andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2010 andrew_gelman_stats-2010-26 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

26 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-11-Update on religious affiliations of Supreme Court justices


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: When Sonia Sotomayor was nominated for the Supreme Court, and there was some discussion of having 6 Roman Catholics on the court at the same time, I posted the following historical graph: It’s time for an update: It’s still gonna take awhile for the Catholics to catch up. . . . And this one might be relevant too: It looks as if Jews and men have been overrepresented, also Episcopalians (which, as I noted earlier, are not necessarily considered Protestant in terms of religious doctrine but which I counted as such for the ethnic categorization). Religion is an interesting political variable because it’s nominally about religious belief but typically seems to be more about ethnicity.


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 When Sonia Sotomayor was nominated for the Supreme Court, and there was some discussion of having 6 Roman Catholics on the court at the same time, I posted the following historical graph: It’s time for an update: It’s still gonna take awhile for the Catholics to catch up. [sent-1, score-1.204]

2 And this one might be relevant too: It looks as if Jews and men have been overrepresented, also Episcopalians (which, as I noted earlier, are not necessarily considered Protestant in terms of religious doctrine but which I counted as such for the ethnic categorization). [sent-5, score-1.453]

3 Religion is an interesting political variable because it’s nominally about religious belief but typically seems to be more about ethnicity. [sent-6, score-0.894]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('catholics', 0.377), ('court', 0.286), ('religious', 0.248), ('categorization', 0.217), ('roman', 0.217), ('sonia', 0.217), ('nominally', 0.204), ('protestant', 0.204), ('nominated', 0.195), ('sotomayor', 0.195), ('doctrine', 0.174), ('overrepresented', 0.174), ('counted', 0.164), ('jews', 0.159), ('supreme', 0.157), ('ethnic', 0.141), ('ethnicity', 0.135), ('religion', 0.133), ('gon', 0.13), ('catch', 0.123), ('na', 0.121), ('update', 0.117), ('historical', 0.115), ('belief', 0.114), ('men', 0.111), ('awhile', 0.104), ('necessarily', 0.101), ('noted', 0.095), ('posted', 0.095), ('considered', 0.088), ('variable', 0.088), ('terms', 0.085), ('typically', 0.083), ('earlier', 0.082), ('looks', 0.079), ('relevant', 0.079), ('graph', 0.075), ('time', 0.071), ('political', 0.058), ('following', 0.057), ('interesting', 0.055), ('take', 0.055), ('discussion', 0.053), ('still', 0.05), ('seems', 0.044), ('might', 0.039), ('also', 0.028), ('one', 0.021)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 1.0000001 26 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-11-Update on religious affiliations of Supreme Court justices

Introduction: When Sonia Sotomayor was nominated for the Supreme Court, and there was some discussion of having 6 Roman Catholics on the court at the same time, I posted the following historical graph: It’s time for an update: It’s still gonna take awhile for the Catholics to catch up. . . . And this one might be relevant too: It looks as if Jews and men have been overrepresented, also Episcopalians (which, as I noted earlier, are not necessarily considered Protestant in terms of religious doctrine but which I counted as such for the ethnic categorization). Religion is an interesting political variable because it’s nominally about religious belief but typically seems to be more about ethnicity.

2 0.1879192 235 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-25-Term Limits for the Supreme Court?

Introduction: In the wake of the confirmation of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, political commentators have been expressing a bit of frustration about polarization within the court and polarization in the nomination process. One proposal that’s been floating around is to replace lifetime appointments by fixed terms, perhaps twelve or eighteen years. This would enforce a regular schedule of replacements, instead of the current system in which eighty-something judges have an incentive to hang on as long as possible so as to time their retirements to be during the administration of a politically-compatible president. A couple weeks ago at the sister blog, John Sides discussed some recent research that was relevant to the judicial term limits proposal. Political scientists Justin Crowe and Chris Karpowitz analyzed the historical record or Supreme Court terms and found that long terms of twenty years or more have been happening since the early years of the court. Yes, there is less turnover th

3 0.16287693 1375 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-11-The unitary nature of consciousness: “It’s impossible to be insanely frustrated about 2 things at once”

Introduction: Dan Kahan writes: We all know it’s ridiculous to be able to go on an fMRI fishing trip & resort to post hoc story-telling to explain the “significant” correlations one (inevitably) observes (good fMRI studies *don’t* do this; only bad ones do– to the injury of the reputation of all the scholars doing good studies of this kind). But now one doesn’t even need correlations that support the post-hoc inferences one is drawing. This one’s good. Kahan continues: Headline: Religious Experiences Shrink Part of the Brain text: ” … The study, published March 30 [2011] in PLoS One, showed greater atrophy in the hippocampus in individuals who identify with specific religious groups as well as those with no religious affiliation … The results showed significantly greater hippocampal atrophy in individuals reporting a life-changing religious experience. In addition, they found significantly greater hippocampal atrophy among born-again Protestants, Catholics, and those with no religiou

4 0.12556958 1728 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-19-The grasshopper wins, and Greg Mankiw’s grandmother would be “shocked and appalled” all over again

Introduction: Given Grandma Mankiw’s hypothetical distaste for Sonia Sotomayor’s spending habits (recall that Grandma “would have been shocked and appalled” by the judge’s lack of savings), I expect she (the grandmother) would be even more irritated by the success of Sotomayor’s recent book: Now that Sotomayor has a ton of money coming in, in addition to a well-paying job and pension for life, that would almost seem to validate Sotomayor’s foolish, foolish decision to enjoy herself in middle age rather than sock hundreds of thousands of dollars into a retirement account she likely would never touch during her lifetime. One interesting thing about this example is that Mankiw apparently holds within himself a descriptive and normative view of economics. Descriptively, he models people as “spenders” or “savers.” But, normatively, he seems to attribute higher values to the “savers.” (He also seems to be confused about the relation between saving to intertemporal preference (see my long p

5 0.12163977 715 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-16-“It doesn’t matter if you believe in God. What matters is if God believes in you.”

Introduction: Mark Chaves sent me this great article on religion and religious practice: After reading a book or article in the scientific study of religion, I [Chaves] wonder if you ever find yourself thinking, “I just don’t believe it.” I have this experience uncomfortably often, and I think it’s because of a pervasive problem in the scientific study of religion. I want to describe that problem and how to overcome it. The problem is illustrated in a story told by Meyer Fortes. He once asked a rainmaker in a native culture he was studying to perform the rainmaking ceremony for him. The rainmaker refused, replying: “Don’t be a fool, whoever makes a rain-making ceremony in the dry season?” The problem is illustrated in a different way in a story told by Jay Demerath. He was in Israel, visiting friends for a Sabbath dinner. The man of the house, a conservative rabbi, stopped in the middle of chanting the prayers to say cheerfully: “You know, we don’t believe in any of this. But then in Judai

6 0.11140989 1234 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-28-The Supreme Court’s Many Median Justices

7 0.11064382 152 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-17-Distorting the Electoral Connection? Partisan Representation in Confirmation Politics

8 0.097350761 1386 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-21-Belief in hell is associated with lower crime rates

9 0.084484845 1657 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-06-Lee Nguyen Tran Kim Song Shimazaki

10 0.083891973 288 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-21-Discussion of the paper by Girolami and Calderhead on Bayesian computation

11 0.074006245 1 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-22-Political Belief Networks: Socio-cognitive Heterogeneity in American Public Opinion

12 0.072509214 1024 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-23-Of hypothesis tests and Unitarians

13 0.070563704 1464 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-20-Donald E. Westlake on George W. Bush

14 0.06974864 1720 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-12-That claim that Harvard admissions discriminate in favor of Jews? After seeing the statistics, I don’t see it.

15 0.066022612 915 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-17-(Worst) graph of the year

16 0.060872566 36 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-16-Female Mass Murderers: Babes Behind Bars

17 0.055708308 1269 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-19-Believe your models (up to the point that you abandon them)

18 0.054789755 1768 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-18-Mertz’s reply to Unz’s response to Mertz’s comments on Unz’s article

19 0.052164517 1286 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-28-Agreement Groups in US Senate and Dynamic Clustering

20 0.049866684 1730 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-20-Unz on Unz


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.068), (1, -0.027), (2, 0.028), (3, 0.014), (4, 0.004), (5, -0.029), (6, -0.013), (7, 0.016), (8, -0.004), (9, -0.005), (10, 0.001), (11, 0.011), (12, -0.021), (13, 0.03), (14, 0.017), (15, 0.057), (16, -0.013), (17, -0.027), (18, -0.01), (19, -0.003), (20, 0.006), (21, -0.007), (22, -0.034), (23, -0.023), (24, 0.028), (25, 0.007), (26, 0.007), (27, -0.007), (28, -0.018), (29, -0.024), (30, 0.018), (31, -0.008), (32, 0.004), (33, -0.014), (34, -0.022), (35, -0.027), (36, -0.036), (37, -0.023), (38, 0.023), (39, 0.019), (40, 0.002), (41, -0.003), (42, 0.031), (43, -0.032), (44, -0.017), (45, -0.025), (46, 0.045), (47, 0.005), (48, 0.001), (49, -0.002)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.93973219 26 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-11-Update on religious affiliations of Supreme Court justices

Introduction: When Sonia Sotomayor was nominated for the Supreme Court, and there was some discussion of having 6 Roman Catholics on the court at the same time, I posted the following historical graph: It’s time for an update: It’s still gonna take awhile for the Catholics to catch up. . . . And this one might be relevant too: It looks as if Jews and men have been overrepresented, also Episcopalians (which, as I noted earlier, are not necessarily considered Protestant in terms of religious doctrine but which I counted as such for the ethnic categorization). Religion is an interesting political variable because it’s nominally about religious belief but typically seems to be more about ethnicity.

2 0.64436281 1633 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-21-Kahan on Pinker on politics

Introduction: Reacting to my recent post on Steven Pinker’s too-broad (in my opinion) speculations on red and blue states, Dan “cultural cognition” Kahan writes : Pinker is clearly right to note that mass political opinions on seemingly diverse issues cohere, and Andrew, I think, is way too quick to challenge this I [Kahan] could cite to billions of interesting papers, but I’ll just show you what I mean instead. A recent CCP data collection involving a nationally representative on-line sample of 1750 subjects included a module that asked the subjects to indicate on a six-point scale “how strongly . . . you support or oppose” a collection of policies: policy_gun Stricter gun control laws in the United States. policy_healthcare Universal health care. policy_taxcut Raising income taxes for persons in the highest-income tax bracket. policy_affirmative action Affirmative action for minorities. policy_warming Stricter carbon emission standards to reduce global warming. Positions c

3 0.6433273 235 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-25-Term Limits for the Supreme Court?

Introduction: In the wake of the confirmation of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, political commentators have been expressing a bit of frustration about polarization within the court and polarization in the nomination process. One proposal that’s been floating around is to replace lifetime appointments by fixed terms, perhaps twelve or eighteen years. This would enforce a regular schedule of replacements, instead of the current system in which eighty-something judges have an incentive to hang on as long as possible so as to time their retirements to be during the administration of a politically-compatible president. A couple weeks ago at the sister blog, John Sides discussed some recent research that was relevant to the judicial term limits proposal. Political scientists Justin Crowe and Chris Karpowitz analyzed the historical record or Supreme Court terms and found that long terms of twenty years or more have been happening since the early years of the court. Yes, there is less turnover th

4 0.64154601 1664 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-10-Recently in the sister blog: Brussels sprouts, ugly graphs, and switched at birth

Introduction: 1. Congress vs. Nickelback: The real action is in the cross tabs : Conservatives are mean, liberals are big babies, and, if supporting an STD is what it takes to be a political moderate, I don’t want to be one. 2. How 2012 stacks up: The worst graph on record? : OK, not actually worse than this one . 3. Boys will be boys; cows will be cows : Children’s essentialist reasoning about gender categories and animal species.

5 0.61742729 50 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-25-Looking for Sister Right

Introduction: Several people have asked me what I thought of this . For example, one colleague wrote: I thought you might find data of this quantity and quality as interesting as I do. In their latest blog entry, okcupid uses its very large dating-site userbase to assess the progression of social and economic views with age, and (taking into account self-specified importance of economic and social views) the resulting political affiliations. The final assessment is that the spectrum of views encompassed under “democrat” ends up being much broader than those under “republican”. I’ve seen this mentioned many times before, but I have never seen such pretty data illustrating the phenomenon. Perhaps this is more graphics to impress, rather than graphics in a typical statistical setting, but I find them captivating nonetheless. In any case, I would be curious to hear your opinions of this. My reply: It’s interesting stuff, although I wonder a lot about the representativeness of their sample

6 0.61467683 600 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-04-“Social Psychologists Detect Liberal Bias Within”

7 0.6076293 276 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-14-Don’t look at just one poll number–unless you really know what you’re doing!

8 0.60609645 1 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-22-Political Belief Networks: Socio-cognitive Heterogeneity in American Public Opinion

9 0.60509789 1166 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-13-Recently in the sister blog

10 0.60300589 1375 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-11-The unitary nature of consciousness: “It’s impossible to be insanely frustrated about 2 things at once”

11 0.59600174 915 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-17-(Worst) graph of the year

12 0.57866031 828 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-28-Thoughts on Groseclose book on media bias

13 0.57648045 1635 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-22-More Pinker Pinker Pinker

14 0.56880617 1631 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-19-Steven Pinker is a psychologist who writes on politics. His theories are interesting but are framed too universally to be valid

15 0.56789744 1258 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Why display 6 years instead of 30?

16 0.56748998 1743 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-28-Different modes of discourse

17 0.55964297 812 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-21-Confusion about “rigging the numbers,” the support of ideological opposites, who’s a 501(c)(3), and the asymmetry of media bias

18 0.55614603 1930 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-09-Symposium Magazine

19 0.54712492 1253 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-08-Technology speedup graph

20 0.54471266 1730 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-20-Unz on Unz


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(5, 0.029), (9, 0.025), (15, 0.023), (16, 0.033), (21, 0.047), (22, 0.037), (24, 0.055), (63, 0.023), (92, 0.024), (98, 0.41), (99, 0.166)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

1 0.97344583 1249 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-06-Thinking seriously about social science research

Introduction: I haven’t linked to the Baby Name Wizard in awhile. . . . Laura Wattenberg takes a look at the question , “Does a hard-to-pronounce baby name hurt you?” Critical thinking without “debunking”—this is the way to go.

same-blog 2 0.88676226 26 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-11-Update on religious affiliations of Supreme Court justices

Introduction: When Sonia Sotomayor was nominated for the Supreme Court, and there was some discussion of having 6 Roman Catholics on the court at the same time, I posted the following historical graph: It’s time for an update: It’s still gonna take awhile for the Catholics to catch up. . . . And this one might be relevant too: It looks as if Jews and men have been overrepresented, also Episcopalians (which, as I noted earlier, are not necessarily considered Protestant in terms of religious doctrine but which I counted as such for the ethnic categorization). Religion is an interesting political variable because it’s nominally about religious belief but typically seems to be more about ethnicity.

3 0.80405045 208 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-15-When Does a Name Become Androgynous?

Introduction: Good stuff , as always, from Laura Wattenberg.

4 0.78718019 425 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-21-If your comment didn’t get through . . .

Introduction: It probably got caught in the spam filter. We get tons and tons of spam (including the annoying spam that I have to remove by hand). If your comment was accompanied by an ad or a spam link, then maybe I just deleted it.

5 0.750337 1239 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-01-A randomized trial of the set-point diet

Introduction: Someone pointed me to this forthcoming article in the journal Nutrition by J. F. Lee et al. It looks pretty cool. I’m glad that someone went to the effort of performing this careful study. Regular readers will know that I’ve been waiting for this one for awhile. In case you can’t read the article through the paywall, here’s the abstract: Background: Under a widely-accepted theory of caloric balance, any individual has a set-point weight and will find it uncomfortable and typically unsustainable to keep his or her weight below that point. Set-points have evidently been increasing over the past few decades in the United States and other countries, leading to a public-health crisis of obesity. In an n=1 study, Roberts (2004, 2006) proposed an intervention to lower the set-point via daily consumption of unflavored sugar water or vegetable oil. Objective: To evaluate weight-loss outcomes under the diet proposed by Roberts (2004, 2006). Design: Randomized clinica

6 0.7484467 96 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-18-Course proposal: Bayesian and advanced likelihood statistical methods for zombies.

7 0.74473125 420 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-18-Prison terms for financial fraud?

8 0.72094965 196 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-10-The U.S. as welfare state

9 0.71741253 1399 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-28-Life imitates blog

10 0.71060956 376 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-28-My talk at American University

11 0.70726293 1853 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-12-OpenData Latinoamerica

12 0.7006312 1 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-22-Political Belief Networks: Socio-cognitive Heterogeneity in American Public Opinion

13 0.68432331 742 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-02-Grouponomics, counterfactuals, and opportunity cost

14 0.67637312 132 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-07-Note to “Cigarettes”

15 0.65704721 2333 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-13-Personally, I’d rather go with Teragram

16 0.65417278 710 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-14-Missed Friday the 13th Zombie Plot Update

17 0.64277577 1867 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-22-To Throw Away Data: Plagiarism as a Statistical Crime

18 0.64110756 1556 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-01-Recently in the sister blogs: special pre-election edition!

19 0.62904441 1701 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-31-The name that fell off a cliff

20 0.60776627 1806 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-16-My talk in Chicago this Thurs 6:30pm