andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2013 andrew_gelman_stats-2013-2031 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Answer here (courtesy of Kaiser Fung).
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('courtesy', 0.678), ('fung', 0.513), ('kaiser', 0.453), ('answer', 0.267)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99999994 2031 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-19-What makes a statistician look like a hero?
Introduction: Answer here (courtesy of Kaiser Fung).
2 0.52797824 648 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-04-The Case for More False Positives in Anti-doping Testing
Introduction: No joke. See here (from Kaiser Fung). At the Statistics Forum.
3 0.37055463 1132 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-21-A counterfeit data graphic
Introduction: Kaiser Fung discusses . It’s a good sign when statistical graphics are so popular that people feel the need to fake them!
4 0.2924709 1001 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-10-Three hours in the life of a statistician
Introduction: Kaiser Fung tells what it’s really like . Here’s a sample: As soon as I [Kaiser] put the substring-concatenate expression together with two lines of code that generate data tables, it choked. Sorta like Dashiell Hammett without the broads and the heaters. And here’s another take, from a slightly different perspective.
5 0.24164431 388 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-01-The placebo effect in pharma
Introduction: Bruce McCullough writes: The Sept 2009 issue of Wired had a big article on the increase in the placebo effect, and why it’s been getting bigger. Kaiser Fung has a synopsis . As if you don’t have enough to do, I thought you might be interested in blogging on this. My reply: I thought Kaiser’s discussion was good, especially this point: Effect on treatment group = Effect of the drug + effect of belief in being treated Effect on placebo group = Effect of belief in being treated Thus, the difference between the two groups = effect of the drug, since the effect of belief in being treated affects both groups of patients. Thus, as Kaiser puts it, if the treatment isn’t doing better than placebo, it doesn’t say that the placebo effect is big (let alone “too big”) but that the treatment isn’t showing any additional effect. It’s “treatment + placebo” vs. placebo, not treatment vs. placebo. That said, I’d prefer for Kaiser to make it clear that the additivity he’s assu
6 0.21104136 140 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-10-SeeThroughNY
7 0.20428877 543 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-28-NYT shills for personal DNA tests
8 0.19344941 2186 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-26-Infoviz on top of stat graphic on top of spreadsheet
9 0.18468067 1256 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Our data visualization panel at the New York Public Library
10 0.18244049 461 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-09-“‘Why work?’”
11 0.15282048 1678 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-17-Wanted: 365 stories of statistics
12 0.14956515 982 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-30-“There’s at least as much as an 80 percent chance . . .”
13 0.14565989 1246 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-04-Data visualization panel at the New York Public Library this evening!
14 0.14104652 1927 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-05-“Numbersense: How to use big data to your advantage”
15 0.13655356 344 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-15-Story time
16 0.13461624 742 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-02-Grouponomics, counterfactuals, and opportunity cost
17 0.13151979 2288 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-10-Small multiples of lineplots > maps (ok, not always, but yes in this case)
18 0.11729228 1223 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-20-A kaleidoscope of responses to Dubner’s criticisms of our criticisms of Freaknomics
19 0.11068696 1090 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-28-“. . . extending for dozens of pages”
20 0.10715342 2121 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-02-Should personal genetic testing be regulated? Battle of the blogroll
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.024), (1, -0.018), (2, -0.015), (3, 0.019), (4, 0.043), (5, -0.051), (6, -0.028), (7, 0.055), (8, 0.032), (9, 0.029), (10, -0.063), (11, -0.032), (12, 0.006), (13, 0.026), (14, -0.123), (15, -0.055), (16, -0.152), (17, 0.287), (18, 0.054), (19, 0.018), (20, 0.004), (21, 0.058), (22, -0.027), (23, -0.183), (24, -0.032), (25, 0.044), (26, -0.002), (27, -0.03), (28, -0.025), (29, 0.068), (30, -0.048), (31, -0.141), (32, 0.123), (33, 0.152), (34, 0.071), (35, -0.118), (36, 0.038), (37, -0.057), (38, -0.037), (39, -0.107), (40, -0.059), (41, 0.166), (42, 0.013), (43, 0.0), (44, -0.029), (45, 0.055), (46, 0.082), (47, 0.044), (48, -0.007), (49, -0.027)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99905348 2031 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-19-What makes a statistician look like a hero?
Introduction: Answer here (courtesy of Kaiser Fung).
2 0.92438662 1256 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Our data visualization panel at the New York Public Library
Introduction: In case you couldn’t come to our panel (with Kaiser Fung, Mark Hansen, Tahir Hemphill, Manuel Lima, and Jonathan Stray, and organized by Isabel Draves), here’s the video:
3 0.87799692 1001 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-10-Three hours in the life of a statistician
Introduction: Kaiser Fung tells what it’s really like . Here’s a sample: As soon as I [Kaiser] put the substring-concatenate expression together with two lines of code that generate data tables, it choked. Sorta like Dashiell Hammett without the broads and the heaters. And here’s another take, from a slightly different perspective.
4 0.85703045 543 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-28-NYT shills for personal DNA tests
Introduction: Kaiser nails it . The offending article , by John Tierney, somehow ended up in the Science section rather than the Opinion section. As an opinion piece (or, for that matter, a blog), Tierney’s article would be nothing special. But I agree with Kaiser that it doesn’t work as a newspaper article. As Kaiser notes, this story involves a bunch of statistical and empirical claims that are not well resolved by P.R. and rhetoric.
5 0.85407168 1132 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-21-A counterfeit data graphic
Introduction: Kaiser Fung discusses . It’s a good sign when statistical graphics are so popular that people feel the need to fake them!
6 0.78188044 1174 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-18-Not as ugly as you look
7 0.71312505 648 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-04-The Case for More False Positives in Anti-doping Testing
8 0.70359033 388 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-01-The placebo effect in pharma
9 0.65353143 2186 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-26-Infoviz on top of stat graphic on top of spreadsheet
10 0.65284997 1246 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-04-Data visualization panel at the New York Public Library this evening!
11 0.62648553 742 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-02-Grouponomics, counterfactuals, and opportunity cost
12 0.61250359 461 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-09-“‘Why work?’”
13 0.59971762 985 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-01-Doug Schoen has 2 poll reports
14 0.58286089 982 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-30-“There’s at least as much as an 80 percent chance . . .”
15 0.54689205 1090 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-28-“. . . extending for dozens of pages”
16 0.50298178 2121 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-02-Should personal genetic testing be regulated? Battle of the blogroll
17 0.49572763 570 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-12-Software request
18 0.48050806 344 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-15-Story time
19 0.45316678 1612 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-08-The Case for More False Positives in Anti-doping Testing
20 0.4470745 209 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-16-EdLab at Columbia’s Teachers’ College
topicId topicWeight
[(34, 0.427), (74, 0.236)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.98346496 2031 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-19-What makes a statistician look like a hero?
Introduction: Answer here (courtesy of Kaiser Fung).
2 0.82404906 2198 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-04-Special discount on Stan! $999 cheaper than Revolution R!
Introduction: And we’ll throw in RStan and PyStan for free! Details here .
Introduction: From AC, AI, and AIH to WAHM, WOHM, and WM. P.S. That was all pretty pointless, so I’ll throw in this viral Jim Henson link (from the same source) for free.
4 0.58285379 648 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-04-The Case for More False Positives in Anti-doping Testing
Introduction: No joke. See here (from Kaiser Fung). At the Statistics Forum.
5 0.33924675 1911 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-23-AI Stats conference on Stan etc.
Introduction: Jaakko Peltonen writes: The Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (http://www.aistats.org) will be next April in Reykjavik, Iceland. AISTATS is an interdisciplinary conference at the intersection of computer science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, statistics, and related areas. ============================================================================== AISTATS 2014 Call for Papers Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics April 22 – 25, 2014, Reykjavik, Iceland http://www.aistats.org Colocated with a MLSS Machine Learning Summer School ============================================================================== AISTATS is an interdisciplinary gathering of researchers at the intersection of computer science, artificial intelligence, machine learning, statistics, and related areas. Since its inception in 1985, the primary goal of AISTATS has been to broaden research in the
6 0.33067843 929 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-27-Visual diagnostics for discrete-data regressions
7 0.31961805 292 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-23-Doug Hibbs on the fundamentals in 2010
8 0.28875566 1144 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-29-How many parameters are in a multilevel model?
9 0.28100705 1501 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-18-More studies on the economic effects of climate change
10 0.26590705 1734 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-23-Life in the C-suite: A graph that is both ugly and bad, and an unrelated story
11 0.26518285 703 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-10-Bringing Causal Models Into the Mainstream
13 0.24845991 2098 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-12-Plaig!
14 0.23586586 1111 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-10-The blog of the Cultural Cognition Project
15 0.22510687 1256 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Our data visualization panel at the New York Public Library
16 0.22343054 956 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-13-Hey, you! Don’t take that class!
17 0.2113585 1132 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-21-A counterfeit data graphic
18 0.20068885 1001 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-10-Three hours in the life of a statistician
19 0.18992245 135 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-09-Rasmussen sez: “108% of Respondents Say . . .”
20 0.18618481 237 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-27-Bafumi-Erikson-Wlezien predict a 50-seat loss for Democrats in November