andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1131 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

1131 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-20-Stan: A (Bayesian) Directed Graphical Model Compiler


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: Here’s Bob’s talk from the NYC machine learning meetup . And here’s Stan himself:


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 Here’s Bob’s talk from the NYC machine learning meetup . [sent-1, score-1.444]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('meetup', 0.561), ('nyc', 0.435), ('bob', 0.373), ('machine', 0.366), ('stan', 0.296), ('learning', 0.29), ('talk', 0.227)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 1.0 1131 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-20-Stan: A (Bayesian) Directed Graphical Model Compiler

Introduction: Here’s Bob’s talk from the NYC machine learning meetup . And here’s Stan himself:

2 0.37269253 1126 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-18-Bob on Stan

Introduction: Thurs 19 Jan 7pm at the NYC Machine Learning meetup. Stan ‘s entirely publicly funded and open-source and it has no secrets . Ask us about it and we’ll tell you everything you might want to know. P.S. And here ‘s the talk.

3 0.34586632 2325 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-07-Stan users meetup next week

Introduction: We have a Stan users meetup for NYC. We’ll have monthly sessions where we can discuss modeling, success stories, pain points, and really have a chance for the user base and the developers to interact in NYC. The first meetup will be on Tuesday, 5/13. I’ll be giving a overview of Stan aimed at a general audience. If you’re interested, please register for the group / talk. Space is limited.

4 0.22344738 1740 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-26-“Is machine learning a subset of statistics?”

Introduction: Following up on our previous post , Andrew Wilson writes: I agree we are in a really exciting time for statistics and machine learning. There has been a lot of talk lately comparing machine learning with statistics. I am curious whether you think there are many fundamental differences between the fields, or just superficial differences — different popular approximate inference methods, slightly different popular application areas, etc. Is machine learning a subset of statistics? In the paper we discuss how we think machine learning is fundamentally about pattern discovery, and ultimately, fully automating the learning and decision making process. In other words, whatever a human does when he or she uses tools to analyze data, can be written down algorithmically and automated on a computer. I am not sure if the ambitions are similar in statistics — and I don’t have any conventional statistics background, which makes it harder to tell. I think it’s an interesting discussion.

5 0.19592085 2035 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-23-Scalable Stan

Introduction: Bob writes: If you have papers that have used Stan, we’d love to hear about it. We finally got some submissions, so we’re going to start a list on the web site for 2.0 in earnest. You can either mail them to the list, to me directly, or just update the issue (at least until it’s closed or moved): https://github.com/stan-dev/stan/issues/187 For example, Henrik Mannerstrom fit a hierarchical model the other day with 360,000 data points and 120,000 variables. And it worked just fine in Stan. I’ve asked him to write this up so we can post it here. Here’s the famous graph Bob made showing the scalability of Stan for a series of hierarchical item-response models:

6 0.17545907 1475 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-30-A Stan is Born

7 0.16154295 403 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-09-Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics startup-math meetup

8 0.1571641 1748 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-04-PyStan!

9 0.15684493 548 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-01-What goes around . . .

10 0.15230809 1992 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-21-Workshop for Women in Machine Learning

11 0.14516556 165 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-27-Nothing is Linear, Nothing is Additive: Bayesian Models for Interactions in Social Science

12 0.14470659 2291 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-14-Transitioning to Stan

13 0.14293629 1297 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-03-New New York data research organizations

14 0.13084184 1630 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-18-Postdoc positions at Microsoft Research – NYC

15 0.1280753 1950 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-22-My talks that were scheduled for Tues at the Data Skeptics meetup and Wed at the Open Statistical Programming meetup

16 0.12597768 2161 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-07-My recent debugging experience

17 0.12480221 324 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-07-Contest for developing an R package recommendation system

18 0.12393574 1580 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-16-Stantastic!

19 0.12198149 492 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-30-That puzzle-solving feeling

20 0.11888456 2275 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-31-Just gave a talk


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.04), (1, 0.018), (2, -0.066), (3, 0.075), (4, 0.066), (5, 0.119), (6, -0.051), (7, -0.162), (8, -0.109), (9, -0.094), (10, -0.144), (11, 0.051), (12, -0.044), (13, -0.017), (14, 0.038), (15, -0.081), (16, -0.035), (17, -0.002), (18, -0.002), (19, -0.006), (20, -0.084), (21, -0.078), (22, 0.003), (23, 0.012), (24, -0.022), (25, 0.006), (26, -0.036), (27, -0.094), (28, -0.03), (29, 0.004), (30, 0.016), (31, -0.002), (32, -0.02), (33, -0.02), (34, 0.001), (35, 0.052), (36, 0.088), (37, -0.025), (38, 0.035), (39, -0.093), (40, -0.041), (41, -0.027), (42, 0.006), (43, 0.107), (44, -0.022), (45, 0.044), (46, 0.089), (47, 0.022), (48, 0.01), (49, 0.016)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.99676514 1131 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-20-Stan: A (Bayesian) Directed Graphical Model Compiler

Introduction: Here’s Bob’s talk from the NYC machine learning meetup . And here’s Stan himself:

2 0.89983362 1126 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-18-Bob on Stan

Introduction: Thurs 19 Jan 7pm at the NYC Machine Learning meetup. Stan ‘s entirely publicly funded and open-source and it has no secrets . Ask us about it and we’ll tell you everything you might want to know. P.S. And here ‘s the talk.

3 0.72710133 712 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-14-The joys of working in the public domain

Introduction: Stan will make a total lifetime profit of $0, so we can’t be sued !

4 0.71529192 1475 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-30-A Stan is Born

Introduction: Stan 1.0.0 and RStan 1.0.0 It’s official. The Stan Development Team is happy to announce the first stable versions of Stan and RStan. What is (R)Stan? Stan is an open-source package for obtaining Bayesian inference using the No-U-Turn sampler, a variant of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. It’s sort of like BUGS, but with a different language for expressing models and a different sampler for sampling from their posteriors. RStan is the R interface to Stan. Stan Home Page Stan’s home page is: http://mc-stan.org/ It links everything you need to get started running Stan from the command line, from R, or from C++, including full step-by-step install instructions, a detailed user’s guide and reference manual for the modeling language, and tested ports of most of the BUGS examples. Peruse the Manual If you’d like to learn more, the Stan User’s Guide and Reference Manual is the place to start.

5 0.70115101 1748 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-04-PyStan!

Introduction: Stan is written in C++ and can be run from the command line and from R. We’d like for Python users to be able to run Stan as well. If anyone is interested in doing this, please let us know and we’d be happy to work with you on it. Stan, like Python, is completely free and open-source. P.S. Because Stan is open-source, it of course would also be possible for people to translate Stan into Python, or to take whatever features they like from Stan and incorporate them into a Python package. That’s fine too. But we think it would make sense in addition for users to be able to run Stan directly from Python, in the same way that it can be run from R.

6 0.66740727 2325 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-07-Stan users meetup next week

7 0.65855902 2150 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-27-(R-Py-Cmd)Stan 2.1.0

8 0.6461854 1576 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-13-Stan at NIPS 2012 Workshop on Probabilistic Programming

9 0.64234096 2209 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-13-CmdStan, RStan, PyStan v2.2.0

10 0.64097506 2124 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-05-Stan (quietly) passes 512 people on the users list

11 0.63357693 1772 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-20-Stan at Google this Thurs and at Berkeley this Fri noon

12 0.62822747 1528 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-10-My talk at MIT on Thurs 11 Oct

13 0.61929846 1580 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-16-Stantastic!

14 0.61552352 548 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-01-What goes around . . .

15 0.60755992 2096 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-10-Schiminovich is on The Simpsons

16 0.59384823 2291 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-14-Transitioning to Stan

17 0.58427089 2161 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-07-My recent debugging experience

18 0.57219362 2318 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-04-Stan (& JAGS) Tutorial on Linear Mixed Models

19 0.5712986 1749 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-04-Stan in L.A. this Wed 3:30pm

20 0.56649047 1855 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-13-Stan!


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(2, 0.127), (24, 0.101), (55, 0.331), (99, 0.171)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.98947114 1131 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-20-Stan: A (Bayesian) Directed Graphical Model Compiler

Introduction: Here’s Bob’s talk from the NYC machine learning meetup . And here’s Stan himself:

2 0.94138229 1107 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-08-More on essentialism

Introduction: Matthieu Authier writes: I just read Genetic essentialism is in our genes . Here are a few papers from Kenneth Weiss about this missing heritability problem and genetic essentialism: Evol.Ant.2011 – Weiss – Seeing the forest through the gene-trees Genetics.2011 – Weiss.&.Buchanan – Is life-law-like

3 0.86205554 1463 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-19-It is difficult to convey intonation in typed speech

Introduction: I just wanted to add the above comment to Bob’s notes on language. Spoken (and, to some extent, handwritten) language can be much more expressive than the typed version. I’m not just talking about slang or words such as baaaaad; I’m also talking about pauses that give logical structure to a sentence. For example, sentences such as “The girl who hit the ball where the dog used to be was the one who was climbing the tree when the dog came by” are effortless to understand in speech but can be difficult for a reader to follow. Often when I write, I need to untangle my sentences to keep them readable.

4 0.85479212 1617 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-11-Math Talks :: Action Movies

Introduction: Jonathan Goodman gave the departmental seminar yesterday (10 Dec 2012) and I was amused by an extended analogy he made. After his (very clear) intro, he said that math talks were like action movies. The overall theorem and its applications provide the plot, and the proofs provide the action scenes.

5 0.78079712 1896 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-13-Against the myth of the heroic visualization

Introduction: Alberto Cairo tells a fascinating story about John Snow, H. W. Acland, and the Mythmaking Problem: Every human community—nations, ethnic and cultural groups, professional guilds—inevitably raises a few of its members to the status of heroes and weaves myths around them. . . . The visual display of information is no stranger to heroes and myth. In fact, being a set of disciplines with a relatively small amount of practitioners and researchers, it has generated a staggering number of heroes, perhaps as a morale-enhancing mechanism. Most of us have heard of the wonders of William Playfair’s Commercial and Political Atlas, Florence Nightingale’s coxcomb charts, Charles Joseph Minard’s Napoleon’s march diagram, and Henry Beck’s 1933 redesign of the London Underground map. . . . Cairo’s goal, I think, is not to disparage these great pioneers of graphics but rather to put their work in perspective, recognizing the work of their excellent contemporaries. I would like to echo Cairo’

6 0.72959864 1299 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-04-Models, assumptions, and data summaries

7 0.70422024 688 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-30-Why it’s so relaxing to think about social issues

8 0.70229346 997 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-07-My contribution to the discussion on “Should voting be mandatory?”

9 0.69994819 620 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-19-Online James?

10 0.69394398 168 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-28-Colorless green, and clueless

11 0.68788815 874 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-27-What’s “the definition of a professional career”?

12 0.68541199 2019 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-12-Recently in the sister blog

13 0.68504363 269 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-10-R vs. Stata, or, Different ways to estimate multilevel models

14 0.67486554 333 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-10-Psychiatric drugs and the reduction in crime

15 0.66380966 2163 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-08-How to display multinominal logit results graphically?

16 0.65551758 2360 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-05-Identifying pathways for managing multiple disturbances to limit plant invasions

17 0.65323794 50 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-25-Looking for Sister Right

18 0.62900209 1406 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-05-Xiao-Li Meng and Xianchao Xie rethink asymptotics

19 0.60326684 706 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-11-The happiness gene: My bottom line (for now)

20 0.60279411 201 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-12-Are all rich people now liberals?