andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2011 andrew_gelman_stats-2011-680 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

680 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-26-My talk at Berkeley on Wednesday


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: Something on Applied Bayesian Statistics April 27, 4:10-5 p.m., 1011 Evans Hall I will deliver one of the following three talks: 1. Of beauty, sex, and power: Statistical challenges in estimating small effects 2. Why we (usually) don’t worry about multiple comparisons 3. Parameterization and Bayesian modeling Whoever shows up on time to the seminar gets to vote, and I’ll give the talk that gets the most votes.


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 , 1011 Evans Hall I will deliver one of the following three talks: 1. [sent-3, score-0.507]

2 Of beauty, sex, and power: Statistical challenges in estimating small effects 2. [sent-4, score-0.547]

3 Why we (usually) don’t worry about multiple comparisons 3. [sent-5, score-0.434]

4 Parameterization and Bayesian modeling Whoever shows up on time to the seminar gets to vote, and I’ll give the talk that gets the most votes. [sent-6, score-1.267]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('evans', 0.285), ('deliver', 0.277), ('gets', 0.262), ('parameterization', 0.248), ('hall', 0.244), ('whoever', 0.238), ('seminar', 0.225), ('beauty', 0.225), ('april', 0.217), ('votes', 0.193), ('talks', 0.191), ('challenges', 0.189), ('bayesian', 0.175), ('sex', 0.172), ('worry', 0.164), ('estimating', 0.153), ('vote', 0.149), ('shows', 0.145), ('comparisons', 0.142), ('power', 0.14), ('multiple', 0.128), ('usually', 0.128), ('modeling', 0.117), ('applied', 0.113), ('talk', 0.112), ('three', 0.109), ('effects', 0.105), ('small', 0.1), ('give', 0.089), ('following', 0.088), ('ll', 0.077), ('statistics', 0.071), ('something', 0.065), ('statistical', 0.065), ('time', 0.055), ('one', 0.033)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.99999994 680 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-26-My talk at Berkeley on Wednesday

Introduction: Something on Applied Bayesian Statistics April 27, 4:10-5 p.m., 1011 Evans Hall I will deliver one of the following three talks: 1. Of beauty, sex, and power: Statistical challenges in estimating small effects 2. Why we (usually) don’t worry about multiple comparisons 3. Parameterization and Bayesian modeling Whoever shows up on time to the seminar gets to vote, and I’ll give the talk that gets the most votes.

2 0.21756934 679 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-25-My talk at Stanford on Tuesday

Introduction: Of Beauty, Sex, and Power: Statistical Challenges in Estimating Small Effects. Tues 26 Apr, 12-1 in the Graham Stuart Lounge, 4th Floor, Encina West.

3 0.18403661 694 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-04-My talk at Hunter College on Thurs

Introduction: Of beauty, sex, and power: Statistical challenges in estimating small effects . Thurs 5 May at 11am at Roosevelt House, at 47-49 East 65th Street (north side of East 65th street, between Park and Madison Avenues).

4 0.17507106 1013 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-16-My talk at Math for America on Saturday

Introduction: Here’s what I’ll talk about for 3 hours : Statistics—Inside and Outside the Classroom (1) Of Beauty, Sex, and Power: Statistical Challenges in the Estimation of Small Effects . A silly example of the frequencies of boy and girl babies leads us to some important research involving the meaning of statistical significance. (2) Mathematics, Statistics, and Political Science . We explore the differences between mathematical and statistical thinking, developing the ideas using examples from my own research in political science. (3) Statistics Teaching Activities . For twenty years I have been collecting class-participation demonstrations in statistics and probability. Here are some of my favorites.

5 0.16280967 651 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-06-My talk at Northwestern University tomorrow (Thursday)

Introduction: Of Beauty, Sex, and Power: Statistical Challenges in Estimating Small Effects. At the Institute of Policy Research, Thurs 7 Apr 2011, 3.30pm . Regular blog readers know all about this topic. ( Here are the slides.) But, rest assured, I don’t just mock. I also offer constructive suggestions. My last talk at Northwestern was fifteen years ago. Actually, I gave two lectures then, in the process of being turned down for a job enjoying their chilly Midwestern hospitality. P.S. I searched on the web and also found this announcement which gives the wrong title.

6 0.14544816 1989 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-20-Correcting for multiple comparisons in a Bayesian regression model

7 0.12592568 1016 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-17-I got 99 comparisons but multiplicity ain’t one

8 0.12088448 2207 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-11-My talks in Bristol this Wed and London this Thurs

9 0.1159436 1824 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-25-Fascinating graphs from facebook data

10 0.11098604 1772 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-20-Stan at Google this Thurs and at Berkeley this Fri noon

11 0.10552205 699 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-06-Another stereotype demolished

12 0.10222253 2147 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-25-Measuring Beauty

13 0.10137398 172 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-30-Why don’t we have peer reviewing for oral presentations?

14 0.10045181 1532 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-13-A real-life dollar auction game!

15 0.097967252 1039 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-02-I just flew in from the econ seminar, and boy are my arms tired

16 0.096908592 466 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-13-“The truth wears off: Is there something wrong with the scientific method?”

17 0.093149796 1554 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-31-It not necessary that Bayesian methods conform to the likelihood principle

18 0.089988247 1205 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-09-Coming to agreement on philosophy of statistics

19 0.088416547 1712 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-07-Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics (with all the discussions!)

20 0.086465649 1695 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-28-Economists argue about Bayes


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.125), (1, 0.047), (2, -0.016), (3, 0.029), (4, -0.045), (5, 0.037), (6, -0.11), (7, 0.029), (8, -0.011), (9, -0.063), (10, 0.012), (11, -0.001), (12, 0.083), (13, 0.02), (14, 0.057), (15, -0.036), (16, -0.04), (17, 0.004), (18, -0.014), (19, 0.054), (20, -0.079), (21, 0.028), (22, 0.057), (23, -0.014), (24, -0.014), (25, -0.026), (26, -0.084), (27, -0.039), (28, -0.022), (29, -0.066), (30, 0.033), (31, -0.004), (32, -0.004), (33, -0.02), (34, 0.077), (35, 0.004), (36, 0.04), (37, -0.024), (38, -0.06), (39, 0.015), (40, 0.028), (41, 0.036), (42, -0.042), (43, 0.018), (44, -0.003), (45, -0.093), (46, 0.033), (47, 0.044), (48, 0.004), (49, -0.048)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.97151715 680 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-26-My talk at Berkeley on Wednesday

Introduction: Something on Applied Bayesian Statistics April 27, 4:10-5 p.m., 1011 Evans Hall I will deliver one of the following three talks: 1. Of beauty, sex, and power: Statistical challenges in estimating small effects 2. Why we (usually) don’t worry about multiple comparisons 3. Parameterization and Bayesian modeling Whoever shows up on time to the seminar gets to vote, and I’ll give the talk that gets the most votes.

2 0.62962425 193 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-09-Besag

Introduction: Xian posts his memories of Julian Besag, who is perhaps most famous for publishing the Hammersley-Clifford theorem (see here for some background). I met Besag in 1989 when I spoke at the University of Washington; also I have a memory of a conference in 1992 or 1993, I think it was, when he objected strongly to my use of the chi-squared test to check the fit of a Bayesian model. (In retrospect, I don’t think I presented my ideas clearly enough; some of the material in that talk ended up in this article with Meng and Stern.) I also recall a talk I gave in Seattle around 1996, when Besag commented that the models I was using for spatial analysis were pretty crude–a fair comment, actually. I don’t actually recall any of Besag’s lectures, but I read many of his papers. As Xian said, Besag did innovative and important work on spatial statistics, work that will be long used and remembered. He was in many ways ahead of his time and was a rarity in his generation of Bayesian statist

3 0.61213493 651 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-06-My talk at Northwestern University tomorrow (Thursday)

Introduction: Of Beauty, Sex, and Power: Statistical Challenges in Estimating Small Effects. At the Institute of Policy Research, Thurs 7 Apr 2011, 3.30pm . Regular blog readers know all about this topic. ( Here are the slides.) But, rest assured, I don’t just mock. I also offer constructive suggestions. My last talk at Northwestern was fifteen years ago. Actually, I gave two lectures then, in the process of being turned down for a job enjoying their chilly Midwestern hospitality. P.S. I searched on the web and also found this announcement which gives the wrong title.

4 0.61156106 2275 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-31-Just gave a talk

Introduction: I just gave a talk in Milan. Actually I was sitting at my desk, it was a g+ hangout which was a bit more convenient for me. The audience was a bunch of astronomers so I figured they could handle a satellite link. . . . Anyway, the talk didn’t go so well. Two reasons: first, it’s just hard to get the connection with the audience without being able to see their faces. Next time I think I’ll try to get several people in the audience to open up their laptops and connect to the hangout, so that I can see a mosaic of faces instead of just a single image from the front of the room. The second problem with the talk was the topic. I asked the people who invited me to choose a topic, and they picked Can we use Bayesian methods to resolve the current crisis of statistically-significant research findings that don’t hold up? But I don’t think this was right for this audience. I think that it would’ve been better to give them the Stan talk or the little data talk or the statistic

5 0.60068101 205 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-13-Arnold Zellner

Introduction: Steve Ziliak reports: I [Ziliak] am sorry to share this sad news about Arnold Zellner (AEA Distinguished Fellow, 2002, ASA President, 1991, ISBA co-founding president, all around genius and sweet fellow), who died yesterday morning (August 11, 2010). He was a truly great statistician and to me and to many others a generous and wonderful friend, colleague, and hero. I will miss him. His cancer was spreading everywhere though you wouldn’t know it as his energy level was Arnold’s typical: abnormally high. But then he had a stroke just a few days after an unsuccessful surgery “to help with breathing” the doctor said, and the combination of events weakened him terribly. He was vibrant through June and much of July, and maintained an 8 hour work day at the office. He never lost his sense of humor nor his joy of life. He died at home in hospice care and fortunately he did not suffer long. From the official announcement from the University of Chicago: Arnold began his academi

6 0.59621286 2368 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-11-Bayes in the research conversation

7 0.59222138 1497 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-15-Our blog makes connections!

8 0.58435047 2000 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-28-Why during the 1950-1960′s did Jerry Cornfield become a Bayesian?

9 0.58224589 679 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-25-My talk at Stanford on Tuesday

10 0.58135277 2131 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-12-My talk at Leuven, Sat 14 Dec

11 0.5806632 1771 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-19-“Ronald Reagan is a Statistician and Other Examples of Learning From Diverse Sources of Information”

12 0.57317382 1781 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-29-Another Feller theory

13 0.57274759 1259 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-11-How things sound to us, versus how they sound to others

14 0.57182121 376 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-28-My talk at American University

15 0.56263536 133 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-08-Gratuitous use of “Bayesian Statistics,” a branding issue?

16 0.55438912 2254 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-18-Those wacky anti-Bayesians used to be intimidating, but now they’re just pathetic

17 0.55408645 466 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-13-“The truth wears off: Is there something wrong with the scientific method?”

18 0.55178756 1772 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-20-Stan at Google this Thurs and at Berkeley this Fri noon

19 0.54151565 694 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-04-My talk at Hunter College on Thurs

20 0.54127425 2293 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-16-Looking for Bayesian expertise in India, for the purpose of analysis of sarcoma trials


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(6, 0.04), (9, 0.08), (16, 0.085), (21, 0.039), (24, 0.125), (66, 0.245), (82, 0.066), (99, 0.179)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

1 0.95220327 188 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-06-Fake newspaper headlines

Introduction: I used this convenient site to create some images for a talk I’m preparing. (The competing headlines: “Beautiful parents have more daughters” vs. “No compelling evidence that beautiful parents are more or less likely to have daughters.” The latter gets cut off at “No compelling evidence that,” which actually works pretty well to demonstrate the sort of dull headline that would result if newspapers were to publish null results.)

same-blog 2 0.91532892 680 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-26-My talk at Berkeley on Wednesday

Introduction: Something on Applied Bayesian Statistics April 27, 4:10-5 p.m., 1011 Evans Hall I will deliver one of the following three talks: 1. Of beauty, sex, and power: Statistical challenges in estimating small effects 2. Why we (usually) don’t worry about multiple comparisons 3. Parameterization and Bayesian modeling Whoever shows up on time to the seminar gets to vote, and I’ll give the talk that gets the most votes.

3 0.88533854 1192 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-02-These people totally don’t know what Chance magazine is all about

Introduction: I received the following unsolicited email, subject line “Chance Magazine – Comedy Showcase”: Hi Andrew, Hope you’re doing well. I’m writing to let you know that we will be putting on an industry showcase at the brand new Laughing Devil Comedy Club (4738 Vernon Blvd. Long Island City) on Thursday, February 9th at 8:00 PM. If you’re unfamiliar, it’s one stop on the 7 train from Grand Central. Following the showcase, the club will stay open for an industry mingle/happy hour with drink specials and all the business card exchanging you can hope for. This showcase will feature 9 of our best: Steve Hofstetter’s latest album hit #1 in the world. He’ll be hosting Collin Moulton (Showtime Half Hour Special), Tony Deyo (Aspen Comedy Festival), Tom Simmons (Winner of the SF International Comedy Festival), Marc Ryan (Host of Mudslingers), Mike Trainor (TruTV), Jessi Campbell (CMT), Danny Browning (Bob & Tom), and Joe Zimmerman (Sirius/XM). I would love for you (and anyone you’d like to

4 0.82669932 1439 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-01-A book with a bunch of simple graphs

Introduction: Howard Friedman sent me a new book, The Measure of a Nation, subtitled How to Regain America’s Competitive Edge and Boost Our Global Standing. Without commenting on the substance of Friedman’s recommendations, I’d like to endorse his strategy of presentation, which is to display graph after graph after graph showing the same message over and over again, which is that the U.S. is outperformed by various other countries (mostly in Europe) on a variety of measures. These aren’t graphs I would ever make—they are scatterplots in which the x-axis conveys no information. But they have the advantage of repetition: once you figure out how to read one of the graphs, you can read the others easily. Here’s an example which I found from a quick Google: I can’t actually figure out what is happening on the x-axis, nor do I understand the “star, middle child, dog” thing. But I like the use of graphics. Lots more fun than bullet points. Seriously. P.S. Just to be clear: I am not trying

5 0.81047118 1049 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-09-Today in the sister blog

Introduction: Everybody hates Jon Voter decision making with third party candidates Cognitive Factors in Bilingual Children’s Pragmatic Language Skills

6 0.797629 536 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-24-Trends in partisanship by state

7 0.76857066 474 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-18-The kind of frustration we could all use more of

8 0.7684921 1200 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-06-Some economists are skeptical about microfoundations

9 0.7562145 204 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-12-Sloppily-written slam on moderately celebrated writers is amusing nonetheless

10 0.75570285 1322 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-15-Question 5 of my final exam for Design and Analysis of Sample Surveys

11 0.75253797 1010 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-14-“Free energy” and economic resources

12 0.75057149 2095 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-09-Typo in Ghitza and Gelman MRP paper

13 0.75006282 674 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-21-Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo

14 0.72787678 1271 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-20-Education could use some systematic evaluation

15 0.71352947 2317 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-04-Honored oldsters write about statistics

16 0.69967717 510 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-10-I guess they noticed that if you take the first word on every seventeenth page, it spells out “Death to the Shah”

17 0.69943053 982 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-30-“There’s at least as much as an 80 percent chance . . .”

18 0.6981014 1931 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-09-“Frontiers in Massive Data Analysis”

19 0.69771266 814 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-21-The powerful consumer?

20 0.69433665 2262 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-23-Win probabilities during a sporting event