andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1314 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Here . See also here . He did Wacky Packs!
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('packs', 0.77), ('wacky', 0.62), ('see', 0.108), ('also', 0.107)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0 1314 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-12-More on Uncle Woody
Introduction: Here . See also here . He did Wacky Packs!
2 0.16185978 644 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-03-The saber saw, the ashtray, and other stories of misbehaving profs
Introduction: This recent story of a wacky psychology professor reminds me of this old story of a wacky psychology professor. This story of a wacky philosophy professor reminds me of a course I almost took at MIT. I was looking through the course catalog one day and saw that Thomas Kuhn was teaching a class in the philosophy of science. Thomas Kuhn–wow! So I enrolled in the class. I only sat through one session before dropping it, though. Kuhn just stood up there and mumbled. At the time, this annoyed me a little. In retrospect, though, it made more sense. I’m sure he felt he had better things to do with his life than teach classes. And MIT was paying him whether or not he did a good job teaching, so it’s not like he was breaking his contract or anything. (Given the range of instructors we had at MIT, it was always a good idea to make use of the shopping period at the beginning of the semester. I had some amazing classes but only one or two really bad ones. Mostly I dropped the b
3 0.10776524 90 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-16-Oil spill and corn production
Introduction: See here .
4 0.093350187 904 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-13-My wikipedia edit
Introduction: The other day someone mentioned my complaint about the Wikipedia article on “Bayesian inference” (see footnote 1 of this article ) and he said I should fix the Wikipedia entry myself. And so I did . I didn’t have the energy to rewrite the whole article–in particular, all of its examples involve discrete parameters, whereas the Bayesian problems I work on generally have continuous parameters, and its “mathematical foundations” section focuses on “independent identically distributed observations x” rather than data y which can have different distributions. It’s just a wacky, unbalanced article. But I altered the first few paragraphs to get rid of the stuff about the posterior probability that a model is true. I much prefer the Scholarpedia article on Bayesian statistics by David Spiegelhalter and Kenneth Rice, but I couldn’t bring myself to simply delete the Wikipedia article and replace it with the Scholarpedia content. Just to be clear: I’m not at all trying to disparage
5 0.061531365 427 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-23-Bayesian adaptive methods for clinical trials
Introduction: Scott Berry, Brad Carlin, Jack Lee, and Peter Muller recently came out with a book with the above title. The book packs a lot into its 280 pages and is fun to read as well (even if they do use the word “modalities” in their first paragraph, and later on they use the phrase “DIC criterion,” which upsets my tidy, logical mind). The book starts off fast on page 1 and never lets go. Clinical trials are a big part of statistics and it’s cool to see the topic taken seriously and being treated rigorously. (Here I’m not talking about empty mathematical rigor (or, should I say, “rigor”), so-called optimal designs and all that, but rather the rigor of applied statistics, mapping models to reality.) Also I have a few technical suggestions. 1. The authors fit a lot of models in Bugs, which is fine, but they go overboard on the WinBUGS thing. There’s WinBUGS, OpenBUGS, JAGS: they’re all Bugs recommend running Bugs from R using the clunky BRugs interface rather than the smoother bugs(
6 0.059811171 1288 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-29-Clueless Americans think they’ll never get sick
7 0.05851369 492 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-30-That puzzle-solving feeling
8 0.055717669 385 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-31-Wacky surveys where they don’t tell you the questions they asked
9 0.048328869 1974 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-08-Statistical significance and the dangerous lure of certainty
10 0.04674853 803 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-14-Subtleties with measurement-error models for the evaluation of wacky claims
11 0.03934259 532 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-23-My Wall Street Journal story
12 0.03478311 219 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-20-Some things are just really hard to believe: more on choosing your facts.
13 0.030015279 408 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-11-Incumbency advantage in 2010
14 0.028318388 505 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-05-Wacky interview questions: An exploration into the nature of evidence on the internet
15 0.026938591 153 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-17-Tenure-track position at U. North Carolina in survey methods and social statistics
16 0.022505132 131 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-07-A note to John
17 0.020386454 348 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-17-Joanne Gowa scooped me by 22 years in my criticism of Axelrod’s Evolution of Cooperation
18 0.019558139 717 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-17-Statistics plagiarism scandal
19 0.016965322 190 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-07-Mister P makes the big jump from the New York Times to the Washington Post
20 0.016410682 124 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-02-Note to the quals
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.017), (1, -0.003), (2, -0.001), (3, 0.003), (4, 0.001), (5, -0.008), (6, -0.003), (7, 0.002), (8, 0.004), (9, -0.001), (10, -0.006), (11, -0.008), (12, 0.005), (13, -0.001), (14, 0.006), (15, 0.006), (16, 0.002), (17, 0.008), (18, -0.004), (19, 0.003), (20, -0.013), (21, 0.011), (22, -0.009), (23, -0.013), (24, 0.008), (25, -0.004), (26, -0.016), (27, 0.004), (28, -0.01), (29, 0.009), (30, 0.002), (31, 0.018), (32, -0.003), (33, -0.018), (34, -0.006), (35, 0.006), (36, -0.007), (37, -0.016), (38, -0.01), (39, 0.005), (40, -0.001), (41, 0.007), (42, 0.007), (43, 0.025), (44, 0.018), (45, -0.012), (46, 0.009), (47, -0.009), (48, -0.014), (49, -0.004)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.90973228 1314 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-12-More on Uncle Woody
Introduction: Here . See also here . He did Wacky Packs!
2 0.82900196 90 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-16-Oil spill and corn production
Introduction: See here .
3 0.77277273 408 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-11-Incumbency advantage in 2010
Introduction: See here for the full story.
4 0.76271087 124 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-02-Note to the quals
Introduction: See here for latest rant.
5 0.65391946 349 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-18-Bike shelf
Introduction: Susan points me to this . But I don’t really see the point. Simply leaning the bike against the wall seems like a better option to me.
6 0.64100903 190 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-07-Mister P makes the big jump from the New York Times to the Washington Post
7 0.60787523 741 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-02-At least he didn’t prove a false theorem
8 0.57530147 443 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-02-Automating my graphics advice
9 0.54249084 2362 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-06-Statistically savvy journalism
10 0.53960836 1791 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-07-Scatterplot charades!
11 0.53652638 153 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-17-Tenure-track position at U. North Carolina in survey methods and social statistics
12 0.52213264 875 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-28-Better than Dennis the dentist or Laura the lawyer
13 0.51573515 1785 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-02-So much artistic talent
14 0.51482522 1232 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-27-Banned in NYC school tests
15 0.50640124 1233 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-27-Pushback against internet self-help gurus
16 0.50352931 306 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-29-Statistics and the end of time
18 0.49248007 843 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-07-Non-rant
19 0.48419192 348 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-17-Joanne Gowa scooped me by 22 years in my criticism of Axelrod’s Evolution of Cooperation
20 0.48370662 204 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-12-Sloppily-written slam on moderately celebrated writers is amusing nonetheless
topicId topicWeight
[(46, 0.537), (99, 0.086)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.81043583 1314 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-12-More on Uncle Woody
Introduction: Here . See also here . He did Wacky Packs!
2 0.37951121 1185 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-26-A statistician’s rants and raves
Introduction: Not from me, from Dean Foster , who maybe was in the same stochastic processes course with me, thirty years ago.
3 0.35461664 195 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-09-President Carter
Introduction: This assessment by Tyler Cowen reminded me that, in 1980, I and just about all my friends hated Jimmy Carter. Most of us much preferred him to Reagan but still hated Carter. I wouldn’t associate this with any particular ideological feeling—it’s not that we thought he was too liberal, or too conservative. He just seemed completely ineffectual. I remember feeling at the time that he had no principles, that he’d do anything to get elected. In retrospect, I think of this as an instance of uniform partisan swing: the president was unpopular nationally, and attitudes about him were negative, relatively speaking, among just about every group. My other Carter story comes from a conversation I had a couple years ago with an economist who’s about my age, a man who said that one reason he and his family moved from town A to town B in his metropolitan area was that, in town B, they didn’t feel like they were the only Republicans on their block. Anyway, this guy described himself as a “
4 0.32320976 282 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-17-I can’t escape it
Introduction: I received the following email: Ms. No.: *** Title: *** Corresponding Author: *** All Authors: *** Dear Dr. Gelman, Because of your expertise, I would like to ask your assistance in determining whether the above-mentioned manuscript is appropriate for publication in ***. The abstract is pasted below. . . . My reply: I would rather not review this article. I suggest ***, ***, and *** as reviewers. I think it would be difficult for me to review the manuscript fairly.
5 0.31077629 1005 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-11-Robert H. Frank and P. J. O’Rourke present . . .
Introduction: I suppose if I can write an article with George Romero, there’s no reason that a noted economist and a legendary humorist can’t collaborate ( link from Felix Salmon). I wonder how they got together in the first place?
6 0.25513959 660 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-14-Job opening at NIH for an experienced statistician
7 0.24183196 872 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-26-Blog on applied probability modeling
8 0.23117155 1202 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-08-Between and within-Krugman correlation
9 0.2281723 452 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-06-Followup questions
10 0.21989544 2104 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-17-Big bad education bureaucracy does big bad things
11 0.21816878 2184 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-24-Parables vs. stories
12 0.20799208 1502 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-19-Scalability in education
14 0.18977499 678 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-25-Democrats do better among the most and least educated groups
15 0.18918148 2084 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-01-Doing Data Science: What’s it all about?
16 0.1872351 343 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-15-?
17 0.18548481 2097 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-11-Why ask why? Forward causal inference and reverse causal questions
18 0.18412943 644 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-03-The saber saw, the ashtray, and other stories of misbehaving profs
19 0.17687693 2009 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-05-A locally organized online BDA course on G+ hangout?
20 0.17270456 279 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-15-Electability and perception of electability