andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2011 andrew_gelman_stats-2011-1005 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

1005 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-11-Robert H. Frank and P. J. O’Rourke present . . .


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: I suppose if I can write an article with George Romero, there’s no reason that a noted economist and a legendary humorist can’t collaborate ( link from Felix Salmon). I wonder how they got together in the first place?


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 I suppose if I can write an article with George Romero, there’s no reason that a noted economist and a legendary humorist can’t collaborate ( link from Felix Salmon). [sent-1, score-2.079]

2 I wonder how they got together in the first place? [sent-2, score-0.528]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('humorist', 0.42), ('romero', 0.396), ('legendary', 0.331), ('collaborate', 0.319), ('felix', 0.28), ('salmon', 0.28), ('george', 0.212), ('economist', 0.21), ('noted', 0.185), ('together', 0.167), ('wonder', 0.157), ('suppose', 0.155), ('place', 0.153), ('link', 0.134), ('reason', 0.128), ('got', 0.123), ('write', 0.115), ('article', 0.082), ('first', 0.081)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 1.0 1005 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-11-Robert H. Frank and P. J. O’Rourke present . . .

Introduction: I suppose if I can write an article with George Romero, there’s no reason that a noted economist and a legendary humorist can’t collaborate ( link from Felix Salmon). I wonder how they got together in the first place?

2 0.19921933 74 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-08-“Extreme views weakly held”

Introduction: Alan and Felix .

3 0.16080065 568 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-11-Calibration in chess

Introduction: Has anybody done this study yet? I’m curious about the results. Perhaps there’s some chess-playing cognitive psychologist who’d like to collaborate on this?

4 0.13579002 33 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-14-Felix Salmon wins the American Statistical Association’s Excellence in Statistical Reporting Award

Introduction: The official announcement: The Excellence in Statistical Reporting Award for 2010 is presented to Felix Salmon for his body of work, which exemplifies the highest standards of scientific reporting. His insightful use of statistics as a tool to understanding the world of business and economics, areas that are critical in today’s economy, sets a new standard in statistical investigative reporting. Here are some examples: Tiger Woods Nigerian spammers How the government fudges job statistics This one is important to me. The idea is that “statistical reporting” is not just traditional science reporting (journalist talks with scientists and tries to understand the consensus) or science popularization or silly feature stories about the lottery. Salmon is doing investigative reporting using statistical thinking. Also, from a political angle, Salmon’s smart and quantitatively sophisticated work (as well as that of others such as Nate Silver) is an important counterweigh

5 0.1140755 1105 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-08-Econ debate about prices at a fancy restaurant

Introduction: Felix Salmon writes : Economists Justin Wolfers and Betsey Stevenson have a problem with Grant Achatz’s pricing strategy at Next, where tickets are sold at a fixed price and are then free to be resold at an enormous markup on the secondary market . . . “It’s democratic in theory, but not in practice,” said Wolfers . . . If a person can sell a ticket for $3,000, the true cost of going to the restaurant — what an economist would call the opportunity cost — is $3000, because that’s how much money the person is giving up for the meal. Bloomberg’s Mark Whitehouse concludes that Next should “consider selling tickets to the highest bidder and giving the extra money to charity” . . . What strikes me is how weird this discussion is. Why should this restaurant owner have some sort of moral obligation to maximize his income and then donate to charity? For one thing, if he really did make more money off the deal he might just keep it. But more to the point, this sort of maximiz

6 0.093730271 505 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-05-Wacky interview questions: An exploration into the nature of evidence on the internet

7 0.089468963 2362 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-06-Statistically savvy journalism

8 0.083282627 128 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-05-The greatest works of statistics never published

9 0.08200144 1181 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-23-Philosophy: Pointer to Salmon

10 0.080703944 1080 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-24-Latest in blog advertising

11 0.07721062 966 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-20-A qualified but incomplete thanks to Gregg Easterbrook’s editor at Reuters

12 0.075307846 974 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-26-NYC jobs in applied statistics, psychometrics, and causal inference!

13 0.073030695 1845 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-07-Is Felix Salmon wrong on free TV?

14 0.072224326 1119 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-15-Excellence in Statistical Reporting Award

15 0.06855192 45 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-20-Domain specificity: Does being really really smart or really really rich qualify you to make economic policy?

16 0.06793426 614 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-15-Induction within a model, deductive inference for model evaluation

17 0.067768484 1223 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-20-A kaleidoscope of responses to Dubner’s criticisms of our criticisms of Freaknomics

18 0.066247463 1083 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-26-The quals and the quants

19 0.065931529 2066 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-17-G+ hangout for test run of BDA course

20 0.065233655 164 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-26-A very short story


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.054), (1, -0.038), (2, -0.016), (3, 0.014), (4, -0.008), (5, -0.006), (6, 0.025), (7, -0.008), (8, 0.032), (9, -0.004), (10, -0.009), (11, -0.03), (12, 0.013), (13, 0.018), (14, -0.022), (15, 0.021), (16, -0.008), (17, 0.041), (18, -0.011), (19, 0.009), (20, -0.013), (21, -0.021), (22, 0.035), (23, -0.023), (24, 0.004), (25, -0.037), (26, 0.004), (27, 0.013), (28, -0.003), (29, -0.005), (30, 0.001), (31, 0.022), (32, 0.01), (33, -0.021), (34, 0.012), (35, -0.001), (36, -0.028), (37, -0.017), (38, -0.017), (39, -0.007), (40, 0.024), (41, 0.026), (42, 0.023), (43, 0.015), (44, 0.028), (45, 0.016), (46, -0.018), (47, 0.045), (48, -0.027), (49, -0.012)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.95809948 1005 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-11-Robert H. Frank and P. J. O’Rourke present . . .

Introduction: I suppose if I can write an article with George Romero, there’s no reason that a noted economist and a legendary humorist can’t collaborate ( link from Felix Salmon). I wonder how they got together in the first place?

2 0.70559782 734 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-28-Funniest comment ever

Introduction: Here (scroll down to the bottom; for some reason the link doesn’t go directly to the comment itself). I’ve never actually seen a Kaypro but I remember the ads. (Background here .)

3 0.64464784 612 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-14-Uh-oh

Introduction: I don’t know for sure, but I’ve long assumed that we get most of our hits from the link on the Marginal Revolution page. The bad news is that in their new design , they seem to have removed the blogroll!

4 0.59279335 859 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-18-Misunderstanding analysis of covariance

Introduction: Jeremy Miles writes: Are you familiar with Miller and Chapman’s (2001) article : Misunderstanding Analysis of Covariance saying that ANCOVA (and therefore, I suppose regression) should not be used when groups differ on a covariate. It has caused a moderate splash in psychology circles. I wondered if you had any thoughts on it. I had not heard of the article so I followed the link . . . ugh! Already on the very first column of the very first page they confuse nonadditivity with nonlinearity. I could probably continue with, “and it gets worse,” but since nobody’s paying me to read this one, I’ll stop reading right there on the first page! I prefer when people point me to good papers to read. . . .

5 0.59262347 806 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-17-6 links

Introduction: The Browser asked me to recommend 6 articles for their readers. Here’s what I came up with. I really wanted to link to this one but it wouldn’t mean much to people who don’t know New York. I also recommended this (if you’ll forgive my reference to bowling), but I think it was too much of a primary source for their taste.

6 0.58623749 1223 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-20-A kaleidoscope of responses to Dubner’s criticisms of our criticisms of Freaknomics

7 0.58097988 1060 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-15-Freakonomics: What went wrong?

8 0.58069068 2024 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-15-Swiss Jonah Lehrer update

9 0.57899499 347 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-17-Getting arm and lme4 running on the Mac

10 0.57726991 1440 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-02-“A Christmas Carol” as applied to plagiarism

11 0.57192594 1871 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-27-Annals of spam

12 0.57183677 625 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-23-My last post on albedo, I promise

13 0.57148385 74 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-08-“Extreme views weakly held”

14 0.57103956 760 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-12-How To Party Your Way Into a Multi-Million Dollar Facebook Job

15 0.5704878 204 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-12-Sloppily-written slam on moderately celebrated writers is amusing nonetheless

16 0.57040882 587 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-24-5 seconds of every #1 pop single

17 0.56782222 664 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-16-Dilbert update: cartooning can give you the strength to open jars with your bare hands

18 0.56385183 1632 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-20-Who exactly are those silly academics who aren’t as smart as a Vegas bookie?

19 0.56363732 2166 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-10-3 years out of date on the whole Dennis the dentist thing!

20 0.56243813 1318 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-13-Stolen jokes


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(16, 0.048), (24, 0.196), (46, 0.168), (63, 0.165), (77, 0.126), (99, 0.107)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.91178584 1005 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-11-Robert H. Frank and P. J. O’Rourke present . . .

Introduction: I suppose if I can write an article with George Romero, there’s no reason that a noted economist and a legendary humorist can’t collaborate ( link from Felix Salmon). I wonder how they got together in the first place?

2 0.75678134 1316 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-12-black and Black, white and White

Introduction: I’ve always thought it looked strange to see people referred to in print as Black or White rather than black or white. For example consider this sentence: “A black guy was walking down the street and he saw a bunch of white guys standing around.” That looks fine, whereas “A Black guy was walking down the street and he saw a bunch of White guys standing around”—that looks weird to me, as if the encounter was taking place in an Ethnic Studies seminar. But maybe I’m wrong on this. Jay Livingston argues that black and white are colors whereas Black and White are races (or, as I would prefer to say, ethnic categories) and illustrates with this picture of a white person and a White person: In conversation, I sometimes talk about pink people, brown people, and tan people, but that won’t work in a research paper. P.S. I suspect Carp will argue that I’m being naive: meanings of words change across contexts and over time. To which I reply: Sure, but I still have to choose h

3 0.74729466 684 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-28-Hierarchical ordered logit or probit

Introduction: Jeff writes: How far off is bglmer and can it handle ordered logit or multinom logit? My reply: bglmer is very close. No ordered logit but I was just talking about it with Sophia today. My guess is that the easiest way to fit a hierarchical ordered logit or multinom logit will be to use stan. For right now I’d recommend using glmer/bglmer to fit the ordered logits in order (e.g., 1 vs. 2,3,4, then 2 vs. 3,4, then 3 vs. 4). Or maybe there’s already a hierarchical multinomial logit in mcmcpack or somewhere?

4 0.70103323 1787 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-04-Wanna be the next Tyler Cowen? It’s not as easy as you might think!

Introduction: Someone told me he ran into someone who said his goal was to be Tyler Cowen. OK, fine, it’s a worthy goal, but I don’t think it’s so easy .

5 0.69887638 782 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-29-Putting together multinomial discrete regressions by combining simple logits

Introduction: When predicting 0/1 data we can use logit (or probit or robit or some other robust model such as invlogit (0.01 + 0.98*X*beta)). Logit is simple enough and we can use bayesglm to regularize and avoid the problem of separation. What if there are more than 2 categories? If they’re ordered (1, 2, 3, etc), we can do ordered logit (and use bayespolr() to avoid separation). If the categories are unordered (vanilla, chocolate, strawberry), there are unordered multinomial logit and probit models out there. But it’s not so easy to fit these multinomial model in a multilevel setting (with coefficients that vary by group), especially if the computation is embedded in an iterative routine such as mi where you have real time constraints at each step. So this got me wondering whether we could kluge it with logits. Here’s the basic idea (in the ordered and unordered forms): - If you have a variable that goes 1, 2, 3, etc., set up a series of logits: 1 vs. 2,3,…; 2 vs. 3,…; and so forth

6 0.69836956 102 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-21-Why modern art is all in the mind

7 0.69444489 1078 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-22-Tables as graphs: The Ramanujan principle

8 0.69032943 313 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-03-A question for psychometricians

9 0.6523782 1258 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Why display 6 years instead of 30?

10 0.649638 482 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-23-Capitalism as a form of voluntarism

11 0.64935994 2310 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-28-On deck this week

12 0.64846176 2038 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-25-Great graphs of names

13 0.64804506 1621 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-13-Puzzles of criminal justice

14 0.64768952 1584 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-19-Tradeoffs in information graphics

15 0.64759982 1006 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-12-Val’s Number Scroll: Helping kids visualize math

16 0.64193177 1484 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-05-Two exciting movie ideas: “Second Chance U” and “The New Dirty Dozen”

17 0.64181465 1092 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-29-More by Berger and me on weakly informative priors

18 0.64152485 938 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-03-Comparing prediction errors

19 0.63997674 1479 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-01-Mothers and Moms

20 0.6389609 1219 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-18-Tips on “great design” from . . . Microsoft!