andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2011 andrew_gelman_stats-2011-1032 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Discussion by a panel of experts at the Statistics Forum .
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 Discussion by a panel of experts at the Statistics Forum . [sent-1, score-1.054]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('panel', 0.596), ('forum', 0.586), ('experts', 0.458), ('discussion', 0.23), ('statistics', 0.197)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99999994 1032 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-28-Does Avastin work on breast cancer? Should Medicare be paying for it?
Introduction: Discussion by a panel of experts at the Statistics Forum .
2 0.55821842 717 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-17-Statistics plagiarism scandal
Introduction: See more at the Statistics Forum (of course).
3 0.4130713 703 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-10-Bringing Causal Models Into the Mainstream
Introduction: John Johnson writes at the Statistics Forum.
4 0.3858867 648 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-04-The Case for More False Positives in Anti-doping Testing
Introduction: No joke. See here (from Kaiser Fung). At the Statistics Forum.
Introduction: At the Statistics Forum, we highlight a debate about how statistics should be taught in high schools. Check it out and then please leave your comments there.
6 0.28956077 686 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-29-What are the open problems in Bayesian statistics??
7 0.22765614 1678 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-17-Wanted: 365 stories of statistics
8 0.19754957 1246 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-04-Data visualization panel at the New York Public Library this evening!
9 0.1869961 1045 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-07-Martyn Plummer’s Secret JAGS Blog
10 0.14947188 378 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-28-World Economic Forum Data Visualization Challenge
11 0.13858128 700 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-06-Suspicious pattern of too-strong replications of medical research
12 0.12912661 1572 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-10-I don’t like this cartoon
13 0.12871858 1452 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-09-Visually weighting regression displays
14 0.12523554 1256 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Our data visualization panel at the New York Public Library
15 0.12291567 437 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-29-The mystery of the U-shaped relationship between happiness and age
16 0.10975397 1687 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-21-Workshop on science communication for graduate students
17 0.10637665 322 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-06-More on the differences between drugs and medical devices
18 0.1028725 284 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-18-Continuing efforts to justify false “death panels” claim
19 0.10279142 563 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-07-Evaluating predictions of political events
20 0.10153813 263 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-08-The China Study: fact or fallacy?
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.043), (1, -0.015), (2, -0.055), (3, 0.017), (4, -0.007), (5, 0.022), (6, -0.067), (7, 0.06), (8, -0.019), (9, 0.01), (10, -0.026), (11, 0.004), (12, 0.092), (13, 0.067), (14, -0.102), (15, -0.024), (16, -0.189), (17, 0.239), (18, 0.012), (19, -0.097), (20, 0.067), (21, 0.118), (22, -0.046), (23, -0.17), (24, -0.123), (25, 0.168), (26, -0.124), (27, -0.03), (28, -0.061), (29, -0.034), (30, 0.066), (31, 0.086), (32, 0.012), (33, -0.063), (34, -0.042), (35, 0.011), (36, -0.049), (37, 0.105), (38, 0.061), (39, 0.146), (40, 0.018), (41, -0.135), (42, -0.008), (43, -0.004), (44, -0.049), (45, -0.078), (46, -0.021), (47, -0.059), (48, 0.028), (49, 0.02)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.9865461 1032 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-28-Does Avastin work on breast cancer? Should Medicare be paying for it?
Introduction: Discussion by a panel of experts at the Statistics Forum .
2 0.95816272 686 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-29-What are the open problems in Bayesian statistics??
Introduction: Follow the discussion (originated by Mike Jordan) at the Statistics Forum.
3 0.94953585 703 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-10-Bringing Causal Models Into the Mainstream
Introduction: John Johnson writes at the Statistics Forum.
4 0.92767882 717 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-17-Statistics plagiarism scandal
Introduction: See more at the Statistics Forum (of course).
Introduction: At the Statistics Forum, we highlight a debate about how statistics should be taught in high schools. Check it out and then please leave your comments there.
6 0.82209706 648 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-04-The Case for More False Positives in Anti-doping Testing
7 0.75748384 1045 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-07-Martyn Plummer’s Secret JAGS Blog
8 0.65485698 1816 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-21-Exponential increase in the number of stat majors
9 0.61683083 700 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-06-Suspicious pattern of too-strong replications of medical research
10 0.57836717 1678 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-17-Wanted: 365 stories of statistics
11 0.54954195 1590 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-26-I need a title for my book on ethics and statistics!!
12 0.54170829 2362 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-06-Statistically savvy journalism
13 0.53223544 1798 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-11-Continuing conflict over conflict statistics
14 0.51224178 1013 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-16-My talk at Math for America on Saturday
15 0.49503413 1951 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-22-Top 5 stat papers since 2000?
16 0.46892071 1770 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-19-Retraction watch
17 0.4670929 2043 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-29-The difficulties of measuring just about anything
18 0.45658582 373 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-27-It’s better than being forwarded the latest works of you-know-who
19 0.44596308 953 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-11-Steve Jobs’s cancer and science-based medicine
20 0.43367586 1071 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-19-“NYU Professor Claims He Was Fired for Giving James Franco a D”
topicId topicWeight
[(24, 0.224), (38, 0.194), (89, 0.197), (99, 0.071)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.89888602 1032 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-28-Does Avastin work on breast cancer? Should Medicare be paying for it?
Introduction: Discussion by a panel of experts at the Statistics Forum .
2 0.76770312 1477 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-30-Visualizing Distributions of Covariance Matrices
Introduction: Since we’ve been discussing prior distributions on covariance matrices, I will recommend this recent article (coauthored with Tomoki Tokuda, Ben Goodrich, Iven Van Mechelen, and Francis Tuerlinckx) on their visualization: We present some methods for graphing distributions of covariance matrices and demonstrate them on several models, including the Wishart, inverse-Wishart, and scaled inverse-Wishart families in different dimensions. Our visualizations follow the principle of decomposing a covariance matrix into scale parameters and correlations, pulling out marginal summaries where possible and using two and three-dimensional plots to reveal multivariate structure. Visualizing a distribution of covariance matrices is a step beyond visualizing a single covariance matrix or a single multivariate dataset. Our visualization methods are available through the R package VisCov.
3 0.73959219 2243 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-11-The myth of the myth of the myth of the hot hand
Introduction: Phil pointed me to this paper so I thought I probably better repeat what I wrote a couple years ago: 1. The effects are certainly not zero. We are not machines, and anything that can affect our expectations (for example, our success in previous tries) should affect our performance. 2. The effects I’ve seen are small, on the order of 2 percentage points (for example, the probability of a success in some sports task might be 45% if you’re “hot” and 43% otherwise). 3. There’s a huge amount of variation, not just between but also among players. Sometimes if you succeed you will stay relaxed and focused, other times you can succeed and get overconfidence. 4. Whatever the latest results on particular sports, I can’t see anyone overturning the basic finding of Gilovich, Vallone, and Tversky that players and spectators alike will perceive the hot hand even when it does not exist and dramatically overestimate the magnitude and consistency of any hot-hand phenomenon that does exist.
4 0.72722161 1215 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-16-The “hot hand” and problems with hypothesis testing
Introduction: Gur Yaari writes : Anyone who has ever watched a sports competition is familiar with expressions like “on fire”, “in the zone”, “on a roll”, “momentum” and so on. But what do these expressions really mean? In 1985 when Thomas Gilovich, Robert Vallone and Amos Tversky studied this phenomenon for the first time, they defined it as: “. . . these phrases express a belief that the performance of a player during a particular period is significantly better than expected on the basis of the player’s overall record”. Their conclusion was that what people tend to perceive as a “hot hand” is essentially a cognitive illusion caused by a misperception of random sequences. Until recently there was little, if any, evidence to rule out their conclusion. Increased computing power and new data availability from various sports now provide surprising evidence of this phenomenon, thus reigniting the debate. Yaari goes on to some studies that have found time dependence in basketball, baseball, voll
Introduction: I remember in 4th grade or so, the teacher would give us a list of vocabulary words each week and we’d have to show we learned them by using each in a sentence. We quickly got bored and decided to do the assignment by writing a single sentence using all ten words. (Which the teacher hated, of course.) The above headline is in that spirit, combining blog posts rather than vocabulary words. But that only uses two of the entries. To really do the job, I’d need to throw in bivariate associations, ecological fallacies, high-dimensional feature selection, statistical significance, the suddenly unpopular name Hilary, snotty reviewers, the contagion of obesity, and milk-related spam. Or we could bring in some of the all-time favorites, such as Bayesians, economists, Finland, beautiful parents and their daughters, goofy graphics, red and blue states, essentialism in children’s reasoning, chess running, and zombies. Putting 8 of these in a single sentence (along with Glenn Hubbard
6 0.67668951 2229 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-28-God-leaf-tree
8 0.64541042 240 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-29-ARM solutions
9 0.64539915 1437 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-31-Paying survey respondents
10 0.64514369 1046 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-07-Neutral noninformative and informative conjugate beta and gamma prior distributions
11 0.64427066 471 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-17-Attractive models (and data) wanted for statistical art show.
12 0.6440571 1685 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-21-Class on computational social science this semester, Fridays, 1:00-3:40pm
13 0.64272785 545 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-30-New innovations in spam
14 0.64046943 643 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-02-So-called Bayesian hypothesis testing is just as bad as regular hypothesis testing
15 0.63544512 833 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-31-Untunable Metropolis
16 0.63351446 38 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-18-Breastfeeding, infant hyperbilirubinemia, statistical graphics, and modern medicine
17 0.63160521 1756 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-10-He said he was sorry
18 0.62740284 59 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-30-Extended Binary Format Support for Mac OS X
19 0.62710714 241 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-29-Ethics and statistics in development research
20 0.62682194 1874 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-28-Nostalgia