andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2011 andrew_gelman_stats-2011-497 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

497 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-02-Hipmunk update


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: Florence from customer support at Hipmunk writes: Hipmunk now includes American Airlines in our search results. Please note that users will be taken directly to AA.com to complete the booking/transaction. . . . we are steadily increasing the number of flights that we offer on Hipmunk. As you may recall, Hipmunk is a really cool flight-finder that didn’t actually work (as of 16 Sept 2010). At the time, I was a bit annoyed at the NYT columnist who plugged Hipmunk without actually telling his readers that the site didn’t actually do the job. (I discovered the problem myself because I couldn’t believe that my flight options to Raleigh-Durham were really so meager, so I checked on Expedia and found a good flight.) I do think Hipmunk’s graphics are beautiful, though, so I’m rooting for them to catch up. P.S. Apparently they include Amtrak Northeast Corridor trains, so I’ll give them a try, next time I travel. The regular Amtrak website is about as horrible as you’d expect.


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 Florence from customer support at Hipmunk writes: Hipmunk now includes American Airlines in our search results. [sent-1, score-0.343]

2 Please note that users will be taken directly to AA. [sent-2, score-0.279]

3 we are steadily increasing the number of flights that we offer on Hipmunk. [sent-7, score-0.411]

4 As you may recall, Hipmunk is a really cool flight-finder that didn’t actually work (as of 16 Sept 2010). [sent-8, score-0.235]

5 At the time, I was a bit annoyed at the NYT columnist who plugged Hipmunk without actually telling his readers that the site didn’t actually do the job. [sent-9, score-0.787]

6 (I discovered the problem myself because I couldn’t believe that my flight options to Raleigh-Durham were really so meager, so I checked on Expedia and found a good flight. [sent-10, score-0.459]

7 ) I do think Hipmunk’s graphics are beautiful, though, so I’m rooting for them to catch up. [sent-11, score-0.31]

8 Apparently they include Amtrak Northeast Corridor trains, so I’ll give them a try, next time I travel. [sent-14, score-0.057]

9 The regular Amtrak website is about as horrible as you’d expect. [sent-15, score-0.243]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('hipmunk', 0.66), ('amtrak', 0.289), ('trains', 0.145), ('rooting', 0.145), ('airlines', 0.145), ('sept', 0.14), ('northeast', 0.14), ('expedia', 0.135), ('flights', 0.135), ('florence', 0.135), ('plugged', 0.135), ('customer', 0.132), ('flight', 0.124), ('columnist', 0.12), ('steadily', 0.118), ('actually', 0.105), ('annoyed', 0.1), ('nyt', 0.097), ('options', 0.095), ('beautiful', 0.095), ('checked', 0.094), ('discovered', 0.092), ('catch', 0.091), ('users', 0.087), ('didn', 0.086), ('horrible', 0.085), ('increasing', 0.084), ('site', 0.084), ('regular', 0.081), ('telling', 0.081), ('includes', 0.079), ('complete', 0.078), ('apparently', 0.077), ('website', 0.077), ('cool', 0.076), ('offer', 0.074), ('graphics', 0.074), ('couldn', 0.073), ('search', 0.072), ('recall', 0.072), ('note', 0.066), ('please', 0.066), ('taken', 0.065), ('expect', 0.064), ('directly', 0.061), ('support', 0.06), ('american', 0.058), ('readers', 0.057), ('include', 0.057), ('really', 0.054)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.99999988 497 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-02-Hipmunk update

Introduction: Florence from customer support at Hipmunk writes: Hipmunk now includes American Airlines in our search results. Please note that users will be taken directly to AA.com to complete the booking/transaction. . . . we are steadily increasing the number of flights that we offer on Hipmunk. As you may recall, Hipmunk is a really cool flight-finder that didn’t actually work (as of 16 Sept 2010). At the time, I was a bit annoyed at the NYT columnist who plugged Hipmunk without actually telling his readers that the site didn’t actually do the job. (I discovered the problem myself because I couldn’t believe that my flight options to Raleigh-Durham were really so meager, so I checked on Expedia and found a good flight.) I do think Hipmunk’s graphics are beautiful, though, so I’m rooting for them to catch up. P.S. Apparently they include Amtrak Northeast Corridor trains, so I’ll give them a try, next time I travel. The regular Amtrak website is about as horrible as you’d expect.

2 0.52758044 2238 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-09-Hipmunk worked

Introduction: In the past I’ve categorized Hipmunk as a really cool flight-finder that doesn’t actually work , as worse than Expedia , and as graphics without content . So, I thought it would be only fair to tell you that I bought a flight the other day using Hipmunk and it gave me the same flight as Expedia but at a lower cost (by linking to something called CheapOair, which I hope is legit). So score one for Hipmunk.

3 0.47010782 917 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-20-Last post on Hipmunk

Introduction: There was some confusion on my last try , so let me explain one more time . . . The flights I where Hipmunk failed (see here for background) were not obscure itineraries. One of them was a nonstop from New York to Cincinnati; another was from NY to Durham, North Carolina; and yet another was a trip to Midway in Chicago. In that last case, Hipmunk showed no nonstops at all—which will come as a surprise to the passengers on the Southwest Airlines flight I was on a couple days ago! In these cases, Hipmunk didn’t even do the courtesy of flashing a message telling me to try elsewhere. I don’t understand. How hard would it be for the program to automatically do a Kayak search and find all the flights? Hipmunk’s graphics are great, though. Lee Wilkinson reports: Check out the figure below from The Grammar of Graphics. Dan Rope invented this graphic and programmed it in Java in the late 1990′s. We shopped this graph around to Orbitz and Expedia but they weren’t interested. So I

4 0.46025041 280 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-16-Meet Hipmunk, a really cool flight-finder that doesn’t actually work

Introduction: Brendan pointed me to this news article by David Pogue promoting a website called Hipmunk , a sleek competitor to Travelocity, Expedia, Kayak, and the like. Coincidentally, I had to a buy a flight right now so I followed the link and found that, indeed, Hipmunk is about a zillion times easier to use and more impressive than Expedia or even Kayak. It’s awesome. The others aren’t even close. The display was so clean and effective, I felt like ordering a few flights just for fun. That’s the good news. Now the bad news. I wasn’t just playing around with the site. There was actually a flight I wanted to buy–an itinerary I’d looked into yesterday but hadn’t saved or booked. I effortlessly set up the request in Hipmunk, scanned its impressive graphical display, and . . . couldn’t find the flight I wanted! Oh no! The last ticket must’ve been sold! Just to check, though, I want on good old ugly Expedia. And my flight was right there! So I bought it. So, just a quick memo

5 0.42406261 894 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-07-Hipmunk FAIL: Graphics without content is not enough

Introduction: I love a good GUI but not if it doesn’t give me the information I need. I again tried Hipmunk and it again failed (this time for a trip to Baltimore where it gave only a useless subset of the available Amtrak trains). I don’t know anything about the internet biz. What I’m guessing is that they set up this cool website that is pretty much functional, with the goal of selling it for a few million dollars to Travelocity or Expedia or Kayak. What I’m wondering is, why haven’t they made the deal already? Hipmunk’s GUI is great. The site is useless because it’s missing so many flights, but if you put it in an actual travel site such as Expedia, it would be great. It’s enough to make me want to hit someone with an i-phone . . .

6 0.32090032 573 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-14-Hipmunk < Expedia, again

7 0.17838424 920 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-22-Top 10 blog obsessions

8 0.10651748 129 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-05-Unrelated to all else

9 0.076709218 1061 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-16-CrossValidated: A place to post your statistics questions

10 0.07631968 199 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-11-Note to semi-spammers

11 0.06936352 354 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-19-There’s only one Amtrak

12 0.060758356 1543 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-21-Model complexity as a function of sample size

13 0.060726412 1006 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-12-Val’s Number Scroll: Helping kids visualize math

14 0.060612522 207 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-14-Pourquoi Google search est devenu plus raisonnable?

15 0.056140125 2124 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-05-Stan (quietly) passes 512 people on the users list

16 0.056058954 153 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-17-Tenure-track position at U. North Carolina in survey methods and social statistics

17 0.054695249 1916 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-27-The weirdest thing about the AJPH story

18 0.054163799 1193 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-03-“Do you guys pay your bills?”

19 0.053370826 188 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-06-Fake newspaper headlines

20 0.052440178 855 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-16-Infovis and statgraphics update update


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.081), (1, -0.045), (2, -0.033), (3, 0.047), (4, 0.064), (5, -0.027), (6, 0.006), (7, -0.02), (8, -0.018), (9, -0.024), (10, 0.007), (11, -0.025), (12, 0.057), (13, 0.019), (14, -0.014), (15, -0.002), (16, 0.028), (17, -0.048), (18, 0.042), (19, 0.088), (20, -0.021), (21, -0.003), (22, 0.029), (23, -0.044), (24, 0.062), (25, -0.008), (26, -0.02), (27, -0.099), (28, -0.028), (29, -0.031), (30, -0.055), (31, -0.091), (32, 0.361), (33, -0.085), (34, -0.128), (35, -0.012), (36, -0.313), (37, -0.084), (38, -0.087), (39, -0.115), (40, -0.066), (41, -0.138), (42, 0.009), (43, -0.159), (44, -0.116), (45, -0.072), (46, -0.047), (47, -0.004), (48, 0.023), (49, 0.003)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

1 0.97596824 2238 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-09-Hipmunk worked

Introduction: In the past I’ve categorized Hipmunk as a really cool flight-finder that doesn’t actually work , as worse than Expedia , and as graphics without content . So, I thought it would be only fair to tell you that I bought a flight the other day using Hipmunk and it gave me the same flight as Expedia but at a lower cost (by linking to something called CheapOair, which I hope is legit). So score one for Hipmunk.

same-blog 2 0.97146547 497 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-02-Hipmunk update

Introduction: Florence from customer support at Hipmunk writes: Hipmunk now includes American Airlines in our search results. Please note that users will be taken directly to AA.com to complete the booking/transaction. . . . we are steadily increasing the number of flights that we offer on Hipmunk. As you may recall, Hipmunk is a really cool flight-finder that didn’t actually work (as of 16 Sept 2010). At the time, I was a bit annoyed at the NYT columnist who plugged Hipmunk without actually telling his readers that the site didn’t actually do the job. (I discovered the problem myself because I couldn’t believe that my flight options to Raleigh-Durham were really so meager, so I checked on Expedia and found a good flight.) I do think Hipmunk’s graphics are beautiful, though, so I’m rooting for them to catch up. P.S. Apparently they include Amtrak Northeast Corridor trains, so I’ll give them a try, next time I travel. The regular Amtrak website is about as horrible as you’d expect.

3 0.96120578 280 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-16-Meet Hipmunk, a really cool flight-finder that doesn’t actually work

Introduction: Brendan pointed me to this news article by David Pogue promoting a website called Hipmunk , a sleek competitor to Travelocity, Expedia, Kayak, and the like. Coincidentally, I had to a buy a flight right now so I followed the link and found that, indeed, Hipmunk is about a zillion times easier to use and more impressive than Expedia or even Kayak. It’s awesome. The others aren’t even close. The display was so clean and effective, I felt like ordering a few flights just for fun. That’s the good news. Now the bad news. I wasn’t just playing around with the site. There was actually a flight I wanted to buy–an itinerary I’d looked into yesterday but hadn’t saved or booked. I effortlessly set up the request in Hipmunk, scanned its impressive graphical display, and . . . couldn’t find the flight I wanted! Oh no! The last ticket must’ve been sold! Just to check, though, I want on good old ugly Expedia. And my flight was right there! So I bought it. So, just a quick memo

4 0.92511773 894 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-07-Hipmunk FAIL: Graphics without content is not enough

Introduction: I love a good GUI but not if it doesn’t give me the information I need. I again tried Hipmunk and it again failed (this time for a trip to Baltimore where it gave only a useless subset of the available Amtrak trains). I don’t know anything about the internet biz. What I’m guessing is that they set up this cool website that is pretty much functional, with the goal of selling it for a few million dollars to Travelocity or Expedia or Kayak. What I’m wondering is, why haven’t they made the deal already? Hipmunk’s GUI is great. The site is useless because it’s missing so many flights, but if you put it in an actual travel site such as Expedia, it would be great. It’s enough to make me want to hit someone with an i-phone . . .

5 0.90729803 917 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-20-Last post on Hipmunk

Introduction: There was some confusion on my last try , so let me explain one more time . . . The flights I where Hipmunk failed (see here for background) were not obscure itineraries. One of them was a nonstop from New York to Cincinnati; another was from NY to Durham, North Carolina; and yet another was a trip to Midway in Chicago. In that last case, Hipmunk showed no nonstops at all—which will come as a surprise to the passengers on the Southwest Airlines flight I was on a couple days ago! In these cases, Hipmunk didn’t even do the courtesy of flashing a message telling me to try elsewhere. I don’t understand. How hard would it be for the program to automatically do a Kayak search and find all the flights? Hipmunk’s graphics are great, though. Lee Wilkinson reports: Check out the figure below from The Grammar of Graphics. Dan Rope invented this graphic and programmed it in Java in the late 1990′s. We shopped this graph around to Orbitz and Expedia but they weren’t interested. So I

6 0.85961139 573 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-14-Hipmunk < Expedia, again

7 0.59834099 919 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-21-Least surprising headline of the year

8 0.53249937 745 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-04-High-level intellectual discussions in the Columbia statistics department

9 0.4742617 1976 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-10-The birthday problem

10 0.45164183 920 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-22-Top 10 blog obsessions

11 0.42393431 297 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-27-An interesting education and statistics blog

12 0.41028491 491 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-29-Don’t try this at home

13 0.40400052 1061 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-16-CrossValidated: A place to post your statistics questions

14 0.40323013 914 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-16-meta-infographic

15 0.3579745 129 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-05-Unrelated to all else

16 0.34917402 354 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-19-There’s only one Amtrak

17 0.34402809 164 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-26-A very short story

18 0.33724985 1938 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-14-Learning how to speak

19 0.33325332 1006 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-12-Val’s Number Scroll: Helping kids visualize math

20 0.32228386 1255 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-10-Amtrak sucks


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(13, 0.032), (16, 0.084), (21, 0.067), (24, 0.068), (51, 0.026), (53, 0.013), (55, 0.021), (56, 0.02), (73, 0.303), (90, 0.021), (99, 0.22)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

1 0.90060133 655 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-10-“Versatile, affordable chicken has grown in popularity”

Introduction: Awhile ago I was cleaning out the closet and found some old unread magazines. Good stuff. As we’ve discussed before , lots of things are better read a few years late. Today I was reading the 18 Nov 2004 issue of the London Review of Books, which contained (among other things) the following: - A review by Jenny Diski of a biography of Stanley Milgram. Diski appears to want to debunk: Milgram was a whiz at devising sexy experiments, but barely interested in any theoretical basis for them. They all have the same instant attractiveness of style, and then an underlying emptiness. Huh? Michael Jordan couldn’t hit the curveball and he was reportedly an easy mark for golf hustlers but that doesn’t diminish his greatness on the basketball court. She also criticizes Milgram for being “no help at all” for solving international disputes. OK, fine. I haven’t solved any international disputes either. Milgram, though, . . . he conducted an imaginative experiment whose results stu

2 0.89437163 1925 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-04-“Versatile, affordable chicken has grown in popularity”

Introduction: From two years ago : Awhile ago I was cleaning out the closet and found some old unread magazines. Good stuff. As we’ve discussed before , lots of things are better read a few years late. Today I was reading the 18 Nov 2004 issue of the London Review of Books, which contained (among other things) the following: - A review by Jenny Diski of a biography of Stanley Milgram. Diski appears to want to debunk: Milgram was a whiz at devising sexy experiments, but barely interested in any theoretical basis for them. They all have the same instant attractiveness of style, and then an underlying emptiness. Huh? Michael Jordan couldn’t hit the curveball and he was reportedly an easy mark for golf hustlers but that doesn’t diminish his greatness on the basketball court. She also criticizes Milgram for being “no help at all” for solving international disputes. OK, fine. I haven’t solved any international disputes either. Milgram, though, . . . he conducted an imaginative exp

3 0.88809311 1099 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-05-Approaching harmonic convergence

Introduction: Check out comment #9 here . All we need is for Steven Levitt, David Runciman, and some Reader in Management somewhere to weigh in and we’ll be all set.

same-blog 4 0.85655057 497 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-02-Hipmunk update

Introduction: Florence from customer support at Hipmunk writes: Hipmunk now includes American Airlines in our search results. Please note that users will be taken directly to AA.com to complete the booking/transaction. . . . we are steadily increasing the number of flights that we offer on Hipmunk. As you may recall, Hipmunk is a really cool flight-finder that didn’t actually work (as of 16 Sept 2010). At the time, I was a bit annoyed at the NYT columnist who plugged Hipmunk without actually telling his readers that the site didn’t actually do the job. (I discovered the problem myself because I couldn’t believe that my flight options to Raleigh-Durham were really so meager, so I checked on Expedia and found a good flight.) I do think Hipmunk’s graphics are beautiful, though, so I’m rooting for them to catch up. P.S. Apparently they include Amtrak Northeast Corridor trains, so I’ll give them a try, next time I travel. The regular Amtrak website is about as horrible as you’d expect.

5 0.84248245 2238 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-09-Hipmunk worked

Introduction: In the past I’ve categorized Hipmunk as a really cool flight-finder that doesn’t actually work , as worse than Expedia , and as graphics without content . So, I thought it would be only fair to tell you that I bought a flight the other day using Hipmunk and it gave me the same flight as Expedia but at a lower cost (by linking to something called CheapOair, which I hope is legit). So score one for Hipmunk.

6 0.82756758 794 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-09-The quest for the holy graph

7 0.8201977 917 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-20-Last post on Hipmunk

8 0.81120545 1748 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-04-PyStan!

9 0.78639483 280 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-16-Meet Hipmunk, a really cool flight-finder that doesn’t actually work

10 0.78243786 7 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-27-Should Mister P be allowed-encouraged to reside in counter-factual populations?

11 0.77046686 894 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-07-Hipmunk FAIL: Graphics without content is not enough

12 0.76281703 161 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-24-Differences in color perception by sex, also the Bechdel test for women in movies

13 0.74788678 1511 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-26-What do statistical p-values mean when the sample = the population?

14 0.74680996 2020 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-12-Samplers for Big Science: emcee and BAT

15 0.73503453 379 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-29-Could someone please set this as the new R default in base graphics?

16 0.71987814 2346 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-24-Buzzfeed, Porn, Kansas…That Can’t Be Good

17 0.71612179 55 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-27-In Linux, use jags() to call Jags instead of using bugs() to call OpenBugs

18 0.7107271 2325 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-07-Stan users meetup next week

19 0.70322251 573 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-14-Hipmunk < Expedia, again

20 0.70010126 798 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-12-Sometimes a graph really is just ugly