high_scalability high_scalability-2007 high_scalability-2007-178 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Hello all, Reading the site you can note that "1 Master for writes, N Slaves for reads" scheme is used offen. How is this implemented? Who decides where writes and reads go? Something in application level or specific database proxies, like Slony-I? Thanks.
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 Hello all, Reading the site you can note that "1 Master for writes, N Slaves for reads" scheme is used offen. [sent-1, score-0.656]
2 Something in application level or specific database proxies, like Slony-I? [sent-4, score-0.457]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('decides', 0.38), ('hello', 0.362), ('reads', 0.336), ('proxies', 0.335), ('writes', 0.309), ('slaves', 0.27), ('scheme', 0.255), ('thanks', 0.238), ('note', 0.223), ('implemented', 0.199), ('master', 0.185), ('specific', 0.168), ('level', 0.114), ('site', 0.106), ('something', 0.1), ('go', 0.09), ('used', 0.072), ('application', 0.07), ('database', 0.062), ('like', 0.043)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.99999994 178 high scalability-2007-12-10-1 Master, N Slaves
Introduction: Hello all, Reading the site you can note that "1 Master for writes, N Slaves for reads" scheme is used offen. How is this implemented? Who decides where writes and reads go? Something in application level or specific database proxies, like Slony-I? Thanks.
2 0.1830737 175 high scalability-2007-12-05-how to: Load Balancing with iis
Introduction: he l l o wor l d, can you te l l me how i can i mp l ement a l oad ba l anc i ng of a web s i te runn i ng under i i s - w i ndows server 2003/08
3 0.14609893 632 high scalability-2009-06-15-starting small with growth in mind
Introduction: Hello all, I'm working on a web site that might totally flop or it might explode to be the next facebook/flickr/digg/etc. Since I really don't know how popular the site will be I don't want to spend a ton of money on the hardware/hosting right away but I want to be able to scale it easily if it does grow rapidly. With this in mind, what would be the best approach to launch the site? Thanks, Dan
4 0.14007208 687 high scalability-2009-08-24-How Google Serves Data from Multiple Datacenters
Introduction: Update: Streamy Explains CAP and HBase's Approach to CAP . We plan to employ inter-cluster replication, with each cluster located in a single DC. Remote replication will introduce some eventual consistency into the system, but each cluster will continue to be strongly consistent. Ryan Barrett, Google App Engine datastore lead, gave this talk Transactions Across Datacenters (and Other Weekend Projects) at the Google I/O 2009 conference. While the talk doesn't necessarily break new technical ground, Ryan does an excellent job explaining and evaluating the different options you have when architecting a system to work across multiple datacenters. This is called multihoming , operating from multiple datacenters simultaneously. As multihoming is one of the most challenging tasks in all computing, Ryan's clear and thoughtful style comfortably leads you through the various options. On the trip you learn: The different multi-homing options are: Backups, Master-Slave, Multi-M
5 0.12542784 163 high scalability-2007-11-21-n-phase commit for FS writes, reads stay local
Introduction: I am try i ng to f i nd a L i nux FS that wi l l a l low me to rep l icate a l l wr i tes synchronous l y to n nodes i n a web server c l uster, wh i le keep i ng a l l reads local. It shou l d not require specialized hardware.
6 0.11266255 132 high scalability-2007-10-25-Who can answer or analyze the image store and visit solution about alibaba.com?Thanks
7 0.11098199 3 high scalability-2007-07-09-LiveJournal Architecture
8 0.10512698 200 high scalability-2008-01-02-WEB hosting Select
9 0.10048968 86 high scalability-2007-09-09-Clustering Solution
10 0.097866707 514 high scalability-2009-02-18-Numbers Everyone Should Know
11 0.094201684 1352 high scalability-2012-10-31-Gone Fishin': LiveJournal Architecture
12 0.093088999 383 high scalability-2008-09-10-Shard servers -- go big or small?
13 0.08829388 177 high scalability-2007-12-08-thesimsonstage.ea.com
14 0.087384365 994 high scalability-2011-02-23-This stuff isn't taught, you learn it bit by bit as you solve each problem.
15 0.086496785 389 high scalability-2008-09-23-How to Scale with Ruby on Rails
16 0.08368203 257 high scalability-2008-02-22-Kevin's Great Adventures in SSDland
17 0.083205871 672 high scalability-2009-08-06-An Unorthodox Approach to Database Design : The Coming of the Shard
18 0.08282648 710 high scalability-2009-09-20-PaxosLease: Diskless Paxos for Leases
19 0.081011891 829 high scalability-2010-05-20-Strategy: Scale Writes to 734 Million Records Per Day Using Time Partitioning
20 0.080857195 72 high scalability-2007-08-22-Wikimedia architecture
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.071), (1, 0.053), (2, -0.044), (3, -0.072), (4, 0.017), (5, 0.027), (6, -0.012), (7, -0.05), (8, 0.027), (9, -0.014), (10, -0.021), (11, 0.005), (12, -0.052), (13, 0.023), (14, 0.051), (15, -0.017), (16, -0.034), (17, 0.006), (18, -0.0), (19, 0.009), (20, 0.008), (21, 0.012), (22, -0.069), (23, 0.0), (24, -0.004), (25, -0.037), (26, 0.044), (27, 0.001), (28, -0.002), (29, -0.045), (30, 0.045), (31, -0.043), (32, -0.015), (33, -0.007), (34, -0.007), (35, -0.0), (36, 0.006), (37, -0.063), (38, 0.013), (39, -0.047), (40, -0.081), (41, 0.004), (42, -0.07), (43, 0.003), (44, 0.073), (45, -0.038), (46, 0.048), (47, -0.019), (48, 0.028), (49, 0.041)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.95973665 178 high scalability-2007-12-10-1 Master, N Slaves
Introduction: Hello all, Reading the site you can note that "1 Master for writes, N Slaves for reads" scheme is used offen. How is this implemented? Who decides where writes and reads go? Something in application level or specific database proxies, like Slony-I? Thanks.
2 0.63094956 710 high scalability-2009-09-20-PaxosLease: Diskless Paxos for Leases
Introduction: PaxosLease is a distributed algorithm for lease negotiation. It is based on Paxos, but does not require disk writes or clock synchrony. PaxosLease is used for master lease negotation in the open-source Keyspace replicated key-value store.
3 0.61523777 163 high scalability-2007-11-21-n-phase commit for FS writes, reads stay local
Introduction: I am try i ng to f i nd a L i nux FS that wi l l a l low me to rep l icate a l l wr i tes synchronous l y to n nodes i n a web server c l uster, wh i le keep i ng a l l reads local. It shou l d not require specialized hardware.
4 0.58145005 683 high scalability-2009-08-18-Hardware Architecture Example (geographical level mapping of servers)
Introduction: I have put down my thoughts in the architecture discussed in the blog . Although I have done substantial research to understand how things should work before deciding this architecture but I will be requiring huge amount of inputs from everyone to come to an architecture decision. Hardware entities which were thought while designing the entities are: 1. Master Web Server which will map different users to web servers placed in different geographical locations. (will prefer storing a mapping table in RAM) 2. Web Servers 3. Application Servers 4. Master Database Servers (to implement entity wise look up sharding) 5. Slave Database Servers. Will really appreciate if some good inputs of using Cloud Computing are given and how to go about it against or in addition to the given architecture. Would like to in fact know people's view on when to decide using cloud computing techniques. Looking forward for inputs from the community.
5 0.57133681 512 high scalability-2009-02-14-Scaling Digg and Other Web Applications
Introduction: Joe Stump, Lead Architect at Digg, gave this presentation at the Web 2.0 Expo. I couldn't find the actual presentation, but fortunately Kris Jordan took some great notes. That's how key moments in history are accidentally captured forever. Joe was also kind enough to respond to my email questions with a phone call. In this first part of the post Joe shares some timeless wisdom that you may or may not have read before. I of course take some pains to extract all the wit from the original presentation in favor of simple rules. What really struck me however was how Joe thought MemcacheDB Will be the biggest new kid on the block in scaling . MemcacheDB has been around for a little while and I've never thought of it in that way. Well learn why Joe is so excited by MemcacheDB at the end of the post. Impressive Stats 80th-100th largest site in the world 26 million uniques a month 30 million users. Uniques are only half that traffic. Traffic = unique web visitors + APIs + Digg
6 0.56628543 514 high scalability-2009-02-18-Numbers Everyone Should Know
7 0.56602442 86 high scalability-2007-09-09-Clustering Solution
8 0.56592453 383 high scalability-2008-09-10-Shard servers -- go big or small?
9 0.55606872 1453 high scalability-2013-05-07-Not Invented Here: A Comical Series on Scalability
10 0.54972744 229 high scalability-2008-01-29-Building scalable storage into application - Instead of MogileFS OpenAFS etc.
11 0.54504782 554 high scalability-2009-04-04-Digg Architecture
12 0.5360468 302 high scalability-2008-04-10-Mysql scalability and failover...
13 0.53035343 262 high scalability-2008-02-26-Architecture to Allow High Availability File Upload
14 0.52236259 868 high scalability-2010-07-30-Basho Lives up to their Name With Consistent Smashing
15 0.52078223 379 high scalability-2008-09-04-Database question for upcoming project
16 0.51619005 3 high scalability-2007-07-09-LiveJournal Architecture
17 0.51422828 799 high scalability-2010-03-23-Digg: 4000% Performance Increase by Sorting in PHP Rather than MySQL
18 0.51363635 1352 high scalability-2012-10-31-Gone Fishin': LiveJournal Architecture
19 0.51343179 366 high scalability-2008-08-17-Many updates against MySQL
20 0.51314169 994 high scalability-2011-02-23-This stuff isn't taught, you learn it bit by bit as you solve each problem.
topicId topicWeight
[(10, 0.712), (61, 0.089)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.94347703 178 high scalability-2007-12-10-1 Master, N Slaves
Introduction: Hello all, Reading the site you can note that "1 Master for writes, N Slaves for reads" scheme is used offen. How is this implemented? Who decides where writes and reads go? Something in application level or specific database proxies, like Slony-I? Thanks.
2 0.90063787 874 high scalability-2010-08-07-ArchCamp: Scalable Databases (NoSQL)
Introduction: ArchCamp: Scalable Databasess (NoSQL) The ArchCamp unconference was held this past Friday at HackerDojo in Mountain View, CA. There was plenty of pizza, beer, and great conversation. This session started out free-form, but shaped up pretty quickly into a discussion of the popular open source scalable NoSQL databases and the architectural categories in which they belong.
3 0.79948926 170 high scalability-2007-12-02-Database-Clustering: a8cjdbc - update: version 1.3
Introduction: The new version of a8cjdbc finished some limitations. Now Clobs and Blobs are supported, and some fixes using binary data. The version was also fully tested with Postgres and mySQL. Since Version 1.3 there is also a free trail version for download available. Check it out and test yourself... Take a look at: http://www.activ8.at/homepage/en/a8cjdbc.php I've downloaded the latest version and setup a environment with one virtual database and two database backends. I tried to make a "non real life szenario": The first backend was a Postgres node, the second was a mySQL node. Everything works fine - failover - recoverylog, etc... with to different backend database types. So check out the trial version and test yourself the clustered driver and give me some results about your experience with a8cjdbc. As I only tested mySQL and Postgres (and the non real life szenario with two different backend types) - maybe someone else have experiences with out databases? greeti
4 0.79948741 171 high scalability-2007-12-02-a8cjdbc - update verision 1.3
Introduction: The new version of a8cjdbc finished some limitations. Now Clobs and Blobs are supported, and some fixes using binary data. The version was also fully tested with Postgres and mySQL. Since Version 1.3 there is also a free trail version for download available. Check it out and test yourself... Take a look at: http://www.activ8.at/homepage/en/a8cjdbc.php I've downloaded the latest version and setup a environment with one virtual database and two database backends. I tried to make a "non real life szenario": The first backend was a Postgres node, the second was a mySQL node. Everything works fine - failover - recoverylog, etc... with to different backend database types. So check out the trial version and test yourself the clustered driver and give me some results about your experience with a8cjdbc. As I only tested mySQL and Postgres (and the non real life szenario with two different backend types) - maybe someone else have experiences with out databases? greeti
5 0.79909229 430 high scalability-2008-10-26-Should you use a SAN to scale your architecture?
Introduction: This is a question everyone must struggle with when building out their datacenter. Storage choices are always the ones I have the least confidence in. David Marks in his blog You Can Change It Later! asks the question Should I get a SAN to scale my site architecture? and answers no. A better solution is to use commodity hardware, directly attach storage on servers, and partition across servers to scale and for greater availability. David's reasoning is interesting: A SAN creates a SPOF (single point of failure) that is dependent on a vendor to fly and fix when there's a problem. This can lead to long down times during this outage you have no access to your data at all. Using easily available commodity hardware minimizes risks to your company, it's not just about saving money. Zooming over to Fry's to buy emergency equipment provides the kind of agility startups need in order to respond quickly to ever changing situations. It's hard to beat the power and flexibility (backup
7 0.78925085 1066 high scalability-2011-06-22-It's the Fraking IOPS - 1 SSD is 44,000 IOPS, Hard Drive is 180
9 0.71395624 1635 high scalability-2014-04-21-This is why Microsoft won. And why they lost.
10 0.7036401 767 high scalability-2010-01-27-Hot Scalability Links for January 28 2010
11 0.66263562 584 high scalability-2009-04-27-Some Questions from a newbie
12 0.64687681 1046 high scalability-2011-05-23-Evernote Architecture - 9 Million Users and 150 Million Requests a Day
13 0.63104916 689 high scalability-2009-08-28-Strategy: Solve Only 80 Percent of the Problem
14 0.62449759 1631 high scalability-2014-04-14-How do you even do anything without using EBS?
15 0.61776626 792 high scalability-2010-03-10-How FarmVille Scales - The Follow-up
16 0.57806557 1585 high scalability-2014-01-24-Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For January 24th, 2014
17 0.53633595 142 high scalability-2007-11-05-Strategy: Diagonal Scaling - Don't Forget to Scale Out AND Up
18 0.50283885 20 high scalability-2007-07-16-Paper: The Clustered Storage Revolution
19 0.49280196 257 high scalability-2008-02-22-Kevin's Great Adventures in SSDland
20 0.48660824 1353 high scalability-2012-11-01-Cost Analysis: TripAdvisor and Pinterest costs on the AWS cloud