575809 2365 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-09-I hate polynomials
14 0.14454995 943 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-04-Flip it around
15 0.14040455 2066 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-17-G+ hangout for test run of BDA course
17 0.1309137 1845 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-07-Is Felix Salmon wrong on free TV?
18 0.12340815 2216 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-18-Florida backlash
19 0.11877976 2071 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-21-Most Popular Girl Names by State over Time
20 0.11555929 2228 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-28-Combining two of my interests
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.043), (1, -0.05), (2, -0.031), (3, 0.03), (4, 0.018), (5, 0.015), (6, 0.042), (7, 0.019), (8, 0.032), (9, -0.002), (10, -0.021), (11, -0.006), (12, 0.021), (13, 0.007), (14, -0.016), (15, 0.017), (16, 0.002), (17, 0.051), (18, -0.021), (19, -0.03), (20, -0.003), (21, -0.058), (22, 0.039), (23, -0.057), (24, -0.008), (25, -0.003), (26, 0.05), (27, 0.071), (28, 0.004), (29, -0.018), (30, -0.017), (31, 0.042), (32, 0.076), (33, -0.054), (34, 0.08), (35, 0.075), (36, -0.044), (37, 0.023), (38, 0.086), (39, 0.155), (40, -0.007), (41, 0.11), (42, 0.101), (43, -0.06), (44, 0.026), (45, 0.133), (46, -0.109), (47, 0.13), (48, -0.066), (49, 0.004)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.9941262 1318 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-13-Stolen jokes
Introduction: Fun stories here (from Kliph Nesteroff, link from Mark Palko).
Introduction: Mark Palko waxes indignant about corporate postmodernism.
3 0.84834039 842 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-07-Hey, I’m just like Picasso (but without all the babes)!
Introduction: So says Mark Liberman.
4 0.70733631 587 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-24-5 seconds of every #1 pop single
Introduction: This is pretty amazing. Now I want to hear volume 3. Also is there a way to download this as I play it so I can listen when I’m offline? P.S. Typo in title fixed. P.P.S. I originally gave a different link but was led to the apparently more definitive link above (which allows direct download) from a commenter . Thanks!
5 0.68402529 1257 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Statisticians’ abbreviations are even less interesting than these!
Introduction: From AC, AI, and AIH to WAHM, WOHM, and WM. P.S. That was all pretty pointless, so I’ll throw in this viral Jim Henson link (from the same source) for free.
6 0.66604614 1433 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-28-LOL without the CATS
7 0.65584528 2066 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-17-G+ hangout for test run of BDA course
8 0.65434569 533 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-23-The scalarization of America
9 0.62930346 612 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-14-Uh-oh
10 0.61964232 357 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-20-Sas and R
11 0.59313154 290 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-22-Data Thief
12 0.57705605 1005 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-11-Robert H. Frank and P. J. O’Rourke present . . .
13 0.57310092 734 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-28-Funniest comment ever
14 0.55357713 347 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-17-Getting arm and lme4 running on the Mac
15 0.54624623 1088 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-28-Argument in favor of Ddulites
16 0.54560935 450 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-04-The Joy of Stats
17 0.53535914 1440 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-02-“A Christmas Carol” as applied to plagiarism
18 0.50633442 2028 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-17-Online conference for young statistics researchers
19 0.50414383 953 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-11-Steve Jobs’s cancer and science-based medicine
20 0.4940345 2283 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-06-An old discussion of food deserts
topicId topicWeight
[(24, 0.103), (85, 0.254), (99, 0.339)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99224633 1318 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-13-Stolen jokes
Introduction: Fun stories here (from Kliph Nesteroff, link from Mark Palko).
2 0.95571536 58 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-29-Stupid legal crap
Introduction: From the website of a journal where I published an article: In Springer journals you have the choice of publishing with or without open access. If you choose open access, your article will be freely available to everyone everywhere. In exchange for an open access fee of â‚Ź 2000 / US $3000 you retain the copyright and your article will carry the Creative Commons License. Please make your choice below. Hmmm . . . pay $3000 so that an article that I wrote and gave to the journal for free can be accessed by others? Sounds like a good deal to me!
3 0.9502033 1790 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-06-Calling Jenny Davidson . . .
Introduction: Now that you have some free time again, you’ll have to check out these books and tell us if they’re worth reading. Claire Kirch reports : Lizzie Skurnick Books launches in September with the release of Debutante Hill by Lois Duncan. The novel, which was originally published by Dodd, Mead, in 1958, has been out of print for about three decades. The other books on the initial list, all reissues, are A Long Day in November by Ernest J. Gaines (originally published in 1971), Happy Endings Are All Alike by Sandra Scoppettone (1979), I’ll Love You When You’re More Like Me by M.E. Kerr (1977), Secret Lives by Berthe Amoss (1979), To All My Fans, With Love, From Sylvie by Ellen Conford (1982), and Me and Fat Glenda by Lila Perl (1972). . . . Noting that many of the books of that era beloved by teen boys are still in print – such as Isaac Asimov’s novels and The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier – Skurnick pointed out that, in contrast, many of the books that were embraced by teen gir
4 0.89652753 330 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-09-What joker put seven dog lice in my Iraqi fez box?
Introduction: New Sentences For The Testing Of Typewriters (from John Lennon ): Fetching killjoy Mavis Wax was probed on the quay. “Yo, never mix Zoloft with Quik,” gabs Doc Jasper. One zany quaff is vodka mixed with grape juice and blood. Zitty Vicki smugly quipped in her journal, “Fay waxes her butt.” Hot Wendy gave me quasi-Kreutzfeld-Jacob pox. Jack’s pervy moxie quashed Bob’s new Liszt fugue. I backed Zevy’s qualms over Janet’s wig of phlox. Tipsy Bangkok panjandrums fix elections with quivering zeal. Mexican juntas, viewed in fog, piqued Zachary, killed Rob. Jaywalking Zulu chieftains vex probate judge Marcy Quinn. Twenty-six Excedrin helped give Jocko quite a firm buzz. Racy pics of bed hijinx with glam queen sunk Val. Why Paxil? Jim’s Bodega stocked no quince-flavor Pez. Wavy-haired quints of El Paz mock Jorge by fax. Two phony quacks of God bi-exorcize evil mojo.
5 0.89570481 734 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-28-Funniest comment ever
Introduction: Here (scroll down to the bottom; for some reason the link doesn’t go directly to the comment itself). I’ve never actually seen a Kaypro but I remember the ads. (Background here .)
6 0.89367652 912 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-15-n = 2
7 0.86712587 1899 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-14-Turing chess tournament!
8 0.8655442 2300 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-21-Ticket to Baaaath
9 0.86517674 417 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-17-Clutering and variance components
10 0.85872668 1187 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-27-“Apple confronts the law of large numbers” . . . huh?
11 0.84127879 584 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-22-“Are Wisconsin Public Employees Underpaid?”
13 0.82772094 1374 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-11-Convergence Monitoring for Non-Identifiable and Non-Parametric Models
14 0.82425719 2048 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-03-A comment on a post at the Monkey Cage
16 0.81996346 796 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-10-Matching and regression: two great tastes etc etc
17 0.81803751 375 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-28-Matching for preprocessing data for causal inference
18 0.81528896 348 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-17-Joanne Gowa scooped me by 22 years in my criticism of Axelrod’s Evolution of Cooperation
19 0.8145932 2216 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-18-Florida backlash
20 0.81422573 1175 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-19-Factual – a new place to find data