andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2011 andrew_gelman_stats-2011-525 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: A year or so ago I discussed the reasoning of zillionaire financier Peter Thiel, who seems to believe his own hype and, worse, seems to be able to convince reporters of his infallibility as well. Apparently he “possesses a preternatural ability to spot patterns that others miss.” More recently, Felix Salmon commented on Thiel’s financial misadventures: Peter Thiel’s hedge fund, Clarium Capital, ain’t doing so well. Its assets under management are down 90% from their peak, and total returns from the high point are -65%. Thiel is smart, successful, rich, well-connected, and on top of all that his calls have actually been right . . . None of that, clearly, was enough for Clarium to make money on its trades: the fund was undone by volatility and weakness in risk management. There are a few lessons to learn here. Firstly, just because someone is a Silicon Valley gazillionaire, or any kind of successful entrepreneur for that matter, doesn’t mean they should be trusted with oth
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 A year or so ago I discussed the reasoning of zillionaire financier Peter Thiel, who seems to believe his own hype and, worse, seems to be able to convince reporters of his infallibility as well. [sent-1, score-0.722]
2 Apparently he “possesses a preternatural ability to spot patterns that others miss. [sent-2, score-0.192]
3 ” More recently, Felix Salmon commented on Thiel’s financial misadventures: Peter Thiel’s hedge fund, Clarium Capital, ain’t doing so well. [sent-3, score-0.166]
4 Its assets under management are down 90% from their peak, and total returns from the high point are -65%. [sent-4, score-0.233]
5 Thiel is smart, successful, rich, well-connected, and on top of all that his calls have actually been right . [sent-5, score-0.066]
6 None of that, clearly, was enough for Clarium to make money on its trades: the fund was undone by volatility and weakness in risk management. [sent-8, score-0.473]
7 Firstly, just because someone is a Silicon Valley gazillionaire, or any kind of successful entrepreneur for that matter, doesn’t mean they should be trusted with other people’s money. [sent-10, score-0.29]
8 Secondly, being smart is a great way of getting in to a lot of trouble as an investor. [sent-11, score-0.261]
9 In order to make money in the markets, you need a weird combination of arrogance and insecurity. [sent-12, score-0.481]
10 Arrogance on its own is fatal, but it’s also endemic to people in Silicon Valley who are convinced that they’re rich because they’re smart, and that since they’re still smart, they can and will therefore get richer still. [sent-13, score-0.302]
11 Just to be clear, I’m not saying that Thiel losing money is evidence that he’s some sort of dummy. [sent-17, score-0.277]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('thiel', 0.559), ('smart', 0.261), ('clarium', 0.245), ('arrogance', 0.224), ('silicon', 0.184), ('valley', 0.167), ('hype', 0.162), ('fund', 0.156), ('money', 0.133), ('peter', 0.125), ('successful', 0.116), ('misadventures', 0.112), ('financier', 0.112), ('infallibility', 0.112), ('preternatural', 0.112), ('trades', 0.112), ('zillionaire', 0.112), ('rich', 0.104), ('firstly', 0.101), ('volatility', 0.094), ('secondly', 0.094), ('assets', 0.092), ('entrepreneur', 0.092), ('fatal', 0.092), ('hedge', 0.092), ('weakness', 0.09), ('peak', 0.085), ('lessons', 0.085), ('trusted', 0.082), ('spot', 0.08), ('convince', 0.079), ('ain', 0.079), ('losing', 0.076), ('richer', 0.075), ('felix', 0.075), ('salmon', 0.075), ('reporters', 0.075), ('returns', 0.074), ('commented', 0.074), ('capital', 0.074), ('believe', 0.07), ('saying', 0.068), ('convinced', 0.067), ('markets', 0.067), ('management', 0.067), ('weird', 0.066), ('calls', 0.066), ('re', 0.06), ('combination', 0.058), ('therefore', 0.056)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0 525 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-19-Thiel update
Introduction: A year or so ago I discussed the reasoning of zillionaire financier Peter Thiel, who seems to believe his own hype and, worse, seems to be able to convince reporters of his infallibility as well. Apparently he “possesses a preternatural ability to spot patterns that others miss.” More recently, Felix Salmon commented on Thiel’s financial misadventures: Peter Thiel’s hedge fund, Clarium Capital, ain’t doing so well. Its assets under management are down 90% from their peak, and total returns from the high point are -65%. Thiel is smart, successful, rich, well-connected, and on top of all that his calls have actually been right . . . None of that, clearly, was enough for Clarium to make money on its trades: the fund was undone by volatility and weakness in risk management. There are a few lessons to learn here. Firstly, just because someone is a Silicon Valley gazillionaire, or any kind of successful entrepreneur for that matter, doesn’t mean they should be trusted with oth
2 0.44326466 1895 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-12-Peter Thiel is writing another book!
Introduction: Tyler Cowen links : “I’m writing this book because we need to think about the future for more than just 140 characters or 15 minutes at a time if we want to make real long-term progress,” Mr. Thiel said in a statement. “’Zero to One’ is about learning from Silicon Valley how to solve hard problems and build great things that have never existed before.” I wonder how Thiel’s previous book turned out?
3 0.10144771 1003 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-11-$
Introduction: Felix Salmon relates the story of an economics Nobel Prize winner getting paid by a hedge fund. It would all seems pretty silly—sort of like Coca-Cola featuring Michael Jordan in their ads—except that hedge funds are disreputable nowadays and so it seems vaguely sleazy for a scholar to trade on his academic reputation to make free money in this way. It falls roughly in the same category as that notorious b-school prof in Inside Job who got $125K for writing a b.s. report about the financial stability of Iceland—and then, when they came back to him later and asked how he could’ve written it, he basically said: Hey, I don’t know anything about Iceland, I was just taking their money! That said, if a hedge fund offered me $125K to sit on their board, I’d probably take it! It’s hard to turn down free money. Or maybe not, I don’t really know. So far, when companies have paid me $, it’s been to do something for them, to consult or give a short course. I’d like to think that if
4 0.073410615 8 andrew gelman stats-2010-04-28-Advice to help the rich get richer
Introduction: Tyler Cowen reviews a recent book, “Lifecyle Investing,” by Ian Ayres and Barry Nalebuff, two professors of management at Yale. The book recommends that young adults take out loans to buy stocks and then hold these stocks for many years to prepare for retirement. What I’m wondering is: What’s the goal of writing this sort of book? The main audience has got to be young adults (and their parents) who are already pretty well fixed, financially. Students at Yale, for example. And the book must be intended for people who are already beyond the standard recommendations of personal-investment books (pay off your credit card debt, don’t waste so much money on restaurant meals and fancy clothes, buy 1 used car instead of 2 new ones, etc). Basically it sounds like they’re talking to people who have a lot of money but want to make sure that they retire rich rather than merely middle-class. I can’t say that I’m morally opposed to helping the rich get richer. After all, I’m not out the
5 0.07155975 2015 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-10-The ethics of lying, cheating, and stealing with data: A case study
Introduction: I’ve been following with mild interest the recent news stories on the lawbreaking at the Steven A. Cohen hedge fund, for the silly reason that I gave a paid lecture for them a few years ago. I wasn’t thinking too hard about whether they would be using my wonderful statistical ideas to be more effective at insider trading . . . Recently Paul Alper sent me an email pointing out that one of the lawbreakers involved is named Gilman—perhaps he’s related to me? Everyone is related to everyone else but I don’t know my relation to this particular guy. I actually have an aunt whose last name is Gilman. Here’s how it happened. A few years after my father was born (but before the birth of his sister), my grandfather changed his name from Gelman to Gilman. The story was that he was tired of people always calling him Gilman so he just changed his name. I’d call that a true commitment to the descriptive approach to linguistics. On the minus side, he gave my father’s older sister Luther
7 0.066570275 380 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-29-“Bluntly put . . .”
10 0.065300852 2255 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-19-How Americans vote
11 0.061397888 390 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-02-Fragment of statistical autobiography
13 0.053582363 1882 andrew gelman stats-2013-06-03-The statistical properties of smart chains (and referral chains more generally)
14 0.05302709 74 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-08-“Extreme views weakly held”
15 0.052453116 1105 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-08-Econ debate about prices at a fancy restaurant
17 0.050296776 1577 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-14-Richer people continue to vote Republican
18 0.049875088 1153 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-04-More on the economic benefits of universities
20 0.049638364 201 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-12-Are all rich people now liberals?
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.079), (1, -0.051), (2, 0.008), (3, 0.024), (4, -0.022), (5, 0.001), (6, 0.032), (7, 0.003), (8, 0.009), (9, 0.027), (10, -0.036), (11, -0.012), (12, -0.009), (13, 0.01), (14, 0.01), (15, 0.004), (16, 0.031), (17, 0.011), (18, 0.02), (19, 0.008), (20, 0.002), (21, -0.007), (22, 0.007), (23, 0.008), (24, -0.012), (25, 0.001), (26, 0.014), (27, 0.017), (28, -0.001), (29, 0.023), (30, -0.015), (31, -0.017), (32, -0.01), (33, 0.009), (34, 0.005), (35, -0.002), (36, 0.018), (37, 0.031), (38, -0.041), (39, 0.019), (40, -0.028), (41, -0.006), (42, -0.052), (43, 0.031), (44, -0.003), (45, -0.002), (46, -0.022), (47, -0.008), (48, 0.0), (49, -0.015)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.94693619 525 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-19-Thiel update
Introduction: A year or so ago I discussed the reasoning of zillionaire financier Peter Thiel, who seems to believe his own hype and, worse, seems to be able to convince reporters of his infallibility as well. Apparently he “possesses a preternatural ability to spot patterns that others miss.” More recently, Felix Salmon commented on Thiel’s financial misadventures: Peter Thiel’s hedge fund, Clarium Capital, ain’t doing so well. Its assets under management are down 90% from their peak, and total returns from the high point are -65%. Thiel is smart, successful, rich, well-connected, and on top of all that his calls have actually been right . . . None of that, clearly, was enough for Clarium to make money on its trades: the fund was undone by volatility and weakness in risk management. There are a few lessons to learn here. Firstly, just because someone is a Silicon Valley gazillionaire, or any kind of successful entrepreneur for that matter, doesn’t mean they should be trusted with oth
2 0.77547377 495 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-31-“Threshold earners” and economic inequality
Introduction: Reihan Salam discusses a theory of Tyler Cowen regarding “threshold earners,” a sort of upscale version of a slacker. Here’s Cowen : A threshold earner is someone who seeks to earn a certain amount of money and no more. If wages go up, that person will respond by seeking less work or by working less hard or less often. That person simply wants to “get by” in terms of absolute earning power in order to experience other gains in the form of leisure. Salam continues: This clearly reflects the pattern of wage dispersion among my friends, particularly those who attended elite secondary schools and colleges and universities. I [Salam] know many “threshold earners,” including both high and low earners who could earn much more if they chose to make the necessary sacrifices. But they are satisficers. OK, fine so far. But then the claim is made that “threshold earning” behavior increases income inequality. In Cowen’s words: The funny thing is this: For years, many cultural c
Introduction: Sandeep Baliga writes : [In a recent study , Gilles Duranton and Matthew Turner write:] For interstate highways in metropolitan areas we [Duranton and Turner] find that VKT (vehicle kilometers traveled) increases one for one with interstate highways, confirming the fundamental law of highway congestion.’ Provision of public transit also simply leads to the people taking public transport being replaced by drivers on the road. Therefore: These findings suggest that both road capacity expansions and extensions to public transit are not appropriate policies with which to combat traffic congestion. This leaves congestion pricing as the main candidate tool to curb traffic congestion. To which I reply: Sure, if your goal is to curb traffic congestion . But what sort of goal is that? Thinking like a microeconomist, my policy goal is to increase people’s utility. Sure, traffic congestion is annoying, but there must be some advantages to driving on that crowded road or pe
4 0.75056744 2341 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-20-plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose
Introduction: This post is by Phil, and I’m writing about the slow pace of change in 21st-century America. [Note added later: at the time that I wrote this, I was unaware that a year-and-a-half ago Andrew had written a similar post on the theme. I suspect I, and perhaps most of this blog's readers, missed it because he posted it on New Year's Day]. [Note added later still: evidently I'm wrong and I did see Andrew's post, because I left a comment on it: " If you want to pick a 50-year period, with nice round numbers for the start and the end, my vote for the biggest lifestyle change for Americans is 1900-1950. Radio, telephone, television, indoor plumbing, refrigerators, home air conditioning, automobiles, airplanes… in the past 50 years all of those things have gotten better than they used to be (although I’m not sure there have been any major advances in indoor plumbing), but the change is small compared with having vs not having." And I was wrong about indoor plumbing, which most people di
5 0.74739522 1850 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-10-The recursion of pop-econ
Introduction: Dave Berri posted the following at the Freakonomics blog: The “best” picture of 2012 was Argo. At least that’s the film that won the Oscar for best picture. According to the Oscars, the decision to give this award to Argo was made by the nearly 6,000 voting members of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. . . . In other words, this choice is made by the “experts.” There is, though, another group that we could have listened to on Sunday night. That group would be the people who actually spend money to go to the movies. . . . According to that group, Marvel’s the Avengers was the “best” picture in 2012. With domestic revenues in excess of $600 million, this filmed earned nearly $200 million more than any other picture. And when we look at world-wide revenues, this film brought in more than $1.5 billion. . . . Despite what seems like a clear endorsement by the customers of this industry, the Avengers was ignored by the Oscars. Perhaps this is just because I am an econo
6 0.74463809 2010 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-06-Would today’s captains of industry be happier in a 1950s-style world?
8 0.72000694 1789 andrew gelman stats-2013-04-05-Elites have alcohol problems too!
9 0.71846366 1845 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-07-Is Felix Salmon wrong on free TV?
10 0.70360416 1010 andrew gelman stats-2011-11-14-“Free energy” and economic resources
11 0.70344919 1621 andrew gelman stats-2012-12-13-Puzzles of criminal justice
12 0.70337659 668 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-19-The free cup and the extra dollar: A speculation in philosophy
13 0.70271897 647 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-04-Irritating pseudo-populism, backed up by false statistics and implausible speculations
14 0.6991685 17 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-05-Taking philosophical arguments literally
15 0.69890171 1410 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-09-Experimental work on market-based or non-market-based incentives
16 0.6958614 1646 andrew gelman stats-2013-01-01-Back when fifty years was a long time ago
17 0.69246107 232 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-25-Dodging the diplomats
18 0.69165486 68 andrew gelman stats-2010-06-03-…pretty soon you’re talking real money.
19 0.68651283 1105 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-08-Econ debate about prices at a fancy restaurant
20 0.68005383 1483 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-04-“Bestselling Author Caught Posting Positive Reviews of His Own Work on Amazon”
topicId topicWeight
[(1, 0.282), (12, 0.013), (16, 0.083), (19, 0.011), (21, 0.025), (24, 0.055), (40, 0.029), (45, 0.019), (48, 0.013), (53, 0.035), (55, 0.033), (63, 0.038), (75, 0.012), (76, 0.012), (77, 0.01), (82, 0.011), (99, 0.21)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.88548315 525 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-19-Thiel update
Introduction: A year or so ago I discussed the reasoning of zillionaire financier Peter Thiel, who seems to believe his own hype and, worse, seems to be able to convince reporters of his infallibility as well. Apparently he “possesses a preternatural ability to spot patterns that others miss.” More recently, Felix Salmon commented on Thiel’s financial misadventures: Peter Thiel’s hedge fund, Clarium Capital, ain’t doing so well. Its assets under management are down 90% from their peak, and total returns from the high point are -65%. Thiel is smart, successful, rich, well-connected, and on top of all that his calls have actually been right . . . None of that, clearly, was enough for Clarium to make money on its trades: the fund was undone by volatility and weakness in risk management. There are a few lessons to learn here. Firstly, just because someone is a Silicon Valley gazillionaire, or any kind of successful entrepreneur for that matter, doesn’t mean they should be trusted with oth
2 0.87650436 581 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-19-“The best living writer of thrillers”
Introduction: On the back of my yellowing pocket book of “The Mask of Dimitros” is the following blurb: ‘Eric Ambler is the best living writer of thrillers.’ — News Chonicle What I’m wondering is, why the qualifier “living”? Did the News Chronicle think there was a better writers of thrillers than Ambler who was no longer alive? I can’t imagine who that could be, considering that Ambler pretty much defined the modern thriller.
Introduction: We were having so much fun on this thread that I couldn’t resist linking to this news item by Adrian Chen. The good news is that Scott Adams (creater of the Dilbert comic strip) “has a certified genius IQ” and that he “can open jars with [his] bare hands.” He is also “able to lift heavy objects.” Cool! In all seriousness, I knew nothing about this aspect of Adams when I wrote the earlier blog. I was just surprised (and remain surprised) that he was so impressed with Charlie Sheen for being good-looking and being able to remember his lines. At the time I thought it was just a matter of Adams being overly-influenced by his direct experience, along with some satisfaction in separating himself from the general mass of Sheen-haters out there. But now I wonder if something more is going on, that maybe he feels that he and Sheen are on the same side in a culture war. In any case, the ultimate topic of interest here is not Sheen or Adams but rather more general questions of what
4 0.85616404 1449 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-08-Gregor Mendel’s suspicious data
Introduction: Howard Wainer points me to a thoughtful discussion by Moti Nissani on “Psychological, Historical, and Ethical Reflections on the Mendelian Paradox.” The paradox, as Nissani defines it, is that Mendel’s data seem in many cases too good to be true, yet Mendel had a reputation for probity and it seems doubtful that he had a Mark-Hauser-style attitude toward reporting scientific data. Nissani writes: Taken together, the situation seems paradoxical. On the one hand, we have evidence that “the data of most, if not all, of the experiments have been falsified so as to agree closely with Mendel’s expectations.” We also have good reasons to believe that Mendel encountered linkage but failed to report it and that he may have taken the somewhat unusual step of having his scientific records destroyed shortly after his death. On the other hand, everything else we know about him/in addition to his undisputed genius/suggests a man of unimpeachable integrity, fine observational powers, and a pa
5 0.84581602 973 andrew gelman stats-2011-10-26-Antman again courts controversy
Introduction: Commenter Zbicyclist links to a fun article by Howard French on biologist E. O. Wilson: Wilson announced that his new book may be his last. It is not limited to the discussion of evolutionary biology, but ranges provocatively through the humanities, as well. . . . Generation after generation of students have suffered trying to “puzzle out” what great thinkers like Socrates, Plato, and Descartes had to say on the great questions of man’s nature, Wilson said, but this was of little use, because philosophy has been based on “failed models of the brain.” This reminds me of my recent remarks on the use of crude folk-psychology models as microfoundations for social sciences. The article also discusses Wilson’s recent crusade against selfish-gene-style simplifications of human and animal nature. I’m with Wilson 100% on this one. “Two brothers or eight cousins” is a cute line but it doesn’t seem to come close to describing how species or societies work, and it’s always seemed a
6 0.82761681 1154 andrew gelman stats-2012-02-04-“Turn a Boring Bar Graph into a 3D Masterpiece”
7 0.80534148 587 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-24-5 seconds of every #1 pop single
9 0.72307086 697 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-05-A statistician rereads Bill James
10 0.72295737 182 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-03-Nebraska never looked so appealing: anatomy of a zombie attack. Oops, I mean a recession.
11 0.7085939 509 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-09-Chartjunk, but in a good cause!
13 0.70404816 272 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-13-Ross Ihaka to R: Drop Dead
15 0.69493973 243 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-30-Computer models of the oil spill
16 0.69266093 2190 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-29-Stupid R Tricks: Random Scope
17 0.6863246 906 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-14-Another day, another stats postdoc
18 0.6799739 148 andrew gelman stats-2010-07-15-“Gender Bias Still Exists in Modern Children’s Literature, Say Centre Researchers”
19 0.67237377 642 andrew gelman stats-2011-04-02-Bill James and the base-rate fallacy
20 0.66826832 541 andrew gelman stats-2011-01-27-Why can’t I be more like Bill James, or, The use of default and default-like models