andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1265 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Howard Wainer writes : When we focus only on the differences between groups, we too easily lose track of the big picture. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the current public discussions of the size of the gap in test scores that is observed between racial groups. It has been noted that in New Jersey the gap between the average scores of white and black students on the well-developed scale of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has shrunk by only about 25 percent over the past two decades. The conclusion drawn was that even though the change is in the right direction, it is far too slow. But focusing on the difference blinds us to what has been a remarkable success in education over the past 20 years. Although the direction and size of student improvements are considered across many subject areas and many age groups, I will describe just one — 4th grade mathematics. . . . there have been steep gains for both racial groups over this period (somewhat steeper g
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 Howard Wainer writes : When we focus only on the differences between groups, we too easily lose track of the big picture. [sent-1, score-0.132]
2 Nowhere is this more obvious than in the current public discussions of the size of the gap in test scores that is observed between racial groups. [sent-2, score-0.502]
3 It has been noted that in New Jersey the gap between the average scores of white and black students on the well-developed scale of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has shrunk by only about 25 percent over the past two decades. [sent-3, score-0.712]
4 But focusing on the difference blinds us to what has been a remarkable success in education over the past 20 years. [sent-5, score-0.467]
5 Although the direction and size of student improvements are considered across many subject areas and many age groups, I will describe just one — 4th grade mathematics. [sent-6, score-0.555]
6 there have been steep gains for both racial groups over this period (somewhat steeper gains for blacks than for whites). [sent-10, score-0.96]
7 New Jersey’s black students performed as well in 2011 as New Jersey’s white students did in 1992. [sent-14, score-0.45]
8 Given the consequential differences in wealth between these two groups, which has always been inextricably connected with student performance, reaching this mark is an accomplishment worthy of applause, not criticism. [sent-15, score-0.749]
9 He concludes: If we couple our concerns about American education and the remarkable success shown in this data, it seems sensible to try to understand what was going on, so that we can do more of it. [sent-16, score-0.356]
10 A little more than 20 years ago, several suits challenging the way that public schools were financed . [sent-20, score-0.111]
11 The courts decided that in order for the mandated “equal educational opportunity” to be true, per-pupil expenditures in all school districts should be about equal. [sent-23, score-0.687]
12 In order for that to happen, given the vast differences in the tax base across different communities, the state had to step in and augment the school budgets of poorer districts. [sent-24, score-0.6]
13 The fact that substantially increased funding has accompanied these substantial improvements in student performance must be considered as a prime candidate in any search for cause. [sent-25, score-0.651]
14 I didn’t hear back from anyone—I guess it was deemed not exciting enough to appear in any major newspaper or magazine, so it eventually ended up in “NJ Spotlight. [sent-27, score-0.094]
15 ” I like it, but maybe the problem was that it wasn’t topical enough. [sent-28, score-0.094]
16 Maybe Howard should’ve sat on the piece for awhile and saved it to time with some test-scores report? [sent-29, score-0.081]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('jersey', 0.268), ('howard', 0.227), ('groups', 0.192), ('remarkable', 0.157), ('gains', 0.157), ('racial', 0.15), ('improvements', 0.142), ('gap', 0.142), ('student', 0.136), ('educational', 0.132), ('differences', 0.132), ('scores', 0.12), ('black', 0.119), ('augment', 0.111), ('steeper', 0.111), ('inextricably', 0.111), ('blinds', 0.111), ('consequential', 0.111), ('nj', 0.111), ('shrunk', 0.111), ('suits', 0.111), ('students', 0.111), ('white', 0.109), ('success', 0.105), ('budgets', 0.105), ('expenditures', 0.105), ('mandated', 0.105), ('steep', 0.105), ('performance', 0.101), ('accomplishment', 0.097), ('direction', 0.097), ('education', 0.094), ('topical', 0.094), ('deemed', 0.094), ('accompanied', 0.094), ('courts', 0.091), ('considered', 0.09), ('size', 0.09), ('prime', 0.088), ('blacks', 0.088), ('nowhere', 0.086), ('order', 0.086), ('school', 0.086), ('wainer', 0.082), ('communities', 0.082), ('districts', 0.082), ('reaching', 0.082), ('saved', 0.081), ('poorer', 0.08), ('worthy', 0.08)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0 1265 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-15-Progress in U.S. education; also, a discussion of what it takes to hit the op-ed pages
Introduction: Howard Wainer writes : When we focus only on the differences between groups, we too easily lose track of the big picture. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the current public discussions of the size of the gap in test scores that is observed between racial groups. It has been noted that in New Jersey the gap between the average scores of white and black students on the well-developed scale of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has shrunk by only about 25 percent over the past two decades. The conclusion drawn was that even though the change is in the right direction, it is far too slow. But focusing on the difference blinds us to what has been a remarkable success in education over the past 20 years. Although the direction and size of student improvements are considered across many subject areas and many age groups, I will describe just one — 4th grade mathematics. . . . there have been steep gains for both racial groups over this period (somewhat steeper g
2 0.11896656 1353 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-30-Question 20 of my final exam for Design and Analysis of Sample Surveys
Introduction: 20. Explain in two sentences why we expect survey respondents to be honest about vote preferences but possibly dishonest about reporting unhealty behaviors. Solution to question 19 From yesterday : 19. A survey is taken of students in a metropolitan area. At the first stage a school is sampled at random. The schools are divided into two strata: 20 private schools and 50 public schools are sampled. At the second stage, 5 classes are sampled within each sampled school. At the third stage, 10 students are sampled within each class. What is the probability that any given student is sampled? Express this in terms of the number of students in the class, number of classes in the school, and number of schools in the area. Define appropriate notation as needed. Solution: Probability a student is sampled is A*B*C, where A = 20/(# private schools) if the student is at a private school, or 50/(# public schools) if the student is at a public school, B = 5/(# classes in the student
3 0.11799348 1316 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-12-black and Black, white and White
Introduction: I’ve always thought it looked strange to see people referred to in print as Black or White rather than black or white. For example consider this sentence: “A black guy was walking down the street and he saw a bunch of white guys standing around.” That looks fine, whereas “A Black guy was walking down the street and he saw a bunch of White guys standing around”—that looks weird to me, as if the encounter was taking place in an Ethnic Studies seminar. But maybe I’m wrong on this. Jay Livingston argues that black and white are colors whereas Black and White are races (or, as I would prefer to say, ethnic categories) and illustrates with this picture of a white person and a White person: In conversation, I sometimes talk about pink people, brown people, and tan people, but that won’t work in a research paper. P.S. I suspect Carp will argue that I’m being naive: meanings of words change across contexts and over time. To which I reply: Sure, but I still have to choose h
4 0.1151122 93 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-17-My proposal for making college admissions fairer
Introduction: After reading the Rewarding Strivers book , I had some thoughts about how to make the college admissions system more fair to students from varying socioeconomic backgrounds. Instead of boosting up the disadvantaged students, why not pull down the advantaged students? Here’s the idea. Disadvantaged students are defined typically not by a bad thing that they have, but rather by good things that they don’t have: financial resources, a high-quality education, and so forth. In contrast, advantaged students get all sorts of freebies. So here are my suggestions: 1. All high school grades on a 4-point scale (A=4, B=3, etc). No more of this 5-points-for-an-A-in-an-AP course, which gives the ridiculous outcomes of kids graduating with a 4.3 average, not so fair to kids in schools that don’t offer a lot of AP classes. 2. Subtract points for taking the SAT multiple times. A simple rule would be: You can use your highest SAT score, but you lose 50 points for every other time
5 0.11143223 957 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-14-Questions about a study of charter schools
Introduction: Phil Harris and Bruce Smith write: We have only recently chanced upon your blog while we were looking for responses to the “decline effect” in medical and scientific studies. We were especially taken by your comment that there is something wrong with the scientific method “if this method is defined as running experiments and doing data analysis in a patternless way and then reporting, as true, results that pass a statistical significance threshold.” To us, that seems to be standard operating procedure in much of social science, including our own field of education. Indeed quasi-experimental designs are the stock in trade of those who attempt to use “science” — we dare not say haruspicy, but you can if you like — to influence the course of public policy. Now, a new entrant into the cherry pickers sweepstakes seems to have emerged. It is on Charter School Performance in Indiana Schools . We are by no means professional statisticians or data analysts, but we have some background in
6 0.11095473 609 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-13-Coauthorship norms
7 0.1087513 71 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-07-Pay for an A?
8 0.1061888 1350 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-28-Value-added assessment: What went wrong?
9 0.10384301 700 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-06-Suspicious pattern of too-strong replications of medical research
10 0.10289309 529 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-21-“City Opens Inquiry on Grading Practices at a Top-Scoring Bronx School”
11 0.10147277 94 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-17-SAT stories
12 0.10121037 1942 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-17-“Stop and frisk” statistics
14 0.099942103 2255 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-19-How Americans vote
15 0.099752523 315 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-03-He doesn’t trust the fit . . . r=.999
16 0.097848117 1548 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-25-Health disparities are associated with low life expectancy
17 0.096103348 1803 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-14-Why girls do better in school
18 0.095222756 1227 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-23-Voting patterns of America’s whites, from the masses to the elites
19 0.094164759 2083 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-31-Value-added modeling in education: Gaming the system by sending kids on a field trip at test time
20 0.093137965 95 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-17-“Rewarding Strivers: Helping Low-Income Students Succeed in College”
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.163), (1, -0.07), (2, 0.054), (3, -0.013), (4, 0.041), (5, 0.083), (6, 0.019), (7, 0.089), (8, -0.043), (9, 0.01), (10, 0.001), (11, 0.062), (12, -0.026), (13, -0.024), (14, 0.035), (15, -0.003), (16, 0.064), (17, 0.027), (18, -0.05), (19, 0.006), (20, -0.007), (21, 0.029), (22, -0.006), (23, -0.033), (24, 0.052), (25, -0.045), (26, -0.011), (27, 0.032), (28, -0.012), (29, 0.023), (30, -0.008), (31, -0.011), (32, 0.063), (33, 0.029), (34, 0.016), (35, 0.042), (36, 0.022), (37, 0.027), (38, 0.061), (39, 0.013), (40, -0.027), (41, 0.007), (42, 0.026), (43, -0.001), (44, -0.013), (45, -0.008), (46, -0.041), (47, -0.047), (48, -0.005), (49, -0.012)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.97802162 1265 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-15-Progress in U.S. education; also, a discussion of what it takes to hit the op-ed pages
Introduction: Howard Wainer writes : When we focus only on the differences between groups, we too easily lose track of the big picture. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the current public discussions of the size of the gap in test scores that is observed between racial groups. It has been noted that in New Jersey the gap between the average scores of white and black students on the well-developed scale of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has shrunk by only about 25 percent over the past two decades. The conclusion drawn was that even though the change is in the right direction, it is far too slow. But focusing on the difference blinds us to what has been a remarkable success in education over the past 20 years. Although the direction and size of student improvements are considered across many subject areas and many age groups, I will describe just one — 4th grade mathematics. . . . there have been steep gains for both racial groups over this period (somewhat steeper g
2 0.86380059 1803 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-14-Why girls do better in school
Introduction: Wayne Folta writes, “In light of your recent blog post on women in higher education, here’s one I just read about on a techie website regarding elementary education”: Why do girls get better grades in elementary school than boys—even when they perform worse on standardized tests? New research . . . suggests that it’s because of their classroom behavior, which may lead teachers to assign girls higher grades than their male counterparts. . . . The study, co-authored by [Christopher] Cornwell and David Mustard at UGA and Jessica Van Parys at Columbia, analyzed data on more than 5,800 students from kindergarten through fifth grade. It examined students’ performance on standardized tests in three categories—reading, math and science-linking test scores to teachers’ assessments of their students’ progress, both academically and more broadly. The data show, for the first time, that gender disparities in teacher grades start early and uniformly favor girls. In every subject area, bo
3 0.86336368 93 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-17-My proposal for making college admissions fairer
Introduction: After reading the Rewarding Strivers book , I had some thoughts about how to make the college admissions system more fair to students from varying socioeconomic backgrounds. Instead of boosting up the disadvantaged students, why not pull down the advantaged students? Here’s the idea. Disadvantaged students are defined typically not by a bad thing that they have, but rather by good things that they don’t have: financial resources, a high-quality education, and so forth. In contrast, advantaged students get all sorts of freebies. So here are my suggestions: 1. All high school grades on a 4-point scale (A=4, B=3, etc). No more of this 5-points-for-an-A-in-an-AP course, which gives the ridiculous outcomes of kids graduating with a 4.3 average, not so fair to kids in schools that don’t offer a lot of AP classes. 2. Subtract points for taking the SAT multiple times. A simple rule would be: You can use your highest SAT score, but you lose 50 points for every other time
4 0.84012944 606 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-10-It’s no fun being graded on a curve
Introduction: Mark Palko points to a news article by Michael Winerip on teacher assessment: No one at the Lab Middle School for Collaborative Studies works harder than Stacey Isaacson, a seventh-grade English and social studies teacher. She is out the door of her Queens home by 6:15 a.m., takes the E train into Manhattan and is standing out front when the school doors are unlocked, at 7. Nights, she leaves her classroom at 5:30. . . . Her principal, Megan Adams, has given her terrific reviews during the two and a half years Ms. Isaacson has been a teacher. . . . The Lab School has selective admissions, and Ms. Isaacson’s students have excelled. Her first year teaching, 65 of 66 scored proficient on the state language arts test, meaning they got 3′s or 4′s; only one scored below grade level with a 2. More than two dozen students from her first two years teaching have gone on to . . . the city’s most competitive high schools. . . . You would think the Department of Education would want to r
5 0.82424158 529 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-21-“City Opens Inquiry on Grading Practices at a Top-Scoring Bronx School”
Introduction: Sharon Otterman reports : When report card grades were released in the fall for the city’s 455 high schools, the highest score went to a small school in a down-and-out section of the Bronx . . . A stunning 94 percent of its seniors graduated, more than 30 points above the citywide average. . . . “When I interviewed for the school,” said Sam Buchbinder, a history teacher, “it was made very clear: this is a school that doesn’t believe in anyone failing.” That statement was not just an exhortation to excellence. It was school policy. By order of the principal, codified in the school’s teacher handbook, all teachers should grade their classes in the same way: 30 percent of students should earn a grade in the A range, 40 percent B’s, 25 percent C’s, and no more than 5 percent D’s. As long as they show up, they should not fail. Hey, that sounds like Harvard and Columbia^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H various selective northeastern colleges I’ve known. Of course, we^H^H
6 0.82360834 542 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-28-Homework and treatment levels
7 0.81813842 825 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-27-Grade inflation: why weren’t the instructors all giving all A’s already??
8 0.80542648 95 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-17-“Rewarding Strivers: Helping Low-Income Students Succeed in College”
9 0.8036232 326 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-07-Peer pressure, selection, and educational reform
10 0.79735398 1507 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-22-Grade inflation: why weren’t the instructors all giving all A’s already??
11 0.77728063 718 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-18-Should kids be able to bring their own lunches to school?
12 0.77353728 1350 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-28-Value-added assessment: What went wrong?
13 0.7723968 71 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-07-Pay for an A?
14 0.76674771 452 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-06-Followup questions
15 0.76048678 1688 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-22-That claim that students whose parents pay for more of college get worse grades
17 0.75318569 853 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-14-Preferential admissions for children of elite colleges
18 0.75133348 226 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-23-More on those L.A. Times estimates of teacher effectiveness
19 0.74684411 261 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-07-The $900 kindergarten teacher
20 0.7442975 992 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-05-Deadwood in the math curriculum
topicId topicWeight
[(9, 0.045), (15, 0.015), (16, 0.114), (21, 0.038), (24, 0.132), (30, 0.205), (45, 0.013), (53, 0.011), (63, 0.023), (89, 0.029), (99, 0.269)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.95938265 179 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-03-An Olympic size swimming pool full of lithium water
Introduction: As part of his continuing plan to sap etc etc., Aleks pointed me to an article by Max Miller reporting on a recommendation from Jacob Appel: Adding trace amounts of lithium to the drinking water could limit suicides. . . . Communities with higher than average amounts of lithium in their drinking water had significantly lower suicide rates than communities with lower levels. Regions of Texas with lower lithium concentrations had an average suicide rate of 14.2 per 100,000 people, whereas those areas with naturally higher lithium levels had a dramatically lower suicide rate of 8.7 per 100,000. The highest levels in Texas (150 micrograms of lithium per liter of water) are only a thousandth of the minimum pharmaceutical dose, and have no known deleterious effects. I don’t know anything about this and am offering no judgment on it; I’m just passing it on. The research studies are here and here . I am skeptical, though, about this part of the argument: We are not talking a
same-blog 2 0.94087464 1265 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-15-Progress in U.S. education; also, a discussion of what it takes to hit the op-ed pages
Introduction: Howard Wainer writes : When we focus only on the differences between groups, we too easily lose track of the big picture. Nowhere is this more obvious than in the current public discussions of the size of the gap in test scores that is observed between racial groups. It has been noted that in New Jersey the gap between the average scores of white and black students on the well-developed scale of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) has shrunk by only about 25 percent over the past two decades. The conclusion drawn was that even though the change is in the right direction, it is far too slow. But focusing on the difference blinds us to what has been a remarkable success in education over the past 20 years. Although the direction and size of student improvements are considered across many subject areas and many age groups, I will describe just one — 4th grade mathematics. . . . there have been steep gains for both racial groups over this period (somewhat steeper g
3 0.94011748 1188 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-28-Reference on longitudinal models?
Introduction: Antonio Ramos writes: The book with Hill has very little on longitudinal models. So do you recommended any reference to complement your book on covariance structures typical from these models, such as AR(1), Antedependence, Factor Analytic, etc? I am very much interest in BUGS code for these basic models as well as how to extend them to more complex situations. My reply: There is a book by Banerjee, Carlin, and Gelfand on Bayesian space-time models. Beyond that, I think there is good work in psychometrics on covaraince structures but I don’t know the literature.
4 0.93721282 412 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-13-Time to apply for the hackNY summer fellows program
Introduction: Chris Wiggins writes of an interesting-looking summer program that undergraduate or graduate students can apply to: The hackNY Fellows program is an initiative to mentor the next generation of technology innovators in New York, focusing on tech startups. Last summer’s class of fellows was paired with NYC startups which demonstrated they could provide a mentoring environment (a clear project, a person who could work with the Fellow, and sufficient stability to commit to 10 weeks of compensation for the Fellow). hackNY, with the support of the Kauffman foundation and the Internet Society of New York, provided shared housing in NYU dorms in Union Square, and organized a series of pedagogical lectures. hackNY was founded by Hilary Mason, chief scientist at bit.ly, Evan Korth, professor of CS at NYU, and Chris Wiggins, professor of applied mathematics at Columbia. Each of us has spent thousands of student-hours teaching and mentoring, and is committed to help build a strong communi
5 0.93643373 593 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-27-Heat map
Introduction: Jarad Niemi sends along this plot: and writes: 2010-2011 Miami Heat offensive (red), defensive (blue), and combined (black) player contribution means (dots) and 95% credible intervals (lines) where zero indicates an average NBA player. Larger positive numbers for offensive and combined are better while larger negative numbers for defense are better. In retrospect, I [Niemi] should have plotted -1*defensive_contribution so that larger was always better. The main point with this figure is that this awesome combination of James-Wade-Bosh that was discussed immediately after the LeBron trade to the Heat has a one-of-these-things-is-not-like-the-other aspect. At least according to my analysis, Bosh is hurting his team compared to the average player (although not statistically significant) due to his terrible defensive contribution (which is statistically significant). All fine so far. But the punchline comes at the end, when he writes: Anyway, a reviewer said he hated the
6 0.93242133 1416 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-14-Ripping off a ripoff
7 0.9291482 1259 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-11-How things sound to us, versus how they sound to others
8 0.91246825 1623 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-14-GiveWell charity recommendations
9 0.90681541 1195 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-04-Multiple comparisons dispute in the tabloids
10 0.90365058 1768 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-18-Mertz’s reply to Unz’s response to Mertz’s comments on Unz’s article
11 0.89803815 1831 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-29-The Great Race
12 0.89624727 41 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-19-Updated R code and data for ARM
13 0.88136941 631 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-28-Explaining that plot.
14 0.87947834 1429 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-26-Our broken scholarly publishing system
15 0.87850749 1497 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-15-Our blog makes connections!
16 0.86702055 2073 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-22-Ivy Jew update
17 0.86079705 450 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-04-The Joy of Stats
18 0.85753381 1936 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-13-Economic policy does not occur in a political vacuum
19 0.85456139 1751 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-06-Janet Mertz’s response to “The Myth of American Meritocracy”
20 0.85384643 109 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-25-Classics of statistics