andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2014 andrew_gelman_stats-2014-2276 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Mon : The most-cited statistics papers ever Tues : American Psychological Society announces a new journal Wed : Am I too negative? Thurs : As the boldest experiment in journalism history, you admit you made a mistake Fri : The Notorious N.H.S.T. presents: Mo P-values Mo Problems Sat : Bizarre academic spam Sun : An old discussion of food deserts
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 Mon : The most-cited statistics papers ever Tues : American Psychological Society announces a new journal Wed : Am I too negative? [sent-1, score-0.609]
2 Thurs : As the boldest experiment in journalism history, you admit you made a mistake Fri : The Notorious N. [sent-2, score-0.882]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('mo', 0.478), ('boldest', 0.259), ('deserts', 0.248), ('announces', 0.226), ('bizarre', 0.202), ('sun', 0.192), ('fri', 0.187), ('mon', 0.183), ('tues', 0.183), ('spam', 0.178), ('thurs', 0.178), ('wed', 0.178), ('journalism', 0.167), ('presents', 0.16), ('food', 0.157), ('sat', 0.151), ('notorious', 0.143), ('admit', 0.135), ('psychological', 0.135), ('society', 0.134), ('mistake', 0.126), ('experiment', 0.125), ('history', 0.124), ('negative', 0.119), ('academic', 0.11), ('old', 0.104), ('american', 0.099), ('ever', 0.096), ('papers', 0.093), ('journal', 0.088), ('problems', 0.075), ('made', 0.07), ('discussion', 0.067), ('statistics', 0.057), ('new', 0.049)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99999994 2276 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-31-On deck this week
Introduction: Mon : The most-cited statistics papers ever Tues : American Psychological Society announces a new journal Wed : Am I too negative? Thurs : As the boldest experiment in journalism history, you admit you made a mistake Fri : The Notorious N.H.S.T. presents: Mo P-values Mo Problems Sat : Bizarre academic spam Sun : An old discussion of food deserts
2 0.26147082 2290 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-14-On deck this week
Introduction: Mon : Transitioning to Stan Tues : When you believe in things that you don’t understand Wed : Looking for Bayesian expertise in India, for the purpose of analysis of sarcoma trials Thurs : If you get to the point of asking, just do it. But some difficulties do arise . . . Fri : One-tailed or two-tailed? Sat : Index or indicator variables Sun : Fooled by randomness
3 0.25680757 2240 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-10-On deck this week: Things people sent me
Introduction: Mon: Preregistration: what’s in it for you? Tues: What if I were to stop publishing in journals? Wed: Empirical implications of Empirical Implications of Theoretical Models Thurs: An Economist’s Guide to Visualizing Data Fri: The maximal information coefficient Sat: Problematic interpretations of confidence intervals Sun: The more you look, the more you find
4 0.25360847 2366 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-09-On deck this week
Introduction: Mon: I hate polynomials Tues: Spring forward, fall back, drop dead? Wed: Bayes in the research conversation Thurs: The health policy innovation center: how best to move from pilot studies to large-scale practice? Fri: Stroopy names Sat: He’s not so great in math but wants to do statistics and machine learning Sun: Comparing the full model to the partial model
5 0.24958089 2321 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-05-On deck this week
Introduction: Mon: Can we make better graphs of global temperature history? Tues: Priors I don’t believe Wed: Cause he thinks he’s so-phisticated Thurs: Discussion with Steven Pinker on research that is attached to data that are so noisy as to be essentially uninformative Fri: Combining forecasts: Evidence on the relative accuracy of the simple average and Bayesian model averaging for predicting social science problems Sat: What property is important in a risk prediction model? Discrimination or calibration? Sun: “What should you talk about?” Plus whatever the co-bloggers want to throw in. Right now I’m super-excited about wedge sampling but I’ll let you know more about that once the paper is done.
6 0.23741736 2331 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-12-On deck this week
7 0.23299129 2348 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-26-On deck this week
8 0.22400112 2264 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-24-On deck this month
9 0.21707264 2298 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-21-On deck this week
10 0.21092066 2356 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-02-On deck this week
11 0.20173657 2339 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-19-On deck this week
12 0.19538137 2253 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-17-On deck this week: Revisitings
13 0.18791507 2310 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-28-On deck this week
14 0.18606365 2206 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-10-On deck this week
15 0.18322799 2285 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-07-On deck this week
16 0.1823049 2222 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-24-On deck this week
17 0.18193087 2265 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-24-On deck this week
18 0.14943403 2214 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-17-On deck this week
19 0.13233808 425 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-21-If your comment didn’t get through . . .
20 0.10887487 132 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-07-Note to “Cigarettes”
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.067), (1, -0.039), (2, -0.066), (3, -0.029), (4, -0.029), (5, 0.012), (6, -0.04), (7, -0.073), (8, 0.008), (9, -0.081), (10, -0.042), (11, 0.346), (12, 0.143), (13, 0.255), (14, -0.039), (15, -0.018), (16, 0.026), (17, 0.015), (18, 0.058), (19, -0.074), (20, 0.008), (21, 0.023), (22, 0.018), (23, 0.022), (24, 0.014), (25, -0.049), (26, 0.052), (27, 0.106), (28, -0.032), (29, 0.012), (30, -0.018), (31, 0.038), (32, 0.007), (33, 0.026), (34, -0.031), (35, -0.004), (36, -0.029), (37, 0.011), (38, -0.028), (39, 0.007), (40, -0.01), (41, 0.038), (42, -0.029), (43, 0.047), (44, 0.016), (45, -0.01), (46, 0.025), (47, 0.054), (48, 0.047), (49, 0.031)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.98050863 2276 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-31-On deck this week
Introduction: Mon : The most-cited statistics papers ever Tues : American Psychological Society announces a new journal Wed : Am I too negative? Thurs : As the boldest experiment in journalism history, you admit you made a mistake Fri : The Notorious N.H.S.T. presents: Mo P-values Mo Problems Sat : Bizarre academic spam Sun : An old discussion of food deserts
2 0.89183122 2298 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-21-On deck this week
Introduction: Mon : Ticket to Baaaath Tues : Ticket to Baaaaarf Wed : Thinking of doing a list experiment? Here’s a list of reasons why you should think again Thurs : An open site for researchers to post and share papers Fri : Questions about “Too Good to Be True” Sat : Sleazy sock puppet can’t stop spamming our discussion of compressed sensing and promoting the work of Xiteng Liu Sun : White stripes and dead armadillos
3 0.83867681 2240 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-10-On deck this week: Things people sent me
Introduction: Mon: Preregistration: what’s in it for you? Tues: What if I were to stop publishing in journals? Wed: Empirical implications of Empirical Implications of Theoretical Models Thurs: An Economist’s Guide to Visualizing Data Fri: The maximal information coefficient Sat: Problematic interpretations of confidence intervals Sun: The more you look, the more you find
4 0.83749533 2290 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-14-On deck this week
Introduction: Mon : Transitioning to Stan Tues : When you believe in things that you don’t understand Wed : Looking for Bayesian expertise in India, for the purpose of analysis of sarcoma trials Thurs : If you get to the point of asking, just do it. But some difficulties do arise . . . Fri : One-tailed or two-tailed? Sat : Index or indicator variables Sun : Fooled by randomness
5 0.83371943 2366 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-09-On deck this week
Introduction: Mon: I hate polynomials Tues: Spring forward, fall back, drop dead? Wed: Bayes in the research conversation Thurs: The health policy innovation center: how best to move from pilot studies to large-scale practice? Fri: Stroopy names Sat: He’s not so great in math but wants to do statistics and machine learning Sun: Comparing the full model to the partial model
6 0.83052844 2214 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-17-On deck this week
7 0.8273285 2253 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-17-On deck this week: Revisitings
8 0.80838138 2310 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-28-On deck this week
9 0.80484259 2331 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-12-On deck this week
10 0.79113603 2348 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-26-On deck this week
11 0.78875673 2356 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-02-On deck this week
12 0.76680213 2206 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-10-On deck this week
13 0.74467593 2285 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-07-On deck this week
14 0.70653546 2265 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-24-On deck this week
15 0.70190674 2321 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-05-On deck this week
16 0.68073177 2339 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-19-On deck this week
17 0.63861781 165 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-27-Nothing is Linear, Nothing is Additive: Bayesian Models for Interactions in Social Science
18 0.62060219 2264 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-24-On deck this month
19 0.59376442 2222 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-24-On deck this week
20 0.54951251 679 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-25-My talk at Stanford on Tuesday
topicId topicWeight
[(15, 0.053), (16, 0.091), (47, 0.055), (49, 0.078), (52, 0.137), (71, 0.094), (78, 0.034), (89, 0.059), (98, 0.086), (99, 0.17)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.93648952 2276 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-31-On deck this week
Introduction: Mon : The most-cited statistics papers ever Tues : American Psychological Society announces a new journal Wed : Am I too negative? Thurs : As the boldest experiment in journalism history, you admit you made a mistake Fri : The Notorious N.H.S.T. presents: Mo P-values Mo Problems Sat : Bizarre academic spam Sun : An old discussion of food deserts
2 0.73770785 1301 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-05-Related to z-statistics
Introduction: Pawel Sobkowicz writes: How many zombies do you know?’ Using indirect survey methods to measure alien attacks and outbreaks of the undead, Arxiv preprint arXiv:1003.6087, 2010 I hope you would find interesting the following paper, recently posted on arXiv: Aliens on Earth. Are reports of close encounters correct?, arXiv:1203.6805 This is soooooo much better than getting links to bad graphs or to papers on sex ratios!
3 0.71765721 1686 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-21-Finite-population Anova calculations for models with interactions
Introduction: Jim Thomson writes: I wonder if you could provide some clarification on the correct way to calculate the finite-population standard deviations for interaction terms in your Bayesian approach to ANOVA (as explained in your 2005 paper, and Gelman and Hill 2007). I understand that it is the SD of the constrained batch coefficients that is of interest, but in most WinBUGS examples I have seen, the SDs are all calculated directly as sd.fin<-sd(beta.main[]) for main effects and sd(beta.int[,]) for interaction effects, where beta.main and beta.int are the unconstrained coefficients, e.g. beta.int[i,j]~dnorm(0,tau). For main effects, I can see that it makes no difference, since the constrained value is calculated by subtracting the mean, and sd(B[]) = sd(B[]-mean(B[])). But the conventional sum-to-zero constraint for interaction terms in linear models is more complicated than subtracting the mean (there are only (n1-1)*(n2-1) free coefficients for an interaction b/w factors with n1 a
4 0.70692694 914 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-16-meta-infographic
Introduction: “Most Popular Infographics you can find around the web” by designer and illustrator Alberto Antoniazzi.
5 0.70548958 1969 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-05-New issue of Symposium magazine
Introduction: Symposium magazine (“Where Academia Meets Public Life”) has some fun stuff this month: Learning to Read All Over Again Lutz Koepnick What produces better students – reading in print or reading on-line? The answer is both. The Elusive Quest for Research Innovation Claude S. Fischer Much of what is considered “new research” has actually been around for a while. But that does not mean it lacks value. Science Journalism and the Art of Expressing Uncertainty Andrew Gelman It is all too easy for unsupported claims to get published in scientific publications. How can journalists address this? A Scientist Goes Rogue Euny Hong Can social media and crowdfunding sustain independent researchers? Still Waiting for Change Sylvia A. Allegretto Economists and policymakers alike are ignoring a huge class of workers whose wages have been effectively frozen for decades. One Professor’s Spirited Enterprise Bob Benenson A burgeoning distilling program has successfully
6 0.70412767 1246 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-04-Data visualization panel at the New York Public Library this evening!
7 0.69625103 223 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-21-Statoverflow
8 0.69510788 104 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-22-Seeking balance
9 0.69245291 376 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-28-My talk at American University
10 0.68904614 1957 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-26-“The Inside Story Of The Harvard Dissertation That Became Too Racist For Heritage”
11 0.68880671 889 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-04-The acupuncture paradox
12 0.68862092 1709 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-06-The fractal nature of scientific revolutions
13 0.68068862 710 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-14-Missed Friday the 13th Zombie Plot Update
14 0.67992175 1806 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-16-My talk in Chicago this Thurs 6:30pm
16 0.67684412 1 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-22-Political Belief Networks: Socio-cognitive Heterogeneity in American Public Opinion
17 0.67091966 2131 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-12-My talk at Leuven, Sat 14 Dec
18 0.66985846 196 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-10-The U.S. as welfare state
19 0.66970873 1020 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-20-No no no no no
20 0.66962963 2060 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-13-New issue of Symposium magazine