andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2010 andrew_gelman_stats-2010-475 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

475 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-19-All politics are local — not


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: Mickey Kaus does a public service by trashing Tip O’Neill’s famous dictum that “all politics are local.” As Kaus point out, all the congressional elections in recent decades have been nationalized. I’d go one step further and say that, sure, all politics are local–if you’re Tip O’Neill and represent a ironclad Democratic seat in Congress. It’s easy to be smug about your political skills if you’re in a safe seat and have enough pull in state politics to avoid your district getting gerrymandered. Then you can sit there and sagely attribute your success to your continuing mastery of local politics rather than to whatever it took to get the seat in the first place.


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 Mickey Kaus does a public service by trashing Tip O’Neill’s famous dictum that “all politics are local. [sent-1, score-0.918]

2 ” As Kaus point out, all the congressional elections in recent decades have been nationalized. [sent-2, score-0.377]

3 I’d go one step further and say that, sure, all politics are local–if you’re Tip O’Neill and represent a ironclad Democratic seat in Congress. [sent-3, score-1.157]

4 It’s easy to be smug about your political skills if you’re in a safe seat and have enough pull in state politics to avoid your district getting gerrymandered. [sent-4, score-1.706]

5 Then you can sit there and sagely attribute your success to your continuing mastery of local politics rather than to whatever it took to get the seat in the first place. [sent-5, score-1.756]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('seat', 0.402), ('neill', 0.353), ('politics', 0.329), ('kaus', 0.317), ('tip', 0.284), ('local', 0.178), ('trashing', 0.177), ('dictum', 0.169), ('mastery', 0.169), ('ironclad', 0.163), ('mickey', 0.158), ('smug', 0.154), ('attribute', 0.123), ('district', 0.123), ('sit', 0.118), ('pull', 0.118), ('congressional', 0.112), ('safe', 0.111), ('continuing', 0.107), ('democratic', 0.102), ('skills', 0.102), ('service', 0.097), ('elections', 0.095), ('represent', 0.09), ('success', 0.088), ('decades', 0.088), ('famous', 0.086), ('avoid', 0.086), ('step', 0.076), ('took', 0.074), ('place', 0.068), ('whatever', 0.067), ('re', 0.067), ('easy', 0.066), ('state', 0.063), ('public', 0.06), ('getting', 0.056), ('political', 0.05), ('recent', 0.048), ('enough', 0.046), ('sure', 0.044), ('go', 0.042), ('rather', 0.039), ('first', 0.036), ('say', 0.036), ('point', 0.034), ('get', 0.026), ('one', 0.019)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.99999994 475 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-19-All politics are local — not

Introduction: Mickey Kaus does a public service by trashing Tip O’Neill’s famous dictum that “all politics are local.” As Kaus point out, all the congressional elections in recent decades have been nationalized. I’d go one step further and say that, sure, all politics are local–if you’re Tip O’Neill and represent a ironclad Democratic seat in Congress. It’s easy to be smug about your political skills if you’re in a safe seat and have enough pull in state politics to avoid your district getting gerrymandered. Then you can sit there and sagely attribute your success to your continuing mastery of local politics rather than to whatever it took to get the seat in the first place.

2 0.57765716 478 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-20-More on why “all politics is local” is an outdated slogan

Introduction: Yesterday I wrote that Mickey Kaus was right to point out that it’s time to retire Tip O’Neill’s famous dictum that “all politics are local.” As Kaus points out, all the congressional elections in recent decades have been nationalized. The slogan is particularly silly for Tip O’Neill himself. Sure, O’Neill had to have a firm grip on local politics to get his safe seat in the first place, but after that it was smooth sailing. Jonathan Bernstein disagrees , writing: Yes, but: don’t most Members of the House have ironclad partisan districts? And isn’t the most important single thing they can do to protect themselves involve having pull in state politics to avoid being gerrymandered? That is “all politics is local,” no? There’s also a fair amount they can do to stay on the good side of their local party, thus avoiding a primary fight. And, even in an era of nationalized elections, there’s still plenty a Member of Congress can do to to influence elections on the margins, a

3 0.36407468 508 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-08-More evidence of growing nationalization of congressional elections

Introduction: The other day I posted some evidence that, however things used to be, congressional elections are increasingly nationalized, and it’s time to retire Tip O’Neill’s slogan, “all politics is local.” (The discussion started with a remark by O.G. blogger Mickey Kaus; I also explain why I disagree with Jonathan Bernstein’s disagreement with me.) Alan Abramowitz writes in with an analysis of National Election Study from a recent paper of his: Average Correlations of House and Senate Votes with Presidential Job Evaluations by Decade Decade House.Vote Senate.Vote 1972-1980 .31 .28 1982-1990 .39 .42 1992-2000 .43 .50 2002-2008 .51 .57 This indeed seems like strong evidence of nationalization, consistent with other things we’ve seen. I a

4 0.17618032 250 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-02-Blending results from two relatively independent multi-level models

Introduction: David Shor writes: I [Shor] am working on a Bayesian Forecasting model for the Mid-term elections that has two components: 1) A poll aggregation system with pooled and hierarchical house and design effects across every race with polls (Average Standard error for house seat level vote-share ~.055) 2) A Bafumi-style regression that applies national-swing to individual seats. (Average Standard error for house seat level vote-share ~.06) Since these two estimates are essentially independent, estimates can probably be made more accurate by pooling them together. But If a house effect changes in one draw, that changes estimates in every race. Changes in regression coefficients and National swing have a similar effect. In the face of high and possibly differing seat-to-seat correlations from each method, I’m not sure what the correct way to “blend” these models would be, either for individual or top-line seat estimates. In the mean-time, I’m just creating variance-weighted avera

5 0.13852111 629 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-26-Is it plausible that 1% of people pick a career based on their first name?

Introduction: In my discussion of dentists-named-Dennis study, I referred to my back-of-the-envelope calculation that the effect (if it indeed exists) corresponds to an approximate 1% aggregate chance that you’ll pick a profession based on your first name. Even if there are nearly twice as many dentist Dennises as would be expected from chance alone, the base rate is so low that a shift of 1% of all Dennises would be enough to do this. My point was that (a) even a small effect could show up when looking at low-frequency events such as the choice to pick a particular career or live in a particular city, and (b) any small effects will inherently be difficult to detect in any direct way. Uri Simonsohn (the author of the recent rebuttal of the original name-choice article by Brett Pelham et al.) wrote: In terms of the effect size. I [Simonsohn] think of it differently and see it as too big to be believable. I don’t find it plausible that I can double the odds that my daughter will marry an

6 0.12238706 1148 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-31-“the forces of native stupidity reinforced by that blind hostility to criticism, reform, new ideas and superior ability which is human as well as academic nature”

7 0.10383746 652 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-07-Minor-league Stats Predict Major-league Performance, Sarah Palin, and Some Differences Between Baseball and Politics

8 0.098067492 362 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-22-A redrawing of the Red-Blue map in November 2010?

9 0.089872144 2255 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-19-How Americans vote

10 0.087619945 1496 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-14-Sides and Vavreck on the 2012 election

11 0.087552592 633 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-28-“The New Tyranny: Carbon Monoxide Detectors?”

12 0.08045195 990 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-04-At the politics blogs . . .

13 0.078941189 270 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-12-Comparison of forecasts for the 2010 congressional elections

14 0.069455892 13 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-30-Things I learned from the Mickey Kaus for Senate campaign

15 0.069159947 1823 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-24-The Tweets-Votes Curve

16 0.068856128 1300 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-05-Recently in the sister blog

17 0.0673149 2125 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-05-What predicts whether a school district will participate in a large-scale evaluation?

18 0.066110939 337 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-12-Election symposium at Columbia Journalism School

19 0.063865408 604 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-08-More on the missing conservative psychology researchers

20 0.063125864 654 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-09-There’s no evidence that voters choose presidential candidates based on their looks


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.069), (1, -0.054), (2, 0.067), (3, 0.054), (4, -0.048), (5, 0.013), (6, -0.02), (7, -0.025), (8, -0.001), (9, 0.002), (10, 0.028), (11, 0.012), (12, -0.004), (13, -0.044), (14, 0.004), (15, 0.007), (16, 0.021), (17, 0.004), (18, -0.028), (19, -0.019), (20, -0.027), (21, 0.016), (22, -0.014), (23, 0.005), (24, 0.016), (25, -0.015), (26, 0.013), (27, 0.011), (28, -0.002), (29, 0.054), (30, 0.001), (31, -0.01), (32, -0.033), (33, -0.014), (34, -0.011), (35, 0.015), (36, -0.033), (37, -0.032), (38, 0.033), (39, -0.025), (40, 0.038), (41, 0.023), (42, -0.094), (43, -0.005), (44, -0.027), (45, 0.022), (46, -0.027), (47, -0.019), (48, 0.03), (49, 0.069)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.96844363 475 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-19-All politics are local — not

Introduction: Mickey Kaus does a public service by trashing Tip O’Neill’s famous dictum that “all politics are local.” As Kaus point out, all the congressional elections in recent decades have been nationalized. I’d go one step further and say that, sure, all politics are local–if you’re Tip O’Neill and represent a ironclad Democratic seat in Congress. It’s easy to be smug about your political skills if you’re in a safe seat and have enough pull in state politics to avoid your district getting gerrymandered. Then you can sit there and sagely attribute your success to your continuing mastery of local politics rather than to whatever it took to get the seat in the first place.

2 0.88578486 478 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-20-More on why “all politics is local” is an outdated slogan

Introduction: Yesterday I wrote that Mickey Kaus was right to point out that it’s time to retire Tip O’Neill’s famous dictum that “all politics are local.” As Kaus points out, all the congressional elections in recent decades have been nationalized. The slogan is particularly silly for Tip O’Neill himself. Sure, O’Neill had to have a firm grip on local politics to get his safe seat in the first place, but after that it was smooth sailing. Jonathan Bernstein disagrees , writing: Yes, but: don’t most Members of the House have ironclad partisan districts? And isn’t the most important single thing they can do to protect themselves involve having pull in state politics to avoid being gerrymandered? That is “all politics is local,” no? There’s also a fair amount they can do to stay on the good side of their local party, thus avoiding a primary fight. And, even in an era of nationalized elections, there’s still plenty a Member of Congress can do to to influence elections on the margins, a

3 0.75363219 508 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-08-More evidence of growing nationalization of congressional elections

Introduction: The other day I posted some evidence that, however things used to be, congressional elections are increasingly nationalized, and it’s time to retire Tip O’Neill’s slogan, “all politics is local.” (The discussion started with a remark by O.G. blogger Mickey Kaus; I also explain why I disagree with Jonathan Bernstein’s disagreement with me.) Alan Abramowitz writes in with an analysis of National Election Study from a recent paper of his: Average Correlations of House and Senate Votes with Presidential Job Evaluations by Decade Decade House.Vote Senate.Vote 1972-1980 .31 .28 1982-1990 .39 .42 1992-2000 .43 .50 2002-2008 .51 .57 This indeed seems like strong evidence of nationalization, consistent with other things we’ve seen. I a

4 0.6171028 654 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-09-There’s no evidence that voters choose presidential candidates based on their looks

Introduction: Jonathan Chait writes that the most important aspect of a presidential candidate is “political talent”: Republicans have generally understood that an agenda tilted toward the desires of the powerful requires a skilled frontman who can pitch Middle America. Favorite character types include jocks, movie stars, folksy Texans and war heroes. . . . [But the frontrunners for the 2012 Republican nomination] make Michael Dukakis look like John F. Kennedy. They are qualified enough to serve as president, but wildly unqualified to run for president. . . . [Mitch] Daniels’s drawbacks begin — but by no means end — with his lack of height, hair and charisma. . . . [Jeb Bush] suffers from an inherent branding challenge [because of his last name]. . . . [Chris] Christie . . . doesn’t cut a trim figure and who specializes in verbally abusing his constituents. . . . [Haley] Barbour is the comic embodiment of his party’s most negative stereotypes. A Barbour nomination would be the rough equivalent

5 0.61279607 364 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-22-Politics is not a random walk: Momentum and mean reversion in polling

Introduction: Nate Silver and Justin Wolfers are having a friendly blog-dispute about momentum in political polling. Nate and Justin each make good points but are also missing parts of the picture. These questions relate to my own research so I thought I’d discuss them here. There ain’t no mo’ Nate led off the discussion by writing that pundits are always talking about “momentum” in the polls: Turn on the news or read through much of the analysis put out by some of our friends, and you’re likely to hear a lot of talk about “momentum”: the term is used about 60 times per day by major media outlets in conjunction with articles about polling. When people say a particular candidate has momentum, what they are implying is that present trends are likely to perpetuate themselves into the future. Say, for instance, that a candidate trailed by 10 points in a poll three weeks ago — and now a new poll comes out showing the candidate down by just 5 points. It will frequently be said that this

6 0.59884608 1496 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-14-Sides and Vavreck on the 2012 election

7 0.58463013 1570 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-08-Poll aggregation and election forecasting

8 0.58441436 200 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-11-Separating national and state swings in voting and public opinion, or, How I avoided blogorific embarrassment: An agony in four acts

9 0.58274055 1512 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-27-A Non-random Walk Down Campaign Street

10 0.58246177 2087 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-03-The Employment Nondiscrimination Act is overwhelmingly popular in nearly every one of the 50 states

11 0.57969058 292 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-23-Doug Hibbs on the fundamentals in 2010

12 0.56122756 2060 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-13-New issue of Symposium magazine

13 0.56073242 656 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-11-Jonathan Chait and I agree about the importance of the fundamentals in determining presidential elections

14 0.55262238 210 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-16-What I learned from those tough 538 commenters

15 0.55158079 312 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-02-“Regression to the mean” is fine. But what’s the “mean”?

16 0.55115175 300 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-28-A calibrated Cook gives Dems the edge in Nov, sez Sandy

17 0.54984212 1000 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-10-Forecasting 2012: How much does ideology matter?

18 0.54951805 270 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-12-Comparison of forecasts for the 2010 congressional elections

19 0.5483883 131 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-07-A note to John

20 0.54580462 87 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-15-Statistical analysis and visualization of the drug war in Mexico


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(16, 0.032), (21, 0.017), (24, 0.139), (45, 0.015), (55, 0.017), (63, 0.05), (86, 0.028), (90, 0.36), (99, 0.203)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

1 0.98237884 512 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-12-Picking pennies in front of a steamroller: A parable comes to life

Introduction: Chapter 1 On Sunday we were over on 125 St so I stopped by the Jamaican beef patties place but they were closed. Jesus Taco was next door so I went there instead. What a mistake! I don’t know what Masanao and Yu-Sung could’ve been thinking. Anyway, then I had Jamaican beef patties on the brain so I went by Monday afternoon and asked for 9: 3 spicy beef, 3 mild beef (for the kids), and 3 chicken (not the jerk chicken; Bob got those the other day and they didn’t impress me). I’m about to pay and then a bunch of people come in and start ordering. The woman behind the counter asks if I’m in a hurry, I ask why, she whispers, For the same price you can get a dozen. So I get two more spicy beef and a chicken. She whispers that I shouldn’t tell anyone. I can’t really figure out why I’m getting this special treatment. So I walk out of there with 12 patties. Total cost: $17.25. It’s a good deal: they’re small but not that small. Sure, I ate 6 of them, but I was hungry. Chapt

2 0.98019081 2259 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-22-Picking pennies in front of a steamroller: A parable comes to life

Introduction: From 2011: Chapter 1 On Sunday we were over on 125 St so I stopped by the Jamaican beef patties place but they were closed. Jesus Taco was next door so I went there instead. What a mistake! I don’t know what Masanao and Yu-Sung could’ve been thinking. Anyway, then I had Jamaican beef patties on the brain so I went by Monday afternoon and asked for 9: 3 spicy beef, 3 mild beef (for the kids), and 3 chicken (not the jerk chicken; Bob got those the other day and they didn’t impress me). I’m about to pay and then a bunch of people come in and start ordering. The woman behind the counter asks if I’m in a hurry, I ask why, she whispers, For the same price you can get a dozen. So I get two more spicy beef and a chicken. She whispers that I shouldn’t tell anyone. I can’t really figure out why I’m getting this special treatment. So I walk out of there with 12 patties. Total cost: $17.25. It’s a good deal: they’re small but not that small. Sure, I ate 6 of them, but I was h

same-blog 3 0.91259611 475 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-19-All politics are local — not

Introduction: Mickey Kaus does a public service by trashing Tip O’Neill’s famous dictum that “all politics are local.” As Kaus point out, all the congressional elections in recent decades have been nationalized. I’d go one step further and say that, sure, all politics are local–if you’re Tip O’Neill and represent a ironclad Democratic seat in Congress. It’s easy to be smug about your political skills if you’re in a safe seat and have enough pull in state politics to avoid your district getting gerrymandered. Then you can sit there and sagely attribute your success to your continuing mastery of local politics rather than to whatever it took to get the seat in the first place.

4 0.80447853 1417 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-15-Some decision analysis problems are pretty easy, no?

Introduction: Cassie Murdoch reports : A 47-year-old woman in Uxbridge, Massachusetts, got behind the wheel of her car after having a bit too much to drink, but instead of wreaking havoc on the road, she ended up lodged in a sand trap at a local golf course. Why? Because her GPS made her do it—obviously! She said the GPS told her to turn left, and she did, right into a cornfield. That didn’t faze her, and she just kept on going until she ended up on the golf course and got stuck in the sand. There were people on the course at the time, but thankfully nobody was injured. Police found a cup full of alcohol in her car and arrested her for driving drunk. Here’s the punchline: This is the fourth time she’s been arrested for a DUI. Assuming this story is accurate, I guess they don’t have one of those “three strikes” laws in Massachusetts? Personally, I’m a lot more afraid of a dangerous driver than of some drug dealer. I’d think a simple cost-benefit calculation would recommend taking away

5 0.77455956 1522 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-05-High temperatures cause violent crime and implications for climate change, also some suggestions about how to better summarize these claims

Introduction: Solomon Hsiang writes : I [Hsiang] have posted about high temperature inducing individuals to exhibit more violent behavior when driving, playing baseball and prowling bars. These cases are neat anecdotes that let us see the “pure aggression” response in lab-like conditions. But they don’t affect most of us too much. But violent crime in the real world affects everyone. Earlier, I posted a paper by Jacob et al. that looked at assault in the USA for about a decade – they found that higher temperatures lead to more assault and that the rise in violent crimes rose more quickly than the analogous rise in non-violent property-crime, an indicator that there is a “pure aggression” component to the rise in violent crime. A new working paper “Crime, Weather, and Climate Change” by recent Harvard grad Matthew Ranson puts together an impressive data set of all types of crime in USA counties for 50 years. The results tell the aggression story using street-level data very clearly [click to

6 0.77059972 1411 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-10-Defining ourselves arbitrarily

7 0.7383998 1655 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-05-The statistics software signal

8 0.70453215 15 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-03-Public Opinion on Health Care Reform

9 0.69604927 1947 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-20-We are what we are studying

10 0.67586923 478 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-20-More on why “all politics is local” is an outdated slogan

11 0.66563559 1932 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-10-Don’t trust the Turk

12 0.6561892 762 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-13-How should journals handle replication studies?

13 0.65588266 2026 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-16-He’s adult entertainer, Child educator, King of the crossfader, He’s the greatest of the greater, He’s a big bad wolf in your neighborhood, Not bad meaning bad but bad meaning good

14 0.65190327 766 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-14-Last Wegman post (for now)

15 0.6457361 1842 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-05-Cleaning up science

16 0.63549924 1934 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-11-Yes, worry about generalizing from data to population. But multilevel modeling is the solution, not the problem

17 0.62889469 2205 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-10-More on US health care overkill

18 0.62264121 530 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-22-MS-Bayes?

19 0.61254817 875 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-28-Better than Dennis the dentist or Laura the lawyer

20 0.61014026 696 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-04-Whassup with glm()?