andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2011 andrew_gelman_stats-2011-1031 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: After blogging on quirky software pioneer Richard Stallman , I thought it appropriate to write something about recently deceased quirky software pioneer John McCarthy, who, with the exception of being bearded, seems like he was the personal and political opposite of Stallman. Here’s a page I found of Stallman McCarthy quotes (compiled by Neil Craig). It’s a mixture of the reasonable and the unreasonable (ok, I suppose the same could be said of this blog!). I wonder if he and Stallman ever met and, if so, whether they had an extended conversation. It would be like matter and anti-matter! P.S. I flipped through McCarthy’s pages and found one of my pet peeves. See item 3 here , which sounds so plausible but is in fact not true (at least, not according to the National Election Study). As McCarthy’s Stanford colleague Mo Fiorina can tell you, otherwise well-informed people believe all sorts of things about polarization that aren’t so. Labeling groups of Americans as “
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 After blogging on quirky software pioneer Richard Stallman , I thought it appropriate to write something about recently deceased quirky software pioneer John McCarthy, who, with the exception of being bearded, seems like he was the personal and political opposite of Stallman. [sent-1, score-1.501]
2 Here’s a page I found of Stallman McCarthy quotes (compiled by Neil Craig). [sent-2, score-0.131]
3 It’s a mixture of the reasonable and the unreasonable (ok, I suppose the same could be said of this blog! [sent-3, score-0.152]
4 I wonder if he and Stallman ever met and, if so, whether they had an extended conversation. [sent-5, score-0.154]
5 I flipped through McCarthy’s pages and found one of my pet peeves. [sent-9, score-0.305]
6 See item 3 here , which sounds so plausible but is in fact not true (at least, not according to the National Election Study). [sent-10, score-0.176]
7 As McCarthy’s Stanford colleague Mo Fiorina can tell you, otherwise well-informed people believe all sorts of things about polarization that aren’t so. [sent-11, score-0.206]
8 Labeling groups of Americans as “tribes” is amusing but shouldn’t really give you license to make stuff up. [sent-12, score-0.161]
9 Delia and I only published our paper on constraints in issue attitudes in 2008, many years after McCarthy wrote this document. [sent-14, score-0.128]
10 I would not expect him to have gotten this right, but I think it was a mistake for him to make a claim about “strongly correlated” without even looking at the data. [sent-15, score-0.129]
11 This is all irrelevant to McCarthy’s work on Lisp; still, I find it interesting, partly because of the retro nature of his 1960s style of pro-rationality, pro-science politically conservative techno-optimism. [sent-16, score-0.422]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('mccarthy', 0.641), ('stallman', 0.335), ('quirky', 0.26), ('pioneer', 0.214), ('fiorina', 0.118), ('craig', 0.118), ('deceased', 0.118), ('software', 0.114), ('mo', 0.103), ('delia', 0.1), ('retro', 0.097), ('compiled', 0.095), ('flipped', 0.093), ('polarization', 0.091), ('license', 0.09), ('extended', 0.088), ('exception', 0.087), ('pet', 0.087), ('neil', 0.086), ('trip', 0.085), ('unreasonable', 0.084), ('stanford', 0.08), ('irrelevant', 0.078), ('labeling', 0.077), ('gotten', 0.075), ('constraints', 0.071), ('amusing', 0.071), ('mixture', 0.068), ('politically', 0.067), ('met', 0.066), ('quotes', 0.066), ('found', 0.065), ('partly', 0.063), ('richard', 0.063), ('item', 0.062), ('plausible', 0.061), ('blogging', 0.061), ('correlated', 0.061), ('colleague', 0.06), ('pages', 0.06), ('style', 0.059), ('opposite', 0.059), ('conservative', 0.058), ('attitudes', 0.057), ('otherwise', 0.055), ('shouldn', 0.055), ('mistake', 0.054), ('election', 0.053), ('sounds', 0.053), ('strongly', 0.053)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99999994 1031 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-27-Richard Stallman and John McCarthy
Introduction: After blogging on quirky software pioneer Richard Stallman , I thought it appropriate to write something about recently deceased quirky software pioneer John McCarthy, who, with the exception of being bearded, seems like he was the personal and political opposite of Stallman. Here’s a page I found of Stallman McCarthy quotes (compiled by Neil Craig). It’s a mixture of the reasonable and the unreasonable (ok, I suppose the same could be said of this blog!). I wonder if he and Stallman ever met and, if so, whether they had an extended conversation. It would be like matter and anti-matter! P.S. I flipped through McCarthy’s pages and found one of my pet peeves. See item 3 here , which sounds so plausible but is in fact not true (at least, not according to the National Election Study). As McCarthy’s Stanford colleague Mo Fiorina can tell you, otherwise well-informed people believe all sorts of things about polarization that aren’t so. Labeling groups of Americans as “
Introduction: This is hilarious ( link from a completely deadpan Tyler Cowen). I’d call it “unintentionally hilarious” but I’m pretty sure that rms knew this was funny when he was writing it. It’s sort of like when you write a top 10 list—it’s hard to resist getting silly and going over the top. It’s only near the end that we get to the bit about the parrots. All joking aside, the most interesting part of the email was this: I [rms] have to spend 6 to 8 hours *every day* doing my usual work, which is responding to email about the GNU Project and the Free Software Movement. I’d wondered for awhile what is it that Richard Stallman actually does, that is how does he spend his time (aside from giving lectures to promote his ideas and pay the bills). Emailing –> Blogging I too spend a lot of time on email, but a few years ago I consciously tried to shift a bunch of my email exchanges to the blog. I found that I was sending out a lot of information to an audience of one, information
3 0.18604724 928 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-27-Hey, look over here! Another rant!
Introduction: Bigshot establishment dude Peter Orszag thinks bigshot establishment dudes don’t have enough power. (Also politically related but not a rant: Joe McCarthy Versus Powerman and the Debt-Ceiling Destroyers, Part One. )
4 0.11607586 34 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-14-Non-academic writings on literature
Introduction: Jenny writes : The Possessed made me [Jenny] think about an interesting workshop-style class I’d like to teach, which would be an undergraduate seminar for students who wanted to find out non-academic ways of writing seriously about literature. The syllabus would include some essays from this book, Geoff Dyer’s Out of Sheer Rage, Jonathan Coe’s Like a Fiery Elephant – and what else? I agree with the commenters that this would be a great class, but . . . I’m confused on the premise. Isn’t there just a huge, huge amount of excellent serious non-academic writing about literature? George Orwell, Mark Twain, Bernard Shaw, T. S. Eliot (if you like that sort of thing), Anthony Burgess , Mary McCarthy (I think you’d call her nonacademic even though she taught the occasional college course), G. K. Chesterton , etc etc etc? Teaching a course about academic ways of writing seriously about literature would seem much tougher to me.
5 0.093800388 2255 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-19-How Americans vote
Introduction: An interview with me from 2012 : You’re a statistician and wrote a book, Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State , looking at why Americans vote the way they do. In an election year I think it would be a good time to revisit that question, not just for people in the US, but anyone around the world who wants to understand the realities – rather than the stereotypes – of how Americans vote. I regret the title I gave my book. I was too greedy. I wanted it to be an airport bestseller because I figured there were millions of people who are interested in politics and some subset of them are always looking at the statistics. It’s got a very grabby title and as a result people underestimated the content. They thought it was a popularisation of my work, or, at best, an expansion of an article we’d written. But it had tons of original material. If I’d given it a more serious, political science-y title, then all sorts of people would have wanted to read it, because they would
7 0.065945655 1514 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-28-AdviseStat 47% Campaign Ad
8 0.062480714 1832 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-29-The blogroll
9 0.061943218 1459 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-15-How I think about mixture models
10 0.06005929 2276 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-31-On deck this week
11 0.054599911 1 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-22-Political Belief Networks: Socio-cognitive Heterogeneity in American Public Opinion
12 0.054421611 2084 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-01-Doing Data Science: What’s it all about?
13 0.05350522 604 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-08-More on the missing conservative psychology researchers
16 0.050873686 771 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-16-30 days of statistics
17 0.049932543 1435 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-30-Retracted articles and unethical behavior in economics journals?
18 0.048896924 600 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-04-“Social Psychologists Detect Liberal Bias Within”
19 0.048842978 304 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-29-Data visualization marathon
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.112), (1, -0.055), (2, 0.004), (3, 0.012), (4, -0.031), (5, -0.007), (6, 0.014), (7, -0.027), (8, 0.003), (9, 0.007), (10, 0.009), (11, -0.005), (12, 0.018), (13, 0.01), (14, 0.005), (15, 0.013), (16, -0.008), (17, -0.002), (18, -0.002), (19, -0.006), (20, 0.007), (21, -0.03), (22, -0.016), (23, -0.009), (24, 0.004), (25, -0.003), (26, 0.005), (27, -0.0), (28, -0.003), (29, -0.013), (30, -0.007), (31, 0.002), (32, 0.018), (33, -0.02), (34, -0.001), (35, -0.021), (36, 0.01), (37, 0.025), (38, 0.019), (39, -0.013), (40, 0.017), (41, -0.01), (42, -0.003), (43, -0.004), (44, 0.028), (45, -0.018), (46, -0.027), (47, 0.007), (48, 0.035), (49, 0.005)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.94149345 1031 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-27-Richard Stallman and John McCarthy
Introduction: After blogging on quirky software pioneer Richard Stallman , I thought it appropriate to write something about recently deceased quirky software pioneer John McCarthy, who, with the exception of being bearded, seems like he was the personal and political opposite of Stallman. Here’s a page I found of Stallman McCarthy quotes (compiled by Neil Craig). It’s a mixture of the reasonable and the unreasonable (ok, I suppose the same could be said of this blog!). I wonder if he and Stallman ever met and, if so, whether they had an extended conversation. It would be like matter and anti-matter! P.S. I flipped through McCarthy’s pages and found one of my pet peeves. See item 3 here , which sounds so plausible but is in fact not true (at least, not according to the National Election Study). As McCarthy’s Stanford colleague Mo Fiorina can tell you, otherwise well-informed people believe all sorts of things about polarization that aren’t so. Labeling groups of Americans as “
Introduction: Q. D. Leavis wrote: The answer does seem to be that the academic world, like other worlds, is run by the politicians, and sensitively scrupulous people tend to leave politics to other people, while people with genuine work to do certainly have no time as well as no taste for committee-rigging and the associated techniques. And then of course there are the forces of native stupidity reinforced by that blind hostility to criticism, reform, new ideas and superior ability which is human as well as academic nature. Not that I’ve ever read anything by Mrs. Leavis (or, as the Brits used to write, Mrs Leavis). The above quote is one of the epigraphs to a book by Richard Kostelanetz. Whom I’ve never heard of, except in a footnote in John Rodden’s classic Orwell study, The Politics of Literary Reputation. I’ll have more to say about Orwell in another post, but for now let me return to the above Leavis quote, to which I have three reactions: 1. On a personal level, I’m on Leavis’s s
3 0.79113644 189 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-06-Proposal for a moratorium on the use of the words “fashionable” and “trendy”
Introduction: Tyler Cowen links to an interesting article by Terry Teachout on David Mamet’s political conservatism. I don’t think of playwrights as gurus, but I do find it interesting to consider the political orientations of authors and celebrities . I have only one problem with Teachout’s thought-provoking article. He writes: As early as 2002 . . . Arguing that “the Western press [had] embraced antisemitism as the new black,” Mamet drew a sharp contrast between that trendy distaste for Jews and the harsh realities of daily life in Israel . . . In 2006, Mamet published a collection of essays called The Wicked Son: Anti-Semitism, Jewish Self-Hatred and the Jews that made the point even more bluntly. “The Jewish State,” he wrote, “has offered the Arab world peace since 1948; it has received war, and slaughter, and the rhetoric of annihilation.” He went on to argue that secularized Jews who “reject their birthright of ‘connection to the Divine’” succumb in time to a self-hatred tha
4 0.78954589 1947 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-20-We are what we are studying
Introduction: Anthropologist Marshall Sahlins writes : When native Australians or New Guineans say that their totemic animals and plants are their kinsmen – that these species are persons like themselves, and that in offering them to others they are giving away part of their own substance – we have to take them seriously, which is to say empirically, if we want to understand the large consequences of these facts for how they organise their lives. The graveyard of ethnographic studies is strewn with the remains of reports which, thanks to anthropologists’ own presuppositions as to what constitutes empirical fact, were content to ignore or debunk the Amazonian peoples who said that the animals they hunted were their brothers-in-law, the Africans who described the way they systematically killed their kings when they became weak, or the Fijian chiefs who claimed they were gods. My first thought was . . . wait a minute! Whazzat with “presuppositions as to what constitutes empirical fact”? That a
5 0.78315681 715 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-16-“It doesn’t matter if you believe in God. What matters is if God believes in you.”
Introduction: Mark Chaves sent me this great article on religion and religious practice: After reading a book or article in the scientific study of religion, I [Chaves] wonder if you ever find yourself thinking, “I just don’t believe it.” I have this experience uncomfortably often, and I think it’s because of a pervasive problem in the scientific study of religion. I want to describe that problem and how to overcome it. The problem is illustrated in a story told by Meyer Fortes. He once asked a rainmaker in a native culture he was studying to perform the rainmaking ceremony for him. The rainmaker refused, replying: “Don’t be a fool, whoever makes a rain-making ceremony in the dry season?” The problem is illustrated in a different way in a story told by Jay Demerath. He was in Israel, visiting friends for a Sabbath dinner. The man of the house, a conservative rabbi, stopped in the middle of chanting the prayers to say cheerfully: “You know, we don’t believe in any of this. But then in Judai
6 0.7715565 483 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-23-Science, ideology, and human origins
7 0.75672293 604 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-08-More on the missing conservative psychology researchers
9 0.75413865 1140 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-27-Educational monoculture
10 0.746656 1303 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-06-I’m skeptical about this skeptical article about left-handedness
11 0.7458958 49 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-24-Blogging
12 0.74549532 1281 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-25-Dyson’s baffling love of crackpots
15 0.73665118 2158 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-03-Booze: Been There. Done That.
16 0.73597217 2053 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-06-Ideas that spread fast and slow
17 0.73587686 166 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-27-The Three Golden Rules for Successful Scientific Research
18 0.73317063 827 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-28-Amusing case of self-defeating science writing
19 0.73243827 1854 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-13-A Structural Comparison of Conspicuous Consumption in China and the United States
topicId topicWeight
[(15, 0.022), (16, 0.098), (21, 0.018), (24, 0.103), (45, 0.318), (49, 0.014), (55, 0.012), (64, 0.013), (79, 0.012), (81, 0.019), (99, 0.256)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.93716109 1407 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-06-Statistical inference and the secret ballot
Introduction: Ring Lardner, Jr.: [In 1936] I was already settled in Southern California, and it may have been that first exercise of the franchise that triggered the FBI surveillance of me that would last for decades. I had assumed, of course, that I was enjoying the vaunted American privilege of the secret ballot. On a wall outside my polling place on Wilshire Boulevard, however, was a compilation of the district’s registered voters: Democrats, a long list of names; Republicans, a somewhat lesser number; and “Declines to State,” one, “Ring W. Lardner, Jr.” The day after the election, alongside those lists were published the results: Roosevelt, so many; Landon, so many; Browder, one.
2 0.91226482 543 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-28-NYT shills for personal DNA tests
Introduction: Kaiser nails it . The offending article , by John Tierney, somehow ended up in the Science section rather than the Opinion section. As an opinion piece (or, for that matter, a blog), Tierney’s article would be nothing special. But I agree with Kaiser that it doesn’t work as a newspaper article. As Kaiser notes, this story involves a bunch of statistical and empirical claims that are not well resolved by P.R. and rhetoric.
3 0.91218728 999 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-09-I was at a meeting a couple months ago . . .
Introduction: . . . and I decided to amuse myself by writing down all the management-speak words I heard: “grappling” “early prototypes” “technology platform” “building block” “machine learning” “your team” “workspace” “tagging” “data exhaust” “monitoring a particular population” “collective intelligence” “communities of practice” “hackathon” “human resources . . . technologies” Any one or two or three of these phrases might be fine, but put them all together and what you have is a festival of jargon. A hackathon, indeed.
same-blog 4 0.86989421 1031 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-27-Richard Stallman and John McCarthy
Introduction: After blogging on quirky software pioneer Richard Stallman , I thought it appropriate to write something about recently deceased quirky software pioneer John McCarthy, who, with the exception of being bearded, seems like he was the personal and political opposite of Stallman. Here’s a page I found of Stallman McCarthy quotes (compiled by Neil Craig). It’s a mixture of the reasonable and the unreasonable (ok, I suppose the same could be said of this blog!). I wonder if he and Stallman ever met and, if so, whether they had an extended conversation. It would be like matter and anti-matter! P.S. I flipped through McCarthy’s pages and found one of my pet peeves. See item 3 here , which sounds so plausible but is in fact not true (at least, not according to the National Election Study). As McCarthy’s Stanford colleague Mo Fiorina can tell you, otherwise well-informed people believe all sorts of things about polarization that aren’t so. Labeling groups of Americans as “
5 0.86643195 1325 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-17-More on the difficulty of “preaching what you practice”
Introduction: A couple months ago, in discussing Charles Murray’s argument that America’s social leaders should “preach what they practice” (Murray argues that they—we!—tend to lead good lives of hard work and moderation but are all too tolerant of antisocial and unproductive behavior among the lower classes), I wrote : Murray does not consider the case of Joe Paterno, but in many ways the Penn State football coach fits his story well. Paterno was said to live an exemplary personal and professional life, combining traditional morality with football success—but, by his actions, he showed little concern about the morality of his players and coaches. At a professional level, Paterno rose higher and higher, and in his personal life he was a responsible adult. But he had an increasing disconnect with the real world, to the extent that horrible crimes were occurring nearby (in the physical and social senses) but he was completely insulated from the consequences for many years. Paterno’s story is s
6 0.86515188 791 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-08-Censoring on one end, “outliers” on the other, what can we do with the middle?
7 0.85292745 310 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-02-The winner’s curse
8 0.84726775 206 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-13-Indiemapper makes thematic mapping easy
9 0.83982682 1504 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-20-Could someone please lock this guy and Niall Ferguson in a room together?
10 0.83981907 69 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-04-A Wikipedia whitewash
11 0.82452375 673 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-20-Upper-income people still don’t realize they’re upper-income
12 0.82410878 192 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-08-Turning pages into data
13 0.81679547 2189 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-28-History is too important to be left to the history professors
14 0.81649041 1012 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-16-Blog bribes!
15 0.81455398 1121 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-15-R-squared for multilevel models
16 0.81454825 362 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-22-A redrawing of the Red-Blue map in November 2010?
17 0.79514188 1015 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-17-Good examples of lurking variables?
18 0.79402924 1767 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-17-The disappearing or non-disappearing middle class
19 0.79286182 573 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-14-Hipmunk < Expedia, again
20 0.79192191 735 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-28-New app for learning intro statistics