andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2013 andrew_gelman_stats-2013-1710 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

1710 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-06-The new Stan 1.1.1, featuring Gaussian processes!


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: We just released Stan 1.1.1 and RStan 1.1.1 As usual, you can find download and install instructions at: http://mc-stan.org/ This is a patch release and is fully backward compatible with Stan and RStan 1.1.0. The main thing you should notice is that the multivariate models should be much faster and all the bugs reported for 1.1.0 have been fixed. We’ve also added a bit more functionality. The substantial changes are listed in the following release notes. v1.1.1 (5 February 2012) ====================================================================== Bug Fixes ———————————- * fixed bug in comparison operators, which swapped operator< with operator<= and swapped operator> with operator>= semantics * auto-initialize all variables to prevent segfaults * atan2 gradient propagation fixed * fixed off-by-one in NUTS treedepth bound so NUTS goes at most to specified tree depth rather than specified depth + 1 * various compiler compatibility and minor consistency issues * f


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 org/ This is a patch release and is fully backward compatible with Stan and RStan 1. [sent-6, score-0.232]

2 The main thing you should notice is that the multivariate models should be much faster and all the bugs reported for 1. [sent-9, score-0.457]

3 The substantial changes are listed in the following release notes. [sent-13, score-0.088]

4 ) * replace boost sign() to avoid compiler conflicts * trapping mismatched dimension assignments in arrays, matrices, and vectors Enhancements ———————————- * user’s guide chapters w. [sent-17, score-0.403]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('fixed', 0.263), ('operator', 0.257), ('bug', 0.223), ('compiler', 0.203), ('multivariate', 0.189), ('matrices', 0.165), ('swapped', 0.151), ('faster', 0.148), ('determinant', 0.139), ('arrays', 0.135), ('functions', 0.132), ('vectors', 0.132), ('depth', 0.123), ('cleaned', 0.121), ('rstan', 0.121), ('models', 0.12), ('parameterization', 0.118), ('extract', 0.114), ('nuts', 0.11), ('added', 0.11), ('bound', 0.108), ('stan', 0.104), ('specified', 0.103), ('precision', 0.097), ('theta', 0.097), ('matrix', 0.095), ('user', 0.091), ('release', 0.088), ('error', 0.084), ('scalars', 0.08), ('lda', 0.08), ('reparameterization', 0.08), ('vectorizations', 0.08), ('probability', 0.076), ('arch', 0.075), ('garch', 0.075), ('dims', 0.075), ('csv', 0.075), ('patches', 0.075), ('treedepth', 0.075), ('normal', 0.074), ('patch', 0.072), ('semantics', 0.072), ('compatible', 0.072), ('operators', 0.072), ('pedantic', 0.072), ('enhancements', 0.072), ('function', 0.07), ('conflicts', 0.068), ('simplified', 0.068)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 1.0000001 1710 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-06-The new Stan 1.1.1, featuring Gaussian processes!

Introduction: We just released Stan 1.1.1 and RStan 1.1.1 As usual, you can find download and install instructions at: http://mc-stan.org/ This is a patch release and is fully backward compatible with Stan and RStan 1.1.0. The main thing you should notice is that the multivariate models should be much faster and all the bugs reported for 1.1.0 have been fixed. We’ve also added a bit more functionality. The substantial changes are listed in the following release notes. v1.1.1 (5 February 2012) ====================================================================== Bug Fixes ———————————- * fixed bug in comparison operators, which swapped operator< with operator<= and swapped operator> with operator>= semantics * auto-initialize all variables to prevent segfaults * atan2 gradient propagation fixed * fixed off-by-one in NUTS treedepth bound so NUTS goes at most to specified tree depth rather than specified depth + 1 * various compiler compatibility and minor consistency issues * f

2 0.3363874 1799 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-12-Stan 1.3.0 and RStan 1.3.0 Ready for Action

Introduction: The Stan Development Team is happy to announce that Stan 1.3.0 and RStan 1.3.0 are available for download. Follow the links on: Stan home page: http://mc-stan.org/ Please let us know if you have problems updating. Here’s the full set of release notes. v1.3.0 (12 April 2013) ====================================================================== Enhancements ---------------------------------- Modeling Language * forward sampling (random draws from distributions) in generated quantities * better error messages in parser * new distributions: + exp_mod_normal + gumbel + skew_normal * new special functions: + owenst * new broadcast (repetition) functions for vectors, arrays, matrices + rep_arrray + rep_matrix + rep_row_vector + rep_vector Command-Line * added option to display autocorrelations in the command-line program to print output * changed default point estimation routine from the command line to

3 0.32984087 1753 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-06-Stan 1.2.0 and RStan 1.2.0

Introduction: Stan 1.2.0 and RStan 1.2.0 are now available for download. See: http://mc-stan.org/ Here are the highlights. Full Mass Matrix Estimation during Warmup Yuanjun Gao, a first-year grad student here at Columbia (!), built a regularized mass-matrix estimator. This helps for posteriors with high correlation among parameters and varying scales. We’re still testing this ourselves, so the estimation procedure may change in the future (don’t worry — it satisfies detailed balance as is, but we might be able to make it more computationally efficient in terms of time per effective sample). It’s not the default option. The major reason is the matrix operations required are expensive, raising the algorithm cost to , where is the average number of leapfrog steps, is the number of iterations, and is the number of parameters. Yuanjun did a great job with the Cholesky factorizations and implemented this about as efficiently as is possible. (His homework for Andrew’s class w

4 0.30834773 2209 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-13-CmdStan, RStan, PyStan v2.2.0

Introduction: The Stan Development Team is happy to announce CmdStan, RStan, and PyStan v2.2.0. As usual, more info is available on the Stan Home Page . This is a minor release with a mix of bug fixes and features. For a full list of changes, please see the v2.2.0 milestone on stan-dev/stan’s issue tracker. Some of the bug fixes and issues are listed below. Bug Fixes increment_log_prob is now vectorized and compiles with vector arguments multinomial random number generator used the wrong size for the return value fixed memory leaks in auto-diff implementation variables can start with the prefix ‘inf’ fixed parameter output order for arrays when using optimization RStan compatibility issue with latest Rcpp 0.11.0 Features suppress command line output with refresh <= 0 added 1 to treedepth to match usual definition of treedepth added distance, squared_distance, diag_pre_multiply, diag_pre_multiply to Stan modeling lnaguage added a ‘fixed_param’ sampler for

5 0.30678573 1627 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-17-Stan and RStan 1.1.0

Introduction: We’re happy to announce the availability of Stan and RStan versions 1.1.0, which are general tools for performing model-based Bayesian inference using the no-U-turn sampler, an adaptive form of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Information on downloading and installing and using them is available as always from Stan Home Page: http://mc-stan.org/ Let us know if you have any problems on the mailing lists or at the e-mails linked on the home page (please don’t use this web page). The full release notes follow. (R)Stan Version 1.1.0 Release Notes =================================== -- Backward Compatibility Issue * Categorical distribution recoded to match documentation; it now has support {1,...,K} rather than {0,...,K-1}. * (RStan) change default value of permuted flag from FALSE to TRUE for Stan fit S4 extract() method -- New Features * Conditional (if-then-else) statements * While statements -- New Functions * generalized multiply_lower_tri

6 0.23620158 2150 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-27-(R-Py-Cmd)Stan 2.1.0

7 0.17807598 2161 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-07-My recent debugging experience

8 0.15229549 555 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-04-Handy Matrix Cheat Sheet, with Gradients

9 0.14917979 1475 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-30-A Stan is Born

10 0.14249101 1991 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-21-BDA3 table of contents (also a new paper on visualization)

11 0.13670975 535 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-24-Bleg: Automatic Differentiation for Log Prob Gradients?

12 0.12436455 472 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-17-So-called fixed and random effects

13 0.12243891 1036 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-30-Stan uses Nuts!

14 0.11304249 1580 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-16-Stantastic!

15 0.11240946 1477 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-30-Visualizing Distributions of Covariance Matrices

16 0.10550511 1726 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-18-What to read to catch up on multivariate statistics?

17 0.10461958 272 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-13-Ross Ihaka to R: Drop Dead

18 0.10057068 1941 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-16-Priors

19 0.099116944 2258 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-21-Random matrices in the news

20 0.095600732 1241 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-02-Fixed effects and identification


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.122), (1, 0.107), (2, 0.01), (3, 0.044), (4, 0.105), (5, 0.076), (6, 0.021), (7, -0.185), (8, -0.081), (9, -0.102), (10, -0.13), (11, -0.025), (12, -0.085), (13, -0.048), (14, 0.057), (15, -0.01), (16, -0.013), (17, 0.085), (18, -0.028), (19, -0.011), (20, 0.039), (21, 0.014), (22, -0.033), (23, -0.005), (24, 0.023), (25, -0.009), (26, 0.005), (27, 0.083), (28, 0.007), (29, -0.019), (30, -0.04), (31, 0.068), (32, 0.002), (33, -0.003), (34, 0.047), (35, -0.06), (36, -0.017), (37, 0.031), (38, 0.006), (39, 0.048), (40, 0.008), (41, -0.043), (42, -0.001), (43, -0.008), (44, -0.002), (45, 0.03), (46, 0.002), (47, 0.004), (48, -0.017), (49, -0.065)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.97213161 1710 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-06-The new Stan 1.1.1, featuring Gaussian processes!

Introduction: We just released Stan 1.1.1 and RStan 1.1.1 As usual, you can find download and install instructions at: http://mc-stan.org/ This is a patch release and is fully backward compatible with Stan and RStan 1.1.0. The main thing you should notice is that the multivariate models should be much faster and all the bugs reported for 1.1.0 have been fixed. We’ve also added a bit more functionality. The substantial changes are listed in the following release notes. v1.1.1 (5 February 2012) ====================================================================== Bug Fixes ———————————- * fixed bug in comparison operators, which swapped operator< with operator<= and swapped operator> with operator>= semantics * auto-initialize all variables to prevent segfaults * atan2 gradient propagation fixed * fixed off-by-one in NUTS treedepth bound so NUTS goes at most to specified tree depth rather than specified depth + 1 * various compiler compatibility and minor consistency issues * f

2 0.94272602 1799 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-12-Stan 1.3.0 and RStan 1.3.0 Ready for Action

Introduction: The Stan Development Team is happy to announce that Stan 1.3.0 and RStan 1.3.0 are available for download. Follow the links on: Stan home page: http://mc-stan.org/ Please let us know if you have problems updating. Here’s the full set of release notes. v1.3.0 (12 April 2013) ====================================================================== Enhancements ---------------------------------- Modeling Language * forward sampling (random draws from distributions) in generated quantities * better error messages in parser * new distributions: + exp_mod_normal + gumbel + skew_normal * new special functions: + owenst * new broadcast (repetition) functions for vectors, arrays, matrices + rep_arrray + rep_matrix + rep_row_vector + rep_vector Command-Line * added option to display autocorrelations in the command-line program to print output * changed default point estimation routine from the command line to

3 0.93540734 1753 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-06-Stan 1.2.0 and RStan 1.2.0

Introduction: Stan 1.2.0 and RStan 1.2.0 are now available for download. See: http://mc-stan.org/ Here are the highlights. Full Mass Matrix Estimation during Warmup Yuanjun Gao, a first-year grad student here at Columbia (!), built a regularized mass-matrix estimator. This helps for posteriors with high correlation among parameters and varying scales. We’re still testing this ourselves, so the estimation procedure may change in the future (don’t worry — it satisfies detailed balance as is, but we might be able to make it more computationally efficient in terms of time per effective sample). It’s not the default option. The major reason is the matrix operations required are expensive, raising the algorithm cost to , where is the average number of leapfrog steps, is the number of iterations, and is the number of parameters. Yuanjun did a great job with the Cholesky factorizations and implemented this about as efficiently as is possible. (His homework for Andrew’s class w

4 0.89333326 1627 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-17-Stan and RStan 1.1.0

Introduction: We’re happy to announce the availability of Stan and RStan versions 1.1.0, which are general tools for performing model-based Bayesian inference using the no-U-turn sampler, an adaptive form of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Information on downloading and installing and using them is available as always from Stan Home Page: http://mc-stan.org/ Let us know if you have any problems on the mailing lists or at the e-mails linked on the home page (please don’t use this web page). The full release notes follow. (R)Stan Version 1.1.0 Release Notes =================================== -- Backward Compatibility Issue * Categorical distribution recoded to match documentation; it now has support {1,...,K} rather than {0,...,K-1}. * (RStan) change default value of permuted flag from FALSE to TRUE for Stan fit S4 extract() method -- New Features * Conditional (if-then-else) statements * While statements -- New Functions * generalized multiply_lower_tri

5 0.8532297 2150 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-27-(R-Py-Cmd)Stan 2.1.0

Introduction: We’re happy to announce the release of Stan C++, CmdStan, RStan, and PyStan 2.1.0.  This is a minor feature release, but it is also an important bug fix release.  As always, the place to start is the (all new) Stan web pages: http://mc-stan.org   Major Bug in 2.0.0, 2.0.1 Stan 2.0.0 and Stan 2.0.1 introduced a bug in the implementation of the NUTS criterion that led to poor tail exploration and thus biased the posterior uncertainty downward.  There was no bug in NUTS in Stan 1.3 or earlier, and 2.1 has been extensively tested and tests put in place so this problem will not recur. If you are using Stan 2.0.0 or 2.0.1, you should switch to 2.1.0 as soon as possible and rerun any models you care about.   New Target Acceptance Rate Default for Stan 2.1.0 Another big change aimed at reducing posterior estimation bias was an increase in the target acceptance rate during adaptation from 0.65 to 0.80.  The bad news is that iterations will take around 50% longer

6 0.82803106 2209 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-13-CmdStan, RStan, PyStan v2.2.0

7 0.76504636 1036 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-30-Stan uses Nuts!

8 0.75601739 1475 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-30-A Stan is Born

9 0.74532026 2003 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-30-Stan Project: Continuous Relaxations for Discrete MRFs

10 0.72617173 2161 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-07-My recent debugging experience

11 0.7178548 1580 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-16-Stantastic!

12 0.71749085 535 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-24-Bleg: Automatic Differentiation for Log Prob Gradients?

13 0.67415923 2242 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-10-Stan Model of the Week: PK Calculation of IV and Oral Dosing

14 0.66753924 555 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-04-Handy Matrix Cheat Sheet, with Gradients

15 0.66444737 2020 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-12-Samplers for Big Science: emcee and BAT

16 0.65387928 2318 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-04-Stan (& JAGS) Tutorial on Linear Mixed Models

17 0.65178245 1748 andrew gelman stats-2013-03-04-PyStan!

18 0.64620131 2231 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-03-Running into a Stan Reference by Accident

19 0.6434958 712 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-14-The joys of working in the public domain

20 0.63238579 2291 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-14-Transitioning to Stan


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(5, 0.011), (6, 0.232), (16, 0.04), (21, 0.016), (24, 0.105), (35, 0.036), (44, 0.022), (63, 0.013), (65, 0.043), (66, 0.01), (85, 0.011), (86, 0.034), (89, 0.05), (95, 0.028), (99, 0.204)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

1 0.93134117 650 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-05-Monitor the efficiency of your Markov chain sampler using expected squared jumped distance!

Introduction: Marc Tanguay writes in with a specific question that has a very general answer. First, the question: I [Tanguay] am currently running a MCMC for which I have 3 parameters that are restricted to a specific space. 2 are bounded between 0 and 1 while the third is binary and updated by a Beta-Binomial. Since my priors are also bounded, I notice that, conditional on All the rest (which covers both data and other parameters), the density was not varying a lot within the space of the parameters. As a result, the acceptance rate is high, about 85%, and this despite the fact that all the parameter’s space is explore. Since in your book, the optimal acceptance rates prescribed are lower that 50% (in case of multiple parameters), do you think I should worry about getting 85%. Or is this normal given the restrictions on the parameters? First off: Yes, my guess is that you should be taking bigger jumps. 85% seems like too high an acceptance rate for Metropolis jumping. More generally, t

same-blog 2 0.9156301 1710 andrew gelman stats-2013-02-06-The new Stan 1.1.1, featuring Gaussian processes!

Introduction: We just released Stan 1.1.1 and RStan 1.1.1 As usual, you can find download and install instructions at: http://mc-stan.org/ This is a patch release and is fully backward compatible with Stan and RStan 1.1.0. The main thing you should notice is that the multivariate models should be much faster and all the bugs reported for 1.1.0 have been fixed. We’ve also added a bit more functionality. The substantial changes are listed in the following release notes. v1.1.1 (5 February 2012) ====================================================================== Bug Fixes ———————————- * fixed bug in comparison operators, which swapped operator< with operator<= and swapped operator> with operator>= semantics * auto-initialize all variables to prevent segfaults * atan2 gradient propagation fixed * fixed off-by-one in NUTS treedepth bound so NUTS goes at most to specified tree depth rather than specified depth + 1 * various compiler compatibility and minor consistency issues * f

3 0.88553196 1638 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-25-Diving chess

Introduction: Knowing of my interest in Turing run-around-the-house chess , David Lockhart points me to this : Diving Chess is a chess variant, which is played in a swimming pool. Instead of using chess clocks, each player must submerge themselves underwater during their turn, only to resurface when they are ready to make a move. Players must make a move within 5 seconds of resurfacing (they will receive a warning if not, and three warnings will result in a forfeit). Diving Chess was invented by American Chess Master Etan Ilfeld; the very first exhibition game took place between Ilfeld and former British Chess Champion William Hartston at the Thirdspace gym in Soho on August 2nd, 2011. Hartston won the match which lasted almost two hours such that each player was underwater for an entire hour.

4 0.87148273 221 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-21-Busted!

Introduction: I’m just glad that universities don’t sanction professors for publishing false theorems. If the guy really is nailed by the feds for fraud, I hope they don’t throw him in prison. In general, prison time seems like a brutal, expensive, and inefficient way to punish people. I’d prefer if the government just took 95% of his salary for several years, made him do community service (cleaning equipment at the local sewage treatment plant, perhaps; a lab scientist should be good at this sort of thing, no?), etc. If restriction of this dude’s personal freedom is judged be part of the sentence, he could be given some sort of electronic tag that would send a message to the police if he were ever more than 3 miles from his home. But no need to bill the taxpayers for the cost of keeping him in prison.

5 0.83351326 1906 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-19-“Behind a cancer-treatment firm’s rosy survival claims”

Introduction: Brett Keller points to a recent news article by Sharon Begley and Robin Respaut: A lot of doctors, hospitals and other healthcare providers in the United States decline to treat people who can’t pay, or have inadequate insurance, among other reasons. What sets CTCA [Cancer Treatment Centers of America] apart is that rejecting certain patients and, even more, culling some of its patients from its survival data lets the company tout in ads and post on its website patient outcomes that look dramatically better than they would if the company treated all comers. These are the rosy survival numbers . . . Details: CTCA reports on its website that the percentage of its patients who are alive after six months, a year, 18 months and longer regularly tops national figures. For instance, 60 percent of its non-small-cell lung cancer patients are alive at six months, CTCA says, compared to 38 percent nationally. And 64 percent of its prostate cancer patients are alive at three years, vers

6 0.82622695 150 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-16-Gaydar update: Additional research on estimating small fractions of the population

7 0.8233254 2316 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-03-“The graph clearly shows that mammography adds virtually nothing to survival and if anything, decreases survival (and increases cost and provides unnecessary treatment)”

8 0.81726384 819 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-24-Don’t idealize “risk aversion”

9 0.8043257 618 andrew gelman stats-2011-03-18-Prior information . . . about the likelihood

10 0.80016726 1924 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-03-Kuhn, 1-f noise, and the fractal nature of scientific revolutions

11 0.79513931 1576 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-13-Stan at NIPS 2012 Workshop on Probabilistic Programming

12 0.7763021 1409 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-08-Is linear regression unethical in that it gives more weight to cases that are far from the average?

13 0.77332103 2310 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-28-On deck this week

14 0.76829726 2332 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-12-“The results (not shown) . . .”

15 0.76762938 1625 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-15-“I coach the jumpers here at Boise State . . .”

16 0.75870299 1489 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-09-Commercial Bayesian inference software is popping up all over

17 0.75819671 1799 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-12-Stan 1.3.0 and RStan 1.3.0 Ready for Action

18 0.75282961 2165 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-09-San Fernando Valley cityscapes: An example of the benefits of fractal devastation?

19 0.74960566 2098 andrew gelman stats-2013-11-12-Plaig!

20 0.74478543 1148 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-31-“the forces of native stupidity reinforced by that blind hostility to criticism, reform, new ideas and superior ability which is human as well as academic nature”