andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2011 andrew_gelman_stats-2011-968 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: In a thought-provoking article subtitled “Top athletes and singers have coaches. Should you?,” surgeon/journalist Atul Gawande describes how, even after eight years and more than two thousand operations, he benefited from coaching (from a retired surgeon), just as pro athletes and accomplished musicians do. He then talks about proposals to institute coaching for teachers to help them perform better. This all makes sense to me—except that I’m a little worried about expansion of the teacher coaching program. I can imagine it could work pretty well for teachers who are motivated to be coached—for example, I think I would get a lot out of it—but I’m afraid that if teacher coaching became a big business, it would get taken over by McKinsey-style scam artists. But could I use a coach? First, let me get rid of the easy questions. 1. Yes, I could use a squash coach. I enjoy squash and play when I can, but I’m terrible at it. I’m sure a coach would help. On the other hand, I’m h
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 In a thought-provoking article subtitled “Top athletes and singers have coaches. [sent-1, score-0.224]
2 ,” surgeon/journalist Atul Gawande describes how, even after eight years and more than two thousand operations, he benefited from coaching (from a retired surgeon), just as pro athletes and accomplished musicians do. [sent-3, score-1.0]
3 He then talks about proposals to institute coaching for teachers to help them perform better. [sent-4, score-0.69]
4 This all makes sense to me—except that I’m a little worried about expansion of the teacher coaching program. [sent-5, score-0.638]
5 I can imagine it could work pretty well for teachers who are motivated to be coached—for example, I think I would get a lot out of it—but I’m afraid that if teacher coaching became a big business, it would get taken over by McKinsey-style scam artists. [sent-6, score-1.025]
6 I enjoy squash and play when I can, but I’m terrible at it. [sent-11, score-0.258]
7 (Paradoxically, I think if I ever play enough that I actually start to get better, I’d probably want to get better still, and then maybe I would want that coach. [sent-14, score-0.137]
8 I have lots of flaws as a teacher and I’m sure a coach would help. [sent-17, score-0.511]
9 I’m not so sure that all or even most college teachers would benefit from coaching. [sent-18, score-0.437]
10 Not because they’re so good, but because I think you have to want to improve, and I think lots of teachers would prefer to just not hear about their own flaws. [sent-19, score-0.236]
11 Gawande reports that top musicians such as Itzhak Perlman (as well as, of course, top athletes of all sorts) benefit from coaching. [sent-23, score-0.686]
12 But I’m not clear that coaching would benefit my performance as a statistician. [sent-24, score-0.648]
13 Coaching might help me with my management skills and other peripheral items, but I don’t know that someone could watch me do statistics and point out areas of improvement, in the way that Perlman’s coach can. [sent-25, score-0.674]
14 Let me put it another way: Gawande is a fine surgeon (at least, from the evidence he presents in his article) and it seems that coaching makes him even better. [sent-28, score-0.69]
15 The United States is full of skilled surgeons making a million dollars a year (or whatever it is they make). [sent-30, score-0.131]
16 What makes Gawande special is not that he’s one of that group; rather, he’s special because of his skills as a reporter and writer. [sent-31, score-0.309]
17 So the real question is: Is he getting coached on his reporting and writing? [sent-32, score-0.155]
18 To be a good editor, you have to have some writing skills but you don’t have to be a top top class writer. [sent-34, score-0.377]
19 In fact, as noted in this space on occasion, in my dream job (if I could not be a statistician), I’d be a Max-Perkins-style editor (if only such jobs still existed). [sent-35, score-0.242]
20 But I don’t know if this could work for statisticians (or for physicists or computer programmers or various other technical jobs). [sent-36, score-0.152]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('gawande', 0.465), ('coaching', 0.444), ('coach', 0.252), ('surgeon', 0.174), ('teachers', 0.166), ('athletes', 0.163), ('coached', 0.155), ('perlman', 0.155), ('squash', 0.141), ('benefit', 0.134), ('top', 0.131), ('musicians', 0.127), ('teacher', 0.122), ('skills', 0.115), ('meng', 0.1), ('could', 0.092), ('watch', 0.091), ('hill', 0.087), ('talks', 0.08), ('editor', 0.075), ('jobs', 0.075), ('rubin', 0.074), ('makes', 0.072), ('surgeons', 0.07), ('would', 0.07), ('play', 0.067), ('sure', 0.067), ('macs', 0.066), ('atul', 0.066), ('areas', 0.063), ('subtitled', 0.061), ('peripheral', 0.061), ('skilled', 0.061), ('scam', 0.061), ('special', 0.061), ('advice', 0.06), ('programmers', 0.06), ('pro', 0.058), ('string', 0.055), ('identity', 0.054), ('use', 0.054), ('accomplished', 0.053), ('retired', 0.052), ('benefited', 0.052), ('eight', 0.051), ('paradoxically', 0.05), ('operations', 0.05), ('existed', 0.05), ('simulate', 0.05), ('terrible', 0.05)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99999994 968 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-21-Could I use a statistics coach?
Introduction: In a thought-provoking article subtitled “Top athletes and singers have coaches. Should you?,” surgeon/journalist Atul Gawande describes how, even after eight years and more than two thousand operations, he benefited from coaching (from a retired surgeon), just as pro athletes and accomplished musicians do. He then talks about proposals to institute coaching for teachers to help them perform better. This all makes sense to me—except that I’m a little worried about expansion of the teacher coaching program. I can imagine it could work pretty well for teachers who are motivated to be coached—for example, I think I would get a lot out of it—but I’m afraid that if teacher coaching became a big business, it would get taken over by McKinsey-style scam artists. But could I use a coach? First, let me get rid of the easy questions. 1. Yes, I could use a squash coach. I enjoy squash and play when I can, but I’m terrible at it. I’m sure a coach would help. On the other hand, I’m h
2 0.21763098 1804 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-15-How effective are football coaches?
Introduction: Dave Berri writes : A recent study published in the Social Science Quarterly suggests that these moves may not lead to the happiness the fans envision (HT: the Sports Economist). E. Scott Adler, Michael J. Berry, and David Doherty looked at coaching changes from 1997 to 2010. What they found should give pause to people who demanded a coaching change (or still hope for one). Here is how these authors summarize their findings: . . . we use matching techniques to compare the performance of football programs that replaced their head coach to those where the coach was retained. The analysis has two major innovations over existing literature. First, we consider how entry conditions moderate the effects of coaching replacements. Second, we examine team performance for several years following the replacement to assess its effects. We find that for particularly poorly performing teams, coach replacements have little effect on team performance as measured against comparable teams that
Introduction: Alex Tabarrok reports on an analysis from the Los Angeles Times of teacher performance (as measured by so-called value-added analysis, which is basically compares teachers based on their students’ average test scores at the end of the year, after controlling for pre-test scores. It’s well known that some teachers are much better than others, but, as Alex points out, what’s striking about the L.A. Times study is that they are publishing the estimates for individual teachers . For example, this: Nice graphics, too. To me, this illustrates one of the big advantages of research in a non-academic environment. If you’re writing an article for the L.A. Times, you can do what you want (within the limits of the law). If you’re doing the same research study at a university, there are a million restrictions. For example, from an official documen t, “The primary purpose of an Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects participati
4 0.14165375 1350 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-28-Value-added assessment: What went wrong?
Introduction: Jacob Hartog writes the following in reaction to my post on the use of value-added modeling for teacher assessment: What I [Hartog] think has been inadequately discussed is the use of individual model specifications to assign these teacher ratings, rather than the zone of agreement across a broad swath of model specifications. For example, the model used by NYCDOE doesn’t just control for a student’s prior year test score (as I think everyone can agree is a good idea.) It also assumes that different demographic groups will learn different amounts in a given year, and assigns a school-level random effect. The result is that, as was much ballyhooed at the time of the release of the data,the average teacher rating for a given school is roughly the same, no matter whether the school is performing great or terribly. The headline from this was “excellent teachers spread evenly across the city’s schools,” rather than “the specification of these models assume that excellent teachers are
5 0.13896498 94 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-17-SAT stories
Introduction: I received a bunch of interesting comments on my blog on adjusting SAT scores. Below I have a long comment from a colleague with experience in the field. But first, this hilarious (from a statistical perspective) story from Howard Wainer: Some years ago when we were visiting Harvard [as a parent of a potential student, not in Howard's role as educational researcher], an admissions director said two things of relevance (i) the SAT hasn’t got enough ‘top’ for Harvard — it doesn’t discriminate well enough at the high end. To prove this she said (ii) that Harvard had more than 1500 ‘perfect 1600s’ apply. Some were rejected. I mentioned that there were only about 750 1600s from HS seniors in the US — about 400 had 1600 in their junior year (and obviously didn’t retake) and about 350 from their senior year. So, I concluded, she must be mistaken. Then I found out that they allowed applicants to pick and choose their highest SAT-V score and their highest SAT-M score from separate adm
6 0.12822232 1620 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-12-“Teaching effectiveness” as another dimension in cognitive ability
7 0.12081332 226 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-23-More on those L.A. Times estimates of teacher effectiveness
8 0.1044994 2053 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-06-Ideas that spread fast and slow
9 0.10099296 1923 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-03-Bayes pays!
10 0.090259269 93 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-17-My proposal for making college admissions fairer
11 0.081822343 1644 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-30-Fixed effects, followed by Bayes shrinkage?
12 0.080558822 1595 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-28-Should Harvard start admitting kids at random?
13 0.079870448 361 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-21-Tenure-track statistics job at Teachers College, here at Columbia!
14 0.078849651 2287 andrew gelman stats-2014-04-09-Advice: positive-sum, zero-sum, or negative-sum
15 0.076365784 2245 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-12-More on publishing in journals
16 0.075215533 1927 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-05-“Numbersense: How to use big data to your advantage”
17 0.074957334 29 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-12-Probability of successive wins in baseball
18 0.074525654 1517 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-01-“On Inspiring Students and Being Human”
19 0.074489564 578 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-17-Credentialism, elite employment, and career aspirations
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.158), (1, -0.06), (2, -0.021), (3, 0.01), (4, 0.026), (5, 0.044), (6, 0.047), (7, 0.052), (8, 0.001), (9, 0.022), (10, 0.008), (11, 0.021), (12, -0.022), (13, -0.043), (14, -0.006), (15, -0.007), (16, 0.032), (17, 0.025), (18, -0.021), (19, 0.023), (20, -0.013), (21, 0.021), (22, -0.004), (23, 0.01), (24, 0.006), (25, -0.014), (26, -0.026), (27, 0.022), (28, -0.041), (29, 0.02), (30, 0.012), (31, -0.019), (32, 0.025), (33, 0.009), (34, 0.01), (35, -0.009), (36, 0.029), (37, 0.051), (38, -0.03), (39, 0.025), (40, 0.043), (41, 0.011), (42, -0.026), (43, 0.012), (44, -0.028), (45, 0.013), (46, 0.002), (47, 0.025), (48, 0.016), (49, -0.037)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.93346781 968 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-21-Could I use a statistics coach?
Introduction: In a thought-provoking article subtitled “Top athletes and singers have coaches. Should you?,” surgeon/journalist Atul Gawande describes how, even after eight years and more than two thousand operations, he benefited from coaching (from a retired surgeon), just as pro athletes and accomplished musicians do. He then talks about proposals to institute coaching for teachers to help them perform better. This all makes sense to me—except that I’m a little worried about expansion of the teacher coaching program. I can imagine it could work pretty well for teachers who are motivated to be coached—for example, I think I would get a lot out of it—but I’m afraid that if teacher coaching became a big business, it would get taken over by McKinsey-style scam artists. But could I use a coach? First, let me get rid of the easy questions. 1. Yes, I could use a squash coach. I enjoy squash and play when I can, but I’m terrible at it. I’m sure a coach would help. On the other hand, I’m h
Introduction: Alex Tabarrok reports on an analysis from the Los Angeles Times of teacher performance (as measured by so-called value-added analysis, which is basically compares teachers based on their students’ average test scores at the end of the year, after controlling for pre-test scores. It’s well known that some teachers are much better than others, but, as Alex points out, what’s striking about the L.A. Times study is that they are publishing the estimates for individual teachers . For example, this: Nice graphics, too. To me, this illustrates one of the big advantages of research in a non-academic environment. If you’re writing an article for the L.A. Times, you can do what you want (within the limits of the law). If you’re doing the same research study at a university, there are a million restrictions. For example, from an official documen t, “The primary purpose of an Institutional Review Board (IRB) is to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects participati
3 0.86784339 1620 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-12-“Teaching effectiveness” as another dimension in cognitive ability
Introduction: I’m not a great teacher. I can get by because I work hard and I know a lot, and for some students my classes are just great, but it’s not a natural talent of mine. I know people who are amazing teachers, and they have something that I just don’t have. I wrote that book, Teaching Statistics: A Bag of Tricks (with Deb Nolan) because I’m not a good teacher and hence need to develop all sorts of techniques to be able to do what good teachers can do without even trying. I’m not proud of being mediocre at teaching. I don’t think that low teaching skill is some sort of indicator that I’m a great researcher. The other think about teaching ability is that I think it’s hard to detect without actually seeing someone teach a class. If you see me give a seminar presentation or even a guest lecture, you’d think I’m an awesome teacher. But, actually, no. I’m an excellent speaker, not such a great teacher. This all came to mind when I received the following email from anthropologist Hen
4 0.86324555 874 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-27-What’s “the definition of a professional career”?
Introduction: Last month I expressed disagreement the following statement from New Republic columnist Jonathan Chait, who wrote: The old liberal slogan always demanded that we “treat teachers like professionals.” That entails some measure of accountability—we can debate the metrics—which allows both that very bad teachers be fired and that very good ones can obtain greater pay and recognition. That’s the definition of a professional career track . . . I was surprised to find the option of being fired as part of the definition of professionalism, and I conjectured that journalists, who currently have little job security could feel resentful toward teachers and other workers who have the expectation of jobs for life. (As Mark Palko notes , “we’re talking about reneging on assurances of job security that were contractual agreed upon and came after a period of proven performance.”) In an update ( link from Palko), Chait writes : Being a professional, to most people, means having the o
5 0.85737562 578 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-17-Credentialism, elite employment, and career aspirations
Introduction: Steve Hsu has posted a series of reflections here , here , and here on the dominance of graduates of HYPS (Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Stanford (in that order, I believe)) in various Master-of-the-Universe-type jobs at “elite law firms, consultancies, and I-banks, hedge/venture funds, startups, and technology companies.” Hsu writes: In the real world, people believe in folk notions of brainpower or IQ. (“Quick on the uptake”, “Picks things up really fast”, “A sponge” …) They count on elite educational institutions to do their g-filtering for them. . . . Most top firms only recruit at a few schools. A kid from a non-elite UG school has very little chance of finding a job at one of these places unless they first go to grad school at, e.g., HBS, HLS, or get a PhD from a top place. (By top place I don’t mean “gee US News says Ohio State’s Aero E program is top 5!” — I mean, e.g., a math PhD from Berkeley or a PhD in computer science from MIT — the traditional top dogs in academ
6 0.83206534 1539 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-18-IRB nightmares
8 0.82488585 740 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-01-The “cushy life” of a University of Illinois sociology professor
9 0.82149339 73 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-08-Observational Epidemiology
10 0.81474161 2202 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-07-Outrage of the week
11 0.80893564 835 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-02-“The sky is the limit” isn’t such a good thing
12 0.79649889 71 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-07-Pay for an A?
13 0.79271591 732 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-26-What Do We Learn from Narrow Randomized Studies?
14 0.78928179 2122 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-03-Objects of the class “Lawrence Summers”: Arne Duncan edition
15 0.78883862 395 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-05-Consulting: how do you figure out what to charge?
16 0.78836024 1224 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-21-Teaching velocity and acceleration
17 0.77986723 992 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-05-Deadwood in the math curriculum
18 0.77938831 452 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-06-Followup questions
20 0.77548265 484 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-24-Foreign language skills as an intrinsic good; also, beware the tyranny of measurement
topicId topicWeight
[(9, 0.024), (14, 0.011), (15, 0.019), (16, 0.088), (21, 0.054), (22, 0.038), (24, 0.083), (39, 0.011), (60, 0.188), (86, 0.031), (89, 0.018), (99, 0.277)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.92393708 567 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-10-English-to-English translation
Introduction: It’s not just for Chaucer (or Mad Max) anymore. Peter Frase writes: It’s a shame that we neglect to re-translate older works into English merely because they were originally written in English. Languages change, and our reactions to words and formulations change. This is obvious when you read something like Chaucer, but it’s true to a more subtle degree of more recent writings. There is a pretty good chance that something written in the 19th century won’t mean the same thing to us that it meant to its contemporary readers. Thus it would make sense to re-translate Huckleberry Finn into modern language, in the same way we periodically get new translations of Homer or Dante or Thomas Mann. This is a point that applies equally well to non-fiction and social theory: in some ways, English-speaking sociologists are lucky that our canonical trio of classical theorists-Marx, Weber, and Durkheim-all wrote in another language. The most recent translation of Capital is eminently more readable
same-blog 2 0.92131937 968 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-21-Could I use a statistics coach?
Introduction: In a thought-provoking article subtitled “Top athletes and singers have coaches. Should you?,” surgeon/journalist Atul Gawande describes how, even after eight years and more than two thousand operations, he benefited from coaching (from a retired surgeon), just as pro athletes and accomplished musicians do. He then talks about proposals to institute coaching for teachers to help them perform better. This all makes sense to me—except that I’m a little worried about expansion of the teacher coaching program. I can imagine it could work pretty well for teachers who are motivated to be coached—for example, I think I would get a lot out of it—but I’m afraid that if teacher coaching became a big business, it would get taken over by McKinsey-style scam artists. But could I use a coach? First, let me get rid of the easy questions. 1. Yes, I could use a squash coach. I enjoy squash and play when I can, but I’m terrible at it. I’m sure a coach would help. On the other hand, I’m h
3 0.91697299 1548 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-25-Health disparities are associated with low life expectancy
Introduction: Lee Seachrest points to an article , “Life expectancy and disparity: an international comparison of life table data,” by James Vaupel, Zhen Zhang, and Alyson van Raalte. This paper has killer graphs. Here are their results: In 89 of the 170 years from 1840 to 2009, the country with the highest male life expectancy also had the lowest male life disparity. This was true in 86 years for female life expectancy and disparity. In all years, the top several life expectancy leaders were also the top life disparity leaders. Although only 38% of deaths were premature, fully 84% of the increase in life expectancy resulted from averting premature deaths. The reduction in life disparity resulted from reductions in early-life disparity, that is, disparity caused by premature deaths; late-life disparity levels remained roughly constant. The authors also note: Reducing early-life disparities helps people plan their less-uncertain lifetimes. A higher likelihood of surviving to old age
4 0.90878624 1040 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-03-Absolutely last Niall Ferguson post ever, in which I offer him serious advice
Introduction: I made the mistake of reading this article by Niall Ferguson summarizing his notorious new book. Here’s the best bit: Far more than in Europe, most Americans remain instinctively loyal to the killer applications of Western ascendancy, from competition all the way through to the work ethic. They know the country has the right software. They just can’t understand why it’s running so damn slowly. What we need to do is to delete the viruses that have crept into our system: the anticompetitive quasi monopolies that blight everything from banking to public education; the politically correct pseudosciences and soft subjects that deflect good students away from hard science; the lobbyists who subvert the rule of law for the sake of the special interests they represent—to say nothing of our crazily dysfunctional system of health care, our overleveraged personal finances, and our newfound unemployment ethic. Then we need to download the updates that are running more successfully
5 0.90487015 949 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-10-Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Introduction: In a review of the movie Moneyball, David Denby writes : Lewis, Miller, and the screenwriters may have gone too far in their gleeful celebration of Beane and their denigration of scouts. Beane has never made it to the World Series (in 2002, the A’s were eliminated in the playoffs by the Minnesota Twins). Oakland has had a mediocre record for the past five years, and it’s finishing a lousy season this year. Success in baseball remains something of a mystery (though pots of money continue to help the Yankees and the Sox). Sabermetrics is a fascinating approach to winning, but it’s one of many approaches, not the ultimate answer. It can’t explain why some teams with the right stats catch fire and others fade. In the movie, the scouts say some dumb stuff, but they know that statistics, no matter how they’re broken down, can’t predict everything. Denby generally likes the movie and is supportive of its message, so I shouldn’t really complain, but . . . the above passage is just s
6 0.90413153 1448 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-07-Scientific fraud, double standards and institutions protecting themselves
7 0.90165877 1053 andrew gelman stats-2011-12-11-This one is so dumb it makes me want to barf
8 0.90025198 191 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-08-Angry about the soda tax
9 0.88820678 1680 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-18-“If scientists wrote horoscopes, this is what yours would say”
10 0.87278998 555 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-04-Handy Matrix Cheat Sheet, with Gradients
11 0.84658402 1946 andrew gelman stats-2013-07-19-Prior distributions on derived quantities rather than on parameters themselves
12 0.84450793 430 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-25-The von Neumann paradox
13 0.84106511 2137 andrew gelman stats-2013-12-17-Replication backlash
14 0.84085697 2368 andrew gelman stats-2014-06-11-Bayes in the research conversation
15 0.84063971 94 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-17-SAT stories
17 0.83776277 1917 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-28-Econ coauthorship update
18 0.83735561 571 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-13-A departmental wiki page?
20 0.83656442 879 andrew gelman stats-2011-08-29-New journal on causal inference