andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1129 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

1129 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-20-Bugs Bunny, the governor of Massachusetts, the Dow 36,000 guy, presidential qualifications, and Peggy Noonan


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: Elsewhere: 1. They asked me to write about my “favorite election- or campaign-related movie, novel, or TV show” (Salon) 2. The shopping period is over; the time for buying has begun (NYT) 3. If anybody’s gonna be criticizing my tax plan, I want it to be this guy (Monkey Cage) 4. The 4 key qualifications to be a great president; unfortunately George W. Bush satisfies all four, and Ronald Reagan doesn’t match any of them (Monkey Cage) 5. The politics of eyeliner (Monkey Cage)


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 They asked me to write about my “favorite election- or campaign-related movie, novel, or TV show” (Salon) 2. [sent-2, score-0.135]

2 The shopping period is over; the time for buying has begun (NYT) 3. [sent-3, score-0.625]

3 If anybody’s gonna be criticizing my tax plan, I want it to be this guy (Monkey Cage) 4. [sent-4, score-0.357]

4 The 4 key qualifications to be a great president; unfortunately George W. [sent-5, score-0.39]

5 Bush satisfies all four, and Ronald Reagan doesn’t match any of them (Monkey Cage) 5. [sent-6, score-0.295]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('monkey', 0.487), ('cage', 0.487), ('salon', 0.198), ('satisfies', 0.177), ('shopping', 0.173), ('begun', 0.165), ('qualifications', 0.159), ('ronald', 0.155), ('buying', 0.147), ('reagan', 0.145), ('bush', 0.135), ('tv', 0.132), ('elsewhere', 0.131), ('anybody', 0.13), ('novel', 0.129), ('nyt', 0.127), ('gon', 0.126), ('movie', 0.123), ('criticizing', 0.119), ('match', 0.118), ('na', 0.117), ('president', 0.11), ('tax', 0.11), ('period', 0.106), ('george', 0.106), ('favorite', 0.105), ('plan', 0.101), ('unfortunately', 0.093), ('four', 0.093), ('politics', 0.092), ('guy', 0.085), ('key', 0.078), ('asked', 0.078), ('show', 0.073), ('great', 0.06), ('write', 0.057), ('doesn', 0.053), ('want', 0.043), ('time', 0.034)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 1.0 1129 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-20-Bugs Bunny, the governor of Massachusetts, the Dow 36,000 guy, presidential qualifications, and Peggy Noonan

Introduction: Elsewhere: 1. They asked me to write about my “favorite election- or campaign-related movie, novel, or TV show” (Salon) 2. The shopping period is over; the time for buying has begun (NYT) 3. If anybody’s gonna be criticizing my tax plan, I want it to be this guy (Monkey Cage) 4. The 4 key qualifications to be a great president; unfortunately George W. Bush satisfies all four, and Ronald Reagan doesn’t match any of them (Monkey Cage) 5. The politics of eyeliner (Monkey Cage)

2 0.50930989 2002 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-30-Blogging

Introduction: A journalist asked me for my thoughts on academics and blogging, in light of the recently announced move of the sister blog to the Washington Post. I responded as follows: John Sides is the leader of the Monkey Cage and in particular was the key person involved in the Washington Post move. But I will give you some general comments based on my own experiences. I started blogging in 2004: Samantha Cook (my postdoc at the time) and I set up the blog so that we could communicate our partially-formed research ideas to each other, in a way that would be open to the world so that (a) we could get input from interested outsiders, and (b) we could publicize our work. We decided to post daily (or approximately thus). At the time, I figured that if there was ever a time that we ran out of material, I could post summaries of my old research papers. The blog quickly became a place for us to give our various thoughts on statistical modeling, causal inference, and social science.

3 0.30032599 2088 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-04-Recently in the sister blog

Introduction: This one’s probably the most important: Republicans on track to retain control of House in 2014 And I like this one for the headline: Impact factor 911 is a joke Here are the others: Press releases make for fishy statistics Why is the Motley Fool hyping Netflix? Our health-care system is like Coca Cola Obama takes big bucks from telecoms, ramps up national security state I have mixed feelings about the move of the Monkey Cage blog to the Washington Post. I’ve been told we get many more readers, but the the comments have declined in number and in quality. It used to be that posting at the Monkey Cage felt like “blogging”: I’d post something there and look at the comments. It was a political science community with many participants from outside the field. Posting at the new blog is more like writing for the newspaper: it’s a broadcast without real feedback. This all makes me realize how much I appreciate the commenters here. Just as I blog for free, out

4 0.22490978 2096 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-10-Schiminovich is on The Simpsons

Introduction: OK, fine . Maybe they could work Stan on to the show next? I thought I could retire once I’d successfully inserted the phrase “multilevel regression and poststratification” into the NYT, but now I want more more more. Maybe a cage match between Stan and Mister P on the Itchy and Scratchy show?

5 0.19840172 1997 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-24-Measurement error in monkey studies

Introduction: Following up on our recent discussion of combative linguist Noam Chomsky and disgraced primatologist Marc Hauser, here are some stories from Jay Livingston about monkey research. Don’t get me wrong—I eat burgers, so I’m not trying to get on my moral high horse here. But the stories do get you thinking about measurement error and why I would not trust the PI of a monkey study to code his own measurements and keep his data secret.

6 0.1386634 2125 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-05-What predicts whether a school district will participate in a large-scale evaluation?

7 0.11994603 2048 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-03-A comment on a post at the Monkey Cage

8 0.08445701 745 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-04-High-level intellectual discussions in the Columbia statistics department

9 0.079449162 956 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-13-Hey, you! Don’t take that class!

10 0.076089367 551 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-02-Obama and Reagan, sitting in a tree, etc.

11 0.075399488 143 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-12-Statistical fact checking needed, or, No, Ronald Reagan did not win “overwhelming support from evangelicals”

12 0.074597649 2086 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-03-How best to compare effects measured in two different time periods?

13 0.072194993 1832 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-29-The blogroll

14 0.071570128 1342 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-24-The Used TV Price is Too Damn High

15 0.063426174 1304 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-06-Picking on Stephen Wolfram

16 0.058275305 1372 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-08-Stop me before I aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

17 0.05750218 682 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-27-“The ultimate left-wing novel”

18 0.056996964 394 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-05-2010: What happened?

19 0.055829745 654 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-09-There’s no evidence that voters choose presidential candidates based on their looks

20 0.055187937 2261 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-23-Greg Mankiw’s utility function


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.049), (1, -0.051), (2, 0.019), (3, 0.045), (4, -0.013), (5, 0.018), (6, 0.012), (7, -0.013), (8, -0.01), (9, -0.015), (10, 0.002), (11, 0.002), (12, 0.017), (13, -0.009), (14, -0.018), (15, 0.011), (16, -0.024), (17, -0.011), (18, -0.007), (19, 0.034), (20, 0.028), (21, -0.005), (22, -0.02), (23, 0.034), (24, 0.004), (25, -0.012), (26, -0.023), (27, -0.03), (28, -0.026), (29, 0.004), (30, 0.019), (31, -0.041), (32, -0.021), (33, 0.034), (34, -0.009), (35, 0.025), (36, -0.042), (37, -0.011), (38, 0.015), (39, -0.045), (40, 0.014), (41, 0.001), (42, -0.004), (43, 0.006), (44, 0.036), (45, 0.033), (46, 0.021), (47, -0.0), (48, -0.053), (49, 0.021)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.96532822 1129 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-20-Bugs Bunny, the governor of Massachusetts, the Dow 36,000 guy, presidential qualifications, and Peggy Noonan

Introduction: Elsewhere: 1. They asked me to write about my “favorite election- or campaign-related movie, novel, or TV show” (Salon) 2. The shopping period is over; the time for buying has begun (NYT) 3. If anybody’s gonna be criticizing my tax plan, I want it to be this guy (Monkey Cage) 4. The 4 key qualifications to be a great president; unfortunately George W. Bush satisfies all four, and Ronald Reagan doesn’t match any of them (Monkey Cage) 5. The politics of eyeliner (Monkey Cage)

2 0.62586564 2088 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-04-Recently in the sister blog

Introduction: This one’s probably the most important: Republicans on track to retain control of House in 2014 And I like this one for the headline: Impact factor 911 is a joke Here are the others: Press releases make for fishy statistics Why is the Motley Fool hyping Netflix? Our health-care system is like Coca Cola Obama takes big bucks from telecoms, ramps up national security state I have mixed feelings about the move of the Monkey Cage blog to the Washington Post. I’ve been told we get many more readers, but the the comments have declined in number and in quality. It used to be that posting at the Monkey Cage felt like “blogging”: I’d post something there and look at the comments. It was a political science community with many participants from outside the field. Posting at the new blog is more like writing for the newspaper: it’s a broadcast without real feedback. This all makes me realize how much I appreciate the commenters here. Just as I blog for free, out

3 0.5969826 966 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-20-A qualified but incomplete thanks to Gregg Easterbrook’s editor at Reuters

Introduction: Dear Reuters editor: Thanks for reading my blog and correcting the erroneous numbers in Easterbrook’s column from the other day. I’m pretty sure you got the corrections from my blog because in your corrections you used the exact same links that I posted. I think your readers will like that you gave links to the sources of your numbers. But I’d appreciate if you cite me! It’s considered polite to credit your sources rather than just copying over numbers and links with no mention of where they came from. Unlike Easterbrook, I’m not expecting to be paid for this material but I’d still like to be thanked. (See the last paragraph of this post by Felix Salmon for more on the desirability of linking to your sources.) Also, since you’re correcting the article anyway, maybe you could go back and change this sentence too: But don’t sell Huntsman short because he is low in the polls – Obama had been at that point, too. As I noted earlier, As of 14 Oct 2011, Gallup gi

4 0.58703607 959 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-14-The most clueless political column ever—I think this Easterbrook dude has the journalistic equivalent of “tenure”

Introduction: I don’t know when I’ve seen political writing quote so misinformed as this. It’s a bizarre mixture of cliches, non-sequitors, and outright mistakes. The author is Gregg Easterbrook and he’s writing for Reuters . First, the cliches: Right now Romney seems to be the frontrunner, which, of course, is a mixed blessing. His aura of experience and reasonableness could prove quite appealing to voters. Perry continues to have the potential to light a populist fire. . . . Of all the 2012 candidates, Huntsman is the one who is Not Just Another Politician. And now the errors. At this point in the 1992 election cycle, the elder George Bush held an 89 percent approval rating. . . . Clinton beat a popular incumbent with a fantastic approval rating. For the 2012 election, Barack Obama is just as vulnerable as the elder Bush, if not even more so. Obama currently has an approval rating of 23 percent. This is all fine, except that: 1. It’s not true that at this point in the 1992 elec

5 0.57699758 588 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-24-In case you were wondering, here’s the price of milk

Introduction: Seeing Sarah Palin’s recent witticism : It’s no wonder Michelle Obama is telling everybody you need to breast feed your babies … the price of milk is so high! I was reminded of Dan Quayle’s quip during the 1988 campaign: The governor of Massachusetts, he lost his top naval adviser last week. His rubber ducky drowned in the bathtub. And this got me wondering: how often do legitimate political figures–not talk show hosts, but actual politicians–communicate via schoolyard-style taunts? I’m not talking here about dry wit of the Bob Dole or Morris Udall variety, or political gamesmanship such as Ronald Reagan’s “make my day,” or flat-out partisanship like Alan Grayson’s “the Republicans want you to die quickly” or James Watt’s line about “liberals and Americans.” It’s gotta be an actual joke. There must be some other examples of Palin/Quayle style humor, but I’m not sure where to look. I keep thinking of Veronica Geng’s hilarious story which includes the line: In

6 0.569906 1577 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-14-Richer people continue to vote Republican

7 0.56185097 1567 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-07-Election reports

8 0.55207831 1569 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-08-30-30-40 Nation

9 0.54538667 394 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-05-2010: What happened?

10 0.54367334 1579 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-16-Hacks, maps, and moon rocks: Recent items in the sister blog

11 0.54279107 84 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-14-Is it 1930?

12 0.53381312 885 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-01-Needed: A Billionaire Candidate for President Who Shares the Views of a Washington Post Columnist

13 0.5244987 1479 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-01-Mothers and Moms

14 0.52243376 2002 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-30-Blogging

15 0.51993024 551 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-02-Obama and Reagan, sitting in a tree, etc.

16 0.51919001 286 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-20-Are the Democrats avoiding a national campaign?

17 0.51608711 143 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-12-Statistical fact checking needed, or, No, Ronald Reagan did not win “overwhelming support from evangelicals”

18 0.51373351 641 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-01-So many topics, so little time

19 0.51328266 868 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-24-Blogs vs. real journalism

20 0.51032686 1574 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-12-How to Lie With Statistics example number 12,498,122


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(16, 0.067), (21, 0.053), (22, 0.022), (23, 0.025), (24, 0.121), (63, 0.07), (73, 0.049), (81, 0.315), (86, 0.018), (98, 0.024), (99, 0.092)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.96767193 1129 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-20-Bugs Bunny, the governor of Massachusetts, the Dow 36,000 guy, presidential qualifications, and Peggy Noonan

Introduction: Elsewhere: 1. They asked me to write about my “favorite election- or campaign-related movie, novel, or TV show” (Salon) 2. The shopping period is over; the time for buying has begun (NYT) 3. If anybody’s gonna be criticizing my tax plan, I want it to be this guy (Monkey Cage) 4. The 4 key qualifications to be a great president; unfortunately George W. Bush satisfies all four, and Ronald Reagan doesn’t match any of them (Monkey Cage) 5. The politics of eyeliner (Monkey Cage)

2 0.91548645 2250 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-16-“I have no idea who Catalina Garcia is, but she makes a decent ruler”

Introduction: Best blog comment ever , following up on our post, How tall is Jon Lee Anderson?: Based on this picture: http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2235/1640569735_05337bb974.jpg he appears to be fairly tall. But the perspective makes it hard to judge. Based on this picture: http://www.catalinagarcia.com/cata/Libraries/BLOG_Images/Cata_w_Jon_Lee_Anderson.sflb.ashx he appears to be about 9-10 inches taller than Catalina Garcia. But how tall is Catalina Garcia? Not that tall – she’s shorter than the high-wire artist Phillipe Petit http://www.catalinagarcia.com/cata/Libraries/BLOG_Images/Cata_w_Philippe_Petite.sflb.ashx. And he doesn’t appear to be that tall… about the same height as Claire Danes: http://cdn.theatermania.com/photo-gallery/Petit_Danes_Daldry_2421_4700.jpg – who according to Google is 5′ 6″. So if Jon Lee Anderson is 10″ taller than Catalina Garcia, who is 2″ shorter than Philippe Petit, who is the same height as Claire Danes, then he is 6′ 2″ tall. I have no idea who Catal

3 0.86534804 1057 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-14-Hey—I didn’t know that!

Introduction: From Wikipedia (via Jay Livingston ): Newsweek sells only about 40,000 newsstand copies compared with 1.5 million subscriptions. (Both figures are substantially lower than they were a decade ago.) The figures for Time are about double those of Newsweek, but the ratio of newsstand sales to subscriptions is about the same. I guess I’m not surprised that most of the sales are from subscriptions, but I’m surprised the fraction is so close to 100%.

4 0.86133409 1762 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-13-“I have no idea who Catalina Garcia is, but she makes a decent ruler”: I don’t know if John Lee “little twerp” Anderson actually suffers from tall-person syndrome, but he is indeed tall

Introduction: I just want to share with you the best comment we’ve every had in the nearly ten-year history of this blog. Also it has statistical content! Here’s the story. After seeing an amusing article by Tom Scocca relating how reporter John Lee Anderson called someone as a “little twerp” on twitter: I conjectured that Anderson suffered from “tall person syndrome,” that problem that some people of above-average height have, that they think they’re more important than other people because they literally look down on them. But I had no idea of Anderson’s actual height. Commenter Gary responded with this impressive bit of investigative reporting: Based on this picture: he appears to be fairly tall. But the perspective makes it hard to judge. Based on this picture: he appears to be about 9-10 inches taller than Catalina Garcia. But how tall is Catalina Garcia? Not that tall – she’s shorter than the high-wire artist Phillipe Petit: And he doesn’t appear

5 0.83054698 915 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-17-(Worst) graph of the year

Introduction: This (forwarded to me from Jeff, from a powerpoint by Willam Gawthrop) wins not on form but on content: Really this graph should stand alone but it’s so wonderful that I can’t resist pointing out a few things: - The gap between 610 and 622 A.D. seems to be about the same as the previous 600 years, and only a little less than the 1400 years before that. - “Pious and devout” Jews are portrayed as having steadily increased in nonviolence up to the present day. Been to Israel lately? - I assume the line labeled “Bible” is referring to Christians? I’m sort of amazed to see pious and devout Christians listed as being maximally violent at the beginning. Huh? I thought Christ was supposed to be a nonviolent, mellow dude. The line starts at 3 B.C., implying that baby Jesus was at the extreme of violence. Gong forward, we can learn from the graph that pious and devout Christians in 1492 or 1618, say, were much more peaceful than Jesus and his crew. - Most amusingly g

6 0.70786864 552 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-03-Model Makers’ Hippocratic Oath

7 0.66263318 1632 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-20-Who exactly are those silly academics who aren’t as smart as a Vegas bookie?

8 0.62597799 484 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-24-Foreign language skills as an intrinsic good; also, beware the tyranny of measurement

9 0.61256123 849 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-11-The Reliability of Cluster Surveys of Conflict Mortality: Violent Deaths and Non-Violent Deaths

10 0.60242975 2249 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-15-Recently in the sister blog

11 0.5925234 1962 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-30-The Roy causal model?

12 0.59129119 1033 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-28-Greece to head statistician: Tell the truth, go to jail

13 0.5823611 1705 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-04-Recently in the sister blog

14 0.56391644 1222 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-20-5 books book

15 0.56319797 556 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-04-Patterns

16 0.56252176 1321 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-15-A statistical research project: Weeding out the fraudulent citations

17 0.55888557 858 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-17-Jumping off the edge of the world

18 0.52565289 442 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-01-bayesglm in Stata?

19 0.51841331 2096 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-10-Schiminovich is on The Simpsons

20 0.51009226 779 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-25-Avoiding boundary estimates using a prior distribution as regularization