acl acl2013 acl2013-311 acl2013-311-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

311 acl-2013-Semantic Neighborhoods as Hypergraphs


Source: pdf

Author: Chris Quirk ; Pallavi Choudhury

Abstract: Ambiguity preserving representations such as lattices are very useful in a number of NLP tasks, including paraphrase generation, paraphrase recognition, and machine translation evaluation. Lattices compactly represent lexical variation, but word order variation leads to a combinatorial explosion of states. We advocate hypergraphs as compact representations for sets of utterances describing the same event or object. We present a method to construct hypergraphs from sets of utterances, and evaluate this method on a simple recognition task. Given a set of utterances that describe a single object or event, we construct such a hypergraph, and demonstrate that it can recognize novel descriptions of the same event with high accuracy.


reference text

Regina Barzilay and Lillian Lee. 2003. Learning to paraphrase: An unsupervised approach using multiple-sequence alignment. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT. David Chen and William Dolan. 2011. Collecting highly parallel data for paraphrase evaluation. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Lan- Technologies, pages 190–200, Portland, Oregon, USA, June. Association for Computational Linguistics. guage Markus Dreyer and Daniel Marcu. 2012. Hyter: Meaning-equivalent semantics for translation evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 162–171, Montr ´eal, Canada, June. Association for Computational Linguistics. Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 423–430, Sapporo, Dan 226 Japan, July. Association for Computational Linguistics. Mark-Jan Nederhof. 2000. Practical experiments with regular approximation of context-free languages. Computational Linguistics, 26(1): 17–44, March. Bo Pang, Kevin Knight, and Daniel Marcu. 2003. Syntax-based alignment of multiple translations: Extracting paraphrases and generating new sentences. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 433–440, Sydney, Australia, July. Association for Computational Linguistics. Chris Quirk, Pallavi Choudhury, Jianfeng Gao, Hisami Suzuki, Kristina Toutanova, Michael Gamon, Wentau Yih, Colin Cherry, and Lucy Vanderwende. 2012. Msr splat, a language analysis toolkit. In Proceedings of the Demonstration Session at the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 21–24, Montr ´eal, Canada, June. Association for Computational Linguistics. Cyrus Rashtchian, Peter Young, Micah Hodosh, and Julia Hockenmaier. 2010. Collecting image annotations using amazon’s mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon ’s Mechanical Turk, pages 139–147, Los Angeles, June. Association for Computational Linguistics. Luis Von Ahn, Manuel Blum, Nicholas J. Hopper, and John Langford. 2003. Captcha: Using hard ai problems for security. In Eli Biham, editor, Advances in Cryptology – EUROCRYPT 2003, volume 2656 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 294–3 11. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 227