andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1504 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Jeffrey Frankel, identified as a former member of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers, writes (link from here ): As a rule, one should judge people on their merits, not on the supposed attributes of the racial, socioeconomic, or geographic groups to which they belong. Yet statistical relationships sometimes are so strong that it is worth pondering their significance. . . . The unspoken truth is that, compared to “blue-staters,” those who live in red states exhibit less responsibility, on average, in their personal behavior: they are less physically fit, less careful in their sexual behavior, more prone to inflict harm on themselves and others through smoking and drinking, and more likely to receive federal subsidies. An unspoken truth, huh? Wow, that really sucks! Something should be done about it. Good thing that this Harvard professor and former member of Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisors is on the case: Statistical analysis shows that sta
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 Jeffrey Frankel, identified as a former member of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers, writes (link from here ): As a rule, one should judge people on their merits, not on the supposed attributes of the racial, socioeconomic, or geographic groups to which they belong. [sent-1, score-0.326]
2 To illustrate, a mere 1% decrease in a state’s obesity on average is estimated to raise the ratio of Democratic to Republican voters from 1. [sent-11, score-0.532]
3 Every time I eat a jelly doughnut, I feel a little bit more Republican. [sent-17, score-0.105]
4 Frankel continues: Blue-state residents, who tend to be more educated and have higher incomes than residents of red states, have refrained from suggesting that their red-states compatriots exhibit behavior that falls short of the conservative rhetoric of personal responsibility. [sent-18, score-1.033]
5 It’s a good thing he established right at the beginning his belief that “as a rule, one should judge people on their merits, not on the supposed attributes of the racial, socioeconomic, or geographic groups to which they belong. [sent-19, score-0.154]
6 ” Otherwise I might think he was judging people based on some combination of their political affiliation and their state of residence, and that wouldn’t be good at all! [sent-20, score-0.139]
7 and he seems to be an expert on international trade. [sent-24, score-0.186]
8 politics and I don’t know anything about international trade! [sent-30, score-0.112]
9 The difference is, I know I don’t know anything about international trade. [sent-31, score-0.112]
10 Jeffrey Frankel, a distinguished economist, public servant, and expert on international trade, made a common but, I hope, avoidable statistical error in a recent column. [sent-39, score-0.186]
11 Blue-state residents, who tend to be more educated and have higher incomes than residents of red states . [sent-43, score-0.888]
12 ” In fact, as we describe in detail in our book Red State Blue State, differences between state averages do not necessarily reflect individual differences. [sent-47, score-0.139]
13 For example, blue state residents have higher incomes, on average, than red state residents; but Democratic (“blue”) voters are poorer, on average, than Republican (“red”) voters. [sent-48, score-0.898]
14 Similarly, it is misleading to write, “Statistical analysis shows that states where more residents suffer from obesity, often because they get less physical exercise and eat more junk food, tend to vote Republican. [sent-50, score-0.901]
15 To illustrate, a mere 1% decrease in a state’s obesity on average is estimated to raise the ratio of Democratic to Republican voters from 1. [sent-51, score-0.532]
16 07″—an argument that conflates individuals and states and confuses correlation with causation. [sent-53, score-0.143]
17 Frankel’s mistake is an easy one to make; others who have confused state-level with aggregate patterns include respected commentators Nicholas Kristof, Michael Barone, and Tucker Carlson. [sent-54, score-0.071]
18 Seeing this mistake made by a leading scholar and former member of the Council of Economic Advisors has motivated me to post on this topic once again. [sent-55, score-0.243]
19 Now Frankel will want to be my friend rather than hating my guts (although, to be fair, when commenters mocked my own ignorance recently, I actually appreciated the help, I didn’t hate their guts at all, so maybe Frankel will react the same way). [sent-58, score-0.196]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('frankel', 0.518), ('residents', 0.301), ('red', 0.163), ('council', 0.152), ('obesity', 0.148), ('states', 0.143), ('state', 0.139), ('inflict', 0.114), ('international', 0.112), ('exhibit', 0.111), ('behavior', 0.111), ('incomes', 0.11), ('less', 0.108), ('average', 0.106), ('eat', 0.105), ('clinton', 0.104), ('advisors', 0.104), ('unspoken', 0.098), ('guts', 0.098), ('member', 0.091), ('physically', 0.09), ('tend', 0.089), ('socioeconomic', 0.085), ('democratic', 0.085), ('educated', 0.082), ('prone', 0.082), ('former', 0.081), ('junk', 0.08), ('voters', 0.08), ('attributes', 0.079), ('merits', 0.077), ('drinking', 0.076), ('jeffrey', 0.076), ('economic', 0.076), ('blue', 0.076), ('republican', 0.075), ('geographic', 0.075), ('suffer', 0.075), ('sexual', 0.075), ('expert', 0.074), ('smoking', 0.072), ('mistake', 0.071), ('responsibility', 0.071), ('harm', 0.07), ('racial', 0.07), ('mere', 0.069), ('trade', 0.069), ('decrease', 0.067), ('personal', 0.066), ('ratio', 0.062)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0000001 1504 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-20-Could someone please lock this guy and Niall Ferguson in a room together?
Introduction: Jeffrey Frankel, identified as a former member of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers, writes (link from here ): As a rule, one should judge people on their merits, not on the supposed attributes of the racial, socioeconomic, or geographic groups to which they belong. Yet statistical relationships sometimes are so strong that it is worth pondering their significance. . . . The unspoken truth is that, compared to “blue-staters,” those who live in red states exhibit less responsibility, on average, in their personal behavior: they are less physically fit, less careful in their sexual behavior, more prone to inflict harm on themselves and others through smoking and drinking, and more likely to receive federal subsidies. An unspoken truth, huh? Wow, that really sucks! Something should be done about it. Good thing that this Harvard professor and former member of Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisors is on the case: Statistical analysis shows that sta
2 0.15856674 2255 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-19-How Americans vote
Introduction: An interview with me from 2012 : You’re a statistician and wrote a book, Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State , looking at why Americans vote the way they do. In an election year I think it would be a good time to revisit that question, not just for people in the US, but anyone around the world who wants to understand the realities – rather than the stereotypes – of how Americans vote. I regret the title I gave my book. I was too greedy. I wanted it to be an airport bestseller because I figured there were millions of people who are interested in politics and some subset of them are always looking at the statistics. It’s got a very grabby title and as a result people underestimated the content. They thought it was a popularisation of my work, or, at best, an expansion of an article we’d written. But it had tons of original material. If I’d given it a more serious, political science-y title, then all sorts of people would have wanted to read it, because they would
Introduction: Matthew Yglesias noticed something interesting in a political story today that reminds me of one of our arguments in Red State, Blue State. I have the feeling that most readers of this blog are less fascinated than I am by U.S. politics, so I’ll put the rest below the fold. Yglesias quotes a Washington Post article on Blanche Lincoln returning to the U.S. Senate after surviving a primary challenge from a candidate supported by organized labor: Lincoln was embraced by her colleagues . . . Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) held up two fists and said of her primary campaign: “Fighting Wall Street with one hand, unions with the other.” Yglesias points out a fundamental asymmetry here: Schumer, who’s become something of a national leader among Senate Democrats, celebrates this ideal [of governing in a manner that's equidistant from rival interest groups], but there’s not a single member of the Republican Party–much less a leader–who’d say anything remotely similar. Schumer is basi
4 0.13630472 1385 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-20-Reconciling different claims about working-class voters
Introduction: After our discussions of psychologist Jonathan Haidt’s opinions about working-class voters (see here and here ), a question arose on how to reconcile the analyses of Alan Abramowitz and Tom Edsall (showing an increase in Republican voting among low-education working white southerners), with Larry Bartels’s finding that “there has been no discernible trend in presidential voting behavior among the ‘working white working class.’” Here is my resolution: All the statistics that have been posted seem reasonable to me. Also relevant to the discussion, I believe, are Figures 3.1, 4.2b, 10.1, and 10.2 of Red State Blue State. In short: Republicans continue to do about 20 percentage points better among upper-income voters compared to lower-income, but the compositions of these coalitions have changed over time. As has been noted, low-education white workers have moved toward the Republican party over the past few decades, and at the same time there have been compositional changes
5 0.13181168 1635 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-22-More Pinker Pinker Pinker
Introduction: After I posted this recent comment on a blog of Steven Pinker (see also here ), we had the following exchange. I’m reposting it here (with Pinker’s agreement) not because we achieved any deep insights but because I thought it useful to reveal to people that so-called experts such as us are not so clear on these issues either. AG: I noticed your article on red and blue states and had some thoughts. . . . The short summary is that I think that your idea is interesting but that, as stated, it explains too much, in that your story is based on centuries-long history but it only fits electoral patterns since the 1980s. SP: Though the exact alignment between red and blue states, political parties, and particular issues surely shift, I’d be surprised if the basic alignments between geography and the right-left divide, and the issues that cluster on each side of the divide, have radically changed over the past century. (Obviously if you define “red” and “blue” by the Republican
7 0.12546493 536 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-24-Trends in partisanship by state
8 0.12143871 125 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-02-The moral of the story is, Don’t look yourself up on Google
9 0.11362692 460 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-09-Statistics gifts?
10 0.11337177 362 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-22-A redrawing of the Red-Blue map in November 2010?
11 0.11129825 159 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-23-Popular governor, small state
12 0.10918551 1839 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-04-Jesus historian Niall Ferguson and the improving standards of public discourse
13 0.1049277 394 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-05-2010: What happened?
15 0.10160232 1653 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-04-Census dotmap
16 0.099293984 1 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-22-Political Belief Networks: Socio-cognitive Heterogeneity in American Public Opinion
17 0.096775129 2022 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-13-You heard it here first: Intense exercise can suppress appetite
18 0.091499805 1189 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-28-Those darn physicists
19 0.090636194 636 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-29-The Conservative States of America
20 0.086301602 1155 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-05-What is a prior distribution?
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.154), (1, -0.088), (2, 0.125), (3, 0.067), (4, -0.053), (5, -0.003), (6, -0.023), (7, -0.002), (8, -0.008), (9, 0.021), (10, -0.011), (11, -0.005), (12, 0.011), (13, 0.024), (14, 0.052), (15, 0.01), (16, 0.005), (17, -0.028), (18, -0.003), (19, -0.038), (20, 0.005), (21, -0.016), (22, -0.04), (23, -0.042), (24, 0.021), (25, -0.004), (26, -0.032), (27, 0.004), (28, 0.033), (29, -0.002), (30, 0.061), (31, -0.036), (32, 0.024), (33, 0.022), (34, 0.021), (35, 0.011), (36, 0.014), (37, -0.022), (38, -0.02), (39, -0.042), (40, 0.027), (41, -0.002), (42, -0.034), (43, -0.009), (44, 0.062), (45, 0.004), (46, -0.034), (47, -0.009), (48, -0.064), (49, 0.01)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.96380979 1504 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-20-Could someone please lock this guy and Niall Ferguson in a room together?
Introduction: Jeffrey Frankel, identified as a former member of President Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisers, writes (link from here ): As a rule, one should judge people on their merits, not on the supposed attributes of the racial, socioeconomic, or geographic groups to which they belong. Yet statistical relationships sometimes are so strong that it is worth pondering their significance. . . . The unspoken truth is that, compared to “blue-staters,” those who live in red states exhibit less responsibility, on average, in their personal behavior: they are less physically fit, less careful in their sexual behavior, more prone to inflict harm on themselves and others through smoking and drinking, and more likely to receive federal subsidies. An unspoken truth, huh? Wow, that really sucks! Something should be done about it. Good thing that this Harvard professor and former member of Bill Clinton’s Council of Economic Advisors is on the case: Statistical analysis shows that sta
2 0.8650589 201 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-12-Are all rich people now liberals?
Introduction: So asks James Ledbetter in Slate. And the answer is . . . No! Here’s what happened in 2008: OK, that’s how people vote. How bout party identification and ideology? Check these out : (Click on image to see larger version.) And here it is, sliced a different way : Of, if you want to see it in map form, check out this article (with Daniel and Yair). P.S. A skeptic might comment that the above graphs, which are based on national poll data, only break down incomes to the top 5% or so. What about the truly rich. Here are my thoughts on the political attitudes of the super-rich. P.P.S. Ledbetter actually makes some good points in his article, which is about the campaign contributions of rich Americans. The article relies on a recent book by David Callahan, which seems to echo the work of Tom Ferguson (cited in the above-linked blog entry), who’s tracked campaign contributions by industry over many years. I think that Ferguson (and Callahan) a
3 0.84941012 1385 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-20-Reconciling different claims about working-class voters
Introduction: After our discussions of psychologist Jonathan Haidt’s opinions about working-class voters (see here and here ), a question arose on how to reconcile the analyses of Alan Abramowitz and Tom Edsall (showing an increase in Republican voting among low-education working white southerners), with Larry Bartels’s finding that “there has been no discernible trend in presidential voting behavior among the ‘working white working class.’” Here is my resolution: All the statistics that have been posted seem reasonable to me. Also relevant to the discussion, I believe, are Figures 3.1, 4.2b, 10.1, and 10.2 of Red State Blue State. In short: Republicans continue to do about 20 percentage points better among upper-income voters compared to lower-income, but the compositions of these coalitions have changed over time. As has been noted, low-education white workers have moved toward the Republican party over the past few decades, and at the same time there have been compositional changes
Introduction: Matthew Yglesias noticed something interesting in a political story today that reminds me of one of our arguments in Red State, Blue State. I have the feeling that most readers of this blog are less fascinated than I am by U.S. politics, so I’ll put the rest below the fold. Yglesias quotes a Washington Post article on Blanche Lincoln returning to the U.S. Senate after surviving a primary challenge from a candidate supported by organized labor: Lincoln was embraced by her colleagues . . . Sen. Chuck Schumer (N.Y.) held up two fists and said of her primary campaign: “Fighting Wall Street with one hand, unions with the other.” Yglesias points out a fundamental asymmetry here: Schumer, who’s become something of a national leader among Senate Democrats, celebrates this ideal [of governing in a manner that's equidistant from rival interest groups], but there’s not a single member of the Republican Party–much less a leader–who’d say anything remotely similar. Schumer is basi
5 0.8328467 362 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-22-A redrawing of the Red-Blue map in November 2010?
Introduction: Here are my answers to the following questions asked by Pauline Peretz: 1. Many analysts have emphasized that there was a redrawing of the electoral map in 2008. To what extent will the November midterm elections affect this red-blue map? How long will the newly blue states remain blue? 2. Do you think the predictable loss of the Democrats in November definitely disqualifies the hypothesis that Obama’s election was the beginning of a realignment in American politics, that is a period of dominance for the Democratic party due to favourable demographics? 3. Some analysts consider that voting patterns are best explained by economic factors, others by values. How do you position yourself in the debate on culture wars vs. economic wars? 4. In your book Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State, you renew the ongoing debate on the correlation between income and vote, showing it is much stronger in poor states. In light of this correlation, would you say that there currently is
6 0.8288914 636 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-29-The Conservative States of America
9 0.80164486 1635 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-22-More Pinker Pinker Pinker
14 0.76817083 159 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-23-Popular governor, small state
15 0.76403248 125 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-02-The moral of the story is, Don’t look yourself up on Google
16 0.76054054 536 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-24-Trends in partisanship by state
19 0.74497724 2255 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-19-How Americans vote
20 0.7421934 1169 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-15-Charles Murray on the new upper class
topicId topicWeight
[(15, 0.029), (16, 0.061), (18, 0.031), (21, 0.019), (24, 0.075), (45, 0.239), (53, 0.014), (55, 0.024), (76, 0.024), (82, 0.025), (89, 0.012), (98, 0.025), (99, 0.265)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.94537759 543 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-28-NYT shills for personal DNA tests
Introduction: Kaiser nails it . The offending article , by John Tierney, somehow ended up in the Science section rather than the Opinion section. As an opinion piece (or, for that matter, a blog), Tierney’s article would be nothing special. But I agree with Kaiser that it doesn’t work as a newspaper article. As Kaiser notes, this story involves a bunch of statistical and empirical claims that are not well resolved by P.R. and rhetoric.
2 0.94236153 1407 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-06-Statistical inference and the secret ballot
Introduction: Ring Lardner, Jr.: [In 1936] I was already settled in Southern California, and it may have been that first exercise of the franchise that triggered the FBI surveillance of me that would last for decades. I had assumed, of course, that I was enjoying the vaunted American privilege of the secret ballot. On a wall outside my polling place on Wilshire Boulevard, however, was a compilation of the district’s registered voters: Democrats, a long list of names; Republicans, a somewhat lesser number; and “Declines to State,” one, “Ring W. Lardner, Jr.” The day after the election, alongside those lists were published the results: Roosevelt, so many; Landon, so many; Browder, one.
3 0.93478733 999 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-09-I was at a meeting a couple months ago . . .
Introduction: . . . and I decided to amuse myself by writing down all the management-speak words I heard: “grappling” “early prototypes” “technology platform” “building block” “machine learning” “your team” “workspace” “tagging” “data exhaust” “monitoring a particular population” “collective intelligence” “communities of practice” “hackathon” “human resources . . . technologies” Any one or two or three of these phrases might be fine, but put them all together and what you have is a festival of jargon. A hackathon, indeed.
4 0.91895986 1325 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-17-More on the difficulty of “preaching what you practice”
Introduction: A couple months ago, in discussing Charles Murray’s argument that America’s social leaders should “preach what they practice” (Murray argues that they—we!—tend to lead good lives of hard work and moderation but are all too tolerant of antisocial and unproductive behavior among the lower classes), I wrote : Murray does not consider the case of Joe Paterno, but in many ways the Penn State football coach fits his story well. Paterno was said to live an exemplary personal and professional life, combining traditional morality with football success—but, by his actions, he showed little concern about the morality of his players and coaches. At a professional level, Paterno rose higher and higher, and in his personal life he was a responsible adult. But he had an increasing disconnect with the real world, to the extent that horrible crimes were occurring nearby (in the physical and social senses) but he was completely insulated from the consequences for many years. Paterno’s story is s
5 0.91394794 1031 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-27-Richard Stallman and John McCarthy
Introduction: After blogging on quirky software pioneer Richard Stallman , I thought it appropriate to write something about recently deceased quirky software pioneer John McCarthy, who, with the exception of being bearded, seems like he was the personal and political opposite of Stallman. Here’s a page I found of Stallman McCarthy quotes (compiled by Neil Craig). It’s a mixture of the reasonable and the unreasonable (ok, I suppose the same could be said of this blog!). I wonder if he and Stallman ever met and, if so, whether they had an extended conversation. It would be like matter and anti-matter! P.S. I flipped through McCarthy’s pages and found one of my pet peeves. See item 3 here , which sounds so plausible but is in fact not true (at least, not according to the National Election Study). As McCarthy’s Stanford colleague Mo Fiorina can tell you, otherwise well-informed people believe all sorts of things about polarization that aren’t so. Labeling groups of Americans as “
same-blog 6 0.91202593 1504 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-20-Could someone please lock this guy and Niall Ferguson in a room together?
7 0.90573072 206 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-13-Indiemapper makes thematic mapping easy
9 0.89179349 69 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-04-A Wikipedia whitewash
10 0.88881493 673 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-20-Upper-income people still don’t realize they’re upper-income
11 0.88767326 192 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-08-Turning pages into data
12 0.88186663 310 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-02-The winner’s curse
13 0.87751365 1012 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-16-Blog bribes!
14 0.87546962 362 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-22-A redrawing of the Red-Blue map in November 2010?
15 0.8702234 2189 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-28-History is too important to be left to the history professors
16 0.86841238 1015 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-17-Good examples of lurking variables?
17 0.866027 735 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-28-New app for learning intro statistics
18 0.86074519 1121 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-15-R-squared for multilevel models
19 0.85810047 1767 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-17-The disappearing or non-disappearing middle class
20 0.85696715 573 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-14-Hipmunk < Expedia, again