acl acl2013 acl2013-53 acl2013-53-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Hector Martinez Alonso ; Bolette Sandford Pedersen ; Nuria Bel
Abstract: We present the result of an annotation task on regular polysemy for a series of semantic classes or dot types in English, Danish and Spanish. This article describes the annotation process, the results in terms of inter-encoder agreement, and the sense distributions obtained with two methods: majority voting with a theory-compliant backoff strategy, and MACE, an unsupervised system to choose the most likely sense from all the annotations.
Mette Skovgaard Andersen, Helle Asmussen, and Jørg Asmussen. 2002. The project of korpus 2000 going public. In The Tenth EURALEX International Congress: EURALEX 2002. J. D. Apresjan. 1974. Regular polysemy. Linguistics. R. Artstein and M. Poesio. 2008. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4):555–596. Gemma Boleda, Sabine Schulte im Walde, and Toni Badia. 2012. Modeling regular polysemy: A study on the semantic classification of catalan adjectives. Computational Linguistics, 38(3):575–616. Ted Briscoe, Ann Copestake, and Alex Lascarides. 1995. Blocking. In Computational Lexical Semantics. Citeseer. Aitor Gonzalez-Agirre, Egoitz Laparra, and German Rigau. 2012. Multilingual central repository version 3.0. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2012), pages 2525–2529. Dirk Hovy, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Ashish Vaswani, and Eduard Hovy. 2013. Learning whom to trust with mace. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2013. N. Ide and C. Macleod. 2001. The american national corpus: A standardized resource of american english. In Proceedings of Corpus Linguistics 2001, pages 274–280. Citeseer. J. B. Johannessen, K. Haagen, K. Haaland, A. B. J ´onsdottir, A. Nøklestad, D. Kokkinakis, P. Meurer, E. Bick, and D. Haltrup. 2005. Named entity recognition for the mainland scandinavian languages. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 20(1):91. M. Lapata and A. Lascarides. 2003. A probabilistic account of logical metonymy. Computational Linguistics, 29(2):261–315. K. Markert and M. Nissim. 2002. Towards a corpus annotated for metonymies: the case of location names. In Proc. of LREC. Citeseer. K. Markert and M. Nissim. 2009. Data and models for metonymy resolution. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43(2): 123–138. Vivi Nastase, Alex Judea, Katja Markert, and Michael Strube. 2012. Local and global context for supervised and unsupervised metonymy resolution. In Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 183–193. Association for Computational Linguistics. Malvina Nissim and Katja Markert. 2005. Learning to buy a renault and talk to bmw: A supervised approach to conventional metonymy. In Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilburg. Geoffrey Nunberg. 1995. Transfers of meaning. Journal of semantics, 12(2): 109–132. B. S. Pedersen, S. Nimb, J. Asmussen, N. H. Sørensen, L. Trap-Jensen, and H. Lorentzen. 2009. Dannet: the challenge of compiling a wordnet for danish by reusing a monolingual dictionary. Language resources and evaluation, 43(3):269–299. Thierry Poibeau. 2006. Dealing with metonymic readings of named entities. arXiv preprint cs/0607052. J. Pustejovsky, A. Rumshisky, J. Moszkowicz, and O. Batiukova. 2009. Glml: Annotating argument selection and coercion. In IWCS-8: Eighth International Conference on Computational Semantics. J. Pustejovsky. 1995. The generative lexicon: a theory of computational lexical semantics. A. Rumshisky, VA Grinberg, and J. Pustejovsky. 2007. Detecting selectional behavior of complex types in text. In Fourth International Workshop on Generative Approaches to the Lexicon, Paris, France. Citeseer. Ekaterina Shutova. 2009. Sense-based interpretation of logical metonymy using a statistical method. In Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Student Research Workshop, pages 1–9. Association for Computational Linguistics. R. Snow, B. O’Connor, D. Jurafsky, and A. Y. Ng. 2008. Cheap and fast—but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In Proceedings of the Conference on Em- pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 254–263. Association for Computational Linguistics. Jorge Vivaldi. 2009. Corpus and exploitation tool: Iulact and bwananet. In I International Conference on Corpus Linguistics (CICL 2009), A survey on corpus-based research, Universidad de Murcia, pages 224–239. 730