high_scalability high_scalability-2008 high_scalability-2008-423 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: One particularly interesting EC2 third party provider is GigaSpaces with their XAP platform that provides in memory transactions backed up to a database. The in memory transactions appear to scale linearly across machines thus providing a distributed in-memory datastore that gets backed up to persistent storage.
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 One particularly interesting EC2 third party provider is GigaSpaces with their XAP platform that provides in memory transactions backed up to a database. [sent-1, score-1.983]
2 The in memory transactions appear to scale linearly across machines thus providing a distributed in-memory datastore that gets backed up to persistent storage. [sent-2, score-2.668]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('backed', 0.432), ('xap', 0.335), ('transactions', 0.26), ('linearly', 0.257), ('appear', 0.25), ('datastore', 0.25), ('gigaspaces', 0.235), ('provider', 0.218), ('persistent', 0.209), ('particularly', 0.207), ('thus', 0.187), ('party', 0.185), ('third', 0.178), ('memory', 0.178), ('providing', 0.16), ('gets', 0.146), ('platform', 0.123), ('machines', 0.123), ('provides', 0.113), ('interesting', 0.089), ('across', 0.082), ('storage', 0.075), ('distributed', 0.07), ('scale', 0.064), ('one', 0.041)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0 423 high scalability-2008-10-19-Alternatives to Google App Engine
Introduction: One particularly interesting EC2 third party provider is GigaSpaces with their XAP platform that provides in memory transactions backed up to a database. The in memory transactions appear to scale linearly across machines thus providing a distributed in-memory datastore that gets backed up to persistent storage.
2 0.19842057 613 high scalability-2009-06-01-Data grid comparison: Oracle Coherence vs Gigaspaces XAP
Introduction: A short summary of differences between Oracle Coherence and GigaSpaces XAP.
Introduction: GigaSpaces launched OpenSpaces.org , a community web site for developers who wish to utilize and contribute to the open source OpenSpaces development framework . OpenSpaces extends the Spring Framework for enterprise Java development, and leverages the GigaSpaces eXtreme Application Platform (XAP) for data caching, messaging and as the container for application business logic. It is designed for building highly-available, scale-out applications in distributed environments, such as SOA, cloud computing, grids and commodity servers. OpenSpaces is widely used in a variety of industries, including financial services, telecommunications, manufacturing and retail -- and across the web in e-commerce, Web 2.0 applications such as social networking sites, search and more. OpenSpaces.org already lists more than two dozen projects submitted by the developer community, including GigaSpaces customers, partners and employees. Innovative projects include an instant messag
4 0.1097917 1459 high scalability-2013-05-16-Paper: Warp: Multi-Key Transactions for Key-Value Stores
Introduction: Looks like an interesting take on "a completely asynchronous, low-latency transaction management protocol, in line with the fully distributed NoSQL architecture." Warp: Multi-Key Transactions for Key-Value Stores  overview: Implementing ACID transactions has been a longstanding challenge for NoSQL systems. Because these systems are based on a sharded architecture, transactions necessarily require coordination across multiple servers. Past work in this space has relied either on heavyweight protocols such as Paxos or clock synchronization for this coordination. This paper presents a novel protocol for coordinating distributed transactions with ACID semantics on top of a sharded data store. Called linear transactions, this protocol achieves scalability by distributing the coordination task to only those servers that hold relevant data for each transaction. It achieves high performance by serializing only those transactions whose concurrent execution could potentially yield a vio
5 0.10867834 944 high scalability-2010-11-17-Some Services are More Equal than Others
Introduction: Remember when the iPhone launched? Remember the complaints about the device not maintaining calls well? Was it really the hardware? Or was it the service provider network, overwhelmed by not just the call volume but millions of hyper-customers experimenting with their new toy? Look – a video! Look a video and a call. Hey, I’m on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and streaming audio at the same time I’m making a call! How awesome is that? Meanwhile, there’s an entire army of operators at a service provider’s NOC who are stalking through the data center with scissors because it’s the only way to stop the madness. Service providers, probably better than any other, understand “services”. For longer than the enterprise has been talking about them, service providers have been implementing them. They’ve got their own set of standards and reference architectures and even language to describe them, but in a nutshell that’s what a service provider does: offers services. The proble
6 0.094608016 972 high scalability-2011-01-11-Google Megastore - 3 Billion Writes and 20 Billion Read Transactions Daily
8 0.09187898 538 high scalability-2009-03-16-Are Cloud Based Memory Architectures the Next Big Thing?
10 0.088280201 623 high scalability-2009-06-10-Dealing with multi-partition transactions in a distributed KV solution
11 0.085846588 395 high scalability-2008-09-25-Is your cloud as scalable as you think it is?
12 0.084962837 1151 high scalability-2011-12-05-Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For December 5, 2011
13 0.083829708 1386 high scalability-2013-01-14-MongoDB and GridFS for Inter and Intra Datacenter Data Replication
14 0.077180363 1160 high scalability-2011-12-21-In Memory Data Grid Technologies
15 0.074789047 765 high scalability-2010-01-25-Let's Welcome our Neo-Feudal Overlords
16 0.07441169 1629 high scalability-2014-04-10-Paper: Scalable Atomic Visibility with RAMP Transactions - Scale Linearly to 100 Servers
17 0.072804123 180 high scalability-2007-12-10-Scalability Developer Competition Launched by GigaSpaces - $25k in prizes
18 0.068790905 709 high scalability-2009-09-19-Space Based Programming in .NET
19 0.068383738 696 high scalability-2009-09-07-Product: Infinispan - Open Source Data Grid
20 0.068111964 92 high scalability-2007-09-15-The Role of Memory within Web 2.0 Architectures and Deployments
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.083), (1, 0.022), (2, 0.017), (3, 0.023), (4, -0.044), (5, 0.056), (6, 0.037), (7, -0.021), (8, -0.038), (9, 0.028), (10, 0.039), (11, 0.003), (12, -0.019), (13, 0.026), (14, -0.008), (15, -0.009), (16, -0.014), (17, -0.047), (18, 0.024), (19, -0.024), (20, -0.001), (21, 0.031), (22, 0.058), (23, 0.017), (24, -0.033), (25, -0.03), (26, -0.024), (27, -0.062), (28, -0.011), (29, -0.01), (30, 0.036), (31, -0.047), (32, -0.014), (33, -0.064), (34, -0.021), (35, -0.051), (36, -0.029), (37, -0.019), (38, -0.01), (39, 0.035), (40, 0.027), (41, -0.014), (42, 0.052), (43, -0.008), (44, 0.003), (45, 0.025), (46, 0.053), (47, 0.01), (48, 0.024), (49, -0.039)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.96191877 423 high scalability-2008-10-19-Alternatives to Google App Engine
Introduction: One particularly interesting EC2 third party provider is GigaSpaces with their XAP platform that provides in memory transactions backed up to a database. The in memory transactions appear to scale linearly across machines thus providing a distributed in-memory datastore that gets backed up to persistent storage.
2 0.70238143 613 high scalability-2009-06-01-Data grid comparison: Oracle Coherence vs Gigaspaces XAP
Introduction: A short summary of differences between Oracle Coherence and GigaSpaces XAP.
3 0.65627819 1221 high scalability-2012-04-03-Hazelcast 2.0: Big Data In-Memory
Introduction: As it is said in the recent article "Google: Taming the Long Latency Tail - When More Machines Equals Worse Results" , latency variability has greater impact in larger scale clusters where a typical request is composed of multiple distributed/parallel requests. The overall response time dramatically decreases if latency of each request is not consistent and low. In dynamically scalable partitioned storage systems, whether it is a NoSQL database, filesystem or in-memory data grid, changes in the cluster (adding or removing a node) can lead to big data moves in the network to re-balance the cluster. Re-balancing will be needed for both primary and backup data on those nodes. If a node crashes for example, dead node’s data has to be re-owned (become primary) by other node(s) and also its backup has to be taken immediately to be fail-safe again. Shuffling MBs of data around has a negative effect in the cluster as it consumes your valuable resources such as network, CPU and RAM. It mig
4 0.63838619 696 high scalability-2009-09-07-Product: Infinispan - Open Source Data Grid
Introduction: Infinispan is a highly scalable, open source licensed data grid platform in the style of GigaSpaces and Oracle Coherence . From their website: The purpose of Infinispan is to expose a data structure that is highly concurrent, designed ground-up to make the most of modern multi-processor/multi-core architectures while at the same time providing distributed cache capabilities. At its core Infinispan exposes a JSR-107 (JCACHE) compatible Cache interface (which in turn extends java.util.Map). It is also optionally is backed by a peer-to-peer network architecture to distribute state efficiently around a data grid. Offering high availability via making replicas of state across a network as well as optionally persisting state to configurable cache stores, Infinispan offers enterprise features such as efficient eviction algorithms to control memory usage as well as JTA compatibility. In addition to the peer-to-peer architecture of Infinispan, on the roadmap is the ability to run f
5 0.63479203 597 high scalability-2009-05-12-GemStone Unveils GemFire Enterprise 6.0
Introduction: GemFire Enterprise is in-memory distributed data management platform that pools memory (and CPU, network and optionally local disk) across multiple processes to manage application objects and behavior. With the 6.0 release, GemFire has reached a stage of maturity in its evolution. GemStone touts this version as the true 'best of breed' distributed caching technology, solving scalability issues in all industries.
6 0.61872792 1016 high scalability-2011-04-04-Scaling Social Ecommerce Architecture Case study
7 0.617805 1118 high scalability-2011-09-19-Big Iron Returns with BigMemory
9 0.60641766 1160 high scalability-2011-12-21-In Memory Data Grid Technologies
10 0.60445184 364 high scalability-2008-08-14-Product: Terracotta - Open Source Network-Attached Memory
11 0.57492924 633 high scalability-2009-06-19-GemFire 6.0: New innovations in data management
12 0.56517494 212 high scalability-2008-01-14-OpenSpaces.org community site launched - framework for building scale-out applications
13 0.5564754 726 high scalability-2009-10-22-Paper: The Case for RAMClouds: Scalable High-Performance Storage Entirely in DRAM
14 0.54555941 709 high scalability-2009-09-19-Space Based Programming in .NET
15 0.54428077 1544 high scalability-2013-11-07-Paper: Tempest: Scalable Time-Critical Web Services Platform
16 0.54427207 538 high scalability-2009-03-16-Are Cloud Based Memory Architectures the Next Big Thing?
17 0.54053813 1582 high scalability-2014-01-20-8 Ways Stardog Made its Database Insanely Scalable
18 0.53901678 979 high scalability-2011-01-27-Comet - An Example of the New Key-Code Databases
19 0.52776343 577 high scalability-2009-04-22-Gear6 Web cache - the hardware solution for working with Memcache
topicId topicWeight
[(1, 0.133), (2, 0.215), (26, 0.076), (40, 0.048), (61, 0.261), (74, 0.049), (79, 0.048)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.95518267 1411 high scalability-2013-02-22-Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For February 22, 2013
Introduction: Hey, it's HighScalability time: Quotable Quotes: @p337er : I have committed some truly horrendous crimes against scalability today. @ErrataRob : doubling performance doesn't double scalability. @rsingel : In 2008 when Yahoo.com linked out, I had a Wired story get 1M visitors in an hour from their homepage. @philiph : Lets solve this scalability problem with a queuing system @jaykreps : Transferring data across data centers? Read this page and go tune your TCP buffer sizes... @gwestr : In which the node community showers schadenfreude upon the rails community for "scalability is not my problem" architectures @pbailis : Makes sense, though I think there's a tradeoff re: coordination and scalability (always homogeneous vs dynamically heterogenous) @pembleton : To summarize Yoav's philosophy: we started as quick as we can and then we accelerated #operationgrandma in #reversim @surfichris : “We chose Heroku because we be
2 0.9527896 150 high scalability-2007-11-12-Slashdot Architecture - How the Old Man of the Internet Learned to Scale
Introduction: Slashdot effect : overwhelming unprepared sites with an avalanche of reader's clicks after being mentioned on Slashdot. Sure, we now have the "Digg effect" and other hot new stars, but Slashdot was the original. And like many stars from generations past, Slashdot plays the elder statesman's role with with class, dignity, and restraint. Yet with millions and millions of users Slashdot is still box office gold and more than keeps up with the young'ins. And with age comes the wisdom of learning how to handle all those users. Just how does Slashdot scale and what can you learn by going old school? Site: http://slashdot.org Information Sources Slashdot's Setup, Part 1- Hardware Slashdot's Setup, Part 2- Software History of Slashdot Part 3- Going Corporate The History of Slashdot Part 4 - Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow The Platform MySQL Linux (CentOS/RHEL) Pound Apache Perl Memcached LVS The Stats Started building the system in 1999
3 0.95177871 501 high scalability-2009-01-25-Where do I start?
Introduction: Hello, I'm developing a product I thought of. As a part of it, I'm trying to figure out the best architecture for the product. It's a server application, what is supposed to serve A LOT of users at a time. Think of an IM application, but not web style, more like ICQ\MSN applications... With web orientation. I've read all about Meebo, Facebook Chat & etc architectures. But I'm still not sure where to start on ICQ style (this is the first phase before I go totally web). Can you direct me to some information on load balancing 10 million users? ;-) I just don't know here to begin... Thanks, Amit
4 0.94949907 1184 high scalability-2012-01-31-Performance in the Cloud: Business Jitter is Bad
Introduction: One of the benefits of web applications is that they are generally transported via TCP, which is a connection-oriented protocol designed to assure delivery. TCP has a variety of native mechanisms through which delivery issues can be addressed – from window sizes to selective acks to idle time specification to ramp up parameters. All these technical knobs and buttons serve as a way for operators and administrators to tweak the protocol, often at run time, to ensure the exchange of requests and responses upon which web applications rely. This is unlike UDP, which is more of a “fire and forget” protocol in which the server doesn’t really care if you receive the data or not. Now, voice and streaming video and audio over the web has always leveraged UDP and thus it has always been highly sensitive to jitter. Jitter is, without getting into layer one (physical) jargon, an undesirable delay in the otherwise consistent delivery of packets. It causes the delay of and sometimes
same-blog 5 0.94548035 423 high scalability-2008-10-19-Alternatives to Google App Engine
Introduction: One particularly interesting EC2 third party provider is GigaSpaces with their XAP platform that provides in memory transactions backed up to a database. The in memory transactions appear to scale linearly across machines thus providing a distributed in-memory datastore that gets backed up to persistent storage.
6 0.94393235 1287 high scalability-2012-07-20-Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For July 20, 2012
7 0.93924874 322 high scalability-2008-05-19-Conference: Infoscale 2008 in Italy (June 4-6)
8 0.933882 675 high scalability-2009-08-08-1dbase vs. many and cloud hosting vs. dedicated server(s)?
11 0.93153125 337 high scalability-2008-05-31-memcached and Storage of Friend list
12 0.93110085 1031 high scalability-2011-04-28-PaaS on OpenStack - Run Applications on Any Cloud, Any Time Using Any Thing
13 0.93071055 1461 high scalability-2013-05-20-The Tumblr Architecture Yahoo Bought for a Cool Billion Dollars
14 0.93036431 173 high scalability-2007-12-05-Easier Production Releases
15 0.92947531 626 high scalability-2009-06-10-Paper: Graph Databases and the Future of Large-Scale Knowledge Management
16 0.92741781 930 high scalability-2010-10-28-NoSQL Took Away the Relational Model and Gave Nothing Back
17 0.92626846 1089 high scalability-2011-07-29-Stuff The Internet Says On Scalability For July 29, 2011
18 0.9258638 685 high scalability-2009-08-20-Dependency Injection and AOP frameworks for .NET
20 0.9243381 332 high scalability-2008-05-28-Job queue and search engine