nips nips2011 nips2011-302 nips2011-302-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

302 nips-2011-Variational Learning for Recurrent Spiking Networks


Source: pdf

Author: Danilo J. Rezende, Daan Wierstra, Wulfram Gerstner

Abstract: We derive a plausible learning rule for feedforward, feedback and lateral connections in a recurrent network of spiking neurons. Operating in the context of a generative model for distributions of spike sequences, the learning mechanism is derived from variational inference principles. The synaptic plasticity rules found are interesting in that they are strongly reminiscent of experimental Spike Time Dependent Plasticity, and in that they differ for excitatory and inhibitory neurons. A simulation confirms the method’s applicability to learning both stationary and temporal spike patterns. 1


reference text

[1] Konrad P K¨ rding and Daniel M Wolpert. Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature, o 427(6971):244–7, January 2004.

[2] P. Berkes, G. Orban, M. Lengyel, and J. Fiser. Spontaneous Cortical Activity Reveals Hallmarks of an Optimal Internal Model of the Environment. Science, 331(6013):83–87, January 2011.

[3] Wei Ji Ma, Jeffrey M Beck, and Alexandre Pouget. Spiking networks for Bayesian inference and choice. Current opinion in neurobiology, 18(2):217–22, April 2008.

[4] Joshua B Tenenbaum, Thomas L Griffiths, and Charles Kemp. Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(7):309–18, 2006.

[5] Konrad P K¨ rding and Daniel M Wolpert. Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends in o cognitive sciences, 10(7):319–26, July 2006.

[6] D. Acuna and P. Schrater. Bayesian modeling of human sequential decision-making on the multi-armed bandit problem. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Washington, DC: Cognitive Science Society, 2008.

[7] Michael D. Lee. A Hierarchical Bayesian Model of Human Decision-Making on an Optimal Stopping Problem. Cognitive Science, 30(3):1–26, May 2006. 8

[8] G. Bi and M. Poo. Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb’s postulate revisited. Annual review of neuroscience, 24(1):139–166, 2001.

[9] W. Gerstner and W. K. Kistler. Mathematical Formulations of Hebbian Learning. Biological Cybernetics, 87(5-6):404–415, 2002. article.

[10] W. Gerstner. Spike-response model. Scholarpedia, 3(12):1343, 2008.

[11] J W Pillow, J Shlens, L Paninski, A Sher, A M Litke, E J Chichilnisky, and E P Simoncelli. Spatiotemporal correlations and visual signaling in a complete neuronal population. Nature, 454(7206):995– 999, Aug 2008.

[12] Renaud Jolivet, Alexander Rauch, Hans R. L¨ scher, and Wulfram Gerstner. Predicting spike timing of u neocortical pyramidal neurons by simple threshold models. J Comput Neurosci, 21(1):35–49, August 2006.

[13] J.P. Pfister, Taro Toyoizumi, D. Barber, and W. Gerstner. Optimal spike-timing-dependent plasticity for precise action potential firing in supervised learning. Neural Computation, 18(6):1318–1348, 2006.

[14] S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler. On Information and Sufficiency. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(1):79–86, March 1951.

[15] Taro Toyoizumi, Kamiar Rahnama Rad, and Liam Paninski. Mean-field approximations for coupled populations of generalized linear model spiking neurons with Markov refractoriness. Neural computation, 21(5):1203–43, May 2009.

[16] Brendan J. Frey and Geoffrey E. Hinton. Variational Learning in Nonlinear Gaussian Belief Networks. Neural Computation, 11(1):193–213, January 1999.

[17] Karl Friston, J´ r´ mie Mattout, Nelson Trujillo-Barreto, John Ashburner, and Will Penny. Variational free ee energy and the Laplace approximation. NeuroImage, 34(1):220–34, January 2007.

[18] Matthew J Beal and Zoubin Ghahramani. Variational Bayesian Learning of Directed Graphical Models with Hidden Variables. Bayesian Analysis, 1(4):793–832, 2006.

[19] T.S. Jaakkola and M.I. Jordan. Bayesian parameter estimation via variational methods. Statistics and Computing, 10(1):25–37, 2000.

[20] Jayant E Kulkarni and Liam Paninski. Common-input models for multiple neural spike-train data. Network (Bristol, England), 18(4):375–407, December 2007.

[21] Ian H Stevenson, James M Rebesco, Nicholas G Hatsopoulos, Zach Haga, Lee E Miller, and Konrad P K¨ rding. Bayesian inference of functional connectivity and network structure from spikes. IEEE transo actions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 17(3):203–13, June 2009.

[22] C. Archambeau, Dan Cornford, Manfred Opper, and J. Shawe-Taylor. Gaussian process approximations of stochastic differential equations. In Journal of Machine Learning Research Workshop and Conference Proceedings, volume 1, pages 1–16. Citeseer, 2007.

[23] Daniel H O’Connor, Gayle M Wittenberg, and Samuel S-H Wang. Graded bidirectional synaptic plasticity is composed of switch-like unitary events. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(27):9679–84, July 2005.

[24] C C Petersen, R C Malenka, R a Nicoll, and J J Hopfield. All-or-none potentiation at CA3-CA1 synapses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95(8):4732–7, April 1998.

[25] Rajesh P N Rao. Bayesian computation in recurrent neural circuits. Neural computation, 16(1):1–38, January 2004.

[26] Bernhard Nessler, Michael Pfeiffer, and Wolfgang Maass. STDP enables spiking neurons to detect hidden causes of their inputs. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS09), pages 1357–1365, 2009. 9