andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2011 andrew_gelman_stats-2011-955 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Karl Broman writes : Barry Rowlingson gave an interesting talk at UseR 2011, “Why R-help must die!” He suggested the Q-and-A type sites Stack Overflow (on programming) and Cross Validated (on statistics), both part of Stack Exchange. I haven’t used R-help recently but I do occasionally send people there. Just to see what was going on there, I clicked on over , did a little searching, and found this delight from a renowned professor of R. There’s something about the “please” there that just makes it all that much more special. (In contrast, the advice here to “please do your homework” just seems rude. I have a larger (or maybe smaller) point to make, though, which is about the silliness of advice to “read the damn manual” etc. Several years ago I read a fascinating book called City by William Whyte. He and his students had gone around various public places in NYC and observed how people actually behaved—how they walked, sit, stood, and interacted. One of Whyte’s ce
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 ” He suggested the Q-and-A type sites Stack Overflow (on programming) and Cross Validated (on statistics), both part of Stack Exchange. [sent-2, score-0.187]
2 I haven’t used R-help recently but I do occasionally send people there. [sent-3, score-0.149]
3 Just to see what was going on there, I clicked on over , did a little searching, and found this delight from a renowned professor of R. [sent-4, score-0.485]
4 (In contrast, the advice here to “please do your homework” just seems rude. [sent-6, score-0.139]
5 I have a larger (or maybe smaller) point to make, though, which is about the silliness of advice to “read the damn manual” etc. [sent-7, score-0.31]
6 Several years ago I read a fascinating book called City by William Whyte. [sent-8, score-0.141]
7 He and his students had gone around various public places in NYC and observed how people actually behaved—how they walked, sit, stood, and interacted. [sent-9, score-0.221]
8 One of Whyte’s central themes was that it does not make sense to design things as you want them to be used; rather, you have to design them so they work well as they actually are used. [sent-10, score-0.178]
9 One of his examples was where people stand on the sidewalk. [sent-11, score-0.262]
10 Whyte and his students noticed that people would often stop for brief conversations at the busiest spot on the sidewalk, a few feet from the corner at an intersection. [sent-12, score-0.764]
11 The inclination of many planners would be to somehow make it difficult to stop and stand there, maybe put bumps in the sidewalk or have some annoying beeping or a sign telling people to move along. [sent-13, score-1.083]
12 Whyte suggested that, instead, city planners should increase the area of the sidewalk at these popular spaces, for example by having them take over some of the street at the corner. [sent-14, score-0.751]
13 Then you allow people to walk on by, in the context of existing patterns of where people like to stand. [sent-15, score-0.369]
14 The sad truth is, very few people read the help page . [sent-17, score-0.442]
15 Most of us would rather read People magazine, or the New York Times, or even Gawker. [sent-19, score-0.141]
16 To chew people out for not reading the documentation is to fight the tide. [sent-20, score-0.325]
17 Just to be clear: I think the renowned professor is doing a useful service to the community in responding to the R-help list. [sent-23, score-0.37]
18 And, given that he’s doing it for free, he should feel free to answer in whatever tone he’d like. [sent-24, score-0.232]
19 I am not objecting to his tone, merely expressing my amusement. [sent-25, score-0.17]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('whyte', 0.359), ('sidewalk', 0.308), ('planners', 0.218), ('renowned', 0.206), ('stack', 0.19), ('manual', 0.168), ('tone', 0.152), ('people', 0.149), ('read', 0.141), ('advice', 0.139), ('city', 0.116), ('stand', 0.113), ('suggested', 0.109), ('behaved', 0.109), ('bumps', 0.109), ('busiest', 0.109), ('delight', 0.109), ('overflow', 0.109), ('stop', 0.106), ('broman', 0.103), ('silliness', 0.098), ('objecting', 0.098), ('professor', 0.093), ('validated', 0.092), ('chew', 0.092), ('barry', 0.09), ('please', 0.089), ('design', 0.089), ('walked', 0.088), ('feet', 0.086), ('spaces', 0.086), ('documentation', 0.084), ('stood', 0.084), ('corner', 0.083), ('conversations', 0.081), ('page', 0.081), ('inclination', 0.08), ('free', 0.08), ('sites', 0.078), ('spot', 0.078), ('karl', 0.077), ('homework', 0.077), ('clicked', 0.077), ('cross', 0.074), ('damn', 0.073), ('students', 0.072), ('expressing', 0.072), ('help', 0.071), ('walk', 0.071), ('responding', 0.071)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0000001 955 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-12-Why it doesn’t make sense to chew people out for not reading the help page
Introduction: Karl Broman writes : Barry Rowlingson gave an interesting talk at UseR 2011, “Why R-help must die!” He suggested the Q-and-A type sites Stack Overflow (on programming) and Cross Validated (on statistics), both part of Stack Exchange. I haven’t used R-help recently but I do occasionally send people there. Just to see what was going on there, I clicked on over , did a little searching, and found this delight from a renowned professor of R. There’s something about the “please” there that just makes it all that much more special. (In contrast, the advice here to “please do your homework” just seems rude. I have a larger (or maybe smaller) point to make, though, which is about the silliness of advice to “read the damn manual” etc. Several years ago I read a fascinating book called City by William Whyte. He and his students had gone around various public places in NYC and observed how people actually behaved—how they walked, sit, stood, and interacted. One of Whyte’s ce
2 0.11432601 2287 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-09-Advice: positive-sum, zero-sum, or negative-sum
Introduction: There’s a lot of free advice out there. I offer some of it myself! As I’ve written before (see this post from 2008 reacting to this advice from Dan Goldstein for business school students, and this post from 2010 reacting to some general advice from Nassim Taleb), what we see is typically presented as advice to individuals, but it’s also interesting to consider the possible total effects if the advice is taken. It’s time to play the game again. This time it’s advice from sociologist Fabio Rojas for Ph.D. students. I’ll copy his eight points of advice, then, for each, evaluate whether I think it is positive or negative sum: 1. Show up. Even if you feel horrible, show up. No matter what. Period. Unless someone died in your family, show up. 2. Do your job. Grade the papers. Do the lab work. Unless the work is extreme, take it in stride. 3. Be completely realistic about how you will be evaluated from day #1 – acquire a teaching record and a record of publication. Don’t h
3 0.10600815 278 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-15-Advice that might make sense for individuals but is negative-sum overall
Introduction: There’s a lot of free advice out there. As I wrote a couple years ago, it’s usually presented as advice to individuals, but it’s also interesting to consider the possible total effects if the advice is taken. For example, Nassim Taleb has a webpage that includes a bunch of one-line bits of advice (scroll to item 132 on the linked page). Here’s his final piece of advice: If you dislike someone, leave him alone or eliminate him; don’t attack him verbally. I’m a big Taleb fan (search this blog to see), but this seems like classic negative-sum advice. I can see how it can be a good individual strategy to keep your mouth shut, bide your time, and then sandbag your enemies. But it can’t be good if lots of people are doing this. Verbal attacks are great, as long as there’s a chance to respond. I’ve been in environments where people follow Taleb’s advice, saying nothing and occasionally trying to “eliminate” people, and it’s not pretty. I much prefer for people to be open
4 0.10331365 2255 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-19-How Americans vote
Introduction: An interview with me from 2012 : You’re a statistician and wrote a book, Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State , looking at why Americans vote the way they do. In an election year I think it would be a good time to revisit that question, not just for people in the US, but anyone around the world who wants to understand the realities – rather than the stereotypes – of how Americans vote. I regret the title I gave my book. I was too greedy. I wanted it to be an airport bestseller because I figured there were millions of people who are interested in politics and some subset of them are always looking at the statistics. It’s got a very grabby title and as a result people underestimated the content. They thought it was a popularisation of my work, or, at best, an expansion of an article we’d written. But it had tons of original material. If I’d given it a more serious, political science-y title, then all sorts of people would have wanted to read it, because they would
5 0.088700682 1611 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-07-Feedback on my Bayesian Data Analysis class at Columbia
Introduction: In one of the final Jitts, we asked the students how the course could be improved. Some of their suggestions would work, some would not. I’m putting all the suggestions below, interpolating my responses. (Overall, I think the course went well. Please remember that the remarks below are not course evaluations; they are answers to my specific question of how the course could be better. If we’d had a Jitt asking all the ways the course was good, you’d be seeing lots of positive remarks. But that wouldn’t be particularly useful or interesting.) The best thing about the course is that the kids worked hard each week on their homeworks. OK, here are the comments and my replies: Could have been better if we did less amount but more in detail. I don’t know if this would’ve been possible. I wanted to get to the harder stuff (HMC, VB, nonparametric models) which required a certain amount of preparation. And, even so, there was not time for everything. And also, needs solut
6 0.087012313 2245 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-12-More on publishing in journals
7 0.086474121 1475 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-30-A Stan is Born
8 0.086232632 1517 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-01-“On Inspiring Students and Being Human”
9 0.086025678 1502 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-19-Scalability in education
11 0.079351902 1296 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-03-Google Translate for code, and an R help-list bot
12 0.078947939 1520 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-03-Advice that’s so eminently sensible but so difficult to follow
13 0.077529088 1678 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-17-Wanted: 365 stories of statistics
15 0.075424626 8 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-28-Advice to help the rich get richer
16 0.073353834 1428 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-25-The problem with realistic advice?
17 0.070912547 1649 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-02-Back when 50 miles was a long way
18 0.070115238 2234 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-05-Plagiarism, Arizona style
19 0.069403373 2172 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-14-Advice on writing research articles
20 0.069107279 1994 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-22-“The comment section is open, but I’m not going to read them”
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.162), (1, -0.074), (2, -0.041), (3, 0.036), (4, 0.037), (5, 0.039), (6, 0.046), (7, 0.015), (8, -0.007), (9, -0.035), (10, -0.011), (11, -0.014), (12, 0.014), (13, -0.007), (14, 0.036), (15, 0.006), (16, -0.0), (17, 0.003), (18, 0.01), (19, -0.006), (20, 0.002), (21, -0.003), (22, 0.015), (23, -0.011), (24, -0.007), (25, 0.026), (26, 0.036), (27, 0.009), (28, 0.029), (29, 0.03), (30, -0.055), (31, -0.015), (32, -0.012), (33, -0.006), (34, -0.006), (35, -0.02), (36, 0.029), (37, -0.001), (38, 0.017), (39, -0.027), (40, 0.035), (41, -0.023), (42, -0.0), (43, 0.02), (44, -0.004), (45, -0.004), (46, -0.024), (47, -0.013), (48, 0.02), (49, 0.035)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.95741308 955 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-12-Why it doesn’t make sense to chew people out for not reading the help page
Introduction: Karl Broman writes : Barry Rowlingson gave an interesting talk at UseR 2011, “Why R-help must die!” He suggested the Q-and-A type sites Stack Overflow (on programming) and Cross Validated (on statistics), both part of Stack Exchange. I haven’t used R-help recently but I do occasionally send people there. Just to see what was going on there, I clicked on over , did a little searching, and found this delight from a renowned professor of R. There’s something about the “please” there that just makes it all that much more special. (In contrast, the advice here to “please do your homework” just seems rude. I have a larger (or maybe smaller) point to make, though, which is about the silliness of advice to “read the damn manual” etc. Several years ago I read a fascinating book called City by William Whyte. He and his students had gone around various public places in NYC and observed how people actually behaved—how they walked, sit, stood, and interacted. One of Whyte’s ce
2 0.81590414 4 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-26-Prolefeed
Introduction: From Anthony Burgess’s review of “The Batsford Companion to Popular Literature,” by Victor Neuberg: Arthur J. Burks (1898-1974) was no gentleman. During the 1930s, when he would sometimes have nearly two million words in current publication, he aimed at producing 18,000 words a day. Editors would call me up and ask me to do a novelette by the next afternoon, and I would, but it nearly killed me. . . . I once appeared on the covers of eleven magazines the same month, and then almost killed myself for years trying to make it twelve. I never did. [Masanao: I think you know where I'm heading with that story.] Ursula Bloom, born 1985 and still with us [this was written sometime between 1978 and 1985], is clearly no lady. Writing also under the pseudonyms of Lozania Prole (there’s an honest name for you), Sheila Burnes and Mary Essex, she has produced 486 boooks, beginning with Tiger at the age of seven. . . . Was Richard Horatio Edgar Wallace (1875-1932) a gentleman? .
3 0.80724823 392 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-03-Taleb + 3.5 years
Introduction: I recently had the occasion to reread my review of The Black Swan, from April 2007. It was fun reading my review (and also this pre-review ; “nothing useful escapes from a blackbody,” indeed). It was like a greatest hits of all my pet ideas that I’ve never published. Looking back, I realize that Taleb really was right about a lot of things. Now that the financial crisis has happened, we tend to forget that the experts who Taleb bashes were not always reasonable at all. Here’s what I wrote in my review, three and a half years ago: On page 19, Taleb refers to the usual investment strategy (which I suppose I actually use myself) as “picking pennies in front of a steamroller.” That’s a cute phrase; did he come up with it? I’m also reminded of the famous Martingale betting system. Several years ago in a university library I came across a charming book by Maxim (of gun fame) where he went through chapter after chapter demolishing the Martingale system. (For those who don’t kno
4 0.79509336 285 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-18-Fiction is not for tirades? Tell that to Saul Bellow!
Introduction: Tyler Cowen links approvingly to this review by B. R. Myers of a book that I haven’t read. Unlike Cowen, I haven’t seen the book in question–so far, I’ve only read the excerpt that appeared in the New Yorker–but I can say that I found Myers’s review very annoying. Myers writes: The same narrator who gives us “sucked” and “very into” also deploys compound adjectives, bursts of journalese, and long if syntactically crude sentences. An idiosyncratic mix? Far from it. We find the same insecure style on The Daily Show and in the blogosphere; we overhear it on the subway. It is the style of all who think highly enough of their own brains to worry about being thought “elitist,” not one of the gang. . . . But if Freedom is middlebrow, it is so in the sacrosanct Don DeLillo tradition, which our critical establishment considers central to literature today. . . . Are we to chuckle at the adult woman for writing this in seriousness, or is she mocking her younger self, the teenage ra
5 0.79395062 1616 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-10-John McAfee is a Heinlein hero
Introduction: “A small group of mathematicians” Jenny Davidson points to this article by Krugman on Asimov’s Foundation Trilogy. Given the silliness of the topic, Krugman’s piece is disappointingly serious (“Maybe the first thing to say about Foundation is that it’s not exactly science fiction – not really. Yes, it’s set in the future, there’s interstellar travel, people shoot each other with blasters instead of pistols and so on. But these are superficial details . . . the story can sound arid and didactic. . . . you’ll also be disappointed if you’re looking for shoot-em-up action scenes, in which Han Solo and Luke Skywalker destroy the Death Star in the nick of time. . . .”). What really jumped out at me from Krugman’s piece, though, was this line: In Foundation, we learn that a small group of mathematicians have developed “psychohistory”, the aforementioned rigorous science of society. Like Davidson (and Krugman), I read the Foundation books as a child. I remember the “psychohisto
6 0.79357177 203 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-12-John McPhee, the Anti-Malcolm
7 0.78931719 1222 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-20-5 books book
8 0.78160703 258 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-05-A review of a review of a review of a decade
9 0.77812302 2297 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-20-Fooled by randomness
10 0.77686024 1641 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-27-The Möbius strip, or, marketing that is impervious to criticism
11 0.77118844 2172 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-14-Advice on writing research articles
12 0.77055848 1436 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-31-A book on presenting numbers from spreadsheets
13 0.77009571 1191 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-01-Hoe noem je?
14 0.76905149 1225 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-22-Procrastination as a positive productivity strategy
15 0.76366675 732 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-26-What Do We Learn from Narrow Randomized Studies?
16 0.7624777 1453 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-10-Quotes from me!
17 0.75768113 2213 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-16-There’s no need for you to read this one
18 0.75712061 886 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-02-The new Helen DeWitt novel
19 0.75580037 1296 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-03-Google Translate for code, and an R help-list bot
20 0.75574774 8 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-28-Advice to help the rich get richer
topicId topicWeight
[(6, 0.016), (13, 0.013), (15, 0.05), (16, 0.077), (21, 0.012), (24, 0.107), (42, 0.011), (43, 0.012), (53, 0.043), (63, 0.024), (84, 0.022), (89, 0.018), (96, 0.015), (98, 0.23), (99, 0.231)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.96239364 26 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-11-Update on religious affiliations of Supreme Court justices
Introduction: When Sonia Sotomayor was nominated for the Supreme Court, and there was some discussion of having 6 Roman Catholics on the court at the same time, I posted the following historical graph: It’s time for an update: It’s still gonna take awhile for the Catholics to catch up. . . . And this one might be relevant too: It looks as if Jews and men have been overrepresented, also Episcopalians (which, as I noted earlier, are not necessarily considered Protestant in terms of religious doctrine but which I counted as such for the ethnic categorization). Religion is an interesting political variable because it’s nominally about religious belief but typically seems to be more about ethnicity.
2 0.94477308 420 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-18-Prison terms for financial fraud?
Introduction: My econ dept colleague Joseph Stiglitz suggests that financial fraudsters be sent to prison. He points out that the usual penalty–million-dollar fines–just isn’t enough for crimes whose rewards can be in the hundreds of millions of dollars. That all makes sense, but why do the options have to be: 1. No punishment 2. A fine with little punishment or deterrent value 3. Prison. What’s the point of putting nonviolent criminals in prison? As I’ve said before , I’d prefer if the government just took all these convicted thieves’ assets along with 95% of their salary for several years, made them do community service (sorting bottles and cans at the local dump, perhaps; a financier should be good at this sort of thing, no?), etc. If restriction of personal freedom is judged be part of the sentence, they could be given some sort of electronic tag that would send a message to the police if you are ever more than 3 miles from your home. And a curfew so you have to stay home bet
3 0.94221056 1239 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-01-A randomized trial of the set-point diet
Introduction: Someone pointed me to this forthcoming article in the journal Nutrition by J. F. Lee et al. It looks pretty cool. I’m glad that someone went to the effort of performing this careful study. Regular readers will know that I’ve been waiting for this one for awhile. In case you can’t read the article through the paywall, here’s the abstract: Background: Under a widely-accepted theory of caloric balance, any individual has a set-point weight and will find it uncomfortable and typically unsustainable to keep his or her weight below that point. Set-points have evidently been increasing over the past few decades in the United States and other countries, leading to a public-health crisis of obesity. In an n=1 study, Roberts (2004, 2006) proposed an intervention to lower the set-point via daily consumption of unflavored sugar water or vegetable oil. Objective: To evaluate weight-loss outcomes under the diet proposed by Roberts (2004, 2006). Design: Randomized clinica
4 0.93011385 1853 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-12-OpenData Latinoamerica
Introduction: Miguel Paz writes : Poderomedia Foundation and PinLatam are launching OpenDataLatinoamerica.org, a regional data repository to free data and use it on Hackathons and other activities by HacksHackers chapters and other organizations. We are doing this because the road to the future of news has been littered with lost datasets. A day or so after every hackathon and meeting where a group has come together to analyze, compare and understand a particular set of data, someone tries to remember where the successful files were stored. Too often, no one is certain. Therefore with Mariano Blejman we realized that we need a central repository where you can share the data that you have proved to be reliable: OpenData Latinoamerica, which we are leading as ICFJ Knight International Journalism Fellows. If you work in Latin America or Central America your organization can take part in OpenDataLatinoamerica.org. To apply, go to the website and answer a simple form agreeing to meet the standard
5 0.92521274 196 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-10-The U.S. as welfare state
Introduction: My Columbia colleague Irv Garfinkel recently came out with a book (with coauthors Lee Rainwater and Timothy Smeeding), “Mythbusters: The U.S. Social Welfare State,” where they argue: The United States is a capitalist nation that has eschewed Scandinavian-style socialist policies in favor of capitalism and economic growth, right? Wrong. The U.S. is not only one of the largest welfare states in the world, but it is strong economically precisely because of its adoption of some socialist policies–with public education as the primary driver. The American welfare state faces large challenges. Restoring its historical lead in education is the most important but requires investing large sums in education–beginning with universal pre-school–and in complementary programs–including selected cash benefits for families with children–that aid children’s development. The American health insurance system is by far the most costly in the rich world, yet fails to insure one sixth of its population
6 0.92034328 96 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-18-Course proposal: Bayesian and advanced likelihood statistical methods for zombies.
7 0.91853821 1249 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-06-Thinking seriously about social science research
8 0.91281313 376 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-28-My talk at American University
10 0.90333259 1399 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-28-Life imitates blog
11 0.89650899 1867 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-22-To Throw Away Data: Plagiarism as a Statistical Crime
12 0.88969892 742 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-02-Grouponomics, counterfactuals, and opportunity cost
13 0.88467675 208 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-15-When Does a Name Become Androgynous?
14 0.88288331 425 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-21-If your comment didn’t get through . . .
same-blog 15 0.87910157 955 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-12-Why it doesn’t make sense to chew people out for not reading the help page
16 0.87847841 132 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-07-Note to “Cigarettes”
17 0.85566497 1806 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-16-My talk in Chicago this Thurs 6:30pm
18 0.85343051 1701 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-31-The name that fell off a cliff
19 0.84429276 710 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-14-Missed Friday the 13th Zombie Plot Update
20 0.84274513 1556 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-01-Recently in the sister blogs: special pre-election edition!