high_scalability high_scalability-2010 high_scalability-2010-777 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

777 high scalability-2010-02-15-Scaling Ambition at StackOverflow


meta infos for this blog

Source: html

Introduction: Joel Spolsky and Jeff Atwood are raising VC money for StackOverflow. This is interesting for three reasons: 1) Joel has always seemed like a keep it small and grow organically type of guy, so this is a big step in a different direction. 2) It means they think there's a very big market in the Q&A; space and they mean to capture as much as the market as possible. 3) Most importantly for this blog, Joel gives some good advice on when to stay fresh and local and when it's time to jump for the brass ring, scale up your ambition, and go for VC money. Please see Joel's blog post for the details, but here's when to go VC: There’s a land grab going on. There is a provable concept that’s repeatable. The business itself could benefit from the publicity. The investor will add substantial value to the business. The business can potentially have a big exit or become a large, publically traded company. The founders are not in it for their own personal aggrandizement. Joel t


Summary: the most important sentenses genereted by tfidf model

sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore

1 This is interesting for three reasons: 1) Joel has always seemed like a keep it small and grow organically type of guy, so this is a big step in a different direction. [sent-2, score-0.652]

2 2) It means they think there's a very big market in the Q&A; space and they mean to capture as much as the market as possible. [sent-3, score-0.615]

3 3) Most importantly for this blog, Joel gives some good advice on when to stay fresh and local and when it's time to jump for the brass ring, scale up your ambition, and go for VC money. [sent-4, score-0.738]

4 Please see Joel's blog post for the details, but here's when to go VC: There’s a land grab going on. [sent-5, score-0.38]

5 The business itself could benefit from the publicity. [sent-7, score-0.179]

6 The investor will add substantial value to the business. [sent-8, score-0.327]

7 The business can potentially have a big exit or become a large, publically traded company. [sent-9, score-0.79]

8 The founders are not in it for their own personal aggrandizement. [sent-10, score-0.247]

9 Joel thinks StackOverflow and their team meets these criteria. [sent-11, score-0.205]


similar blogs computed by tfidf model

tfidf for this blog:

wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)

[('joel', 0.448), ('vc', 0.423), ('blogpost', 0.192), ('organically', 0.192), ('publically', 0.192), ('ambition', 0.166), ('exit', 0.156), ('traded', 0.156), ('spolsky', 0.156), ('investor', 0.153), ('founders', 0.146), ('market', 0.143), ('grab', 0.137), ('luck', 0.137), ('stackoverflow', 0.131), ('ring', 0.119), ('substantial', 0.115), ('fresh', 0.114), ('land', 0.113), ('meets', 0.11), ('seemed', 0.109), ('guy', 0.107), ('capture', 0.107), ('importantly', 0.105), ('jump', 0.105), ('personal', 0.101), ('big', 0.1), ('guys', 0.095), ('thinks', 0.095), ('business', 0.095), ('potentially', 0.091), ('advice', 0.09), ('stay', 0.085), ('benefit', 0.084), ('concept', 0.084), ('reasons', 0.078), ('step', 0.076), ('go', 0.068), ('mean', 0.064), ('grow', 0.064), ('blog', 0.062), ('local', 0.061), ('value', 0.059), ('space', 0.058), ('please', 0.058), ('details', 0.058), ('type', 0.057), ('gives', 0.056), ('three', 0.054), ('good', 0.054)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 1.0 777 high scalability-2010-02-15-Scaling Ambition at StackOverflow

Introduction: Joel Spolsky and Jeff Atwood are raising VC money for StackOverflow. This is interesting for three reasons: 1) Joel has always seemed like a keep it small and grow organically type of guy, so this is a big step in a different direction. 2) It means they think there's a very big market in the Q&A; space and they mean to capture as much as the market as possible. 3) Most importantly for this blog, Joel gives some good advice on when to stay fresh and local and when it's time to jump for the brass ring, scale up your ambition, and go for VC money. Please see Joel's blog post for the details, but here's when to go VC: There’s a land grab going on. There is a provable concept that’s repeatable. The business itself could benefit from the publicity. The investor will add substantial value to the business. The business can potentially have a big exit or become a large, publically traded company. The founders are not in it for their own personal aggrandizement. Joel t

2 0.087165698 136 high scalability-2007-10-28-Scaling Early Stage Startups

Introduction: Mark Maunder of No VC Required --who advocates not taking VC money lest you be turned into a frog instead of the prince (or princess) you were dreaming of--has an excellent slide deck on how to scale an early stage startup. His blog also has some good SEO tips and a very spooky widget showing the geographical location of his readers. Perfect for Halloween! What is Mark's other worldly scaling strategies for startups? Site: http://novcrequired.com/ Information Sources Slides from Seattle Tech Startup Talk . Scaling Early Stage Startups blog post by Mark Maunder. The Platform Linxux An ISAM type data store. Perl Httperf is used for benchmarking. Websitepulse.com is used for perf monitoring. The Architecture Performance matters because being slow could cost you 20% of your revenue. The UIE guys disagree saying this ain't necessarily so. They explain their reasoning in Usability Tools Podcast: The Truth About Page Download Time . The idea i

3 0.085891247 394 high scalability-2008-09-25-HighScalability.com Rated 16th Best Blog for Development Managers

Introduction: Jurgen Appelo of Noop.nl asked for nominations for top blogs and then performed a sophisticated weighting of their popularity based on page range, trust authority, Alexa rank, Google hits, and number of comments. When all the results poured out of the blender HighScalability was ranked 16th. Not bad! Joel on Software was number one, of course. The next few were: 2) Coding Horror by Jeff Atwood 3) Seth's Blog by Seth Godin and 4) Paul Graham: Essays Paul Graham. All excellent blogs. Very cool.

4 0.074752808 201 high scalability-2008-01-04-For $5 Million You Can Buy Enough Storage to Compete with Google

Introduction: Kevin Burton calculates that Blekko , one of the barbarian hoard storming Google's search fortress, would need to spend $5 million just to buy enough weapons, er storage. Kevin estimates storing a deep crawl of the internet would take about 5 petabytes. At a projected $1 million per petabyte that's a paltry $5 million. Less than expected. Imagine in days of old an ambitious noble itching to raise an army to conquer a land and become its new prince. For a fine land, and the search market is one of the richest, that would be a smart investment for a VC to make. In these situations I always ask: What would Machiavelli do? Machiavelli taught some lands are hard to conquer and easy to keep and some are easy to conquer and hard to keep. A land like France was easy to conquer because it was filled with nobles. You can turn nobles on each other because they always hate each other for some reason or another. But it's hard to keep a land of nobles because they all think they

5 0.074120536 671 high scalability-2009-08-05-Stack Overflow Architecture

Introduction: Update 2 : Stack Overflow Architecture Update - Now At 95 Million Page Views A Month Update: Startup – ASP.NET MVC, Cloud Scale & Deployment shows an interesting alternative approach for a Windows stack using ServerPath/GoGrid for a dedicated database machine, elastic VMs for the front end, and a free load balancer. Stack Overflow is a much loved programmer question and answer site written by two guys nobody has ever heard of before. Well, not exactly. The site was created by top programmer and blog stars Jeff Atwood and Joel Spolsky . In that sense Stack Overflow is like a celebrity owned restaurant, only it should be around for a while. Joel estimates 1/3 of all the programmers in the world have used the site so they must be serving up something good. I fell in deep like with Stack Overflow for purely selfish reasons, it helped me solve a few difficult problems that were jabbing my eyes out with pain. I also appreciate their no-apologies anthropologically based desig

6 0.072689176 750 high scalability-2009-12-16-Building Super Scalable Systems: Blade Runner Meets Autonomic Computing in the Ambient Cloud

7 0.072643586 1355 high scalability-2012-11-05-Gone Fishin': Building Super Scalable Systems: Blade Runner Meets Autonomic Computing In The Ambient Cloud

8 0.069575772 790 high scalability-2010-03-09-Applications as Virtual States

9 0.067181252 242 high scalability-2008-02-07-Looking for good business examples of compaines using Hadoop

10 0.067077041 643 high scalability-2009-06-29-How to Succeed at Capacity Planning Without Really Trying : An Interview with Flickr's John Allspaw on His New Book

11 0.064676024 1110 high scalability-2011-09-06-Big Data Application Platform

12 0.064385101 894 high scalability-2010-09-03-Six guiding principles to Consolidate your IT

13 0.063463442 765 high scalability-2010-01-25-Let's Welcome our Neo-Feudal Overlords

14 0.062429365 1131 high scalability-2011-10-24-StackExchange Architecture Updates - Running Smoothly, Amazon 4x More Expensive

15 0.060746245 855 high scalability-2010-07-11-So, Why is Twitter Really Not Using Cassandra to Store Tweets?

16 0.05718568 931 high scalability-2010-10-28-Notes from A NOSQL Evening in Palo Alto

17 0.056135628 1439 high scalability-2013-04-12-Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For April 12, 2013

18 0.055833519 1240 high scalability-2012-05-07-Startups are Creating a New System of the World for IT

19 0.053747181 1252 high scalability-2012-05-25-Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For May 25, 2012

20 0.05140239 1490 high scalability-2013-07-12-Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For July 12, 2013


similar blogs computed by lsi model

lsi for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(0, 0.072), (1, 0.038), (2, 0.023), (3, 0.023), (4, 0.006), (5, -0.031), (6, -0.024), (7, 0.008), (8, 0.011), (9, -0.017), (10, -0.034), (11, -0.002), (12, -0.001), (13, 0.027), (14, 0.035), (15, -0.019), (16, 0.006), (17, -0.028), (18, -0.016), (19, 0.026), (20, -0.016), (21, -0.006), (22, 0.003), (23, 0.008), (24, -0.007), (25, -0.005), (26, 0.016), (27, 0.012), (28, -0.021), (29, -0.005), (30, -0.018), (31, -0.017), (32, 0.006), (33, 0.006), (34, -0.027), (35, -0.005), (36, -0.014), (37, -0.0), (38, -0.007), (39, -0.033), (40, 0.011), (41, -0.02), (42, 0.044), (43, 0.005), (44, 0.037), (45, -0.022), (46, 0.045), (47, -0.012), (48, -0.016), (49, -0.003)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.95878476 777 high scalability-2010-02-15-Scaling Ambition at StackOverflow

Introduction: Joel Spolsky and Jeff Atwood are raising VC money for StackOverflow. This is interesting for three reasons: 1) Joel has always seemed like a keep it small and grow organically type of guy, so this is a big step in a different direction. 2) It means they think there's a very big market in the Q&A; space and they mean to capture as much as the market as possible. 3) Most importantly for this blog, Joel gives some good advice on when to stay fresh and local and when it's time to jump for the brass ring, scale up your ambition, and go for VC money. Please see Joel's blog post for the details, but here's when to go VC: There’s a land grab going on. There is a provable concept that’s repeatable. The business itself could benefit from the publicity. The investor will add substantial value to the business. The business can potentially have a big exit or become a large, publically traded company. The founders are not in it for their own personal aggrandizement. Joel t

2 0.70510346 1500 high scalability-2013-08-12-100 Curse Free Lessons from Gordon Ramsay on Building Great Software

Introduction: Gordon Ramsay is a world renowned chef with a surprising amount to say on software development. Well, he says it about cooking and running a restaurant, but it applies to software development too. You may have seen Gordon Ramsay on one of his many TV shows. Hell's Kitchen is a competition between chefs trying to win a dream job: head chef of their own high-end restaurant. On this show Ramsay is judge, jury, and executioner. And he chops off more than a few heads. Kitchen Nightmares is a show where Ramsay is called in by restaurant owners to help turn around their failing restaurants. On this show Ramsay is there to help. If you just watch Hell's Kitchen you will likely conclude Ramsay is one of the devil's own helpers ("ram" is the symbol of the devil and "say" means he speaks for the devil: Ramsay). Ramsay screams, yells, cusses, belittles, and throws tantrums even a 7 year old could learn from. Then he does it all over gain just for spite. In Hell's Kitchen there's no evidence a

3 0.69824123 363 high scalability-2008-08-12-Strategy: Limit The New, Not The Old

Introduction: One of the most popular and effective scalability strategies is to impose limits ( GAE Quotas , Fotolog , Facebook ) as a means of protecting a website against service destroying traffic spikes . Twitter will reportedly limit the number followers to 2,000 in order to thwart follow spam. This may also allow Twitter to make some bank by going freemium and charging for adding more followers. Agree or disagree with Twitter's strategies, the more interesting aspect for me is how do you introduce new policies into an already established ecosystem? One approach is the big bang. Introduce all changes at once and let everyone adjust. If users don't like it they can move on. The hope is, however, most users won't be impacted by the changes and that those who are will understand it's all for the greater good of their beloved service. Casualties are assumed, but the damage will probably be minor. Now in Twitter's case the people with the most followers tend to be o

4 0.68850154 1410 high scalability-2013-02-20-Smart Companies Fail Because they Do Everything Right - Staying Alive to Scale

Introduction: Wired has a wonderful interview  with  Clayton Christensen , author of the tech ninja's bible,  Innovator's Dilemma . Innovation is the name of the game in Silicon Valley and if you want to understand the rules of the game this article is a quick and clear way of learning. Everything is simply explained with compelling examples by the man himself. Just as every empire has fallen, every organization is open to disruption. It's the human condition to become comfortable and discount potential dangers. It takes a great deal of mindfulness to outwit and outlast the human condition. If you want to be the disruptor and avoid being the disruptee, this is good stuff. He also talks about his new book, The Capitalist's Dilemma , which addresses this puzzle: if corporations are doing so well why are individuals doing so bad? If someone can help you see a deep meaningful pattern in life then they haven't brought you a fish, they've taught you how to fish. That's what Christensen does. Here'

5 0.68573153 1012 high scalability-2011-03-28-Aztec Empire Strategy: Use Dual Pipes in Your Aqueduct for High Availability

Introduction: With the  Chapultepec aqueduct , also named the great aqueduct , the Aztecs built a novel uninterruptible water supply for providing fresh water to  Tenochtitlan , their fast growing jewel of a capital city. A section of the aqueduct is still around today:  It's fun to think about how even 600 years ago how it was built with high availability in mind. We find engineers being engineers , no matter the age: It consisted of a twin pipe distribution system made in part of compacted soil and in part of wood for the crossings of the aqueduct over the bridges built to allow the passage of the canoes. It was finished around 1466 AD, and the main purpose was to supply fresh water to Mexico-Tenochtitlan, to mitigate its thirst. The main source for the aqueduct was the spring of Chapultepec and the purpose of the twin pipes was to ease the maintenance of the system, because the water was conveyed through one pipe, and when it got dirty, the water was diverted to the other pipe

6 0.68056387 352 high scalability-2008-07-18-Robert Scoble's Rules for Successfully Scaling Startups

7 0.67968452 1377 high scalability-2012-12-26-Ask HS: What will programming and architecture look like in 2020?

8 0.6788063 747 high scalability-2009-11-26-What I'm Thankful For on Thanksgiving

9 0.67828494 347 high scalability-2008-07-07-Five Ways to Stop Framework Fixation from Crashing Your Scaling Strategy

10 0.67277062 390 high scalability-2008-09-23-Scaling your cookie recipes

11 0.66291249 765 high scalability-2010-01-25-Let's Welcome our Neo-Feudal Overlords

12 0.66250008 1388 high scalability-2013-01-16-What if Cars Were Rented Like We Hire Programmers?

13 0.65140569 1503 high scalability-2013-08-19-What can the Amazing Race to the South Pole Teach us About Startups?

14 0.65119809 790 high scalability-2010-03-09-Applications as Virtual States

15 0.65012407 917 high scalability-2010-10-08-4 Scalability Themes from Surgecon

16 0.6421445 1384 high scalability-2013-01-09-The Story of How Turning Disk Into a Service Lead to a Deluge of Density

17 0.64108229 1492 high scalability-2013-07-17-How do you create a 100th Monkey software development culture?

18 0.6410712 1027 high scalability-2011-04-20-Packet Pushers: How to Build a Low Cost Data Center

19 0.63268507 864 high scalability-2010-07-24-4 New Podcasts for Scalable Summertime Reading

20 0.630831 330 high scalability-2008-05-27-Should Twitter be an All-You-Can-Eat Buffet or a Vending Machine?


similar blogs computed by lda model

lda for this blog:

topicId topicWeight

[(1, 0.096), (2, 0.181), (34, 0.407), (61, 0.074), (79, 0.092), (94, 0.025)]

similar blogs list:

simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle

same-blog 1 0.84239143 777 high scalability-2010-02-15-Scaling Ambition at StackOverflow

Introduction: Joel Spolsky and Jeff Atwood are raising VC money for StackOverflow. This is interesting for three reasons: 1) Joel has always seemed like a keep it small and grow organically type of guy, so this is a big step in a different direction. 2) It means they think there's a very big market in the Q&A; space and they mean to capture as much as the market as possible. 3) Most importantly for this blog, Joel gives some good advice on when to stay fresh and local and when it's time to jump for the brass ring, scale up your ambition, and go for VC money. Please see Joel's blog post for the details, but here's when to go VC: There’s a land grab going on. There is a provable concept that’s repeatable. The business itself could benefit from the publicity. The investor will add substantial value to the business. The business can potentially have a big exit or become a large, publically traded company. The founders are not in it for their own personal aggrandizement. Joel t

2 0.80593026 830 high scalability-2010-05-25-Strategy: Rule of 3 Admins to Save Your Sanity

Introduction: The idea came up in this Hacker News thread , commenting on a 37signals interview, that having three system administrators is the minimum optimal number of admins. Everyone wants to lower their costs by having each admin administer a lot of machines. The problem is when you have fewer than three admins you can never get a break from the constant corrosive pressure of always being on call. When every moment of your life you are dreading the next emergency, it eats at you. Having three admins solves that problem. With three admins you can: Go on a real vacation. The two remaining admins can switch off being on call. Not be on call all the time. A larger shop will naturally have more admins so it's not as big an issue, but at smaller shops trying to minimize head count, carrying three admins (or people in those roles) might be something to consider.

3 0.79733741 557 high scalability-2009-04-06-A picture is realy worth a thousand word, and also a window in time...

Introduction: Photograpic picture to me is window, an address to that specific moment what do your think about that?

4 0.66044879 1092 high scalability-2011-08-04-Jim Starkey is Creating a Brave New World by Rethinking Databases for the Cloud

Introduction: Jim Starkey , founder of NuoDB , in this thread  on the Cloud Computing group, delivers a  masterful post  on why he thinks the relational model is the best overall compromise amongst the different options, why NewSQL can free itself from the limitations of legacy SQL architectures, and how this creates a brave new lock free world.... I'll [Jim Starkey] go into more detail later in the post for those who care, but the executive summary goes like this:  Network latency is relatively high and human attention span is relatively low.  So human facing computer systems have to perform their work in a small number of trips between the client and the database server.  But the human condition leads inexorably to data complexity.  There are really only two strategies to manage this problem. One is to use coarse granularity storage, glombing together related data into a single blob and letting intelligence on the client make sense of it.  The other is storing fine granularity data on the s

5 0.63773292 387 high scalability-2008-09-22-Paper: On Delivering Embarrassingly Distributed Cloud Services

Introduction: How do we scale datacenters? Should we build a few mammoth million machine datacenters or many smaller micro datacenters? Intuitively we usually go with a bigger is better economies of scale type argument, but it may not be so. What works for Walmart may not work for White Box World. Mega datacenters may actually exhibit diseconomies of scale. It may be better to run applications over many distributed micro datacenters instead of one large one. This paper by Ken Church, Albert Greenberg, and James Hamilton, all from Microsoft, takes a look at the different issues and concludes: Putting it all together, the micro model offers a design point with attractive performance, reliability, scale and cost. Given how much the industry is currently investing in the mega model, the industry would do well to consider the micro alternative.     Related Articles   Embarrasingly Distributed Cloud Services by James Hamilton Diseconomies of Scale by James Hamilton. Architecture

6 0.61491996 1594 high scalability-2014-02-12-Paper: Network Stack Specialization for Performance

7 0.59850049 859 high scalability-2010-07-14-DynaTrace's Top 10 Performance Problems taken from Zappos, Monster, Thomson and Co

8 0.5933001 109 high scalability-2007-10-03-Save on a Load Balancer By Using Client Side Load Balancing

9 0.5817818 69 high scalability-2007-08-21-What does the next generation data center look like?

10 0.57345247 114 high scalability-2007-10-07-Product: Wackamole

11 0.57161319 1378 high scalability-2012-12-28-Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For December 28, 2012

12 0.53082693 1557 high scalability-2013-12-02-Evolution of Bazaarvoice’s Architecture to 500M Unique Users Per Month

13 0.52139324 1251 high scalability-2012-05-24-Build your own twitter like real time analytics - a step by step guide

14 0.50048214 392 high scalability-2008-09-24-Building a Scalable Architecture for Web Apps

15 0.49958122 589 high scalability-2009-05-05-Drop ACID and Think About Data

16 0.49911344 920 high scalability-2010-10-15-Troubles with Sharding - What can we learn from the Foursquare Incident?

17 0.49863437 169 high scalability-2007-12-01-many website, one setup, many databases

18 0.49801919 1064 high scalability-2011-06-20-35+ Use Cases for Choosing Your Next NoSQL Database

19 0.49788815 1313 high scalability-2012-08-28-Making Hadoop Run Faster

20 0.49755746 1131 high scalability-2011-10-24-StackExchange Architecture Updates - Running Smoothly, Amazon 4x More Expensive