andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2013 andrew_gelman_stats-2013-1927 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

1927 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-05-“Numbersense: How to use big data to your advantage”


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: Business statistician Kaiser Fung just came out with another book, this one full of stories about how organizations use data: 1. Why do law school deans send each other junk mail? 2. Can a new statistic make us less fat? 3. How can sellouts ruin a business? 4. Will personalizing deals save Groupon? 5. Why do marketers send you mixed messages? 6. Are they new jobs if no one can apply? 7. How much did you pay for the eggs? 8. Are you a better coach or manager? Unlike most books of this sort, there’s no hero: These are not stories about a fabulous businessman who made millions of dollars by following his dream and taking the customer seriously, nor are they Gladwellian sagas of brilliant scientists, nor are they auto-Gladwellian tales of the Ariely variety. In some ways, the stories in Fung’s book have the form of opened-up business reporting, in which you get to see the statistical models underlying various assumptions and conclusions. In that sense, this b


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 Business statistician Kaiser Fung just came out with another book, this one full of stories about how organizations use data: 1. [sent-1, score-0.464]

2 Why do law school deans send each other junk mail? [sent-2, score-0.35]

3 In some ways, the stories in Fung’s book have the form of opened-up business reporting, in which you get to see the statistical models underlying various assumptions and conclusions. [sent-18, score-0.766]

4 In that sense, this book could be a good way for people to learn some fundamental statistical concepts. [sent-19, score-0.205]

5 The next step will be to fold such ideas into statistics (or “data science”) classes. [sent-20, score-0.137]

6 As it is, our examples seem to oscillate between happytalk success stories (with a pretty regression model or a comfortably statistically-significant conclusion) or stories of selection bias, with no good integration into the how-to-do-it material. [sent-21, score-1.456]

7 I tried to put this all together the last time I taught intro stat, but it didn’t work so well. [sent-22, score-0.188]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('stories', 0.36), ('business', 0.206), ('fung', 0.198), ('oscillate', 0.163), ('groupon', 0.163), ('happytalk', 0.163), ('personalizing', 0.163), ('gladwellian', 0.153), ('marketers', 0.153), ('ruin', 0.153), ('comfortably', 0.153), ('send', 0.148), ('tales', 0.147), ('ariely', 0.142), ('eggs', 0.142), ('fold', 0.137), ('businessman', 0.137), ('customer', 0.134), ('book', 0.127), ('junk', 0.126), ('deals', 0.126), ('manager', 0.123), ('mail', 0.118), ('fat', 0.118), ('coach', 0.116), ('hero', 0.115), ('statistic', 0.115), ('dream', 0.113), ('integration', 0.106), ('messages', 0.105), ('brilliant', 0.104), ('organizations', 0.104), ('intro', 0.1), ('stat', 0.097), ('mixed', 0.092), ('millions', 0.092), ('save', 0.091), ('unlike', 0.09), ('taught', 0.088), ('dollars', 0.088), ('kaiser', 0.087), ('jobs', 0.086), ('conclusion', 0.081), ('fundamental', 0.078), ('success', 0.077), ('seriously', 0.076), ('law', 0.076), ('reporting', 0.076), ('selection', 0.074), ('underlying', 0.073)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.9999997 1927 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-05-“Numbersense: How to use big data to your advantage”

Introduction: Business statistician Kaiser Fung just came out with another book, this one full of stories about how organizations use data: 1. Why do law school deans send each other junk mail? 2. Can a new statistic make us less fat? 3. How can sellouts ruin a business? 4. Will personalizing deals save Groupon? 5. Why do marketers send you mixed messages? 6. Are they new jobs if no one can apply? 7. How much did you pay for the eggs? 8. Are you a better coach or manager? Unlike most books of this sort, there’s no hero: These are not stories about a fabulous businessman who made millions of dollars by following his dream and taking the customer seriously, nor are they Gladwellian sagas of brilliant scientists, nor are they auto-Gladwellian tales of the Ariely variety. In some ways, the stories in Fung’s book have the form of opened-up business reporting, in which you get to see the statistical models underlying various assumptions and conclusions. In that sense, this b

2 0.1683802 648 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-04-The Case for More False Positives in Anti-doping Testing

Introduction: No joke. See here (from Kaiser Fung). At the Statistics Forum.

3 0.16011733 1318 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-13-Stolen jokes

Introduction: Fun stories here (from Kliph Nesteroff, link from Mark Palko).

4 0.142685 2284 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-07-How literature is like statistical reasoning: Kosara on stories. Gelman and Basbøll on stories.

Introduction: In “Story: A Definition,” visual analysis researcher Robert Kosara writes : A story ties facts together. There is a reason why this particular collection of facts is in this story, and the story gives you that reason. provides a narrative path through those facts. In other words, it guides the viewer/reader through the world, rather than just throwing them in there. presents a particular interpretation of those facts. A story is always a particular path through a world, so it favors one way of seeing things over all others. The relevance of these ideas to statistical graphics is apparent. From a completely different direction, in “When do stories work? Evidence and illustration in the social sciences,” Thomas Basbøll and I write : Storytelling has long been recognized as central to human cognition and communication. Here we explore a more active role of stories in social science research, not merely to illustrate concepts but also to develop new ideas and evalu

5 0.14104652 2031 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-19-What makes a statistician look like a hero?

Introduction: Answer here (courtesy of Kaiser Fung).

6 0.13039938 258 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-05-A review of a review of a review of a decade

7 0.12876223 1405 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-04-“Titanic Thompson: The Man Who Would Bet on Everything”

8 0.12750557 1132 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-21-A counterfeit data graphic

9 0.1262109 742 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-02-Grouponomics, counterfactuals, and opportunity cost

10 0.11706488 719 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-19-Everything is Obvious (once you know the answer)

11 0.10351083 1750 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-05-Watership Down, thick description, applied statistics, immutability of stories, and playing tennis with a net

12 0.099238873 33 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-14-Felix Salmon wins the American Statistical Association’s Excellence in Statistical Reporting Award

13 0.098524734 1804 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-15-How effective are football coaches?

14 0.097244136 2245 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-12-More on publishing in journals

15 0.097200982 1001 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-10-Three hours in the life of a statistician

16 0.091253139 1997 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-24-Measurement error in monkey studies

17 0.089409389 1634 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-21-Two reviews of Nate Silver’s new book, from Kaiser Fung and Cathy O’Neil

18 0.088066325 2106 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-19-More on “data science” and “statistics”

19 0.087857649 57 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-29-Roth and Amsterdam

20 0.087649323 499 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-03-5 books


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.159), (1, -0.034), (2, -0.062), (3, 0.05), (4, 0.033), (5, 0.036), (6, -0.004), (7, 0.037), (8, 0.071), (9, 0.059), (10, -0.02), (11, -0.023), (12, 0.009), (13, -0.028), (14, -0.025), (15, -0.016), (16, -0.072), (17, 0.102), (18, 0.068), (19, -0.04), (20, 0.021), (21, -0.015), (22, -0.006), (23, -0.059), (24, -0.02), (25, 0.039), (26, 0.024), (27, -0.012), (28, -0.03), (29, 0.045), (30, -0.062), (31, -0.026), (32, 0.015), (33, 0.063), (34, 0.045), (35, 0.026), (36, -0.027), (37, -0.043), (38, -0.016), (39, -0.028), (40, -0.012), (41, 0.054), (42, 0.002), (43, -0.003), (44, 0.008), (45, 0.038), (46, 0.0), (47, 0.064), (48, -0.015), (49, -0.063)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.9502396 1927 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-05-“Numbersense: How to use big data to your advantage”

Introduction: Business statistician Kaiser Fung just came out with another book, this one full of stories about how organizations use data: 1. Why do law school deans send each other junk mail? 2. Can a new statistic make us less fat? 3. How can sellouts ruin a business? 4. Will personalizing deals save Groupon? 5. Why do marketers send you mixed messages? 6. Are they new jobs if no one can apply? 7. How much did you pay for the eggs? 8. Are you a better coach or manager? Unlike most books of this sort, there’s no hero: These are not stories about a fabulous businessman who made millions of dollars by following his dream and taking the customer seriously, nor are they Gladwellian sagas of brilliant scientists, nor are they auto-Gladwellian tales of the Ariely variety. In some ways, the stories in Fung’s book have the form of opened-up business reporting, in which you get to see the statistical models underlying various assumptions and conclusions. In that sense, this b

2 0.72661185 1634 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-21-Two reviews of Nate Silver’s new book, from Kaiser Fung and Cathy O’Neil

Introduction: People keep asking me what I think of Nate’s book, and I keep replying that, as a blogger, I’m spoiled. I’m so used to getting books for free that I wouldn’t go out and buy a book just for the purpose of reviewing it. (That reminds me that I should post reviews of some of those books I’ve received in the mail over the past few months.) I have, however, encountered a couple of reviews of The Signal and the Noise so I thought I’d pass them on to you. Both these reviews are by statisticians / data scientists who work here in NYC in the non-academic “real world” so in that sense they are perhaps better situated than me to review the book (also, they have not collaborated with Nate so they have no conflict of interest). Kaiser Fung gives a positive review : It is in the subtitle—“why so many predictions fail – but some don’t”—that one learns the core philosophy of Silver: he is most concerned with the honest evaluation of the performance of predictive models. The failure to look

3 0.72024524 1001 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-10-Three hours in the life of a statistician

Introduction: Kaiser Fung tells what it’s really like . Here’s a sample: As soon as I [Kaiser] put the substring-concatenate expression together with two lines of code that generate data tables, it choked. Sorta like Dashiell Hammett without the broads and the heaters. And here’s another take, from a slightly different perspective.

4 0.71011341 209 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-16-EdLab at Columbia’s Teachers’ College

Introduction: According to Kaiser : EdLab at Teachers’ College does a lot of interesting things, like creating technologies for the classroom and libraries, blogging, and analyzing data sets in the education sector. They’re 2 blocks from my office and I’ve never heard of them! And I even work with people at Teachers College. Columbia’s a big place. P.S. Kaiser also makes an excellent point: The most intriguing and unexpected question was: to do well in this business, do you have to read a lot? This is where I stumbled into a spaghetti carbonara analogy while mixing metaphors with the gray flannel, with which I have already been associated. Basically, statistics is not pure mathematics, there is not one correct way of doing things, there are many different methodologies, like there are hundreds of recipes for making carbonara. What statisticians do is to try many different recipes (methods), and based on tasting the food (evaluating the outcomes), we determine which recipe to use. Be

5 0.68805617 543 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-28-NYT shills for personal DNA tests

Introduction: Kaiser nails it . The offending article , by John Tierney, somehow ended up in the Science section rather than the Opinion section. As an opinion piece (or, for that matter, a blog), Tierney’s article would be nothing special. But I agree with Kaiser that it doesn’t work as a newspaper article. As Kaiser notes, this story involves a bunch of statistical and empirical claims that are not well resolved by P.R. and rhetoric.

6 0.67417538 742 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-02-Grouponomics, counterfactuals, and opportunity cost

7 0.66891992 1174 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-18-Not as ugly as you look

8 0.66607034 1132 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-21-A counterfeit data graphic

9 0.66229004 461 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-09-“‘Why work?’”

10 0.65359396 1783 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-31-He’s getting ready to write a book

11 0.64943731 1256 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Our data visualization panel at the New York Public Library

12 0.64259732 258 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-05-A review of a review of a review of a decade

13 0.63615626 2186 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-26-Infoviz on top of stat graphic on top of spreadsheet

14 0.63376135 11 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-29-Auto-Gladwell, or Can fractals be used to predict human history?

15 0.6271016 238 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-27-No radon lobby

16 0.62696034 344 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-15-Story time

17 0.62471592 1405 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-04-“Titanic Thompson: The Man Who Would Bet on Everything”

18 0.62177593 2031 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-19-What makes a statistician look like a hero?

19 0.61711884 2189 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-28-History is too important to be left to the history professors

20 0.61116314 590 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-25-Good introductory book for statistical computation?


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(15, 0.033), (16, 0.101), (22, 0.022), (24, 0.064), (34, 0.036), (39, 0.168), (45, 0.014), (48, 0.013), (56, 0.015), (63, 0.025), (69, 0.015), (75, 0.016), (93, 0.012), (95, 0.024), (97, 0.013), (98, 0.041), (99, 0.296)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

1 0.94613039 1343 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-25-And now, here’s something we hope you’ll really like

Introduction: This came in the email: Postdoctoral Researcher (3 years) in State-Space Modeling of Animal Movement and Population Dynamics in Universities of Turku and Helsinki, Finland We seek for a statistician/mathematician with experience in ecological modeling or an ecologist with strong quantitative training to join an interdisciplinary research team focusing on dispersal and dynamics of the Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans). The Postdoctoral Researcher will develop modeling approaches (from individual based models to population level models) to assess the dispersal and population dynamics of the flying squirrel. A key challenge will be the integration of different kinds of data (census data, telemetry data, mark-recapture data, life-history data, and data on environmental covariates such as forest structure) into the modeling framework using Bayesian State-Space models or other such approaches. The project will be supervised by Dr. Vesa Selonen (a flying squirrel specialist;

2 0.94443655 443 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-02-Automating my graphics advice

Introduction: After seeing this graph : I have the following message for Sharad: Rotate the graph 90 degrees so you can see the words. Also you can ditch the lines. Then what you have is a dotplot, following the principles of Cleveland (1985). You can lay out a few on one page to see some interactions with demographics. The real challenge here . . . . . . is to automate this sort of advice. Or maybe we just need a really nice dotplot() function and enough examples, and people will start doing it? P.S. Often a lineplot is better. See here for a discussion of another Sharad example.

3 0.93022639 844 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-07-Update on the new Handbook of MCMC

Introduction: It’s edited by Steve Brooks, Galin Jones, Xiao-Li Meng, and myself. Here’s the information and some sample chapters (including my own chapter with Ken Shirley on inference and monitoring convergence and Radford’s instant classic on Hamiltonian Monte Carlo). Sorry about the $100 price tag–nobody asked me about that! But if you’re doing these computations as part of your work, I think the book will be well worth it.

same-blog 4 0.91628957 1927 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-05-“Numbersense: How to use big data to your advantage”

Introduction: Business statistician Kaiser Fung just came out with another book, this one full of stories about how organizations use data: 1. Why do law school deans send each other junk mail? 2. Can a new statistic make us less fat? 3. How can sellouts ruin a business? 4. Will personalizing deals save Groupon? 5. Why do marketers send you mixed messages? 6. Are they new jobs if no one can apply? 7. How much did you pay for the eggs? 8. Are you a better coach or manager? Unlike most books of this sort, there’s no hero: These are not stories about a fabulous businessman who made millions of dollars by following his dream and taking the customer seriously, nor are they Gladwellian sagas of brilliant scientists, nor are they auto-Gladwellian tales of the Ariely variety. In some ways, the stories in Fung’s book have the form of opened-up business reporting, in which you get to see the statistical models underlying various assumptions and conclusions. In that sense, this b

5 0.90755606 1622 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-14-Can gambling addicts be identified in gambling venues?

Introduction: Mark Griffiths, a psychologist who apparently is Europe’s only Professor of Gambling Studies, writes: You made the comment about how difficult it is to spot problem gamblers. I and a couple of colleagues [Paul Delfabbro and Daniel Kingjust] published this review of all the research done on spotting problem gamblers in online and offline gaming venues (attached) that I covered in one of my recent blogs .

6 0.90386713 31 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-13-Visualization in 1939

7 0.89608669 441 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-01-Mapmaking software

8 0.88883889 935 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-01-When should you worry about imputed data?

9 0.88202429 334 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-11-Herman Chernoff used to do that too; also, some puzzlement over another’s puzzlement over another’s preferences

10 0.88170481 1193 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-03-“Do you guys pay your bills?”

11 0.88010836 1157 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-07-Philosophy of Bayesian statistics: my reactions to Hendry

12 0.87937129 155 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-19-David Blackwell

13 0.87360036 1681 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-19-Participate in a short survey about the weight of evidence provided by statistics

14 0.87248546 867 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-23-The economics of the mac? A paradox of competition

15 0.86440504 625 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-23-My last post on albedo, I promise

16 0.86366802 371 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-26-Musical chairs in econ journals

17 0.863545 2280 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-03-As the boldest experiment in journalism history, you admit you made a mistake

18 0.86163515 2301 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-22-Ticket to Baaaaarf

19 0.86003482 54 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-27-Hype about conditional probability puzzles

20 0.85971433 1125 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-18-Beautiful Line Charts