andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1260 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

1260 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-11-Hunger Games survival analysis


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: Phil points to this post by Brett Keller and writes: I [Phil] haven’t seen Hunger Games or read the book(s?). It’s sort of nice that people do this kind of thing but might be even nicer if they dedicated this sort of amateur data analysis to real-world problems. I dunno. I think it’s always good to get practice. Analyzing a book/movie is like doing sports statistics; it can keep you in shape.


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 Phil points to this post by Brett Keller and writes: I [Phil] haven’t seen Hunger Games or read the book(s? [sent-1, score-0.381]

2 It’s sort of nice that people do this kind of thing but might be even nicer if they dedicated this sort of amateur data analysis to real-world problems. [sent-3, score-1.805]

3 Analyzing a book/movie is like doing sports statistics; it can keep you in shape. [sent-6, score-0.348]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('phil', 0.365), ('keller', 0.319), ('hunger', 0.305), ('nicer', 0.294), ('amateur', 0.294), ('dedicated', 0.272), ('brett', 0.272), ('shape', 0.228), ('games', 0.204), ('sports', 0.192), ('analyzing', 0.183), ('nice', 0.158), ('sort', 0.155), ('haven', 0.134), ('kind', 0.126), ('keep', 0.119), ('seen', 0.119), ('book', 0.088), ('points', 0.088), ('always', 0.088), ('read', 0.087), ('post', 0.087), ('thing', 0.076), ('analysis', 0.072), ('statistics', 0.071), ('might', 0.06), ('good', 0.056), ('even', 0.051), ('writes', 0.051), ('get', 0.048), ('people', 0.046), ('data', 0.046), ('like', 0.037), ('think', 0.037)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 1.0000001 1260 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-11-Hunger Games survival analysis

Introduction: Phil points to this post by Brett Keller and writes: I [Phil] haven’t seen Hunger Games or read the book(s?). It’s sort of nice that people do this kind of thing but might be even nicer if they dedicated this sort of amateur data analysis to real-world problems. I dunno. I think it’s always good to get practice. Analyzing a book/movie is like doing sports statistics; it can keep you in shape.

2 0.14287159 1173 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-17-Sports examples in class

Introduction: Karl Broman writes : I [Karl] personally would avoid sports entirely, as I view the subject to be insufficiently serious. . . . Certainly lots of statisticians are interested in sports. . . . And I’m not completely uninterested in sports: I like to watch football, particularly Nebraska, Green Bay, and Baltimore, and to see Notre Dame or any team from Florida or Texas lose. But statistics about sports? Yawn. As a person who loves sports, statistics, and sports statistics, I have a few thoughts: 1. Not everyone likes sports, and even fewer are interested in any particular sport. It’s ok to use sports examples, but don’t delude yourself into thinking that everyone in the class cares about it. 2. Don’t forget foreign students. A lot of them don’t even know the rules of kickball, fer chrissake! 3. Of the students who care about a sport, there will be a minority who really care. We had some serious basketball fans in our class last year. 4. I think the best solution

3 0.10238443 115 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-28-Whassup with those crappy thrillers?

Introduction: I was stunned this from Jenny Davidson about mystery writers: The crime fiction community is smart and adult and welcoming, and so many good books are being written (Lee Child was mentioning his peer group – i.e. they were the new kids around the same tie – being Michael Connelly, Robert Crais, Dennis Lehane, Laura Lippman – the list speaks for itself) . . . Why was I stunned? Because just a few days earlier I had a look at a book by Robert Crais. It just happened that Phil, when he was visiting, had finished this book (which he described as “pretty good”) and left it with me so he wouldn’t have to take it back with him. I’d never heard of Crais, but it had pretty amazing blurbs on the cover and Phil recommended it, so I took a look. It was bad. From page 1 it was bad. It was like a bad cop show. I could see the seams where the sentences were stitched together. I could see how somebody might like this sort of book, but I certainly can’t understand the blurbs or the i

4 0.10131121 681 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-26-Worst statistical graphic I have seen this year

Introduction: This gets my vote for the worst statistical graphic I (Phil) have seen this year. If you’ve got a worse one, put a link in the comments. “Credit” for this one goes to “Peter and Maria Hoey (Source: Tommy McCall/Environmental Law Institute).”

5 0.095027775 2336 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-16-How much can we learn about individual-level causal claims from state-level correlations?

Introduction: Hey, we all know the answer: “correlation does not imply causation”—but of course life is more complicated than that. As philosophers, economists, statisticians, and others have repeatedly noted, most of our information about the world is observational not experimental, yet we manage to draw causal conclusions all the time. Sure, some of these conclusions are wrong (more often than 5% of the time, I’m sure) but that’s an accepted part of life. Challenges in this regard arise in the design of a study, in the statistical analysis, in how you write it up for a peer-reviewed journal, and finally in how you present it to the world. School sports and life outcomes An interesting case of all this came up recently in a post on Freakonomics that pointed to a post on Deadspin that pointed to a research article . The claim was that “sports participation [in high school] causes women to be less likely to be religious . . . more likely to have children . . . more likely to be singl

6 0.094112761 263 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-08-The China Study: fact or fallacy?

7 0.094008557 2243 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-11-The myth of the myth of the myth of the hot hand

8 0.086668067 1822 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-24-Samurai sword-wielding Mormon bishop pharmaceutical statistician stops mugger

9 0.084897682 218 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-20-I think you knew this already

10 0.081862755 1847 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-08-Of parsing and chess

11 0.081605107 1383 andrew gelman stats-2012-06-18-Hierarchical modeling as a framework for extrapolation

12 0.075085811 1295 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-02-Selection bias, or, How you can think the experts don’t check their models, if you simply don’t look at what the experts actually are doing

13 0.074841715 99 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-19-Paired comparisons

14 0.074716493 2262 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-23-Win probabilities during a sporting event

15 0.073506601 2105 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-18-What’s my Kasparov number?

16 0.072549962 626 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-23-Physics is hard

17 0.070434801 1252 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-08-Jagdish Bhagwati’s definition of feminist sincerity

18 0.065761201 690 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-01-Peter Huber’s reflections on data analysis

19 0.064549506 1701 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-31-The name that fell off a cliff

20 0.062835425 30 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-13-Trips to Cleveland


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.101), (1, -0.034), (2, -0.032), (3, 0.031), (4, 0.019), (5, 0.009), (6, 0.031), (7, 0.034), (8, 0.052), (9, 0.002), (10, 0.014), (11, -0.012), (12, 0.019), (13, -0.034), (14, 0.025), (15, 0.017), (16, -0.011), (17, 0.029), (18, 0.043), (19, -0.041), (20, 0.009), (21, 0.032), (22, -0.016), (23, 0.025), (24, -0.014), (25, 0.017), (26, -0.012), (27, 0.024), (28, 0.006), (29, -0.045), (30, 0.015), (31, -0.022), (32, -0.023), (33, -0.011), (34, -0.006), (35, 0.05), (36, 0.072), (37, -0.025), (38, -0.027), (39, 0.033), (40, 0.024), (41, -0.027), (42, -0.021), (43, -0.014), (44, 0.012), (45, 0.005), (46, 0.0), (47, 0.015), (48, -0.005), (49, -0.01)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.94901943 1260 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-11-Hunger Games survival analysis

Introduction: Phil points to this post by Brett Keller and writes: I [Phil] haven’t seen Hunger Games or read the book(s?). It’s sort of nice that people do this kind of thing but might be even nicer if they dedicated this sort of amateur data analysis to real-world problems. I dunno. I think it’s always good to get practice. Analyzing a book/movie is like doing sports statistics; it can keep you in shape.

2 0.7270382 881 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-30-Rickey Henderson and Peter Angelos, together again

Introduction: Today I was reminded of a riddle from junior high: Q: What do you get when you cross an elephant with peanut butter? A: Peanut butter that never forgets, or an elephant that sticks to the roof of your mouth. The occasion was a link from Tyler Cowen to a new book by Garry Kasparov and . . . Peter Thiel. Kasparov we all know about. I still remember how he pulled out a victory in the last game of his tournament with Karpov. Just amazing: he had to win the game, a draw would not be enough. Both players knew that Kasparov had to win. And he did it. A feat as impressive as Kirk Gibson’s off-the-bench game-winning home run in the 1987 Series. Peter Theil is a more obscure figure. He’s been featured a couple of times on this blog and comes across as your typical overconfident rich dude. It’s an odd combination, sort of like what you might get if Rickey Henderson and Peter Angelos were to write a book about how to reform baseball. Cowen writes, “How can I not pre-orde

3 0.72658694 623 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-21-Baseball’s greatest fielders

Introduction: Someone just stopped by and dropped off a copy of the book Wizardry: Baseball’s All-time Greatest Fielders Revealed, by Michael Humphreys. I don’t have much to say about the topic–I did see Brooks Robinson play, but I don’t remember any fancy plays. I must have seen Mark Belanger but I don’t really recall. Ozzie Smith was cool but I saw only him on TV. The most impressive thing I ever saw live was Rickey Henderson stealing a base. The best thing about that was that everyone was expecting him to steal the base, and he still was able to do it. But that wasn’t fielding either. Anyway, Humphreys was nice enough to give me a copy of his book, and since I can’t say much (I didn’t have it in me to study the formulas in detail, nor do I know enough to be able to evaluate them), I might as well say what I can say right away. (Note: Humphreys replies to some of these questions in a comment .) 1. Near the beginning, Humphreys says that 10 runs are worth about 1 win. I’ve always b

4 0.71353811 621 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-20-Maybe a great idea in theory, didn’t work so well in practice

Introduction: I followed the link of commenter “Epanechnikov” to his blog, where I found, among other things, an uncritical discussion of Richard von Mises’s book, “Probability, Statistics and Truth.” The bad news is that, based on the evidence of his book, Mises didn’t seem to understand basic ideas of statistical significance. See here, Or at the very least, he was grossly overconfident (which can perhaps be seen from the brash title of his book). This is not the fault of “Epanechnikov,” but I just thought that people should be careful about taking too seriously the statistical philosophy of someone who didn’t think to do a chi-squared test when it was called for. (This is not a Bayesian/non-Bayesian thing; it’s just basic statistics.)

5 0.71258575 1285 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-27-“How to Lie with Statistics” guy worked for the tobacco industry to mock studies of the risks of smoking statistics

Introduction: Remember How to Lie With Statistics? It turns out that the author worked for the cigarette companies. John Mashey points to this, from Robert Proctor’s book, “Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition”: Darrell Huff, author of the wildly popular (and aptly named) How to Lie With Statistics, was paid to testify before Congress in the 1950s and then again in the 1960s, with the assigned task of ridiculing any notion of a cigarette-disease link. On March 22, 1965, Huff testified at hearings on cigarette labeling and advertising, accusing the recent Surgeon General’s report of myriad failures and “fallacies.” Huff peppered his attack with with amusing asides and anecdotes, lampooning spurious correlations like that between the size of Dutch families and the number of storks nesting on rooftops–which proves not that storks bring babies but rather that people with large families tend to have larger houses (which therefore attract more storks).

6 0.69282579 30 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-13-Trips to Cleveland

7 0.69214618 949 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-10-Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

8 0.69112211 46 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-21-Careers, one-hit wonders, and an offer of a free book

9 0.68748093 590 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-25-Good introductory book for statistical computation?

10 0.6823743 203 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-12-John McPhee, the Anti-Malcolm

11 0.68031925 802 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-13-Super Sam Fuld Needs Your Help (with Foul Ball stats)

12 0.67889637 316 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-03-Suggested reading for a prospective statistician?

13 0.6729809 2267 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-26-Is a steal really worth 9 points?

14 0.67164415 263 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-08-The China Study: fact or fallacy?

15 0.67016941 1590 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-26-I need a title for my book on ethics and statistics!!

16 0.6633451 1988 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-19-BDA3 still (I hope) at 40% off! (and a link to one of my favorite papers)

17 0.66225004 115 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-28-Whassup with those crappy thrillers?

18 0.6609174 76 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-09-Both R and Stata

19 0.65565258 1641 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-27-The Möbius strip, or, marketing that is impervious to criticism

20 0.65367293 499 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-03-5 books


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(2, 0.458), (9, 0.037), (21, 0.046), (24, 0.044), (99, 0.252)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

1 0.94269121 663 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-15-Happy tax day!

Introduction: Your taxes pay for the research funding that supports the work we do here, some of which appears on this blog and almost all of which is public, free, and open-source. So, to all of the taxpayers out there in the audience: thank you.

2 0.89469886 97 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-18-Economic Disparities and Life Satisfaction in European Regions

Introduction: Grazia Pittau, Roberto Zelli, and I came out with a paper investigating the role of economic variables in predicting regional disparities in reported life satisfaction of European Union citizens. We use multilevel modeling to explicitly account for the hierarchical nature of our data, respondents within regions and countries, and for understanding patterns of variation within and between regions. Here’s what we found: - Personal income matters more in poor regions than in rich regions, a pattern that still holds for regions within the same country. - Being unemployed is negatively associated with life satisfaction even after controlled for income variation. Living in high unemployment regions does not alleviate the unhappiness of being out of work. - After controlling for individual characteristics and modeling interactions, regional differences in life satisfaction still remain. Here’s a quick graph; there’s more in the article:

3 0.89231086 489 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-28-Brow inflation

Introduction: In an article headlined, “Hollywood moves away from middlebrow,” Brooks Barnes writes : As Hollywood plowed into 2010, there was plenty of clinging to the tried and true: humdrum remakes like “The Wolfman” and “The A-Team”; star vehicles like “Killers” with Ashton Kutcher and “The Tourist” with Angelina Jolie and Johnny Depp; and shoddy sequels like “Sex and the City 2.” All arrived at theaters with marketing thunder intended to fill multiplexes on opening weekend, no matter the quality of the film. . . . But the audience pushed back. One by one, these expensive yet middle-of-the-road pictures delivered disappointing results or flat-out flopped. Meanwhile, gambles on original concepts paid off. “Inception,” a complicated thriller about dream invaders, racked up more than $825 million in global ticket sales; “The Social Network” has so far delivered $192 million, a stellar result for a highbrow drama. . . . the message that the year sent about quality and originality is real enoug

4 0.88213325 44 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-20-Boris was right

Introduction: Boris Shor in January : the pivotal Senator will now be a Republican, not a Democrat . . . Brown stands to become the pivotal member of the Senate. The New York Times today : The Senate voted on Thursday afternoon to close debate on a far-reaching financial regulatory bill . . . In an interesting twist, the decisive vote was supplied by Senator Scott Brown, the Republican freshman of Massachusetts . . .

5 0.85675263 17 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-05-Taking philosophical arguments literally

Introduction: Aaron Swartz writes the following, as a lead-in to an argument in favor of vegetarianism: Imagine you were an early settler of what is now the United States. It seems likely you would have killed native Americans. After all, your parents killed them, your siblings killed them, your friends killed them, the leaders of the community killed them, the President killed them. Chances are, you would have killed them too . . . Or if you see nothing wrong with killing native Americans, take the example of slavery. Again, everyone had slaves and probably didn’t think too much about the morality of it. . . . Are these statements true, though? It’s hard for me to believe that most early settlers (from the context, it looks like Swartz is discussing the 1500s-1700s here) killed native Americans. That is, if N is the number of early settlers, and Y is the number of these settlers who killed at least one Indian, I suspect Y/N is much closer to 0 than to 1. Similarly, it’s not even cl

6 0.84851217 885 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-01-Needed: A Billionaire Candidate for President Who Shares the Views of a Washington Post Columnist

same-blog 7 0.81763756 1260 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-11-Hunger Games survival analysis

8 0.81422174 1567 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-07-Election reports

9 0.80975103 1189 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-28-Those darn physicists

10 0.80723846 549 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-01-“Roughly 90% of the increase in . . .” Hey, wait a minute!

11 0.80600429 694 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-04-My talk at Hunter College on Thurs

12 0.80527514 1017 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-18-Lack of complete overlap

13 0.79712868 1508 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-23-Speaking frankly

14 0.79593861 1698 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-30-The spam just gets weirder and weirder

15 0.77755946 1663 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-09-The effects of fiscal consolidation

16 0.76489961 1102 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-06-Bayesian Anova found useful in ecology

17 0.75198472 1872 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-27-More spam!

18 0.75185311 1893 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-11-Folic acid and autism

19 0.71894801 1954 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-24-Too Good To Be True: The Scientific Mass Production of Spurious Statistical Significance

20 0.70694667 2360 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-05-Identifying pathways for managing multiple disturbances to limit plant invasions