andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2010 andrew_gelman_stats-2010-348 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: See page 179 here for Gowa’s review from 1986. And here’s my version (from 2008).
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('version', 0.629), ('page', 0.535), ('review', 0.531), ('see', 0.189)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99999994 348 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-17-Joanne Gowa scooped me by 22 years in my criticism of Axelrod’s Evolution of Cooperation
Introduction: See page 179 here for Gowa’s review from 1986. And here’s my version (from 2008).
2 0.18917468 90 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-16-Oil spill and corn production
Introduction: See here .
3 0.18578549 1627 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-17-Stan and RStan 1.1.0
Introduction: We’re happy to announce the availability of Stan and RStan versions 1.1.0, which are general tools for performing model-based Bayesian inference using the no-U-turn sampler, an adaptive form of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Information on downloading and installing and using them is available as always from Stan Home Page: http://mc-stan.org/ Let us know if you have any problems on the mailing lists or at the e-mails linked on the home page (please don’t use this web page). The full release notes follow. (R)Stan Version 1.1.0 Release Notes =================================== -- Backward Compatibility Issue * Categorical distribution recoded to match documentation; it now has support {1,...,K} rather than {0,...,K-1}. * (RStan) change default value of permuted flag from FALSE to TRUE for Stan fit S4 extract() method -- New Features * Conditional (if-then-else) statements * While statements -- New Functions * generalized multiply_lower_tri
4 0.18359774 225 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-23-Getting into hot water over hot graphics
Introduction: I like what Antony Unwin has to say here (start on page 5).
5 0.18027933 836 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-03-Another plagiarism mystery
Introduction: Nick Cox comments : I heard of a leading U.S. statistician who delegates some of his book reviews to smart graduate students. The (very grateful) ex-student who told me said, in effect, it’s just his way of working. He makes the deal evident beforehand and makes it up to you in other ways by superb mentoring. I don’t understand this at all! If the student wrote the review, he or she should be sole author, no? The thing that puzzles me about this story is that if you’re a “leading statistician,” you don’t really get any credit for reviewing. If anything, people probably think you’re writing reviews as a way to avoid doing real work. If there’s some concern that the journal won’t publish a review under the sole authorship of obscure student X, they could always compromise and include the senior prof as a second author on the review (in which case the prof should at least read the review and vet it, but that can’t take much time). I guess what I’m saying is that it makes pe
6 0.16070107 1106 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-08-Intro to splines—with cool graphs
7 0.16013809 1080 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-24-Latest in blog advertising
8 0.15874264 631 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-28-Explaining that plot.
9 0.15811212 1436 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-31-A book on presenting numbers from spreadsheets
10 0.15709302 1444 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-05-Those darn conservative egalitarians
11 0.14638785 1473 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-28-Turing chess run update
12 0.13856024 1429 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-26-Our broken scholarly publishing system
13 0.13665612 2239 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-09-Reviewing the peer review process?
14 0.13655406 531 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-22-Third-party Dream Ticket
15 0.13654733 146 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-14-The statistics and the science
16 0.13494514 282 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-17-I can’t escape it
17 0.12363173 1026 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-25-Bayes wikipedia update
18 0.12157593 1134 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-21-Lessons learned from a recent R package submission
19 0.11705494 843 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-07-Non-rant
20 0.11670624 2017 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-11-“Informative g-Priors for Logistic Regression”
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.058), (1, -0.022), (2, -0.036), (3, 0.012), (4, 0.018), (5, -0.019), (6, 0.017), (7, -0.068), (8, 0.012), (9, -0.034), (10, 0.046), (11, -0.052), (12, -0.01), (13, -0.006), (14, 0.081), (15, 0.016), (16, 0.015), (17, 0.074), (18, 0.005), (19, -0.038), (20, -0.021), (21, 0.056), (22, 0.062), (23, -0.069), (24, 0.038), (25, 0.008), (26, 0.078), (27, -0.017), (28, -0.002), (29, -0.056), (30, -0.135), (31, 0.043), (32, -0.029), (33, -0.022), (34, -0.003), (35, -0.106), (36, -0.032), (37, -0.143), (38, 0.099), (39, 0.04), (40, 0.087), (41, 0.013), (42, 0.01), (43, 0.075), (44, 0.061), (45, -0.043), (46, -0.014), (47, -0.083), (48, 0.009), (49, 0.021)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.97579598 348 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-17-Joanne Gowa scooped me by 22 years in my criticism of Axelrod’s Evolution of Cooperation
Introduction: See page 179 here for Gowa’s review from 1986. And here’s my version (from 2008).
2 0.83468175 531 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-22-Third-party Dream Ticket
Introduction: Who are the only major politicians who are viewed more positively than negatively by the American public? (See page 3 of this report .)
3 0.7711364 1106 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-08-Intro to splines—with cool graphs
Introduction: Ido Rosen pointed me to this page by Mike Kamermans.
4 0.62380385 859 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-18-Misunderstanding analysis of covariance
Introduction: Jeremy Miles writes: Are you familiar with Miller and Chapman’s (2001) article : Misunderstanding Analysis of Covariance saying that ANCOVA (and therefore, I suppose regression) should not be used when groups differ on a covariate. It has caused a moderate splash in psychology circles. I wondered if you had any thoughts on it. I had not heard of the article so I followed the link . . . ugh! Already on the very first column of the very first page they confuse nonadditivity with nonlinearity. I could probably continue with, “and it gets worse,” but since nobody’s paying me to read this one, I’ll stop reading right there on the first page! I prefer when people point me to good papers to read. . . .
5 0.61815971 225 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-23-Getting into hot water over hot graphics
Introduction: I like what Antony Unwin has to say here (start on page 5).
6 0.61353999 631 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-28-Explaining that plot.
7 0.58141547 282 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-17-I can’t escape it
8 0.56924754 1080 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-24-Latest in blog advertising
9 0.55292535 2239 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-09-Reviewing the peer review process?
10 0.53076339 1444 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-05-Those darn conservative egalitarians
11 0.52504617 1240 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-02-Blogads update
12 0.51902705 1026 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-25-Bayes wikipedia update
13 0.51246369 1436 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-31-A book on presenting numbers from spreadsheets
14 0.51182288 16 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-04-Burgess on Kipling
15 0.51164889 2095 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-09-Typo in Ghitza and Gelman MRP paper
16 0.51009852 836 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-03-Another plagiarism mystery
17 0.49106792 1660 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-08-Bayesian, Permutable Symmetries
18 0.48918706 365 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-24-Erving Goffman archives
19 0.47773984 190 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-07-Mister P makes the big jump from the New York Times to the Washington Post
20 0.47424248 124 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-02-Note to the quals
topicId topicWeight
[(16, 0.19), (99, 0.47)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99862748 348 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-17-Joanne Gowa scooped me by 22 years in my criticism of Axelrod’s Evolution of Cooperation
Introduction: See page 179 here for Gowa’s review from 1986. And here’s my version (from 2008).
2 0.98647976 2329 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-11-“What should you talk about?”
Introduction: Tyler Cowen quotes Robin Hanson: If your main reason for talking is to socialize, you’ll want to talk about whatever everyone else is talking about. Like say the missing Malaysia Airlines plane. But if instead your purpose is to gain and spread useful insight, so that we can all understand more about things that matter, you’ll want to look for relatively neglected topics. . . . One advantage of having this blog on a lag of a month or two is that I can post things, knowing that when my discussion finally appears, it will no longer be topical. Indeed, this post is an example.
3 0.98564625 725 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-21-People kept emailing me this one so I think I have to blog something
Introduction: Here and here , for example. I just hope they’re using our survey methods and aren’t trying to contact the zombies face-to-face!
4 0.98559916 2066 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-17-G+ hangout for test run of BDA course
Introduction: Try this link . . . . OK, it worked (as well as might be expected given that we don’t have any professional audiovisual people involved). Tomorrow 8h30, I’ll post a new link with the new G+ hangout. We’ll be going through the first two sets of slides (class1a.pdf and class1b.pdf) following the link for the slides here .
5 0.98382401 909 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-15-7 steps to successful infographics
Introduction: Aleks pointed me to this interesting article by Sarah Slobin. I don’t have any good way of summarizing it, so you’ll just have to follow the link and read it.
6 0.98248363 54 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-27-Hype about conditional probability puzzles
7 0.97674775 1554 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-31-It not necessary that Bayesian methods conform to the likelihood principle
8 0.97559798 2197 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-04-Peabody here.
9 0.96900523 2070 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-20-The institution of tenure
10 0.96767706 316 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-03-Suggested reading for a prospective statistician?
11 0.9672122 935 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-01-When should you worry about imputed data?
12 0.96671462 761 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-13-A survey’s not a survey if they don’t tell you how they did it
13 0.96615022 2107 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-20-NYT (non)-retraction watch
14 0.96523041 1038 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-02-Donate Your Data to Science!
15 0.96465802 1649 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-02-Back when 50 miles was a long way
16 0.96458566 967 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-20-Picking on Gregg Easterbrook
17 0.96432751 2106 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-19-More on “data science” and “statistics”
19 0.96188366 1389 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-23-Larry Wasserman’s statistics blog
20 0.96174353 339 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-13-Battle of the NYT opinion-page economists