andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2014 andrew_gelman_stats-2014-2325 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

2325 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-07-Stan users meetup next week


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: We have a Stan users meetup for NYC. We’ll have monthly sessions where we can discuss modeling, success stories, pain points, and really have a chance for the user base and the developers to interact in NYC. The first meetup will be on Tuesday, 5/13. I’ll be giving a overview of Stan aimed at a general audience. If you’re interested, please register for the group / talk. Space is limited.


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 We’ll have monthly sessions where we can discuss modeling, success stories, pain points, and really have a chance for the user base and the developers to interact in NYC. [sent-2, score-1.847]

2 I’ll be giving a overview of Stan aimed at a general audience. [sent-4, score-0.608]

3 If you’re interested, please register for the group / talk. [sent-5, score-0.452]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('meetup', 0.482), ('stan', 0.255), ('sessions', 0.241), ('pain', 0.235), ('interact', 0.226), ('register', 0.226), ('developers', 0.212), ('aimed', 0.207), ('overview', 0.204), ('tuesday', 0.202), ('monthly', 0.19), ('base', 0.168), ('user', 0.167), ('users', 0.158), ('limited', 0.156), ('success', 0.138), ('space', 0.138), ('ll', 0.133), ('stories', 0.13), ('giving', 0.122), ('please', 0.12), ('discuss', 0.112), ('chance', 0.109), ('group', 0.106), ('modeling', 0.102), ('interested', 0.087), ('points', 0.076), ('general', 0.075), ('first', 0.057), ('re', 0.052), ('really', 0.049)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 1.0 2325 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-07-Stan users meetup next week

Introduction: We have a Stan users meetup for NYC. We’ll have monthly sessions where we can discuss modeling, success stories, pain points, and really have a chance for the user base and the developers to interact in NYC. The first meetup will be on Tuesday, 5/13. I’ll be giving a overview of Stan aimed at a general audience. If you’re interested, please register for the group / talk. Space is limited.

2 0.34586632 1131 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-20-Stan: A (Bayesian) Directed Graphical Model Compiler

Introduction: Here’s Bob’s talk from the NYC machine learning meetup . And here’s Stan himself:

3 0.18650867 1475 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-30-A Stan is Born

Introduction: Stan 1.0.0 and RStan 1.0.0 It’s official. The Stan Development Team is happy to announce the first stable versions of Stan and RStan. What is (R)Stan? Stan is an open-source package for obtaining Bayesian inference using the No-U-Turn sampler, a variant of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. It’s sort of like BUGS, but with a different language for expressing models and a different sampler for sampling from their posteriors. RStan is the R interface to Stan. Stan Home Page Stan’s home page is: http://mc-stan.org/ It links everything you need to get started running Stan from the command line, from R, or from C++, including full step-by-step install instructions, a detailed user’s guide and reference manual for the modeling language, and tested ports of most of the BUGS examples. Peruse the Manual If you’d like to learn more, the Stan User’s Guide and Reference Manual is the place to start.

4 0.177725 1748 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-04-PyStan!

Introduction: Stan is written in C++ and can be run from the command line and from R. We’d like for Python users to be able to run Stan as well. If anyone is interested in doing this, please let us know and we’d be happy to work with you on it. Stan, like Python, is completely free and open-source. P.S. Because Stan is open-source, it of course would also be possible for people to translate Stan into Python, or to take whatever features they like from Stan and incorporate them into a Python package. That’s fine too. But we think it would make sense in addition for users to be able to run Stan directly from Python, in the same way that it can be run from R.

5 0.15908465 2124 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-05-Stan (quietly) passes 512 people on the users list

Introduction: Stan is alive and well. We’re up to 523 people on the users list . [We're sure there are many more than 523 actual users, since it's easy to download and use Stan directly without joining the list.] We’re working on a v2.1.0 release now and we hope to release it in within the next couple of weeks.

6 0.15855095 2291 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-14-Transitioning to Stan

7 0.14209443 403 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-09-Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics startup-math meetup

8 0.12420154 1950 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-22-My talks that were scheduled for Tues at the Data Skeptics meetup and Wed at the Open Statistical Programming meetup

9 0.11318123 2161 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-07-My recent debugging experience

10 0.11219398 1580 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-16-Stantastic!

11 0.098561242 2178 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-20-Mailing List Degree-of-Difficulty Difficulty

12 0.098468937 1198 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-05-A cloud with a silver lining

13 0.097869344 2150 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-27-(R-Py-Cmd)Stan 2.1.0

14 0.092618331 2173 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-15-Postdoc involving pathbreaking work in MRP, Stan, and the 2014 election!

15 0.089191012 2209 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-13-CmdStan, RStan, PyStan v2.2.0

16 0.08641915 919 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-21-Least surprising headline of the year

17 0.086183891 2096 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-10-Schiminovich is on The Simpsons

18 0.086178452 1528 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-10-My talk at MIT on Thurs 11 Oct

19 0.085546307 1837 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-03-NYC Data Skeptics Meetup

20 0.08255025 714 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-16-NYT Labs releases Openpaths, a utility for saving your iphone data


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.073), (1, 0.006), (2, -0.045), (3, 0.059), (4, 0.072), (5, 0.084), (6, -0.019), (7, -0.171), (8, -0.086), (9, -0.09), (10, -0.112), (11, -0.016), (12, -0.028), (13, -0.037), (14, 0.023), (15, -0.018), (16, -0.031), (17, 0.013), (18, -0.015), (19, 0.016), (20, -0.032), (21, -0.029), (22, -0.016), (23, -0.032), (24, -0.026), (25, 0.01), (26, 0.033), (27, -0.036), (28, -0.061), (29, -0.001), (30, 0.013), (31, -0.026), (32, 0.0), (33, -0.008), (34, -0.019), (35, 0.055), (36, 0.034), (37, -0.0), (38, 0.041), (39, -0.041), (40, 0.011), (41, -0.017), (42, -0.014), (43, -0.062), (44, -0.038), (45, 0.039), (46, 0.004), (47, -0.004), (48, -0.064), (49, 0.055)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.98318374 2325 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-07-Stan users meetup next week

Introduction: We have a Stan users meetup for NYC. We’ll have monthly sessions where we can discuss modeling, success stories, pain points, and really have a chance for the user base and the developers to interact in NYC. The first meetup will be on Tuesday, 5/13. I’ll be giving a overview of Stan aimed at a general audience. If you’re interested, please register for the group / talk. Space is limited.

2 0.90575182 1748 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-04-PyStan!

Introduction: Stan is written in C++ and can be run from the command line and from R. We’d like for Python users to be able to run Stan as well. If anyone is interested in doing this, please let us know and we’d be happy to work with you on it. Stan, like Python, is completely free and open-source. P.S. Because Stan is open-source, it of course would also be possible for people to translate Stan into Python, or to take whatever features they like from Stan and incorporate them into a Python package. That’s fine too. But we think it would make sense in addition for users to be able to run Stan directly from Python, in the same way that it can be run from R.

3 0.89459896 712 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-14-The joys of working in the public domain

Introduction: Stan will make a total lifetime profit of $0, so we can’t be sued !

4 0.87661344 2124 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-05-Stan (quietly) passes 512 people on the users list

Introduction: Stan is alive and well. We’re up to 523 people on the users list . [We're sure there are many more than 523 actual users, since it's easy to download and use Stan directly without joining the list.] We’re working on a v2.1.0 release now and we hope to release it in within the next couple of weeks.

5 0.86521584 1475 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-30-A Stan is Born

Introduction: Stan 1.0.0 and RStan 1.0.0 It’s official. The Stan Development Team is happy to announce the first stable versions of Stan and RStan. What is (R)Stan? Stan is an open-source package for obtaining Bayesian inference using the No-U-Turn sampler, a variant of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. It’s sort of like BUGS, but with a different language for expressing models and a different sampler for sampling from their posteriors. RStan is the R interface to Stan. Stan Home Page Stan’s home page is: http://mc-stan.org/ It links everything you need to get started running Stan from the command line, from R, or from C++, including full step-by-step install instructions, a detailed user’s guide and reference manual for the modeling language, and tested ports of most of the BUGS examples. Peruse the Manual If you’d like to learn more, the Stan User’s Guide and Reference Manual is the place to start.

6 0.86197138 1576 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-13-Stan at NIPS 2012 Workshop on Probabilistic Programming

7 0.84559178 2209 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-13-CmdStan, RStan, PyStan v2.2.0

8 0.81586462 2150 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-27-(R-Py-Cmd)Stan 2.1.0

9 0.80149215 1580 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-16-Stantastic!

10 0.79118747 2291 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-14-Transitioning to Stan

11 0.78581387 2096 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-10-Schiminovich is on The Simpsons

12 0.77286434 2318 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-04-Stan (& JAGS) Tutorial on Linear Mixed Models

13 0.74741769 1627 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-17-Stan and RStan 1.1.0

14 0.72401488 2161 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-07-My recent debugging experience

15 0.71936709 1131 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-20-Stan: A (Bayesian) Directed Graphical Model Compiler

16 0.70242238 1855 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-13-Stan!

17 0.7011103 1472 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-28-Migrating from dot to underscore

18 0.68015331 1711 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-07-How Open Should Academic Papers Be?

19 0.67846131 1126 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-18-Bob on Stan

20 0.67805523 2035 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-23-Scalable Stan


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(15, 0.037), (24, 0.118), (36, 0.078), (42, 0.036), (55, 0.083), (65, 0.112), (73, 0.102), (94, 0.03), (99, 0.251)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.95854414 2325 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-07-Stan users meetup next week

Introduction: We have a Stan users meetup for NYC. We’ll have monthly sessions where we can discuss modeling, success stories, pain points, and really have a chance for the user base and the developers to interact in NYC. The first meetup will be on Tuesday, 5/13. I’ll be giving a overview of Stan aimed at a general audience. If you’re interested, please register for the group / talk. Space is limited.

2 0.87429857 2061 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-14-More on Mister P and how it does what it does

Introduction: Following up on our discussion the other day, Matt Buttice and Ben Highton write: It was nice to see our article mentioned and discussed by Andrew, Jeff Lax, Justin Phillips, and Yair Ghitza on Andrew’s blog in this post on Wednesday. As noted in the post, we recently published an article in Political Analysis on how well multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) performs at producing estimates of state opinion with conventional national surveys where N≈1,500. Our central claims are that (i) the performance of MRP is highly variable, (ii) in the absence of knowing the true values, it is difficult to determine the quality of the MRP estimates produced on the basis of a single national sample, and, (iii) therefore, our views about the usefulness of MRP in instances where a researcher has a single sample of N≈1,500 are less optimistic than the ones expressed in previous research on the topic. Obviously we were interested in the blog posts. We found them stimulating

3 0.86486799 2062 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-15-Last word on Mister P (for now)

Introduction: To recap: Matt Buttice and Ben Highton recently published an article where they evaluated multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) on a bunch of political examples estimating state-level attitudes. My Columbia colleagues Jeff Lax, Justin Phillips, and Yair Ghitza added some discussion , giving a bunch of practical tips and pointing to some problems with Buttice and Highton’s evaluations. Buttice and Highton replied , emphasizing the difficulties of comparing methods in the absence of a known ground truth. And Jeff Lax added the following comment, which I think is a good overview of the discussion so far: In the back and forth between us all on details, some points may get lost and disagreements overstated. Where are things at this point? 1. Buttice and Highton (BH) show beyond previous work that MRP performance in making state estimates can vary to an extent that is not directly observable unless one knows the true estimates (in which case one would not be us

4 0.86426896 1021 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-21-Don’t judge a book by its title

Introduction: A correspondent writes: I just want to spend a few words to point you to this book I have just found on Amazon: “Understanding The New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis” by G. Cumming. I have been attracted by the rather unusual and ‘sexy’ title but it seems to be nothing more than an attempt at alerting the psychology community on considering point estimation procedures and confidence intervals, in place of hypothesis testing, the latter being ‘a terrible idea!’ in the author’s own words. Some more quotes here . Then he says: “‘These are hardly new techniques, but I label them ‘The New Statistics’ because using them would for many researchers be quite new, as well as a highly beneficial change!’” Of course the latter is not stated on the book cover. That’s about as bad as writing a book with subtitle, “Why Americans vote the way they do,” but not actually telling the reader why Americans vote the way they do. I guess what I’m saying is:

5 0.85751832 2056 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-09-Mister P: What’s its secret sauce?

Introduction: This is a long and technical post on an important topic: the use of multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) to estimate state-level public opinion. MRP as a research method, and state-level opinion (or, more generally, attitudes in demographic and geographic subpopulation) as a subject, have both become increasingly important in political science—and soon, I expect, will become increasingly important in other social sciences as well. Being able to estimate state-level opinion from national surveys is just such a powerful thing, that if it can be done, people will do it. It’s taken 15 years or so for the method to really catch on, but the ready availability of survey data and of computing power—as well as our increasing comfort level, as a profession, with these techniques, has made MRP become more of a routine research tool. As a method becomes used more and more widely, there will be natural concerns about its domains of applicability. That is the subject of the pres

6 0.85599506 1365 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-04-Question 25 of my final exam for Design and Analysis of Sample Surveys

7 0.85557353 671 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-20-One more time-use graph

8 0.85499942 758 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-11-Hey, good news! Your p-value just passed the 0.05 threshold!

9 0.85282737 7 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-27-Should Mister P be allowed-encouraged to reside in counter-factual populations?

10 0.84816432 1925 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-04-“Versatile, affordable chicken has grown in popularity”

11 0.84813815 1197 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-04-“All Models are Right, Most are Useless”

12 0.84686822 1811 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-18-Psychology experiments to understand what’s going on with data graphics?

13 0.84491688 917 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-20-Last post on Hipmunk

14 0.84376413 655 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-10-“Versatile, affordable chicken has grown in popularity”

15 0.84325182 2161 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-07-My recent debugging experience

16 0.84259725 1748 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-04-PyStan!

17 0.84246784 416 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-16-Is parenting a form of addiction?

18 0.84197211 1847 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-08-Of parsing and chess

19 0.84196979 620 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-19-Online James?

20 0.84148788 2292 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-15-When you believe in things that you don’t understand