andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2010 andrew_gelman_stats-2010-4 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: From Anthony Burgess’s review of “The Batsford Companion to Popular Literature,” by Victor Neuberg: Arthur J. Burks (1898-1974) was no gentleman. During the 1930s, when he would sometimes have nearly two million words in current publication, he aimed at producing 18,000 words a day. Editors would call me up and ask me to do a novelette by the next afternoon, and I would, but it nearly killed me. . . . I once appeared on the covers of eleven magazines the same month, and then almost killed myself for years trying to make it twelve. I never did. [Masanao: I think you know where I'm heading with that story.] Ursula Bloom, born 1985 and still with us [this was written sometime between 1978 and 1985], is clearly no lady. Writing also under the pseudonyms of Lozania Prole (there’s an honest name for you), Sheila Burnes and Mary Essex, she has produced 486 boooks, beginning with Tiger at the age of seven. . . . Was Richard Horatio Edgar Wallace (1875-1932) a gentleman? .
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 During the 1930s, when he would sometimes have nearly two million words in current publication, he aimed at producing 18,000 words a day. [sent-3, score-0.627]
2 Editors would call me up and ask me to do a novelette by the next afternoon, and I would, but it nearly killed me. [sent-4, score-0.318]
3 I once appeared on the covers of eleven magazines the same month, and then almost killed myself for years trying to make it twelve. [sent-8, score-0.526]
4 [Masanao: I think you know where I'm heading with that story. [sent-10, score-0.095]
5 ] Ursula Bloom, born 1985 and still with us [this was written sometime between 1978 and 1985], is clearly no lady. [sent-11, score-0.182]
6 Writing also under the pseudonyms of Lozania Prole (there’s an honest name for you), Sheila Burnes and Mary Essex, she has produced 486 boooks, beginning with Tiger at the age of seven. [sent-12, score-0.238]
7 In the 1920s and 1930s, Mr Neuburg tells us, one in four of all books was the work of Wallace. [sent-21, score-0.071]
8 I guess I'll have to track down his book and find out. [sent-23, score-0.145]
9 ] Everybody, especially the now unreadable Sir Hugh Walpole, looked down on this perpetually dressing-gowned king of the churners, who gave the public what it wanted. [sent-24, score-0.461]
10 Burgess continues: What the public wanted, and still wants, is an unflowery style woven out of cliches, convincing dialogue, loads of action. [sent-25, score-0.48]
11 I’ll have more to say at some point about the popular literature of the past, but for now let me just note the commonplace that once-bestselling melodramas often seem unreadable to present-day audiences. [sent-28, score-0.566]
12 I’m guessing that it has something to do with the cliches not working any more and the dialogue no longer being convincing. [sent-29, score-0.669]
13 I’m sure there will even be a day when Eddie Coyle’s words no longer sound natural. [sent-30, score-0.285]
14 (Not that that book was ever extremely easy to read, nor was it a major bestseller. [sent-31, score-0.071]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('neuburg', 0.3), ('cliches', 0.257), ('burgess', 0.246), ('unreadable', 0.246), ('dialogue', 0.211), ('killed', 0.193), ('words', 0.157), ('edgar', 0.137), ('woven', 0.137), ('public', 0.132), ('eddie', 0.129), ('eleven', 0.129), ('hugh', 0.129), ('loads', 0.129), ('longer', 0.128), ('nearly', 0.125), ('companion', 0.123), ('gentleman', 0.123), ('mr', 0.123), ('bloom', 0.119), ('sir', 0.115), ('popular', 0.114), ('arthur', 0.11), ('tiger', 0.11), ('magazines', 0.108), ('commonplace', 0.105), ('masanao', 0.105), ('wallace', 0.105), ('literature', 0.101), ('mary', 0.1), ('afternoon', 0.099), ('aimed', 0.096), ('covers', 0.096), ('sometime', 0.096), ('anthony', 0.095), ('heading', 0.095), ('producing', 0.092), ('born', 0.086), ('honest', 0.084), ('king', 0.083), ('convincing', 0.082), ('produced', 0.079), ('emphasis', 0.076), ('beginning', 0.075), ('editors', 0.075), ('track', 0.074), ('guessing', 0.073), ('richard', 0.073), ('book', 0.071), ('tells', 0.071)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0000001 4 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-26-Prolefeed
Introduction: From Anthony Burgess’s review of “The Batsford Companion to Popular Literature,” by Victor Neuberg: Arthur J. Burks (1898-1974) was no gentleman. During the 1930s, when he would sometimes have nearly two million words in current publication, he aimed at producing 18,000 words a day. Editors would call me up and ask me to do a novelette by the next afternoon, and I would, but it nearly killed me. . . . I once appeared on the covers of eleven magazines the same month, and then almost killed myself for years trying to make it twelve. I never did. [Masanao: I think you know where I'm heading with that story.] Ursula Bloom, born 1985 and still with us [this was written sometime between 1978 and 1985], is clearly no lady. Writing also under the pseudonyms of Lozania Prole (there’s an honest name for you), Sheila Burnes and Mary Essex, she has produced 486 boooks, beginning with Tiger at the age of seven. . . . Was Richard Horatio Edgar Wallace (1875-1932) a gentleman? .
2 0.13528399 16 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-04-Burgess on Kipling
Introduction: This is my last entry derived from Anthony Burgess’s book reviews , and it’ll be short. His review of Angus Wilson’s “The Strange Ride of Rudyard Kipling: His Life and Works” is a wonderfully balanced little thing. Nothing incredibly deep–like most items in the collection, the review is only two pages long–but I give it credit for being a rare piece of Kipling criticism I’ve seen that (a) seriously engages with the politics, without (b) congratulating itself on bravely going against the fashions of the politically incorrect chattering classes by celebrating Kipling’s magnificent achievement blah blah blah. Instead, Burgess shows respect for Kipling’s work and puts it in historical, biographical, and literary context. Burgess concludes that Wilson’s book “reminds us, in John Gross’s words, that Kipling ‘remains a haunting, unsettling presence, with whom we still have to come to terms.’ Still.” Well put, and generous of Burgess to end his review with another’s quote. Other cri
3 0.11378924 17 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-05-Taking philosophical arguments literally
Introduction: Aaron Swartz writes the following, as a lead-in to an argument in favor of vegetarianism: Imagine you were an early settler of what is now the United States. It seems likely you would have killed native Americans. After all, your parents killed them, your siblings killed them, your friends killed them, the leaders of the community killed them, the President killed them. Chances are, you would have killed them too . . . Or if you see nothing wrong with killing native Americans, take the example of slavery. Again, everyone had slaves and probably didn’t think too much about the morality of it. . . . Are these statements true, though? It’s hard for me to believe that most early settlers (from the context, it looks like Swartz is discussing the 1500s-1700s here) killed native Americans. That is, if N is the number of early settlers, and Y is the number of these settlers who killed at least one Indian, I suspect Y/N is much closer to 0 than to 1. Similarly, it’s not even cl
4 0.1074681 34 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-14-Non-academic writings on literature
Introduction: Jenny writes : The Possessed made me [Jenny] think about an interesting workshop-style class I’d like to teach, which would be an undergraduate seminar for students who wanted to find out non-academic ways of writing seriously about literature. The syllabus would include some essays from this book, Geoff Dyer’s Out of Sheer Rage, Jonathan Coe’s Like a Fiery Elephant – and what else? I agree with the commenters that this would be a great class, but . . . I’m confused on the premise. Isn’t there just a huge, huge amount of excellent serious non-academic writing about literature? George Orwell, Mark Twain, Bernard Shaw, T. S. Eliot (if you like that sort of thing), Anthony Burgess , Mary McCarthy (I think you’d call her nonacademic even though she taught the occasional college course), G. K. Chesterton , etc etc etc? Teaching a course about academic ways of writing seriously about literature would seem much tougher to me.
5 0.10388393 2168 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-12-Things that I like that almost nobody else is interested in
Introduction: This post by Jordan Ellenberg (“Stoner represents a certain strain in the mid-century American novel that I really like, and which I don’t think exists in contemporary fiction. Anguish, verbal restraint, weirdness”) reminds me that what I really like is mid-to-late-twentieth-century literary criticism . I read a great book from the 50s, I think it was, by Anthony West (son of Rebecca West and H. G. Wells), who reviewed books for the New Yorker. It was great, and it made me wish that other collections of his reviews had been published (they hadn’t). I’d also love to read collections of Alfred Kazin ‘s reviews (there are some collections, but he published many many others that have never been reprinted) and others of that vintage. I’m pretty sure these hypothetical books wouldn’t sell many copies, though. (I feel lucky, though, that at one point a publisher released a pretty fat collection of Anthony Burgess ‘s book reviews.) It’s actually scary to think that many many more peopl
6 0.096887767 723 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-21-Literary blurb translation guide
7 0.078588694 1925 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-04-“Versatile, affordable chicken has grown in popularity”
8 0.077136077 77 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-09-Sof[t]
9 0.075400032 2255 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-19-How Americans vote
10 0.075192094 655 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-10-“Versatile, affordable chicken has grown in popularity”
11 0.074308217 499 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-03-5 books
12 0.069443651 308 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-30-Nano-project qualifying exam process: An intensified dialogue between students and faculty
14 0.066314459 1655 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-05-The statistics software signal
15 0.063796729 2172 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-14-Advice on writing research articles
16 0.063577011 620 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-19-Online James?
17 0.062110845 1191 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-01-Hoe noem je?
18 0.061405472 206 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-13-Indiemapper makes thematic mapping easy
19 0.06137985 2244 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-11-What if I were to stop publishing in journals?
20 0.060496308 1453 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-10-Quotes from me!
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.118), (1, -0.064), (2, -0.021), (3, 0.023), (4, 0.008), (5, 0.005), (6, 0.048), (7, -0.017), (8, 0.028), (9, -0.006), (10, 0.023), (11, -0.026), (12, 0.027), (13, 0.004), (14, 0.038), (15, -0.024), (16, -0.007), (17, 0.002), (18, 0.049), (19, -0.033), (20, -0.005), (21, 0.009), (22, -0.003), (23, 0.014), (24, 0.004), (25, 0.019), (26, 0.012), (27, 0.032), (28, -0.001), (29, 0.015), (30, -0.054), (31, -0.023), (32, -0.033), (33, 0.016), (34, 0.006), (35, -0.001), (36, -0.001), (37, 0.006), (38, 0.031), (39, -0.049), (40, -0.017), (41, -0.045), (42, 0.011), (43, 0.004), (44, 0.008), (45, -0.005), (46, -0.007), (47, 0.003), (48, -0.003), (49, 0.023)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.97947389 4 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-26-Prolefeed
Introduction: From Anthony Burgess’s review of “The Batsford Companion to Popular Literature,” by Victor Neuberg: Arthur J. Burks (1898-1974) was no gentleman. During the 1930s, when he would sometimes have nearly two million words in current publication, he aimed at producing 18,000 words a day. Editors would call me up and ask me to do a novelette by the next afternoon, and I would, but it nearly killed me. . . . I once appeared on the covers of eleven magazines the same month, and then almost killed myself for years trying to make it twelve. I never did. [Masanao: I think you know where I'm heading with that story.] Ursula Bloom, born 1985 and still with us [this was written sometime between 1978 and 1985], is clearly no lady. Writing also under the pseudonyms of Lozania Prole (there’s an honest name for you), Sheila Burnes and Mary Essex, she has produced 486 boooks, beginning with Tiger at the age of seven. . . . Was Richard Horatio Edgar Wallace (1875-1932) a gentleman? .
2 0.86513424 2168 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-12-Things that I like that almost nobody else is interested in
Introduction: This post by Jordan Ellenberg (“Stoner represents a certain strain in the mid-century American novel that I really like, and which I don’t think exists in contemporary fiction. Anguish, verbal restraint, weirdness”) reminds me that what I really like is mid-to-late-twentieth-century literary criticism . I read a great book from the 50s, I think it was, by Anthony West (son of Rebecca West and H. G. Wells), who reviewed books for the New Yorker. It was great, and it made me wish that other collections of his reviews had been published (they hadn’t). I’d also love to read collections of Alfred Kazin ‘s reviews (there are some collections, but he published many many others that have never been reprinted) and others of that vintage. I’m pretty sure these hypothetical books wouldn’t sell many copies, though. (I feel lucky, though, that at one point a publisher released a pretty fat collection of Anthony Burgess ‘s book reviews.) It’s actually scary to think that many many more peopl
3 0.85771197 1843 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-05-The New York Times Book of Mathematics
Introduction: This was an good idea: take a bunch of old (and some recent) news articles on developments in mathematics and related ares from the past hundred years. Fun for the math content and historical/nostalgia value. Relive the four-color theorem, Fermat, fractals, and early computing. I have too much of a technical bent to be the ideal reader for this sort of book, but it seems like an excellent gift for a non-technical reader who nonetheless enjoys math. (I assume that such people are out there, just as there are people like me who can’t read music but still enjoy reading about the subject.) The book is organized by topic. My own preference would have been chronological and with more old stuff. I particularly enjoyed the material from many decades ago, such as the news report on one of the early computers. This must have been a fun book to compile.
4 0.85748917 285 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-18-Fiction is not for tirades? Tell that to Saul Bellow!
Introduction: Tyler Cowen links approvingly to this review by B. R. Myers of a book that I haven’t read. Unlike Cowen, I haven’t seen the book in question–so far, I’ve only read the excerpt that appeared in the New Yorker–but I can say that I found Myers’s review very annoying. Myers writes: The same narrator who gives us “sucked” and “very into” also deploys compound adjectives, bursts of journalese, and long if syntactically crude sentences. An idiosyncratic mix? Far from it. We find the same insecure style on The Daily Show and in the blogosphere; we overhear it on the subway. It is the style of all who think highly enough of their own brains to worry about being thought “elitist,” not one of the gang. . . . But if Freedom is middlebrow, it is so in the sacrosanct Don DeLillo tradition, which our critical establishment considers central to literature today. . . . Are we to chuckle at the adult woman for writing this in seriousness, or is she mocking her younger self, the teenage ra
5 0.84948874 1970 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-06-New words of 1917
Introduction: I happened to come across a little book, “Current Glossary: Words Coined Since the War.” Here are some of them: as’pi-rin, n. A white compound used as a drug in the cure of headaches and rheumatism. bob’go, n. A kind of antelope in Africa; its meat is good for food. cat’ta-lo, n. A cross between an American bison and a cow. dart, n. A short, pointed spear-like weapon of steel dropped by airmen in attacks on the enemy. free’lance, n. A rover in literature, a writer not in the employ of one firm. griz’zly bear. A new kind of dance. You get the idea. P.S. Some more literary nostalgia from the archives: Prolefeed 70 Years of Best Sellers More on book sales . . . and reflections on the disappearance of millions of copies of the once-ubiquitous “Alive!”
6 0.84832549 203 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-12-John McPhee, the Anti-Malcolm
7 0.84645098 115 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-28-Whassup with those crappy thrillers?
8 0.83381838 16 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-04-Burgess on Kipling
9 0.8319878 1641 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-27-The Möbius strip, or, marketing that is impervious to criticism
10 0.82930285 886 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-02-The new Helen DeWitt novel
11 0.82614464 57 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-29-Roth and Amsterdam
12 0.82129562 46 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-21-Careers, one-hit wonders, and an offer of a free book
13 0.82037795 258 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-05-A review of a review of a review of a decade
14 0.81622934 2023 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-14-On blogging
15 0.81586999 1222 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-20-5 books book
16 0.81289786 392 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-03-Taleb + 3.5 years
17 0.80849379 1179 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-21-“Readability” as freedom from the actual sensation of reading
18 0.80607498 2297 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-20-Fooled by randomness
19 0.80491996 2189 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-28-History is too important to be left to the history professors
20 0.80129969 432 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-27-Neumann update
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.217), (2, 0.037), (9, 0.018), (15, 0.025), (16, 0.112), (23, 0.032), (24, 0.114), (31, 0.011), (45, 0.012), (63, 0.013), (73, 0.045), (86, 0.013), (90, 0.022), (96, 0.013), (99, 0.214)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.90807474 565 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-09-Dennis the dentist, debunked?
Introduction: Devah Pager points me to this article by Uri Simonsohn, which begins: Three articles published [by Brett Pelham et al.] have shown that a disproportionate share of people choose spouses, places to live, and occupations with names similar to their own. These findings, interpreted as evidence of implicit egotism, are included in most modern social psychology textbooks and many university courses. The current article successfully replicates the original findings but shows that they are most likely caused by a combination of cohort, geographic, and ethnic confounds as well as reverse causality. From Simonsohn’s article, here’s a handy summary of the claims and the evidence (click on it to enlarge): The Pelham et al. articles have come up several times on the blog, starting with this discussion and this estimate and then more recently here . I’m curious what Pelham and his collaborators think of Simonsohn’s claims.
same-blog 2 0.89611018 4 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-26-Prolefeed
Introduction: From Anthony Burgess’s review of “The Batsford Companion to Popular Literature,” by Victor Neuberg: Arthur J. Burks (1898-1974) was no gentleman. During the 1930s, when he would sometimes have nearly two million words in current publication, he aimed at producing 18,000 words a day. Editors would call me up and ask me to do a novelette by the next afternoon, and I would, but it nearly killed me. . . . I once appeared on the covers of eleven magazines the same month, and then almost killed myself for years trying to make it twelve. I never did. [Masanao: I think you know where I'm heading with that story.] Ursula Bloom, born 1985 and still with us [this was written sometime between 1978 and 1985], is clearly no lady. Writing also under the pseudonyms of Lozania Prole (there’s an honest name for you), Sheila Burnes and Mary Essex, she has produced 486 boooks, beginning with Tiger at the age of seven. . . . Was Richard Horatio Edgar Wallace (1875-1932) a gentleman? .
3 0.88914633 2166 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-10-3 years out of date on the whole Dennis the dentist thing!
Introduction: Paging Uri Simonsohn . . . January 2014: Alice Robb writes , completely uncritically: “If Your Name is Dennis, You’re More Likely to Become a Dentist The strange science of how names shape careers.” But look what you can learn from a quick google: Hmmmm, maybe worth following up on that second link . . . More details here , from 2011: Devah Pager points me to this article by Uri Simonsohn, which begins: Three articles published [by Brett Pelham et al.] have shown that a disproportionate share of people choose spouses, places to live, and occupations with names similar to their own. These findings, interpreted as evidence of implicit egotism, are included in most modern social psychology textbooks and many university courses. The current article successfully replicates the original findings but shows that they are most likely caused by a combination of cohort, geographic, and ethnic confounds as well as reverse causality. From Simonsohn’s article, here’s a han
4 0.88777339 1828 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-27-Time-Sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences
Introduction: James Druckman and Jeremy Freese write: We are pleased to announce that Time-Sharing Experiments for the Social Sciences (TESS) was renewed for another round of funding by NSF starting last Fall. TESS allows researchers to submit proposals for experiments to be conducted on a nationally-representative, probability-based Internet platform, and successful proposals are fielded at no cost to investigators. More information about how TESS works and how to submit proposals is available at http://www.tessexperiments.org. Additionally, we are pleased to announce the development of two new proposal mechanisms. TESS’s Short Studies Program (SSP) is accepting proposals for fielding very brief population-based survey experiments on a general population of at least 2000 adults. SSP recruits participants from within the U.S. using the same Internet-based platform as other TESS studies. More information about SSP and proposal requirements is available at http://www.tessexperiments.org/ssp.
5 0.88445365 40 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-18-What visualization is best?
Introduction: Jeff Heer and Mike Bostock provided Mechanical Turk workers with a problem they had to answer using different types of charts. The lower error the workers got, the better the visualization. Here are some results from their paper Crowdsourcing Graphical Perception: Using Mechanical Turk to Assess Visualization Design : They also looked at various settings, like density, aspect ratio, spacing, etc. Visualization has become empirical science, no longer just art.
6 0.88168526 1068 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-18-Faculty who don’t like teaching and hate working with students
8 0.86550999 365 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-24-Erving Goffman archives
9 0.83128703 1765 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-16-Recently in the sister blog
10 0.8277595 1736 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-24-Rcpp class in Sat 9 Mar in NYC
11 0.82769513 1540 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-18-“Intrade to the 57th power”
12 0.82690567 1781 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-29-Another Feller theory
13 0.81856143 1755 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-09-Plaig
14 0.81766033 1075 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-20-This guy has a regular column at Reuters
15 0.80716777 1177 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-20-Joshua Clover update
16 0.8047843 557 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-05-Call for book proposals
17 0.78776962 2190 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-29-Stupid R Tricks: Random Scope
18 0.77218926 862 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-20-An illustrated calculus textbook
19 0.76998103 859 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-18-Misunderstanding analysis of covariance
20 0.76953489 1262 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-12-“Not only defended but also applied”: The perceived absurdity of Bayesian inference