andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2010 andrew_gelman_stats-2010-441 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

441 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-01-Mapmaking software


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: I can’t use this on my PC, but the link comes from Aleks, so maybe it’s something good!


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 I can’t use this on my PC, but the link comes from Aleks, so maybe it’s something good! [sent-1, score-1.009]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('pc', 0.725), ('aleks', 0.492), ('comes', 0.264), ('link', 0.257), ('maybe', 0.177), ('something', 0.156), ('use', 0.155), ('good', 0.133)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 1.0 441 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-01-Mapmaking software

Introduction: I can’t use this on my PC, but the link comes from Aleks, so maybe it’s something good!

2 0.40900347 227 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-23-Visualization magazine

Introduction: Aleks pointed me to this .

3 0.39480728 1063 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-16-Suspicious histogram bars

Introduction: Aleks sent me this (I’m not sure from where):

4 0.38577887 867 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-23-The economics of the mac? A paradox of competition

Introduction: I switched to the mac and it’s great I’d like a bit more real estate on my laptop but Malecki assures me that soon I’ll get used to jumping between windows. Anyway, my impression is that now the mac dominates the pc, but a few years ago it wasn’t so clear. The mac had some nice features but often ran slowly, and thinkpads could do a lot. At the time, the way I understood this was that only one company made macs but several made pc’s, thus there was a lot of competition, stimulating innovation in the pc market. But what’s the story now? The macbook air is awesome and a real advance on what came before, while the thinkpads and all the rest have stagnated. So what’s my new theory? There’s lots of competition on pc’s, but what they’re all competing on is price. Meanwhile, only one company makes the mac and so they have the freedom to make something good. But I’m just blathering here. I’m sure someone can offer some thick description to reveal the real story.

5 0.34191376 281 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-16-NSF crowdsourcing

Introduction: I have no idea what this and this are, but Aleks passed these on, and maybe some of you will find them interesting.

6 0.28704634 1302 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-06-Fun with google autocomplete

7 0.27843159 909 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-15-7 steps to successful infographics

8 0.26139936 1125 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-18-Beautiful Line Charts

9 0.19023299 455 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-07-Some ideas on communicating risks to the general public

10 0.16417898 1402 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-01-Ice cream! and temperature

11 0.15296444 428 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-24-Flawed visualization of U.S. voting maybe has some good features

12 0.13759983 795 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-10-Aleks says this is the future of visualization

13 0.12286034 1152 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-03-Web equation

14 0.11998354 1064 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-16-The benefit of the continuous color scale

15 0.11240184 2066 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-17-G+ hangout for test run of BDA course

16 0.11232689 1958 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-27-Teaching is hard

17 0.10704986 554 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-04-An addition to the model-makers’ oath

18 0.10670449 1487 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-08-Animated drought maps

19 0.10601503 207 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-14-Pourquoi Google search est devenu plus raisonnable?

20 0.096115433 1080 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-24-Latest in blog advertising


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.058), (1, -0.024), (2, -0.023), (3, 0.041), (4, 0.048), (5, -0.027), (6, 0.041), (7, -0.0), (8, 0.011), (9, -0.042), (10, 0.019), (11, -0.051), (12, 0.088), (13, 0.01), (14, -0.078), (15, 0.161), (16, 0.032), (17, 0.086), (18, -0.332), (19, -0.284), (20, -0.15), (21, -0.099), (22, 0.067), (23, 0.082), (24, -0.027), (25, -0.047), (26, -0.029), (27, -0.057), (28, -0.023), (29, 0.014), (30, -0.019), (31, -0.016), (32, 0.031), (33, 0.071), (34, 0.035), (35, 0.054), (36, -0.017), (37, 0.027), (38, -0.023), (39, 0.021), (40, 0.019), (41, -0.015), (42, -0.019), (43, -0.018), (44, 0.015), (45, 0.013), (46, 0.011), (47, 0.022), (48, -0.0), (49, 0.028)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.97465956 441 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-01-Mapmaking software

Introduction: I can’t use this on my PC, but the link comes from Aleks, so maybe it’s something good!

2 0.94866133 227 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-23-Visualization magazine

Introduction: Aleks pointed me to this .

3 0.94557011 1063 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-16-Suspicious histogram bars

Introduction: Aleks sent me this (I’m not sure from where):

4 0.93292922 281 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-16-NSF crowdsourcing

Introduction: I have no idea what this and this are, but Aleks passed these on, and maybe some of you will find them interesting.

5 0.93220919 1302 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-06-Fun with google autocomplete

Introduction: Aleks points us to this idea of labeling for news.

6 0.92396945 1064 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-16-The benefit of the continuous color scale

7 0.87623024 909 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-15-7 steps to successful infographics

8 0.84669828 795 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-10-Aleks says this is the future of visualization

9 0.7820164 1958 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-27-Teaching is hard

10 0.76818293 1152 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-03-Web equation

11 0.68444675 428 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-24-Flawed visualization of U.S. voting maybe has some good features

12 0.66126817 1402 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-01-Ice cream! and temperature

13 0.61032039 965 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-19-Web-friendly visualizations in R

14 0.6027934 455 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-07-Some ideas on communicating risks to the general public

15 0.60027593 1487 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-08-Animated drought maps

16 0.57710612 207 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-14-Pourquoi Google search est devenu plus raisonnable?

17 0.57223475 862 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-20-An illustrated calculus textbook

18 0.55642575 1423 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-21-Optimizing software in C++

19 0.44425264 1172 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-17-Rare name analysis and wealth convergence

20 0.42185885 639 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-31-Bayes: radical, liberal, or conservative?


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(16, 0.174), (39, 0.219), (80, 0.133), (99, 0.188)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.8491345 441 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-01-Mapmaking software

Introduction: I can’t use this on my PC, but the link comes from Aleks, so maybe it’s something good!

2 0.75002122 1343 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-25-And now, here’s something we hope you’ll really like

Introduction: This came in the email: Postdoctoral Researcher (3 years) in State-Space Modeling of Animal Movement and Population Dynamics in Universities of Turku and Helsinki, Finland We seek for a statistician/mathematician with experience in ecological modeling or an ecologist with strong quantitative training to join an interdisciplinary research team focusing on dispersal and dynamics of the Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans). The Postdoctoral Researcher will develop modeling approaches (from individual based models to population level models) to assess the dispersal and population dynamics of the flying squirrel. A key challenge will be the integration of different kinds of data (census data, telemetry data, mark-recapture data, life-history data, and data on environmental covariates such as forest structure) into the modeling framework using Bayesian State-Space models or other such approaches. The project will be supervised by Dr. Vesa Selonen (a flying squirrel specialist;

3 0.74197888 844 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-07-Update on the new Handbook of MCMC

Introduction: It’s edited by Steve Brooks, Galin Jones, Xiao-Li Meng, and myself. Here’s the information and some sample chapters (including my own chapter with Ken Shirley on inference and monitoring convergence and Radford’s instant classic on Hamiltonian Monte Carlo). Sorry about the $100 price tag–nobody asked me about that! But if you’re doing these computations as part of your work, I think the book will be well worth it.

4 0.72141373 443 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-02-Automating my graphics advice

Introduction: After seeing this graph : I have the following message for Sharad: Rotate the graph 90 degrees so you can see the words. Also you can ditch the lines. Then what you have is a dotplot, following the principles of Cleveland (1985). You can lay out a few on one page to see some interactions with demographics. The real challenge here . . . . . . is to automate this sort of advice. Or maybe we just need a really nice dotplot() function and enough examples, and people will start doing it? P.S. Often a lineplot is better. See here for a discussion of another Sharad example.

5 0.71700448 1494 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-13-Watching the sharks jump

Introduction: Recently in the sister blog: Niall Ferguson is a hack . Niall Ferguson is not always a hack, sometimes he just makes silly mistakes . Paul Krugman is not a hack, but he sometimes he goes over the top . Reflections on hacks . P.S. Yes, technically I’m misusing the expression, it should really be something like, “Watching the sharks get jumped.” But I liked the image of the jumping shark.

6 0.70759153 1168 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-14-The tabloids strike again

7 0.70728326 387 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-01-Do you own anything that was manufactured in the 1950s and still is in regular, active use in your life?

8 0.70251846 587 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-24-5 seconds of every #1 pop single

9 0.69962466 1330 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-19-Cross-validation to check missing-data imputation

10 0.6977886 1025 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-24-Always check your evidence

11 0.69738907 1598 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-30-A graphics talk with no visuals!

12 0.69717348 1180 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-22-I’m officially no longer a “rogue”

13 0.69678581 1487 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-08-Animated drought maps

14 0.69562495 1495 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-13-Win $5000 in the Economist’s data visualization competition

15 0.69483745 1928 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-06-How to think about papers published in low-grade journals?

16 0.6942063 1304 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-06-Picking on Stephen Wolfram

17 0.69350827 1022 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-21-Progress for the Poor

18 0.69122368 1156 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-06-Bayesian model-building by pure thought: Some principles and examples

19 0.69073081 321 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-05-Racism!

20 0.68968856 700 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-06-Suspicious pattern of too-strong replications of medical research