andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2010 andrew_gelman_stats-2010-58 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: From the website of a journal where I published an article: In Springer journals you have the choice of publishing with or without open access. If you choose open access, your article will be freely available to everyone everywhere. In exchange for an open access fee of â‚Ź 2000 / US $3000 you retain the copyright and your article will carry the Creative Commons License. Please make your choice below. Hmmm . . . pay $3000 so that an article that I wrote and gave to the journal for free can be accessed by others? Sounds like a good deal to me!
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 From the website of a journal where I published an article: In Springer journals you have the choice of publishing with or without open access. [sent-1, score-1.248]
2 If you choose open access, your article will be freely available to everyone everywhere. [sent-2, score-1.059]
3 In exchange for an open access fee of â‚Ź 2000 / US $3000 you retain the copyright and your article will carry the Creative Commons License. [sent-3, score-1.793]
4 pay $3000 so that an article that I wrote and gave to the journal for free can be accessed by others? [sent-8, score-1.043]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('open', 0.316), ('access', 0.299), ('accessed', 0.268), ('springer', 0.268), ('commons', 0.233), ('choice', 0.231), ('fee', 0.216), ('copyright', 0.211), ('retain', 0.211), ('article', 0.209), ('freely', 0.2), ('hmmm', 0.179), ('creative', 0.177), ('carry', 0.174), ('journal', 0.172), ('exchange', 0.157), ('publishing', 0.131), ('website', 0.129), ('journals', 0.122), ('sounds', 0.12), ('choose', 0.118), ('pay', 0.118), ('deal', 0.114), ('gave', 0.111), ('please', 0.11), ('everyone', 0.108), ('available', 0.108), ('free', 0.098), ('published', 0.077), ('others', 0.076), ('without', 0.07), ('us', 0.067), ('wrote', 0.067), ('good', 0.044), ('make', 0.044), ('like', 0.029)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99999988 58 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-29-Stupid legal crap
Introduction: From the website of a journal where I published an article: In Springer journals you have the choice of publishing with or without open access. If you choose open access, your article will be freely available to everyone everywhere. In exchange for an open access fee of â‚Ź 2000 / US $3000 you retain the copyright and your article will carry the Creative Commons License. Please make your choice below. Hmmm . . . pay $3000 so that an article that I wrote and gave to the journal for free can be accessed by others? Sounds like a good deal to me!
2 0.20371121 2304 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-24-An open site for researchers to post and share papers
Introduction: Alexander Grossman writes : We have launched a beta version of ScienceOpen in December at the occasion of the MRS Fall meeting in Boston. The participants of that conference, most of them were active researchers in physics, chemistry, and materials science, provided us with a very positive feedback. In particular they emphazised that it appears to be a good idea to offer scientists a free platform to collaborate with each other and to share draft versions of their next paper privately. Meanwhile more than 1 million open access papers in the area of the natural sciences and medicine can be accessed via ScienceOpen, read, and commented or evaluated after publication. We call this concept post-publication peer review. I don’t know anything about this but I thought I’d share it with you. I know a lot of people use Arxiv but that has some problems, maybe this will have some advantages. P.S. A commenter writes that the website says, “Fee for publication on the ScienceOpen p
3 0.19206302 1915 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-27-Huh?
Introduction: I received the following bizarre email: Apr 26, 2013 Dear Andrew Gelman You are receiving this notice because you have published a paper with the American Journal of Public Health within the last few years. Currently, content on the Journal is closed access for the first 2 years after publication, and then freely accessible thereafter. On June 1, 2013, the Journal will be extending its closed-access window from 2 years to 10 years. Extending this window will close public access to your article via the Journal web portal, but public access will still be available via the National Institutes of Health PubMedCentral web portal. If you would like to make your article available to the public for free on the Journal web portal, we are extending this limited time offer of open access at a steeply discounted rate of $1,000 per article. If interested in purchasing this access, please contact Brian Selzer, Publications Editor, at brian.selzer@apha.org Additionally, you may purchas
4 0.1633884 1820 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-23-Foundation for Open Access Statistics
Introduction: Now here’s a foundation I (Bob) can get behind: Foundation for Open Access Statistics (FOAS) Their mission is to “promote free software, open access publishing, and reproducible research in statistics.” To me, that’s like supporting motherhood and apple pie ! FOAS spun out of and is partially designed to support the Journal of Statistical Software (aka JSS , aka JStatSoft ). I adore JSS because it (a) is open access, (b) publishes systems papers on statistical software, (c) has fast reviewing turnaround times, and (d) is free for authors and readers. One of the next items on my to-do list is to write up the Stan modeling language and submit it to JSS . As a not-for-profit with no visible source of income, they are quite sensibly asking for donations (don’t complain — it beats $3K author fees or not being able to read papers).
5 0.13072026 1916 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-27-The weirdest thing about the AJPH story
Introduction: Earlier today I posted a weird email that began with “You are receiving this notice because you have published a paper with the American Journal of Public Health within the last few years” and continued with a sleazy attempt to squeeze $1000 out of me so that an article that I sent them for free could be available to the public. $1000 might seem like a lot, but they assured me that “we are extending this limited time offer of open access at a steeply discounted rate.” Sort of like a Vegematic but without that set of Ginsu knives thrown in for free. But then when I was responding to comments, I realized that . . . I didn’t actually remember ever publishing anything in that journal. It’s not on my list of 100+ journals. I did a search on my published papers page and couldn’t find anything closer than the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (and that was not within the last few years). I checked Google Scholar. And then I went straight to the AJPH webpage and sea
6 0.13001406 1922 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-02-They want me to send them free material and pay for the privilege
7 0.12367031 2075 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-23-PubMed Commons: A system for commenting on articles in PubMed
8 0.10986745 879 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-29-New journal on causal inference
11 0.099220626 2245 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-12-More on publishing in journals
12 0.095820449 1435 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-30-Retracted articles and unethical behavior in economics journals?
13 0.090189703 371 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-26-Musical chairs in econ journals
14 0.08916232 1928 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-06-How to think about papers published in low-grade journals?
15 0.087801605 2013 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-08-What we need here is some peer review for statistical graphics
16 0.087339073 958 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-14-The General Social Survey is a great resource
17 0.085263893 1393 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-26-The reverse-journal-submission system
18 0.08086855 2353 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-30-I posted this as a comment on a sociology blog
19 0.080480978 1711 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-07-How Open Should Academic Papers Be?
20 0.078390867 1429 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-26-Our broken scholarly publishing system
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.091), (1, -0.059), (2, -0.081), (3, -0.053), (4, -0.04), (5, -0.014), (6, 0.012), (7, -0.11), (8, -0.038), (9, -0.005), (10, 0.071), (11, -0.028), (12, -0.023), (13, 0.061), (14, -0.029), (15, 0.007), (16, 0.021), (17, -0.007), (18, -0.032), (19, 0.035), (20, 0.028), (21, 0.022), (22, 0.076), (23, -0.025), (24, -0.029), (25, 0.015), (26, -0.004), (27, -0.033), (28, -0.002), (29, 0.018), (30, -0.02), (31, -0.075), (32, 0.036), (33, 0.01), (34, -0.042), (35, 0.015), (36, 0.03), (37, 0.019), (38, 0.003), (39, 0.022), (40, 0.05), (41, -0.018), (42, -0.036), (43, 0.019), (44, -0.0), (45, 0.033), (46, -0.031), (47, -0.043), (48, -0.023), (49, -0.043)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.98103529 58 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-29-Stupid legal crap
Introduction: From the website of a journal where I published an article: In Springer journals you have the choice of publishing with or without open access. If you choose open access, your article will be freely available to everyone everywhere. In exchange for an open access fee of â‚Ź 2000 / US $3000 you retain the copyright and your article will carry the Creative Commons License. Please make your choice below. Hmmm . . . pay $3000 so that an article that I wrote and gave to the journal for free can be accessed by others? Sounds like a good deal to me!
2 0.87352866 1915 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-27-Huh?
Introduction: I received the following bizarre email: Apr 26, 2013 Dear Andrew Gelman You are receiving this notice because you have published a paper with the American Journal of Public Health within the last few years. Currently, content on the Journal is closed access for the first 2 years after publication, and then freely accessible thereafter. On June 1, 2013, the Journal will be extending its closed-access window from 2 years to 10 years. Extending this window will close public access to your article via the Journal web portal, but public access will still be available via the National Institutes of Health PubMedCentral web portal. If you would like to make your article available to the public for free on the Journal web portal, we are extending this limited time offer of open access at a steeply discounted rate of $1,000 per article. If interested in purchasing this access, please contact Brian Selzer, Publications Editor, at brian.selzer@apha.org Additionally, you may purchas
3 0.78778476 2304 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-24-An open site for researchers to post and share papers
Introduction: Alexander Grossman writes : We have launched a beta version of ScienceOpen in December at the occasion of the MRS Fall meeting in Boston. The participants of that conference, most of them were active researchers in physics, chemistry, and materials science, provided us with a very positive feedback. In particular they emphazised that it appears to be a good idea to offer scientists a free platform to collaborate with each other and to share draft versions of their next paper privately. Meanwhile more than 1 million open access papers in the area of the natural sciences and medicine can be accessed via ScienceOpen, read, and commented or evaluated after publication. We call this concept post-publication peer review. I don’t know anything about this but I thought I’d share it with you. I know a lot of people use Arxiv but that has some problems, maybe this will have some advantages. P.S. A commenter writes that the website says, “Fee for publication on the ScienceOpen p
4 0.78733957 1916 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-27-The weirdest thing about the AJPH story
Introduction: Earlier today I posted a weird email that began with “You are receiving this notice because you have published a paper with the American Journal of Public Health within the last few years” and continued with a sleazy attempt to squeeze $1000 out of me so that an article that I sent them for free could be available to the public. $1000 might seem like a lot, but they assured me that “we are extending this limited time offer of open access at a steeply discounted rate.” Sort of like a Vegematic but without that set of Ginsu knives thrown in for free. But then when I was responding to comments, I realized that . . . I didn’t actually remember ever publishing anything in that journal. It’s not on my list of 100+ journals. I did a search on my published papers page and couldn’t find anything closer than the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (and that was not within the last few years). I checked Google Scholar. And then I went straight to the AJPH webpage and sea
5 0.7461642 1820 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-23-Foundation for Open Access Statistics
Introduction: Now here’s a foundation I (Bob) can get behind: Foundation for Open Access Statistics (FOAS) Their mission is to “promote free software, open access publishing, and reproducible research in statistics.” To me, that’s like supporting motherhood and apple pie ! FOAS spun out of and is partially designed to support the Journal of Statistical Software (aka JSS , aka JStatSoft ). I adore JSS because it (a) is open access, (b) publishes systems papers on statistical software, (c) has fast reviewing turnaround times, and (d) is free for authors and readers. One of the next items on my to-do list is to write up the Stan modeling language and submit it to JSS . As a not-for-profit with no visible source of income, they are quite sensibly asking for donations (don’t complain — it beats $3K author fees or not being able to read papers).
6 0.72773242 1429 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-26-Our broken scholarly publishing system
7 0.72061235 1393 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-26-The reverse-journal-submission system
8 0.71758944 1922 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-02-They want me to send them free material and pay for the privilege
9 0.71606243 834 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-01-I owe it all to the haters
10 0.69016421 2095 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-09-Typo in Ghitza and Gelman MRP paper
11 0.68872529 1872 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-27-More spam!
12 0.68776011 1321 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-15-A statistical research project: Weeding out the fraudulent citations
13 0.67252129 1928 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-06-How to think about papers published in low-grade journals?
14 0.67230302 2239 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-09-Reviewing the peer review process?
15 0.65536737 2244 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-11-What if I were to stop publishing in journals?
16 0.65253496 2233 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-04-Literal vs. rhetorical
17 0.65052611 1122 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-16-“Groundbreaking or Definitive? Journals Need to Pick One”
18 0.6445148 2353 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-30-I posted this as a comment on a sociology blog
19 0.64046699 883 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-01-Arrow’s theorem update
topicId topicWeight
[(15, 0.058), (16, 0.146), (21, 0.022), (24, 0.027), (29, 0.033), (63, 0.03), (85, 0.327), (99, 0.214)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.92827541 1899 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-14-Turing chess tournament!
Introduction: Daniel Murrell is organizing a run-around-the-house chess tournament in Cambridge, England, on 23 Jun 2013. Maybe Niall Ferguson will show up, given his interest in the history of mid-twentieth-century gay English heroes.
2 0.90854597 330 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-09-What joker put seven dog lice in my Iraqi fez box?
Introduction: New Sentences For The Testing Of Typewriters (from John Lennon ): Fetching killjoy Mavis Wax was probed on the quay. “Yo, never mix Zoloft with Quik,” gabs Doc Jasper. One zany quaff is vodka mixed with grape juice and blood. Zitty Vicki smugly quipped in her journal, “Fay waxes her butt.” Hot Wendy gave me quasi-Kreutzfeld-Jacob pox. Jack’s pervy moxie quashed Bob’s new Liszt fugue. I backed Zevy’s qualms over Janet’s wig of phlox. Tipsy Bangkok panjandrums fix elections with quivering zeal. Mexican juntas, viewed in fog, piqued Zachary, killed Rob. Jaywalking Zulu chieftains vex probate judge Marcy Quinn. Twenty-six Excedrin helped give Jocko quite a firm buzz. Racy pics of bed hijinx with glam queen sunk Val. Why Paxil? Jim’s Bodega stocked no quince-flavor Pez. Wavy-haired quints of El Paz mock Jorge by fax. Two phony quacks of God bi-exorcize evil mojo.
3 0.89901567 1318 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-13-Stolen jokes
Introduction: Fun stories here (from Kliph Nesteroff, link from Mark Palko).
same-blog 4 0.89844477 58 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-29-Stupid legal crap
Introduction: From the website of a journal where I published an article: In Springer journals you have the choice of publishing with or without open access. If you choose open access, your article will be freely available to everyone everywhere. In exchange for an open access fee of â‚Ź 2000 / US $3000 you retain the copyright and your article will carry the Creative Commons License. Please make your choice below. Hmmm . . . pay $3000 so that an article that I wrote and gave to the journal for free can be accessed by others? Sounds like a good deal to me!
5 0.84746528 1790 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-06-Calling Jenny Davidson . . .
Introduction: Now that you have some free time again, you’ll have to check out these books and tell us if they’re worth reading. Claire Kirch reports : Lizzie Skurnick Books launches in September with the release of Debutante Hill by Lois Duncan. The novel, which was originally published by Dodd, Mead, in 1958, has been out of print for about three decades. The other books on the initial list, all reissues, are A Long Day in November by Ernest J. Gaines (originally published in 1971), Happy Endings Are All Alike by Sandra Scoppettone (1979), I’ll Love You When You’re More Like Me by M.E. Kerr (1977), Secret Lives by Berthe Amoss (1979), To All My Fans, With Love, From Sylvie by Ellen Conford (1982), and Me and Fat Glenda by Lila Perl (1972). . . . Noting that many of the books of that era beloved by teen boys are still in print – such as Isaac Asimov’s novels and The Chocolate War by Robert Cormier – Skurnick pointed out that, in contrast, many of the books that were embraced by teen gir
6 0.76807892 734 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-28-Funniest comment ever
8 0.74780792 912 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-15-n = 2
9 0.72349203 2300 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-21-Ticket to Baaaath
10 0.71531904 1534 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-15-The strange reappearance of Matthew Klam
11 0.69851458 417 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-17-Clutering and variance components
12 0.69592637 1187 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-27-“Apple confronts the law of large numbers” . . . huh?
13 0.68463117 1374 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-11-Convergence Monitoring for Non-Identifiable and Non-Parametric Models
15 0.65891397 584 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-22-“Are Wisconsin Public Employees Underpaid?”
16 0.65519714 375 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-28-Matching for preprocessing data for causal inference
17 0.65337974 843 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-07-Non-rant
19 0.63288593 1175 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-19-Factual – a new place to find data
20 0.63226134 842 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-07-Hey, I’m just like Picasso (but without all the babes)!