acl acl2013 acl2013-116 acl2013-116-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

116 acl-2013-Detecting Metaphor by Contextual Analogy


Source: pdf

Author: Eirini Florou

Abstract: As one of the most challenging issues in NLP, metaphor identification and its interpretation have seen many models and methods proposed. This paper presents a study on metaphor identification based on the semantic similarity between literal and non literal meanings of words that can appear at the same context.


reference text

Tony Berber Sardinha. 2002. Metaphor in early applied linguistics writing: A corpus-based analysis of lexis in dissertations. In I Conference on Metaphor in Language and Thought. Tony Berber Sardinha. 2010. Creating and using the Corpus do Portugues and the frequency dictionary of portuguese. Working with Portuguese Corpora. Julia Birke and Anoop Sarkar. 2006. A clustering approach for the nearly unsupervised recogni- tion of nonliteral language. In Proceedings of EACL-06, pages 329–336. Trento, Italy. Dan Fass. 1991. met*: a method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics, 17(1). Gilles Fauconnier and Mark Tuner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books. Jerome Feldman. 2006. From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neutral Theory of Language. The MIT Press. Charles Fillmore, Christopher Johnson and Miriam Petruck. 2003. Background to framenet. International Journal of Lexicography, 16(3):235–250. Matt Gedigian, John Bryant, Srini Narayanan, and Branimir Ciric. 2006. Catching metaphors. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding, pages 41– 48. New York. Joseph Edward Grady. 1997. Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. University Microfilms International. Yael Karov and Shimon Edelman. 1998. Similarity-based word sense disambiguation. Computational Linguistics, 24(1):41–59. Paul Kingsbury and Martha Palmer. 2002. From treebank to propbank. In Proceedings of LREC2002, pages 1989–1993. Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain. Saisuresh Krishnakumaran and Xiaojin Zhu. 2007. Hunting elusive metaphors using lexical resources. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language, April, 2007, Rochester, New York, pages 13–20. Association for Computational Linguistics, Rochester, New York. URL http : / /www .aclweb .org/ anthology/W/W0 7 /W0 7 - 0 10 3. George Lakoff, Jane Espenson, and Alan Schwartz. 1991. The master metaphor list. University of California at Berkeley. George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. Dekang Lin. 1997. Using syntactic dependency as local context to resolve word sense ambiguity. In Proceedings of ACL-97, pages 64–71 . Madrid, Spain. Dekang Lin. 1998. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-98). Madison, WI, USA, July 1998., page 296304. Zachary Mason. 2004. Cormet: a computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system. Computational Linguistics, 30(1):23– 44. Srini Narayanan. 1997. Knowledge-based Action Representations for Metaphor and Aspect (KARMA). University of Californial. Siddharth Padwardhan, Satanjeev Banerjee, and Ted Pedersen. 2003. Using measures of semantic relatedness for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Intelligent Text Processing and Computational Linguistics (CICLing-03), Mexico City, pages 241–257. Stephen Pinker. 2007. The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. Viking Adult. Judita Preiss, Ted Briscoe, and Anna Korhonen. 2007. A system for large-scale acquisition of verbal, nominal and adjectival subcategorization frames from corpora. In Proceedings of ACL-07, volume 45, page 912. Philip Resnik. 1997. Selectional preference and sense disambiguation. In ACL SIGLEX Workshop on Tagging Text with Lexical Semantics. Washington, D.C. Ekaterina Shutova, Simone Teufel and Anna Korhonen. 2012. Statistical metaphor processing. Computational Linguistics, 39(2). Julie Weeds, David Weir, and Diana McCarthy. 2004. Characterising measures of lexical dis29 tributional ing similarity. In Proceedings 2004, pages 1015–1021 of Col- . COLING, Geneva, Switzerland. Yorick Wilks. 1978. Making preferences more ac- tive. Artificial Intelligence, 11(3). 1994. Zhibiao Wu and Martha Palmer. Verb se- mantics and lexical selection. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the ACL (ACL-04), pages 133–138. 30