hunch_net hunch_net-2008 hunch_net-2008-305 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

305 hunch net-2008-06-30-ICML has a comment system


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: Mark Reid has stepped up and created a comment system for ICML papers which Greger Linden has tightly integrated. My understanding is that Mark spent quite a bit of time on the details, and there are some cool features like working latex math mode. This is an excellent chance for the ICML community to experiment with making ICML year-round, so I hope it works out. Please do consider experimenting with it.


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 Mark Reid has stepped up and created a comment system for ICML papers which Greger Linden has tightly integrated. [sent-1, score-0.778]

2 My understanding is that Mark spent quite a bit of time on the details, and there are some cool features like working latex math mode. [sent-2, score-1.562]

3 This is an excellent chance for the ICML community to experiment with making ICML year-round, so I hope it works out. [sent-3, score-1.005]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('mark', 0.43), ('latex', 0.311), ('icml', 0.29), ('tightly', 0.259), ('reid', 0.24), ('experimenting', 0.215), ('math', 0.21), ('spent', 0.197), ('excellent', 0.197), ('cool', 0.187), ('experiment', 0.176), ('comment', 0.169), ('created', 0.169), ('please', 0.158), ('chance', 0.145), ('community', 0.142), ('details', 0.137), ('features', 0.132), ('works', 0.121), ('making', 0.112), ('hope', 0.112), ('working', 0.111), ('understanding', 0.11), ('consider', 0.108), ('system', 0.101), ('bit', 0.094), ('quite', 0.086), ('papers', 0.08), ('time', 0.063), ('like', 0.061)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.99999994 305 hunch net-2008-06-30-ICML has a comment system

Introduction: Mark Reid has stepped up and created a comment system for ICML papers which Greger Linden has tightly integrated. My understanding is that Mark spent quite a bit of time on the details, and there are some cool features like working latex math mode. This is an excellent chance for the ICML community to experiment with making ICML year-round, so I hope it works out. Please do consider experimenting with it.

2 0.3840287 254 hunch net-2007-07-12-ICML Trends

Introduction: Mark Reid did a post on ICML trends that I found interesting.

3 0.24471039 356 hunch net-2009-05-24-2009 ICML discussion site

Introduction: Mark Reid has setup a discussion site for ICML papers again this year and Monica Dinculescu has linked it in from the ICML site. Last year’s attempt appears to have been an acceptable but not wild success as a little bit of fruitful discussion occurred. I’m hoping this year will be a bit more of a success—please don’t be shy I’d like to also point out that ICML ‘s early registration deadline has a few hours left, while UAI ‘s and COLT ‘s are in a week.

4 0.23840877 401 hunch net-2010-06-20-2010 ICML discussion site

Introduction: A substantial difficulty with the 2009 and 2008 ICML discussion system was a communication vacuum, where authors were not informed of comments, and commenters were not informed of responses to their comments without explicit monitoring. Mark Reid has setup a new discussion system for 2010 with the goal of addressing this. Mark didn’t want to make it to intrusive, so you must opt-in. As an author, find your paper and “Subscribe by email” to the comments. As a commenter, you have the option of providing an email for follow-up notification.

5 0.15627594 70 hunch net-2005-05-12-Math on the Web

Introduction: Andrej Bauer has setup a Mathematics and Computation Blog. As a first step he has tried to address the persistent and annoying problem of math on the web. As a basic tool for precisely stating and transfering understanding of technical subjects, mathematics is very necessary. Despite this necessity, every mechanism for expressing mathematics on the web seems unnaturally clumsy. Here are some of the methods and their drawbacks: MathML This was supposed to be the answer, but it has two severe drawbacks: “Internet Explorer” doesn’t read it and the language is an example of push-XML-to-the-limit which no one would ever consider writing in. (In contrast, html is easy to write in.) It’s also very annoying that math fonts must be installed independent of the browser, even for mozilla based browsers. Create inline images. This has several big drawbacks: font size is fixed for all viewers, you can’t cut & paste inside the images, and you can’t hyperlink from (say) symbol to de

6 0.14594242 452 hunch net-2012-01-04-Why ICML? and the summer conferences

7 0.12576339 468 hunch net-2012-06-29-ICML survey and comments

8 0.11741413 472 hunch net-2012-08-27-NYAS ML 2012 and ICML 2013

9 0.098900177 453 hunch net-2012-01-28-Why COLT?

10 0.09879192 437 hunch net-2011-07-10-ICML 2011 and the future

11 0.093509071 361 hunch net-2009-06-24-Interesting papers at UAICMOLT 2009

12 0.088595867 454 hunch net-2012-01-30-ICML Posters and Scope

13 0.085090488 117 hunch net-2005-10-03-Not ICML

14 0.084211498 404 hunch net-2010-08-20-The Workshop on Cores, Clusters, and Clouds

15 0.080240518 202 hunch net-2006-08-10-Precision is not accuracy

16 0.079725422 403 hunch net-2010-07-18-ICML & COLT 2010

17 0.079555094 364 hunch net-2009-07-11-Interesting papers at KDD

18 0.078858368 29 hunch net-2005-02-25-Solution: Reinforcement Learning with Classification

19 0.078515589 65 hunch net-2005-05-02-Reviewing techniques for conferences

20 0.073741361 21 hunch net-2005-02-17-Learning Research Programs


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.128), (1, -0.132), (2, 0.021), (3, -0.039), (4, 0.026), (5, -0.023), (6, -0.02), (7, -0.088), (8, -0.059), (9, -0.014), (10, -0.056), (11, -0.026), (12, -0.166), (13, 0.113), (14, 0.253), (15, 0.04), (16, -0.288), (17, -0.241), (18, -0.077), (19, 0.04), (20, 0.073), (21, -0.034), (22, -0.061), (23, 0.042), (24, 0.015), (25, -0.119), (26, 0.002), (27, -0.154), (28, 0.059), (29, 0.03), (30, -0.062), (31, -0.04), (32, 0.038), (33, 0.11), (34, -0.099), (35, -0.063), (36, -0.047), (37, -0.038), (38, 0.03), (39, 0.031), (40, 0.048), (41, -0.021), (42, -0.036), (43, 0.062), (44, 0.018), (45, 0.068), (46, -0.008), (47, 0.016), (48, 0.053), (49, -0.061)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.99070191 305 hunch net-2008-06-30-ICML has a comment system

Introduction: Mark Reid has stepped up and created a comment system for ICML papers which Greger Linden has tightly integrated. My understanding is that Mark spent quite a bit of time on the details, and there are some cool features like working latex math mode. This is an excellent chance for the ICML community to experiment with making ICML year-round, so I hope it works out. Please do consider experimenting with it.

2 0.9155789 254 hunch net-2007-07-12-ICML Trends

Introduction: Mark Reid did a post on ICML trends that I found interesting.

3 0.84238183 401 hunch net-2010-06-20-2010 ICML discussion site

Introduction: A substantial difficulty with the 2009 and 2008 ICML discussion system was a communication vacuum, where authors were not informed of comments, and commenters were not informed of responses to their comments without explicit monitoring. Mark Reid has setup a new discussion system for 2010 with the goal of addressing this. Mark didn’t want to make it to intrusive, so you must opt-in. As an author, find your paper and “Subscribe by email” to the comments. As a commenter, you have the option of providing an email for follow-up notification.

4 0.7883997 356 hunch net-2009-05-24-2009 ICML discussion site

Introduction: Mark Reid has setup a discussion site for ICML papers again this year and Monica Dinculescu has linked it in from the ICML site. Last year’s attempt appears to have been an acceptable but not wild success as a little bit of fruitful discussion occurred. I’m hoping this year will be a bit more of a success—please don’t be shy I’d like to also point out that ICML ‘s early registration deadline has a few hours left, while UAI ‘s and COLT ‘s are in a week.

5 0.71017498 117 hunch net-2005-10-03-Not ICML

Introduction: Alex Smola showed me this ICML 2006 webpage. This is NOT the ICML we know, but rather some people at “Enformatika”. Investigation shows that they registered with an anonymous yahoo email account from dotregistrar.com the “Home of the $6.79 wholesale domain!” and their nameservers are by Turkticaret , a Turkish internet company. It appears the website has since been altered to “ ICNL ” (the above link uses the google cache). They say that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, so the organizers of the real ICML 2006 must feel quite flattered.

6 0.58421463 468 hunch net-2012-06-29-ICML survey and comments

7 0.48731348 37 hunch net-2005-03-08-Fast Physics for Learning

8 0.48172295 472 hunch net-2012-08-27-NYAS ML 2012 and ICML 2013

9 0.41982743 452 hunch net-2012-01-04-Why ICML? and the summer conferences

10 0.40975845 447 hunch net-2011-10-10-ML Symposium and ICML details

11 0.39962208 403 hunch net-2010-07-18-ICML & COLT 2010

12 0.39161289 487 hunch net-2013-07-24-ICML 2012 videos lost

13 0.37908643 364 hunch net-2009-07-11-Interesting papers at KDD

14 0.37764812 246 hunch net-2007-06-13-Not Posting

15 0.34944382 65 hunch net-2005-05-02-Reviewing techniques for conferences

16 0.3389543 454 hunch net-2012-01-30-ICML Posters and Scope

17 0.32822257 70 hunch net-2005-05-12-Math on the Web

18 0.32265928 297 hunch net-2008-04-22-Taking the next step

19 0.32109359 361 hunch net-2009-06-24-Interesting papers at UAICMOLT 2009

20 0.30990982 433 hunch net-2011-04-23-ICML workshops due


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(26, 0.358), (27, 0.152), (53, 0.147), (55, 0.181)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

1 0.92744291 171 hunch net-2006-04-09-Progress in Machine Translation

Introduction: I just visited ISI where Daniel Marcu and others are working on machine translation. Apparently, machine translation is rapidly improving. A particularly dramatic year was 2002->2003 when systems switched from word-based translation to phrase-based translation. From a (now famous) slide by Charles Wayne at DARPA (which funds much of the work on machine translation) here is some anecdotal evidence: 2002 2003 insistent Wednesday may recurred her trips to Libya tomorrow for flying. Cairo 6-4 ( AFP ) – An official announced today in the Egyptian lines company for flying Tuesday is a company “insistent for flying” may resumed a consideration of a day Wednesday tomorrow her trips to Libya of Security Council decision trace international the imposed ban comment. And said the official “the institution sent a speech to Ministry of Foreign Affairs of lifting on Libya air, a situation her recieving replying are so a trip will pull to Libya a morning Wednesday.” E

2 0.92738634 17 hunch net-2005-02-10-Conferences, Dates, Locations

Introduction: Conference Locate Date COLT Bertinoro, Italy June 27-30 AAAI Pittsburgh, PA, USA July 9-13 UAI Edinburgh, Scotland July 26-29 IJCAI Edinburgh, Scotland July 30 – August 5 ICML Bonn, Germany August 7-11 KDD Chicago, IL, USA August 21-24 The big winner this year is Europe. This is partly a coincidence, and partly due to the general internationalization of science over the last few years. With cuts to basic science in the US and increased hassle for visitors, conferences outside the US become more attractive. Europe and Australia/New Zealand are the immediate winners because they have the science, infrastructure, and english in place. China and India are possible future winners.

same-blog 3 0.9201529 305 hunch net-2008-06-30-ICML has a comment system

Introduction: Mark Reid has stepped up and created a comment system for ICML papers which Greger Linden has tightly integrated. My understanding is that Mark spent quite a bit of time on the details, and there are some cool features like working latex math mode. This is an excellent chance for the ICML community to experiment with making ICML year-round, so I hope it works out. Please do consider experimenting with it.

4 0.89587659 413 hunch net-2010-10-08-An easy proof of the Chernoff-Hoeffding bound

Introduction: Textbooks invariably seem to carry the proof that uses Markov’s inequality, moment-generating functions, and Taylor approximations. Here’s an easier way. For , let be the KL divergence between a coin of bias and one of bias : Theorem: Suppose you do independent tosses of a coin of bias . The probability of seeing heads or more, for , is at most . So is the probability of seeing heads or less, for . Remark: By Pinsker’s inequality, . Proof Let’s do the case; the other is identical. Let be the distribution over induced by a coin of bias , and likewise for a coin of bias . Let be the set of all sequences of tosses which contain heads or more. We’d like to show that is unlikely under . Pick any , with say heads. Then: Since for every , we have and we’re done.

5 0.78935575 97 hunch net-2005-07-23-Interesting papers at ACL

Introduction: A recent discussion indicated that one goal of this blog might be to allow people to post comments about recent papers that they liked. I think this could potentially be very useful, especially for those with diverse interests but only finite time to read through conference proceedings. ACL 2005 recently completed, and here are four papers from that conference that I thought were either good or perhaps of interest to a machine learning audience. David Chiang, A Hierarchical Phrase-Based Model for Statistical Machine Translation . (Best paper award.) This paper takes the standard phrase-based MT model that is popular in our field (basically, translate a sentence by individually translating phrases and reordering them according to a complicated statistical model) and extends it to take into account hierarchy in phrases, so that you can learn things like “X ‘s Y” -> “Y de X” in chinese, where X and Y are arbitrary phrases. This takes a step toward linguistic syntax for MT, whic

6 0.77791142 25 hunch net-2005-02-20-At One Month

7 0.58878845 43 hunch net-2005-03-18-Binomial Weighting

8 0.56380558 116 hunch net-2005-09-30-Research in conferences

9 0.5595718 452 hunch net-2012-01-04-Why ICML? and the summer conferences

10 0.55069298 395 hunch net-2010-04-26-Compassionate Reviewing

11 0.54929495 331 hunch net-2008-12-12-Summer Conferences

12 0.54608297 151 hunch net-2006-01-25-1 year

13 0.5452292 270 hunch net-2007-11-02-The Machine Learning Award goes to …

14 0.54159486 90 hunch net-2005-07-07-The Limits of Learning Theory

15 0.53712255 437 hunch net-2011-07-10-ICML 2011 and the future

16 0.53678888 458 hunch net-2012-03-06-COLT-ICML Open Questions and ICML Instructions

17 0.52751476 356 hunch net-2009-05-24-2009 ICML discussion site

18 0.52632648 484 hunch net-2013-06-16-Representative Reviewing

19 0.52570093 40 hunch net-2005-03-13-Avoiding Bad Reviewing

20 0.52510726 454 hunch net-2012-01-30-ICML Posters and Scope