andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2010 andrew_gelman_stats-2010-236 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Some thoughts from Mark Palko: Of all the subjects a student is likely to encounter after elementary school, mathematics is by far the easiest to teach yourself. . . . What is it that makes math teachers so expendable? . . . At some point all disciplines require the transition from passive to active and that transition can be challenging. In courses like high school history and science, the emphasis on passively acquiring knowledge (yes, I realize that students write essays in history classes and apply formulas in science classes but that represents a relatively small portion of their time and, more importantly, the work those students do is fundamentally different from the day-to-day work done by historians and scientists). By comparison, junior high students playing in an orchestra, writing short stories or solving math problems are almost entirely focused on processes and those processes are essentially the same as those engaged in by professional musicians, writers and mat
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 Some thoughts from Mark Palko: Of all the subjects a student is likely to encounter after elementary school, mathematics is by far the easiest to teach yourself. [sent-1, score-0.53]
2 What is it that makes math teachers so expendable? [sent-5, score-0.356]
3 At some point all disciplines require the transition from passive to active and that transition can be challenging. [sent-9, score-0.557]
4 By comparison, junior high students playing in an orchestra, writing short stories or solving math problems are almost entirely focused on processes and those processes are essentially the same as those engaged in by professional musicians, writers and mathematicians. [sent-11, score-1.083]
5 Unlike music and writing, however, mathematics starts out as a convergent process. [sent-12, score-0.557]
6 This unique position of mathematics allows for any number of easy and effective self-study techniques. [sent-16, score-0.265]
7 All you need is a textbook and a few sheets of scratch paper. [sent-20, score-0.186]
8 You cover everything below the paragraph you’re reading with the sheet of paper. [sent-21, score-0.095]
9 I have nothing to add to this except to agree that, yes, doing mathematical research (or, at least, doing mathematics as part of statistical research) really is like doing math homework problems! [sent-29, score-0.987]
10 An oft-stated distinction is that homeworks almost always have a clear correct answer, whereas research is open-ended. [sent-30, score-0.402]
11 But, actually, when I do math for my research, it surprisingly often does work out. [sent-31, score-0.515]
12 Doing (applied) mathematical research is a little bit like waking through the woods: sometimes I get stuck and have to work around an obstacle, and I usually don’t end up exactly where I intend to go, but I usually make some progress. [sent-32, score-0.744]
13 And in many cases the math is smarter than I am, in the sense that, through mathematical analysis, I’m able to find a correct answer that is surprising, until I realize how truly right it is. [sent-33, score-0.911]
14 Also relevant is Dick De Veaux’s remark that math is like music, statistics is like literature. [sent-34, score-0.356]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('math', 0.356), ('mathematics', 0.265), ('transition', 0.186), ('music', 0.172), ('mathematical', 0.163), ('processes', 0.135), ('classes', 0.13), ('veaux', 0.12), ('obstacle', 0.12), ('acquiring', 0.12), ('convergent', 0.12), ('passively', 0.12), ('students', 0.119), ('research', 0.118), ('realize', 0.113), ('musicians', 0.108), ('smarter', 0.108), ('waking', 0.108), ('history', 0.108), ('dick', 0.105), ('historians', 0.105), ('homeworks', 0.105), ('woods', 0.099), ('essays', 0.097), ('passive', 0.097), ('correct', 0.095), ('sheet', 0.095), ('formulas', 0.095), ('sheets', 0.095), ('school', 0.093), ('scratch', 0.091), ('engaged', 0.091), ('intend', 0.091), ('usually', 0.091), ('elementary', 0.09), ('portion', 0.088), ('disciplines', 0.088), ('easiest', 0.088), ('encounter', 0.087), ('homework', 0.085), ('almost', 0.084), ('junior', 0.083), ('importantly', 0.083), ('work', 0.082), ('solving', 0.08), ('finished', 0.08), ('yes', 0.08), ('surprisingly', 0.077), ('answer', 0.076), ('fundamentally', 0.075)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0 236 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-26-Teaching yourself mathematics
Introduction: Some thoughts from Mark Palko: Of all the subjects a student is likely to encounter after elementary school, mathematics is by far the easiest to teach yourself. . . . What is it that makes math teachers so expendable? . . . At some point all disciplines require the transition from passive to active and that transition can be challenging. In courses like high school history and science, the emphasis on passively acquiring knowledge (yes, I realize that students write essays in history classes and apply formulas in science classes but that represents a relatively small portion of their time and, more importantly, the work those students do is fundamentally different from the day-to-day work done by historians and scientists). By comparison, junior high students playing in an orchestra, writing short stories or solving math problems are almost entirely focused on processes and those processes are essentially the same as those engaged in by professional musicians, writers and mat
2 0.22237624 390 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-02-Fragment of statistical autobiography
Introduction: I studied math and physics at MIT. To be more precise, I started in math as default–ever since I was two years old, I’ve thought of myself as a mathematician, and I always did well in math class, so it seemed like a natural fit. But I was concerned. In high school I’d been in the U.S. Mathematical Olympiad training program, and there I’d met kids who were clearly much much better at math than I was. In retrospect, I don’t think I was as bad as I’d thought at the time: there were 24 kids in the program, and I was probably around #20, if that, but I think a lot of the other kids had more practice working on “math olympiad”-type problems. Maybe I was really something like the tenth-best in the group. Tenth-best or twentieth-best, whatever it was, I reached a crisis of confidence around my sophomore or junior year in college. At MIT, I started right off taking advanced math classes, and somewhere along the way I realized I wasn’t seeing the big picture. I was able to do the homework pr
3 0.17945828 992 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-05-Deadwood in the math curriculum
Introduction: Mark Palko asks : What are the worst examples of curriculum dead wood? Here’s the background: One of the first things that hit me [Palko] when I started teaching high school math was how much material there was to cover. . . . The most annoying part, though, was the number of topics that could easily have been cut, thus giving the students the time to master the important skills and concepts. The example that really stuck with me was synthetic division, a more concise but less intuitive way of performing polynomial long division. Both of these topics are pretty much useless in daily life but polynomial long division does, at least, give the student some insight into the relationship between polynomials and familiar base-ten numbers. Synthetic division has no such value; it’s just a faster but less interesting way of doing something you’ll never have to do. I started asking hardcore math people — mathematicians, statisticians, physicists, rocket scientists — if they.’d ever u
4 0.15906569 1752 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-06-Online Education and Jazz
Introduction: Alex Tabarrok writes : There is something special, magical, and “almost sacred” about the live teaching experience. I agree that this is true for teaching at its best but it’s also irrelevant. It’s even more true that there is something special, magical and almost sacred about the live musical experience. . . . Mark Edmundson makes the analogy between teaching and music explicit: Every memorable class is a bit like a jazz composition. Quite right but every non-memorable class is also a bit like a jazz composition, namely one that was expensive, took an hour to drive to (15 minutes just to find parking) and at the end of the day wasn’t very memorable. The correct conclusion to draw from the analogy between live teaching and live music is that at their best both are great but both are also costly and inefficient ways of delivering most teaching and most musical experiences. Excellent points (and Tabarrok has additional good points that I haven’t quoted). We’re not all
5 0.15337218 1611 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-07-Feedback on my Bayesian Data Analysis class at Columbia
Introduction: In one of the final Jitts, we asked the students how the course could be improved. Some of their suggestions would work, some would not. I’m putting all the suggestions below, interpolating my responses. (Overall, I think the course went well. Please remember that the remarks below are not course evaluations; they are answers to my specific question of how the course could be better. If we’d had a Jitt asking all the ways the course was good, you’d be seeing lots of positive remarks. But that wouldn’t be particularly useful or interesting.) The best thing about the course is that the kids worked hard each week on their homeworks. OK, here are the comments and my replies: Could have been better if we did less amount but more in detail. I don’t know if this would’ve been possible. I wanted to get to the harder stuff (HMC, VB, nonparametric models) which required a certain amount of preparation. And, even so, there was not time for everything. And also, needs solut
6 0.14583035 2347 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-25-Why I decided not to be a physicist
7 0.13202992 976 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-27-Geophysicist Discovers Modeling Error (in Economics)
8 0.12840897 1135 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-22-Advice on do-it-yourself stats education?
9 0.1271264 2202 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-07-Outrage of the week
10 0.12565224 1517 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-01-“On Inspiring Students and Being Human”
11 0.11988541 961 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-16-The “Washington read” and the algebra of conditional distributions
12 0.11804217 1843 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-05-The New York Times Book of Mathematics
13 0.11569393 344 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-15-Story time
14 0.11378842 32 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-14-Causal inference in economics
15 0.1121414 1864 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-20-Evaluating Columbia University’s Frontiers of Science course
16 0.10891745 1803 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-14-Why girls do better in school
17 0.10738916 2282 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-05-Bizarre academic spam
19 0.1036229 2330 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-12-Historical Arc of Universities
20 0.097389624 1353 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-30-Question 20 of my final exam for Design and Analysis of Sample Surveys
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.184), (1, -0.057), (2, -0.071), (3, -0.026), (4, 0.033), (5, 0.123), (6, 0.046), (7, 0.113), (8, -0.039), (9, -0.005), (10, 0.03), (11, 0.068), (12, -0.065), (13, -0.047), (14, -0.016), (15, -0.066), (16, -0.016), (17, 0.025), (18, -0.016), (19, 0.0), (20, 0.01), (21, -0.027), (22, -0.027), (23, 0.013), (24, 0.009), (25, -0.01), (26, 0.049), (27, 0.043), (28, -0.036), (29, 0.017), (30, 0.009), (31, 0.016), (32, 0.002), (33, 0.006), (34, 0.021), (35, -0.028), (36, -0.043), (37, 0.056), (38, 0.01), (39, -0.007), (40, -0.004), (41, 0.023), (42, 0.013), (43, -0.01), (44, -0.016), (45, -0.033), (46, -0.052), (47, 0.046), (48, 0.015), (49, -0.003)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.9693855 236 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-26-Teaching yourself mathematics
Introduction: Some thoughts from Mark Palko: Of all the subjects a student is likely to encounter after elementary school, mathematics is by far the easiest to teach yourself. . . . What is it that makes math teachers so expendable? . . . At some point all disciplines require the transition from passive to active and that transition can be challenging. In courses like high school history and science, the emphasis on passively acquiring knowledge (yes, I realize that students write essays in history classes and apply formulas in science classes but that represents a relatively small portion of their time and, more importantly, the work those students do is fundamentally different from the day-to-day work done by historians and scientists). By comparison, junior high students playing in an orchestra, writing short stories or solving math problems are almost entirely focused on processes and those processes are essentially the same as those engaged in by professional musicians, writers and mat
2 0.82976574 1028 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-26-Tenure lets you handle students who cheat
Introduction: The other day, a friend of mine who is an untenured professor (not in statistics or political science) was telling me about a class where many of the students seemed to be resubmitting papers that they had already written for previous classes. (The supposition was based on internal evidence of the topics of the submitted papers.) It would be possible to check this and then kick the cheating students out of the program—but why do it? It would be a lot of work, also some of the students who are caught might complain, then word would get around that my friend is a troublemaker. And nobody likes a troublemaker. Once my friend has tenure it would be possible to do the right thing. But . . . here’s the hitch: most college instructors do not have tenure, and one result, I suspect, is a decline in ethical standards. This is something I hadn’t thought of in our earlier discussion of job security for teachers: tenure gives you the freedom to kick out cheating students.
3 0.82682395 992 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-05-Deadwood in the math curriculum
Introduction: Mark Palko asks : What are the worst examples of curriculum dead wood? Here’s the background: One of the first things that hit me [Palko] when I started teaching high school math was how much material there was to cover. . . . The most annoying part, though, was the number of topics that could easily have been cut, thus giving the students the time to master the important skills and concepts. The example that really stuck with me was synthetic division, a more concise but less intuitive way of performing polynomial long division. Both of these topics are pretty much useless in daily life but polynomial long division does, at least, give the student some insight into the relationship between polynomials and familiar base-ten numbers. Synthetic division has no such value; it’s just a faster but less interesting way of doing something you’ll never have to do. I started asking hardcore math people — mathematicians, statisticians, physicists, rocket scientists — if they.’d ever u
4 0.82489938 2104 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-17-Big bad education bureaucracy does big bad things
Introduction: In response to some big new push for testing schoolchildren, Mark Palko writes : The announcement of a new curriculum is invariably followed by a round of hearty round of self congratulations and talk of “keeping standards high” as if adding a slide to a PowerPoint automatically made students better informed. It doesn’t work that way. Adding a topic to the list simply means that students will be exposed to it, not that they will understand or master or retain it. Well put. In my own teaching, I often am tempted to believe that just putting a topic in a homework problem is enough to ensure that students will learn it. But it doesn’t work that way. Even if they manage to somehow struggle through and solve the problem (and many don’t, or they rely on their friends’ solutions), they won’t learn much if they don’t see the connection with everything else they know. I’m reminded of the time, several years ago, that I learned that photocopying an article and filing it was not the
5 0.82057434 1620 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-12-“Teaching effectiveness” as another dimension in cognitive ability
Introduction: I’m not a great teacher. I can get by because I work hard and I know a lot, and for some students my classes are just great, but it’s not a natural talent of mine. I know people who are amazing teachers, and they have something that I just don’t have. I wrote that book, Teaching Statistics: A Bag of Tricks (with Deb Nolan) because I’m not a good teacher and hence need to develop all sorts of techniques to be able to do what good teachers can do without even trying. I’m not proud of being mediocre at teaching. I don’t think that low teaching skill is some sort of indicator that I’m a great researcher. The other think about teaching ability is that I think it’s hard to detect without actually seeing someone teach a class. If you see me give a seminar presentation or even a guest lecture, you’d think I’m an awesome teacher. But, actually, no. I’m an excellent speaker, not such a great teacher. This all came to mind when I received the following email from anthropologist Hen
8 0.79325002 579 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-18-What is this, a statistics class or a dentist’s office??
9 0.79127932 1864 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-20-Evaluating Columbia University’s Frontiers of Science course
10 0.78448379 308 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-30-Nano-project qualifying exam process: An intensified dialogue between students and faculty
11 0.78415704 1517 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-01-“On Inspiring Students and Being Human”
12 0.78228509 1752 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-06-Online Education and Jazz
13 0.78103036 606 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-10-It’s no fun being graded on a curve
14 0.7776705 73 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-08-Observational Epidemiology
15 0.76962805 1507 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-22-Grade inflation: why weren’t the instructors all giving all A’s already??
16 0.76466686 617 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-17-“Why Preschool Shouldn’t Be Like School”?
17 0.76394325 516 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-14-A new idea for a science core course based entirely on computer simulation
18 0.76346129 326 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-07-Peer pressure, selection, and educational reform
19 0.76134443 956 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-13-Hey, you! Don’t take that class!
20 0.76124316 390 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-02-Fragment of statistical autobiography
topicId topicWeight
[(15, 0.012), (16, 0.094), (24, 0.099), (40, 0.018), (54, 0.016), (59, 0.014), (60, 0.01), (63, 0.016), (84, 0.167), (86, 0.043), (96, 0.042), (99, 0.335)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.97906756 1181 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-23-Philosophy: Pointer to Salmon
Introduction: Larry Brownstein writes: I read your article on induction and deduction and your comments on Deborah Mayo’s approach and thought you might find the following useful in this discussion. It is Wesley Salmon’s Reality and Rationality (2005). Here he argues that Bayesian inferential procedures can replace the hypothetical-deductive method aka the Hempel-Oppenheim theory of explanation. He is concerned about the subjectivity problem, so takes a frequentist approach to the use of Bayes in this context. Hardly anyone agrees that the H-D approach accounts for scientific explanation. The problem has been to find a replacement. Salmon thought he had found it. I don’t know this book—but that’s no surprise since I know just about none of the philosophy of science literature that came after Popper, Kuhn, and Lakatos. That’s why I collaborated with Cosma Shalizi. He’s the one who connected me to Deborah Mayo and who put in the recent philosophy references in our articles. Anyway, I’m pa
2 0.97631806 490 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-29-Brain Structure and the Big Five
Introduction: Many years ago, a research psychologist whose judgment I greatly respect told me that the characterization of personality by the so-called Big Five traits (extraversion, etc.) was old-fashioned. So I’m always surprised to see that the Big Five keeps cropping up. I guess not everyone agrees that it’s a bad idea. For example, Hamdan Azhar wrote to me: I was wondering if you’d seen this recent paper (De Young et al. 2010) that finds significant correlations between brain volume in selected regions and personality trait measures (from the Big Five). This is quite a ground-breaking finding and it was covered extensively in the mainstream media. I think readers of your blog would be interested in your thoughts, statistically speaking, on their methodology and findings. My reply: I’d be interested in my thoughts on this too! But I don’t know enough to say anything useful. From the abstract of the paper under discussion: Controlling for age, sex, and whole-brain volume
3 0.96546423 235 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-25-Term Limits for the Supreme Court?
Introduction: In the wake of the confirmation of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, political commentators have been expressing a bit of frustration about polarization within the court and polarization in the nomination process. One proposal that’s been floating around is to replace lifetime appointments by fixed terms, perhaps twelve or eighteen years. This would enforce a regular schedule of replacements, instead of the current system in which eighty-something judges have an incentive to hang on as long as possible so as to time their retirements to be during the administration of a politically-compatible president. A couple weeks ago at the sister blog, John Sides discussed some recent research that was relevant to the judicial term limits proposal. Political scientists Justin Crowe and Chris Karpowitz analyzed the historical record or Supreme Court terms and found that long terms of twenty years or more have been happening since the early years of the court. Yes, there is less turnover th
Introduction: Hadley Wickham sent me this , by Keith Baggerly and Kevin Coombes: In this report we [Baggerly and Coombes] examine several related papers purporting to use microarray-based signatures of drug sensitivity derived from cell lines to predict patient response. Patients in clinical trials are currently being allocated to treatment arms on the basis of these results. However, we show in five case studies that the results incorporate several simple errors that may be putting patients at risk. One theme that emerges is that the most common errors are simple (e.g., row or column offsets); conversely, it is our experience that the most simple errors are common. This is horrible! But, in a way, it’s not surprising. I make big mistakes in my applied work all the time. I mean, all the time. Sometimes I scramble the order of the 50 states, or I’m plotting a pure noise variable, or whatever. But usually I don’t drift too far from reality because I have a lot of cross-checks and I (or my
5 0.95775974 1352 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-29-Question 19 of my final exam for Design and Analysis of Sample Surveys
Introduction: 19. A survey is taken of students in a metropolitan area. At the first stage a school is sampled at random. The schools are divided into two strata: 20 private schools and 50 public schools are sampled. At the second stage, 5 classes are sampled within each sampled school. At the third stage, 10 students are sampled within each class. What is the probability that any given student is sampled? Express this in terms of the number of students in the class, number of classes in the school, and number of schools in the area. Define appropriate notation as needed. Solution to question 18 From yesterday : 18. A survey is taken of 100 undergraduates, 100 graduate students, and 100 continuing education students at a university. Assume a simple random sample within each group. Each student is asked to rate his or her satisfaction (on a 1–10 scale) with his or her experiences. Write the estimate and standard error of the average satisfaction of all the students at the university. Introd
6 0.95425045 2004 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-01-Post-publication peer review: How it (sometimes) really works
7 0.95139861 2053 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-06-Ideas that spread fast and slow
same-blog 8 0.94832921 236 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-26-Teaching yourself mathematics
10 0.94376409 1165 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-13-Philosophy of Bayesian statistics: my reactions to Wasserman
11 0.94219148 184 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-04-That half-Cauchy prior
12 0.94133854 932 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-30-Articles on the philosophy of Bayesian statistics by Cox, Mayo, Senn, and others!
13 0.94118506 1152 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-03-Web equation
14 0.94105482 1877 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-30-Infill asymptotics and sprawl asymptotics
15 0.94085199 667 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-19-Free $5 gift certificate!
16 0.93547112 98 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-19-Further thoughts on happiness and life satisfaction research
17 0.93333262 1732 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-22-Evaluating the impacts of welfare reform?
18 0.93118274 1353 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-30-Question 20 of my final exam for Design and Analysis of Sample Surveys
19 0.93021929 1205 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-09-Coming to agreement on philosophy of statistics
20 0.92937052 323 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-06-Sociotropic Voting and the Media