andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2010 andrew_gelman_stats-2010-205 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

205 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-13-Arnold Zellner


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: Steve Ziliak reports: I [Ziliak] am sorry to share this sad news about Arnold Zellner (AEA Distinguished Fellow, 2002, ASA President, 1991, ISBA co-founding president, all around genius and sweet fellow), who died yesterday morning (August 11, 2010). He was a truly great statistician and to me and to many others a generous and wonderful friend, colleague, and hero. I will miss him. His cancer was spreading everywhere though you wouldn’t know it as his energy level was Arnold’s typical: abnormally high. But then he had a stroke just a few days after an unsuccessful surgery “to help with breathing” the doctor said, and the combination of events weakened him terribly. He was vibrant through June and much of July, and maintained an 8 hour work day at the office. He never lost his sense of humor nor his joy of life. He died at home in hospice care and fortunately he did not suffer long. From the official announcement from the University of Chicago: Arnold began his academi


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 Steve Ziliak reports: I [Ziliak] am sorry to share this sad news about Arnold Zellner (AEA Distinguished Fellow, 2002, ASA President, 1991, ISBA co-founding president, all around genius and sweet fellow), who died yesterday morning (August 11, 2010). [sent-1, score-0.144]

2 But then he had a stroke just a few days after an unsuccessful surgery “to help with breathing” the doctor said, and the combination of events weakened him terribly. [sent-5, score-0.224]

3 He died at home in hospice care and fortunately he did not suffer long. [sent-8, score-0.091]

4 In 1966 he joined the faculty of Chicago Booth and remained on our faculty until his retirement in 1996. [sent-10, score-0.32]

5 Arnold pioneered the field of Bayesian econometrics and was highly regarded by colleagues in his field. [sent-11, score-0.268]

6 He founded the International Society of Bayesian Analysis, served in numerous leadership roles of the American Statistical Association, and received several honorary degrees. [sent-12, score-0.12]

7 He remained active after his retirement, continuing to do research, publish papers, and serve as a mentor to students. [sent-14, score-0.148]

8 Arnold was a distinguished researcher, award-winning teacher, and wonderful colleague. [sent-15, score-0.163]

9 We are fortunate to have had someone as remarkable both professionally and personally as Arnold be a member of our community for so many years. [sent-17, score-0.117]

10 To a statistician such as myself, econometrics seems to have two different, nearly opposing, personalities. [sent-21, score-0.194]

11 On one side, econometrics is the study of physics-like laws–supply and demand, utility theory, simultaneous equation models, all sorts of attempts to capture economic behavior with mathematical laws. [sent-22, score-0.251]

12 More recently, some of this focus has moved to agent-based modeling, but it’s still the same basic idea to me: serious mathematical modeling. [sent-23, score-0.121]

13 But there’s another side to economics, a side that I think has become much more prominent, and that’s the anti-modeling approach, the distribution-free methods that try to assume as little as possible (replacing distributional assumptions by second-order stationarity, etc. [sent-25, score-0.266]

14 To the extent that economics is a model-centered field, I think it’s naturally Bayesian, and Zellner’s methods fit in well. [sent-27, score-0.165]

15 To the extent that economists are interested in robust, non-model-based population inference, I think Bayesian methods are also important–nonparametric methods get complicated quickly, and Bayesian inference is a good way to structure that complexity. [sent-28, score-0.275]

16 Unfortunately, Bayesian methods have a bad name in some quarters of econometrics because they are associated with subjectivity, which goes against both mainstream threads in econometrics. [sent-29, score-0.357]

17 What Zellner showed in his work was how Bayesian methods could be objective, and statistically efficient, and solve problems in econometrics. [sent-32, score-0.11]

18 At one point near the end of the meeting, Zellner stood up and said: Hearing all this important work makes me (Zellner) realize we need to start a crash research program on these methods. [sent-38, score-0.089]

19 And you know what they say about crash research programs. [sent-39, score-0.089]

20 He was lucky to have the chance to express his statistical thoughts in many venues, and we as a field were lucky to be there to hear him. [sent-45, score-0.244]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('zellner', 0.537), ('arnold', 0.342), ('econometrics', 0.194), ('bayesian', 0.148), ('zeller', 0.139), ('ziliak', 0.127), ('university', 0.113), ('methods', 0.11), ('remained', 0.091), ('died', 0.091), ('retirement', 0.091), ('distinguished', 0.089), ('crash', 0.089), ('lucky', 0.085), ('seminar', 0.085), ('fellow', 0.082), ('side', 0.078), ('chicago', 0.076), ('field', 0.074), ('wonderful', 0.074), ('objective', 0.072), ('faculty', 0.069), ('president', 0.066), ('moved', 0.064), ('aea', 0.063), ('honorary', 0.063), ('stationarity', 0.063), ('gracious', 0.06), ('professionally', 0.06), ('mathematical', 0.057), ('fortunate', 0.057), ('breathing', 0.057), ('disdain', 0.057), ('founded', 0.057), ('mckinsey', 0.057), ('mentor', 0.057), ('nonparametrics', 0.057), ('stroke', 0.057), ('weakened', 0.057), ('humor', 0.055), ('surgery', 0.055), ('unsuccessful', 0.055), ('extent', 0.055), ('threads', 0.053), ('sweet', 0.053), ('asa', 0.053), ('booth', 0.053), ('legacy', 0.053), ('pause', 0.053), ('pregnant', 0.053)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.99999994 205 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-13-Arnold Zellner

Introduction: Steve Ziliak reports: I [Ziliak] am sorry to share this sad news about Arnold Zellner (AEA Distinguished Fellow, 2002, ASA President, 1991, ISBA co-founding president, all around genius and sweet fellow), who died yesterday morning (August 11, 2010). He was a truly great statistician and to me and to many others a generous and wonderful friend, colleague, and hero. I will miss him. His cancer was spreading everywhere though you wouldn’t know it as his energy level was Arnold’s typical: abnormally high. But then he had a stroke just a few days after an unsuccessful surgery “to help with breathing” the doctor said, and the combination of events weakened him terribly. He was vibrant through June and much of July, and maintained an 8 hour work day at the office. He never lost his sense of humor nor his joy of life. He died at home in hospice care and fortunately he did not suffer long. From the official announcement from the University of Chicago: Arnold began his academi

2 0.27845627 493 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-31-Obituaries in 2010

Introduction: David Blackwell . Julian Besag . Arnold Zellner . Benoit Mandelbrot and Hirotugu Akaike (late) . Alfred Kahn .

3 0.13724536 183 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-04-Bayesian models for simultaneous equation systems?

Introduction: A neuroeconomist asks:: Is there any literature on the Bayesian approach to simultaneous equation systems that you could suggest? (Think demand/supply in econ). My reply: I’m not up-to-date on the Bayesian econometrics literature. TTony Lancaster came out with a book a few years ago that might have some of these models. Maybe you, the commenters, have some suggestions? Measurement-error models are inherently Bayesian, seeing as they have all these latent parameters, so it seems like there should be a lot out there.

4 0.11824011 1695 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-28-Economists argue about Bayes

Introduction: Robert Bell pointed me to this post by Brad De Long on Bayesian statistics, and then I also noticed this from Noah Smith, who wrote: My impression is that although the Bayesian/Frequentist debate is interesting and intellectually fun, there’s really not much “there” there… despite being so-hip-right-now, Bayesian is not the Statistical Jesus. I’m happy to see the discussion going in this direction. Twenty-five years ago or so, when I got into this biz, there were some serious anti-Bayesian attitudes floating around in mainstream statistics. Discussions in the journals sometimes devolved into debates of the form, “Bayesians: knaves or fools?”. You’d get all sorts of free-floating skepticism about any prior distribution at all, even while people were accepting without question (and doing theory on) logistic regressions, proportional hazards models, and all sorts of strong strong models. (In the subfield of survey sampling, various prominent researchers would refuse to mode

5 0.11245896 1469 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-25-Ways of knowing

Introduction: In this discussion from last month, computer science student and Judea Pearl collaborator Elias Barenboim expressed an attitude that hierarchical Bayesian methods might be fine in practice but that they lack theory, that Bayesians can’t succeed in toy problems. I posted a P.S. there which might not have been noticed so I will put it here: I now realize that there is some disagreement about what constitutes a “guarantee.” In one of his comments, Barenboim writes, “the assurance we have that the result must hold as long as the assumptions in the model are correct should be regarded as a guarantee.” In that sense, yes, we have guarantees! It is fundamental to Bayesian inference that the result must hold if the assumptions in the model are correct. We have lots of that in Bayesian Data Analysis (particularly in the first four chapters but implicitly elsewhere as well), and this is also covered in the classic books by Lindley, Jaynes, and others. This sort of guarantee is indeed p

6 0.10822757 1779 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-27-“Two Dogmas of Strong Objective Bayesianism”

7 0.10750848 1554 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-31-It not necessary that Bayesian methods conform to the likelihood principle

8 0.10671051 1039 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-02-I just flew in from the econ seminar, and boy are my arms tired

9 0.10561146 2368 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-11-Bayes in the research conversation

10 0.099589728 1624 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-15-New prize on causality in statstistics education

11 0.094025709 1205 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-09-Coming to agreement on philosophy of statistics

12 0.091464803 244 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-30-Useful models, model checking, and external validation: a mini-discussion

13 0.090878204 231 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-24-Yet another Bayesian job opportunity

14 0.09033832 1763 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-14-Everyone’s trading bias for variance at some point, it’s just done at different places in the analyses

15 0.089997023 1719 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-11-Why waste time philosophizing?

16 0.089397684 2273 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-29-References (with code) for Bayesian hierarchical (multilevel) modeling and structural equation modeling

17 0.088873923 449 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-04-Generalized Method of Moments, whatever that is

18 0.088669278 2072 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-21-The future (and past) of statistical sciences

19 0.088361137 2245 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-12-More on publishing in journals

20 0.087557003 1418 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-16-Long discussion about causal inference and the use of hierarchical models to bridge between different inferential settings


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.185), (1, 0.014), (2, -0.082), (3, 0.022), (4, -0.084), (5, 0.071), (6, -0.065), (7, 0.041), (8, 0.011), (9, 0.025), (10, -0.015), (11, -0.047), (12, 0.01), (13, 0.025), (14, 0.016), (15, 0.021), (16, 0.009), (17, -0.01), (18, -0.015), (19, 0.046), (20, -0.028), (21, 0.023), (22, -0.003), (23, 0.026), (24, 0.054), (25, -0.02), (26, -0.034), (27, -0.026), (28, -0.001), (29, 0.0), (30, 0.014), (31, 0.037), (32, -0.003), (33, 0.007), (34, 0.016), (35, -0.016), (36, -0.013), (37, -0.003), (38, -0.028), (39, 0.016), (40, -0.018), (41, 0.007), (42, -0.017), (43, -0.007), (44, 0.025), (45, -0.027), (46, 0.035), (47, 0.026), (48, 0.005), (49, 0.01)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.97678494 205 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-13-Arnold Zellner

Introduction: Steve Ziliak reports: I [Ziliak] am sorry to share this sad news about Arnold Zellner (AEA Distinguished Fellow, 2002, ASA President, 1991, ISBA co-founding president, all around genius and sweet fellow), who died yesterday morning (August 11, 2010). He was a truly great statistician and to me and to many others a generous and wonderful friend, colleague, and hero. I will miss him. His cancer was spreading everywhere though you wouldn’t know it as his energy level was Arnold’s typical: abnormally high. But then he had a stroke just a few days after an unsuccessful surgery “to help with breathing” the doctor said, and the combination of events weakened him terribly. He was vibrant through June and much of July, and maintained an 8 hour work day at the office. He never lost his sense of humor nor his joy of life. He died at home in hospice care and fortunately he did not suffer long. From the official announcement from the University of Chicago: Arnold began his academi

2 0.81628472 1781 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-29-Another Feller theory

Introduction: My paper with Christian Robert, “Not Only Defended But Also Applied”: The Perceived Absurdity of Bayesian Inference , was recently published in The American Statistician, along with discussions by Steve Fienberg, Steve Stigler, Deborah Mayo, and Wesley Johnson, and our rejoinder, The Anti-Bayesian Moment and Its Passing . These articles revolved around the question of why the great probabilist William Feller, in his classic book on probability (“Feller, Volume 1,” as it is known), was so intemperately anti-Bayesian. We located Feller’s attitude within a post-WW2 “anti-Bayesian moment” in which Bayesian inference was perceived as a threat to the dominance of non-Bayesian methods, which were mature enough to have solved problems yet new enough to still appear to have limitless promise. Howard Wainer read this. Howard is a friend who has a longstanding interest in the history of statistics and who also has known a lot of important statisticians over the years. Howard writes: O

3 0.80964595 155 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-19-David Blackwell

Introduction: David Blackwell was already retired by the time I came to Berkeley, and probably our closest connection was that I taught the class in decision theory that he used to teach. I enjoyed that class a lot, partly because it took me out of my usual comfort zone of statistical inference and data analysis toward something more theoretical and mathematical. Blackwell was one of the legendary figures in the department at that time and was also one of the most tolerant of alternative approaches to statistics, perhaps because of combination of a mathematical background, applied research in the war and after (which I learned about in this recent obituary ), and personal experiences, Blackwell may be best known in statistics for the Rao-Blackwell theorem . Rao, of course, is also famoust for the Cramer-Rao lower bound. Both theorems relate to minimum-variance statistical estimators. Here’s a quote from Thomas (Jesus’s dad) Ferguson in Blackwell’s obituary : He went from one area to an

4 0.80808222 2254 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-18-Those wacky anti-Bayesians used to be intimidating, but now they’re just pathetic

Introduction: From 2006 : Eric Archer forwarded this document by Nick Freemantle, “The Reverend Bayes—was he really a prophet?”, in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine: Does [Bayes's] contribution merit the enthusiasms of his followers? Or is his legacy overhyped? . . . First, Bayesians appear to have an absolute right to disapprove of any conventional approach in statistics without offering a workable alternative—for example, a colleague recently stated at a meeting that ‘. . . it is OK to have multiple comparisons because Bayesians’ don’t believe in alpha spending’. . . . Second, Bayesians appear to build an army of straw men—everything it seems is different and better from a Bayesian perspective, although many of the concepts seem remarkably familiar. For example, a very well known Bayesian statistician recently surprised the audience with his discovery of the P value as a useful Bayesian statistic at a meeting in Birmingham. Third, Bayesians possess enormous enthusiasm fo

5 0.79457146 1469 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-25-Ways of knowing

Introduction: In this discussion from last month, computer science student and Judea Pearl collaborator Elias Barenboim expressed an attitude that hierarchical Bayesian methods might be fine in practice but that they lack theory, that Bayesians can’t succeed in toy problems. I posted a P.S. there which might not have been noticed so I will put it here: I now realize that there is some disagreement about what constitutes a “guarantee.” In one of his comments, Barenboim writes, “the assurance we have that the result must hold as long as the assumptions in the model are correct should be regarded as a guarantee.” In that sense, yes, we have guarantees! It is fundamental to Bayesian inference that the result must hold if the assumptions in the model are correct. We have lots of that in Bayesian Data Analysis (particularly in the first four chapters but implicitly elsewhere as well), and this is also covered in the classic books by Lindley, Jaynes, and others. This sort of guarantee is indeed p

6 0.79361463 193 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-09-Besag

7 0.7770822 1259 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-11-How things sound to us, versus how they sound to others

8 0.77196336 2368 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-11-Bayes in the research conversation

9 0.77049494 117 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-29-Ya don’t know Bayes, Jack

10 0.76699048 2000 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-28-Why during the 1950-1960′s did Jerry Cornfield become a Bayesian?

11 0.76674134 1067 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-18-Christopher Hitchens was a Bayesian

12 0.76542068 746 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-05-An unexpected benefit of Arrow’s other theorem

13 0.76351929 2012 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-07-Job openings at American University

14 0.75107729 114 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-28-More on Bayesian deduction-induction

15 0.75043988 110 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-26-Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics

16 0.74898833 133 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-08-Gratuitous use of “Bayesian Statistics,” a branding issue?

17 0.74304217 449 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-04-Generalized Method of Moments, whatever that is

18 0.74168831 231 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-24-Yet another Bayesian job opportunity

19 0.73695832 1262 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-12-“Not only defended but also applied”: The perceived absurdity of Bayesian inference

20 0.73621619 2131 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-12-My talk at Leuven, Sat 14 Dec


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(15, 0.02), (16, 0.073), (20, 0.011), (21, 0.035), (24, 0.11), (43, 0.015), (47, 0.017), (63, 0.027), (72, 0.014), (73, 0.01), (84, 0.029), (86, 0.032), (96, 0.133), (99, 0.274)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

1 0.98293865 410 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-12-The Wald method has been the subject of extensive criticism by statisticians for exaggerating results”

Introduction: Paul Nee sends in this amusing item: MELA Sciences claimed success in a clinical trial of its experimental skin cancer detection device only by altering the statistical method used to analyze the data in violation of an agreement with U.S. regulators, charges an independent healthcare analyst in a report issued last week. . . The BER report, however, relies on its own analysis to suggest that MELA struck out with FDA because the agency’s medical device reviewers discovered the MELAFind pivotal study failed to reach statistical significance despite the company’s claims to the contrary. And now here’s where it gets interesting: MELA claims that a phase III study of MELAFind met its primary endpoint by detecting accurately 112 of 114 eligible melanomas for a “sensitivity” rate of 98%. The lower confidence bound of the sensitivity analysis was 95.1%, which met the FDA’s standard for statistical significance in the study spelled out in a binding agreement with MELA, the compa

2 0.97624397 1731 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-21-If a lottery is encouraging addictive gambling, don’t expand it!

Introduction: This story from Vivian Yee seems just horrible to me. First the background: Pronto Lotto’s real business takes place in the carpeted, hushed area where its most devoted customers watch video screens from a scattering of tall silver tables, hour after hour, day after day. The players — mostly men, about a dozen at any given time — come on their lunch breaks or after work to study the screens, which are programmed with the Quick Draw lottery game, and flash a new set of winning numbers every four minutes. They have helped make Pronto Lotto the top Quick Draw vendor in the state, selling $3.3 million worth of tickets last year, more than $1 million more than the second busiest location, a World Books shop in Penn Station. Some stay for just a few minutes. Others play for the length of a workday, repeatedly traversing the few yards between their seats and the cash register as they hand the next wager to a clerk with a dollar bill or two, and return to wait. “It’s like my job, 24

3 0.9731288 1306 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-07-Lists of Note and Letters of Note

Introduction: These (from Shaun Usher) are surprisingly good, especially since he appears to come up with new lists and letters pretty regularly. I suppose a lot of them get sent in from readers, but still. Here’s my favorite recent item, a letter sent to the Seattle Bureau of Prohibition in 1931: Dear Sir: My husband is in the habit of buying a quart of wiskey every other day from a Chinese bootlegger named Chin Waugh living at 317-16th near Alder street. We need this money for household expenses. Will you please have his place raided? He keeps a supply planted in the garden and a smaller quantity under the back steps for quick delivery. If you make the raid at 9:30 any morning you will be sure to get the goods and Chin also as he leaves the house at 10 o’clock and may clean up before he goes. Thanking you in advance, I remain yours truly, Mrs. Hillyer

4 0.96588898 327 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-07-There are never 70 distinct parameters

Introduction: Sam Seaver writes: I’m a graduate student in computational biology, and I’m relatively new to advanced statistics, and am trying to teach myself how best to approach a problem I have. My dataset is a small sparse matrix of 150 cases and 70 predictors, it is sparse as in many zeros, not many ‘NA’s. Each case is a nutrient that is fed into an in silico organism, and its response is whether or not it stimulates growth, and each predictor is one of 70 different pathways that the nutrient may or may not belong to. Because all of the nutrients do not belong to all of the pathways, there are thus many zeros in my matrix. My goal is to be able to use the pathways themselves to predict whether or not a nutrient could stimulate growth, thus I wanted to compute regression coefficients for each pathway, with which I could apply to other nutrients for other species. There are quite a few singularities in the dataset (summary(glm) reports that 14 coefficients are not defined because of sin

5 0.96337336 1023 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-22-Going Beyond the Book: Towards Critical Reading in Statistics Teaching

Introduction: My article with the above title is appearing in the journal Teaching Statistics. Here’s the introduction: We can improve our teaching of statistical examples from books by collecting further data, reading cited articles and performing further data analysis. This should not come as a surprise, but what might be new is the realization of how close to the surface these research opportunities are: even influential and celebrated books can have examples where more can be learned with a small amount of additional effort. We discuss three examples that have arisen in our own teaching: an introductory textbook that motivated us to think more carefully about categorical and continuous variables; a book for the lay reader that misreported a study of menstruation and accidents; and a monograph on the foundations of probability that over interpreted statistically insignificant fluctuations in sex ratios. And here’s the conclusion: Individually, these examples are of little importance.

same-blog 6 0.95415759 205 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-13-Arnold Zellner

7 0.95233291 319 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-04-“Who owns Congress”

8 0.94960332 302 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-28-This is a link to a news article about a scientific paper

9 0.94504243 787 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-05-Different goals, different looks: Infovis and the Chris Rock effect

10 0.93858647 99 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-19-Paired comparisons

11 0.93402398 1338 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-23-Advice on writing research articles

12 0.93345451 1887 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-07-“Happy Money: The Science of Smarter Spending”

13 0.93338907 934 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-30-Nooooooooooooooooooo!

14 0.93322593 690 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-01-Peter Huber’s reflections on data analysis

15 0.93044704 405 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-10-Estimation from an out-of-date census

16 0.92832494 2296 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-19-Index or indicator variables

17 0.92430216 2065 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-17-Cool dynamic demographic maps provide beautiful illustration of Chris Rock effect

18 0.920151 897 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-09-The difference between significant and not significant…

19 0.91905159 236 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-26-Teaching yourself mathematics

20 0.91774464 2172 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-14-Advice on writing research articles