andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1397 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Jeff points me to a paper by Chandler McClellan and Erdal Tekin which begins as follows: The controversies surrounding Stand Your Ground laws have recently captured the nation’s attention. Since 2005, eighteen states have passed laws extending the right to self-defense with no duty to retreat to any place a person has a legal right to be, and several additional states are debating the adoption of similar legislation. Despite the implications that these laws may have for public safety, there has been little empirical investigation of their impact on crime and victimization. In this paper, we use monthly data from the U.S. Vital Statistics to examine how Stand Your Ground laws affect homicides. We identify the impact of these laws by exploiting variation in the effective date of these laws across states. Our results indicate that Stand Your Ground laws are associated with a significant increase in the number of homicides among whites, especially white males. According to our estimat
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 Jeff points me to a paper by Chandler McClellan and Erdal Tekin which begins as follows: The controversies surrounding Stand Your Ground laws have recently captured the nation’s attention. [sent-1, score-0.759]
2 Since 2005, eighteen states have passed laws extending the right to self-defense with no duty to retreat to any place a person has a legal right to be, and several additional states are debating the adoption of similar legislation. [sent-2, score-1.264]
3 Despite the implications that these laws may have for public safety, there has been little empirical investigation of their impact on crime and victimization. [sent-3, score-0.721]
4 Vital Statistics to examine how Stand Your Ground laws affect homicides. [sent-6, score-0.596]
5 We identify the impact of these laws by exploiting variation in the effective date of these laws across states. [sent-7, score-1.323]
6 Our results indicate that Stand Your Ground laws are associated with a significant increase in the number of homicides among whites, especially white males. [sent-8, score-1.259]
7 4 additional white males are killed each month as a result of these laws. [sent-11, score-0.357]
8 We find no evidence to suggest that these laws increase homicides among blacks. [sent-12, score-1.121]
9 Our results are robust to a number of specifications and unlikely to be driven entirely by the killings of assailants. [sent-13, score-0.113]
10 Taken together, our findings raise serious doubts against the argument that Stand Your Ground laws make America safer. [sent-14, score-0.654]
11 From a policy standpoint, I guess it’s no surprise that Stand Your Ground laws could be associated with an increase in homicide. [sent-17, score-0.789]
12 After all, these laws aren’t really enacted as a homicide-control measure, right? [sent-18, score-0.665]
13 It’s more the opposite, that they legalize certain violence that used to be criminal. [sent-19, score-0.108]
14 I could imagine Stand Your Ground decreasing homicide in some sort of deterrence effect, but that would seem to me to be a bit of a bank-shot of an effect, hoping that legalizing some acts of violence would decrease others. [sent-20, score-0.581]
15 To put it another way, even if Stand Your Ground laws really did increase homicides, I could imagine people still supporting the laws on the grounds that some of these homicides were justifiable. [sent-22, score-1.772]
16 I suppose that would be the next stage of research but it would take a lot more effort as it would have to investigate the story of each homicide. [sent-23, score-0.2]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('laws', 0.596), ('homicides', 0.347), ('ground', 0.329), ('stand', 0.267), ('mcclellan', 0.162), ('tekin', 0.162), ('homicide', 0.128), ('increase', 0.127), ('violence', 0.108), ('additional', 0.105), ('chandler', 0.074), ('legalizing', 0.074), ('white', 0.072), ('month', 0.071), ('impact', 0.07), ('ups', 0.069), ('enacted', 0.069), ('eighteen', 0.066), ('downs', 0.066), ('associated', 0.066), ('debating', 0.064), ('specifications', 0.064), ('vital', 0.061), ('exploiting', 0.061), ('acts', 0.059), ('states', 0.058), ('imagine', 0.058), ('doubts', 0.058), ('surrounding', 0.057), ('adoption', 0.057), ('males', 0.057), ('controversies', 0.056), ('retreat', 0.056), ('decreasing', 0.056), ('investigation', 0.055), ('extending', 0.053), ('investigate', 0.053), ('killed', 0.052), ('nation', 0.052), ('definitive', 0.051), ('curves', 0.051), ('duty', 0.051), ('among', 0.051), ('captured', 0.05), ('right', 0.05), ('would', 0.049), ('safety', 0.049), ('driven', 0.049), ('grounds', 0.048), ('monthly', 0.048)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0000001 1397 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-27-Stand Your Ground laws and homicides
Introduction: Jeff points me to a paper by Chandler McClellan and Erdal Tekin which begins as follows: The controversies surrounding Stand Your Ground laws have recently captured the nation’s attention. Since 2005, eighteen states have passed laws extending the right to self-defense with no duty to retreat to any place a person has a legal right to be, and several additional states are debating the adoption of similar legislation. Despite the implications that these laws may have for public safety, there has been little empirical investigation of their impact on crime and victimization. In this paper, we use monthly data from the U.S. Vital Statistics to examine how Stand Your Ground laws affect homicides. We identify the impact of these laws by exploiting variation in the effective date of these laws across states. Our results indicate that Stand Your Ground laws are associated with a significant increase in the number of homicides among whites, especially white males. According to our estimat
2 0.18009758 1085 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-27-Laws as expressive
Introduction: June Carbone points out sometimes people want laws to express a sentiment. This isn’t just about Congress passing National Smoked Meats Week or San Francisco establishing itself as a nuclear-free zone, it also includes things such as laws against gay marriage, where, as Carbone writes, “we ‘care too much,’ when in fact we can do so little.” I don’t have anything to add here, and I expect many of you are familiar with this idea, but it’s new to me. I’d always been puzzled by people who want to use the law to express a sentiment, but perhaps it makes sense to be open-minded and to consider this as one of the purposes of the legislative process.
3 0.091191038 716 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-17-Is the internet causing half the rapes in Norway? I wanna see the scatterplot.
Introduction: Ryan King writes: This involves causal inference, hierarchical setup, small effect sizes (in absolute terms), and will doubtless be heavily reported in the media. The article is by Manudeep Bhuller, Tarjei Havnes, Edwin Leuven, and Magne Mogstad and begins as follows: Does internet use trigger sex crime? We use unique Norwegian data on crime and internet adoption to shed light on this question. A public program with limited funding rolled out broadband access points in 2000-2008, and provides plausibly exogenous variation in internet use. Our instrumental variables and fixed effect estimates show that internet use is associated with a substantial increase in reported incidences of rape and other sex crimes. We present a theoretical framework that highlights three mechanisms for how internet use may affect reported sex crime, namely a reporting effect, a matching effect on potential offenders and victims, and a direct effect on crime propensity. Our results indicate that the
4 0.090843894 962 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-17-Death!
Introduction: This graph shows the estimate that Kenny Shirley and I have of support for the death penalty by sex and race in the U.S. since 1955: We also found that capital punishment used to be more popular in the Northeast than in the South, but now it’s the other way around. Here’s the abstract to our paper : One of the longest running questions that has been regularly included in Gallup’s national public opinion poll is “Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder?” Because the death penalty is governed by state laws rather than federal laws, it is of special interest to know how public opinion varies by state, and how it has changed over time within each state. In this paper we combine dozens of national polls taken over a fifty-year span and fit a Bayesian multilevel logistic regression model to individual response data to estimate changes in state-level public opinion over time. Such a long span of polls has not been analyzed this way before, partly
5 0.088631526 994 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-06-Josh Tenenbaum presents . . . a model of folk physics!
Introduction: Josh Tenenbaum describes some new work modeling people’s physical reasoning as probabilistic inferences over intuitive theories of mechanics. A general-purpose capacity for “physical intelligence”—inferring physical properties of objects and predicting future states in complex dynamical scenes—is central to how humans interpret their environment and plan safe and effective actions. The computations and representations underlying physical intelligence remain unclear, however. Cognitive studies have focused on mapping out judgment biases and errors, or on testing simple heuristic models suitable only for highly specific cases; they have not attempted to give general-purpose unifying models. In computer science, artificial intelligence and robotics researchers have long sought to formalize common-sense physical reasoning but without success in approaching human-level competence. Here we show that a wide range of human physical judgments can be explained by positing an “intuitive me
6 0.088318646 145 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-13-Statistical controversy regarding human rights violations in Colomnbia
7 0.087042116 877 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-29-Applying quantum probability to political science
8 0.083156288 1097 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-03-Libertarians in Space
9 0.079015717 711 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-14-Steven Rhoads’s book, “The Economist’s View of the World”
10 0.072274841 661 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-14-NYC 1950
11 0.07215187 11 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-29-Auto-Gladwell, or Can fractals be used to predict human history?
12 0.069444537 2072 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-21-The future (and past) of statistical sciences
13 0.068873942 786 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-04-Questions about quantum computing
14 0.062790819 1417 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-15-Some decision analysis problems are pretty easy, no?
15 0.060770538 1079 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-23-Surveys show Americans are populist class warriors, except when they aren’t
16 0.059510998 2255 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-19-How Americans vote
17 0.057855152 2158 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-03-Booze: Been There. Done That.
19 0.057031892 1955 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-25-Bayes-respecting experimental design and other things
20 0.056807246 936 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-02-Covariate Adjustment in RCT - Model Overfitting in Multilevel Regression
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.106), (1, -0.031), (2, 0.044), (3, -0.031), (4, -0.004), (5, -0.019), (6, -0.005), (7, 0.0), (8, 0.0), (9, 0.009), (10, -0.023), (11, -0.009), (12, -0.004), (13, 0.009), (14, 0.023), (15, 0.012), (16, 0.022), (17, 0.0), (18, -0.006), (19, -0.001), (20, -0.01), (21, 0.011), (22, -0.029), (23, 0.006), (24, -0.009), (25, 0.005), (26, -0.017), (27, 0.013), (28, 0.013), (29, 0.011), (30, 0.002), (31, -0.018), (32, 0.005), (33, -0.005), (34, -0.013), (35, -0.017), (36, -0.008), (37, -0.0), (38, 0.026), (39, -0.027), (40, -0.006), (41, -0.023), (42, -0.047), (43, -0.005), (44, 0.001), (45, 0.008), (46, 0.008), (47, 0.002), (48, -0.002), (49, 0.016)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.93965876 1397 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-27-Stand Your Ground laws and homicides
Introduction: Jeff points me to a paper by Chandler McClellan and Erdal Tekin which begins as follows: The controversies surrounding Stand Your Ground laws have recently captured the nation’s attention. Since 2005, eighteen states have passed laws extending the right to self-defense with no duty to retreat to any place a person has a legal right to be, and several additional states are debating the adoption of similar legislation. Despite the implications that these laws may have for public safety, there has been little empirical investigation of their impact on crime and victimization. In this paper, we use monthly data from the U.S. Vital Statistics to examine how Stand Your Ground laws affect homicides. We identify the impact of these laws by exploiting variation in the effective date of these laws across states. Our results indicate that Stand Your Ground laws are associated with a significant increase in the number of homicides among whites, especially white males. According to our estimat
2 0.79672152 67 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-03-More on that Dartmouth health care study
Introduction: Hank Aaron at the Brookings Institution, who knows a lot more about policy than I do, had some interesting comments on the recent New York Times article about problems with the Dartmouth health care atlas. which I discussed a few hours ago . Aaron writes that much of the criticism in that newspaper article was off-base, but that there are real difficulties in translating the Dartmouth results (finding little relation between spending and quality of care) to cost savings in the real world. Aaron writes: The Dartmouth research, showing huge variation in the use of various medical procedures and large variations in per patient spending under Medicare, has been a revelation and a useful one. There is no way to explain such variation on medical grounds and it is problematic. But readers, including my former colleague Orszag, have taken an oversimplistic view of what the numbers mean and what to do about them. There are three really big problems with the common interpreta
3 0.77807117 179 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-03-An Olympic size swimming pool full of lithium water
Introduction: As part of his continuing plan to sap etc etc., Aleks pointed me to an article by Max Miller reporting on a recommendation from Jacob Appel: Adding trace amounts of lithium to the drinking water could limit suicides. . . . Communities with higher than average amounts of lithium in their drinking water had significantly lower suicide rates than communities with lower levels. Regions of Texas with lower lithium concentrations had an average suicide rate of 14.2 per 100,000 people, whereas those areas with naturally higher lithium levels had a dramatically lower suicide rate of 8.7 per 100,000. The highest levels in Texas (150 micrograms of lithium per liter of water) are only a thousandth of the minimum pharmaceutical dose, and have no known deleterious effects. I don’t know anything about this and am offering no judgment on it; I’m just passing it on. The research studies are here and here . I am skeptical, though, about this part of the argument: We are not talking a
4 0.75736743 284 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-18-Continuing efforts to justify false “death panels” claim
Introduction: Brendan Nyhan gives the story . Here’s Sarah Palin’s statement introducing the now-notorious phrase: The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their “level of productivity in society,” whether they are worthy of health care. And now Brendan: Palin’s language suggests that a “death panel” would determine whether individual patients receive care based on their “level of productivity in society.” This was — and remains — false. Denying coverage at a system level for specific treatments or drugs is not equivalent to “decid[ing], based on a subjective judgment of their ‘level of productivity in society.’” Seems like an open-and-shut case to me. The “bureaucrats” (I think Palin is referring to “government employees”) are making decisions based on studies of the drug’s effectiveness: An FDA advisory committee
Introduction: Alexander at GiveWell writes : The Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries (DCP2), a major report funded by the Gates Foundation . . . provides an estimate of $3.41 per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) for the cost-effectiveness of soil-transmitted-helminth (STH) treatment, implying that STH treatment is one of the most cost-effective interventions for global health. In investigating this figure, we have corresponded, over a period of months, with six scholars who had been directly or indirectly involved in the production of the estimate. Eventually, we were able to obtain the spreadsheet that was used to generate the $3.41/DALY estimate. That spreadsheet contains five separate errors that, when corrected, shift the estimated cost effectiveness of deworming from $3.41 to $326.43. [I think they mean to say $300 -- ed.] We came to this conclusion a year after learning that the DCP2’s published cost-effectiveness estimate for schistosomiasis treatment – another kind of
6 0.74959517 12 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-30-More on problems with surveys estimating deaths in war zones
7 0.74296641 743 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-03-An argument that can’t possibly make sense
8 0.74289638 845 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-08-How adoption speed affects the abandonment of cultural tastes
11 0.7381168 1910 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-22-Struggles over the criticism of the “cannabis users and IQ change” paper
12 0.73628449 549 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-01-“Roughly 90% of the increase in . . .” Hey, wait a minute!
14 0.73555207 988 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-02-Roads, traffic, and the importance in decision analysis of carefully examining your goals
15 0.73397219 177 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-02-Reintegrating rebels into civilian life: Quasi-experimental evidence from Burundi
17 0.73017365 646 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-04-Graphical insights into the safety of cycling.
18 0.72935265 629 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-26-Is it plausible that 1% of people pick a career based on their first name?
19 0.72840923 1558 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-02-Not so fast on levees and seawalls for NY harbor?
20 0.72784942 149 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-16-Demographics: what variable best predicts a financial crisis?
topicId topicWeight
[(9, 0.011), (15, 0.012), (16, 0.063), (21, 0.012), (24, 0.113), (36, 0.012), (55, 0.012), (81, 0.014), (86, 0.041), (89, 0.019), (93, 0.275), (95, 0.014), (99, 0.219)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.91446853 1397 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-27-Stand Your Ground laws and homicides
Introduction: Jeff points me to a paper by Chandler McClellan and Erdal Tekin which begins as follows: The controversies surrounding Stand Your Ground laws have recently captured the nation’s attention. Since 2005, eighteen states have passed laws extending the right to self-defense with no duty to retreat to any place a person has a legal right to be, and several additional states are debating the adoption of similar legislation. Despite the implications that these laws may have for public safety, there has been little empirical investigation of their impact on crime and victimization. In this paper, we use monthly data from the U.S. Vital Statistics to examine how Stand Your Ground laws affect homicides. We identify the impact of these laws by exploiting variation in the effective date of these laws across states. Our results indicate that Stand Your Ground laws are associated with a significant increase in the number of homicides among whites, especially white males. According to our estimat
2 0.91154671 1569 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-08-30-30-40 Nation
Introduction: Barack Obama’s win has a potentially huge effect on policy. The current budget negotiations will affect the level and direction of government spending and on the mix of taxes paid by different groups of Americans. We can guess that a President Romney would have fought hard against upper-income tax increases. Other areas of long-term impact include the government’s stance on global warming, foreign policy, and the likelihood that Obama will nominate new Supreme Court justices who will uphold the right to abortion announced in Roe v. Wade. When it comes to public opinion, the story is different. The Democrats may well benefit in 2014 and 2016 from the anticipated slow but steady recovery of the economy over the next few years—but, as of November 6, 2012, the parties are essentially tied, with Barack Obama receiving 51% of the two-party vote, compared to Mitt Romney’s 49%, a split comparable to Al Gore’s narrow victory in 2000, Richard Nixon’s in 1968, and John Kennedy’s in 1960.
3 0.90033591 1210 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-12-Plagiarists are in the habit of lying
Introduction: Amy Hundley writes in the New Yorker about a notorious recent case of unacknowledged literary quilting : I [Hundley] was the editor at Grove/Atlantic to whom Quentin Rowan’s novel “Appearance and the Park” was submitted (“The Plagiarist’s Tale,” by Lizzie Widdicombe, February 13th & 20th). Widdicombe writes that the editor in question thought that “its plot was too close to that of another of the house’s books, ‘My Idea of Fun,’ by Will Self,” and I can only assume that this explanation came from Rowan. In fact, Rowan had lifted a passage nearly verbatim from Will Self’s novella “The Sweet Smell of Psychosis.” It was an especially delicious one, in which Self describes the media denizens of a particular bar. I recognized it immediately and informed his agent that he’d plagiarized it. Writing a plot similar to a successful novelist’s—something that can arise innocently—is very different from plagiarizing. Appropriating and remixing someone else’s work while acknowledging sources is
4 0.8823781 1281 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-25-Dyson’s baffling love of crackpots
Introduction: Peter Woit reports on the sympathy that well-known physicist Freeman Dyson has with crackpot theorists. The interesting part is that Dyson has positive feelings for these cranks, even while believing that their theories are completely wrong : In my [Dyson's] career as a scientist, I twice had the good fortune to be a personal friend of a famous dissident. One dissident, Sir Arthur Eddington, was an insider like Thomson and Tait. The other, Immanuel Velikovsky, was an outsider like Carter. Both of them were tragic figures, intellectually brilliant and morally courageous, with the same fatal flaw as Carter. Both of them were possessed by fantasies that people with ordinary common sense could recognize as nonsense. I made it clear to both that I did not believe their fantasies, but I admired them as human beings and as imaginative artists. I admired them most of all for their stubborn refusal to remain silent. With the whole world against them, they remained true to their beliefs.
5 0.88135064 1432 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-27-“Get off my lawn”-blogging
Introduction: Jay Livingston critiques the recent pronouncements of sociologist and cigarette shill Peter Berger, who recently has moved into cultural criticism of New York’s mayor for living with “a woman to whom he is not married” (this is apparently a European sort of thing, I guess they don’t have unmarried partners in the parts of the U.S. where Berger hangs out). But what impresses me is that Berger is doing regular blogging at the age of 84 , writing a long essay each week. That’s really amazing to me. Some of the blogging is a bit suspect, for example the bit where he claims that he personally could convert gays to heterosexual orientation (“A few stubborn individuals may resist the Berger conversion program. The majority will succumb”)—but, really, you gotta admire that he’s doing this. I hope I’m that active when (if) I reach my mid-80s. (As a nonsmoker, I should have a pretty good chance of reaching that point.) P.S. More rant at the sister blog. P.P.S. In comments,
6 0.87689006 1123 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-17-Big corporations are more popular than you might realize
8 0.86740023 1503 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-19-“Poor Smokers in New York State Spend 25% of Income on Cigarettes, Study Finds”
9 0.86349714 683 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-28-Asymmetry in Political Bias
10 0.84684354 1116 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-13-Infographic on the economy
11 0.83332688 1711 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-07-How Open Should Academic Papers Be?
12 0.80414581 1959 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-28-50 shades of gray: A research story
14 0.79321074 1693 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-25-Subsidized driving
15 0.73753434 585 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-22-“How has your thinking changed over the past three years?”
16 0.73490679 1328 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-18-Question 8 of my final exam for Design and Analysis of Sample Surveys
17 0.73336643 1182 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-24-Untangling the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox
19 0.71960837 1075 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-20-This guy has a regular column at Reuters
20 0.71882111 897 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-09-The difference between significant and not significant…