andrew_gelman_stats andrew_gelman_stats-2012 andrew_gelman_stats-2012-1442 knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: html
Introduction: Dan Kahan writes on what seems to be the topic of the week : In reflecting on Lehrer , I [Kahan] have to wonder why the sanction is so much more severe — basically career “death penalty” subject to parole [I think he means "life imprisonment" --- ed.], I suppose, if he manages decades of “good behavior” — for this science journalist when scholars who stick plagiarized material in their “popular science” writing don’t even get slap on wrist — more like shrug of the shoulders. I do think the behavior is comparable; if anything, it’s probably “less wrong” to make up innocuous filler quotes (the Dylan one is, for sure), then to stick paragraphs of someone else’s writing into a book. But the cause is the same: laziness. (The plagarism I’m talking about is not the sort done by Wegman; its sort done by scholars who use factory production techniques to write popular press books — teams of research assistants who write memos, which the “author” then knits together & passes off as learne
sentIndex sentText sentNum sentScore
1 ], I suppose, if he manages decades of “good behavior” — for this science journalist when scholars who stick plagiarized material in their “popular science” writing don’t even get slap on wrist — more like shrug of the shoulders. [sent-2, score-0.344]
2 My sense is that the sanctions should be brought into line by adjusted the penalty substantially upward for the “scholars” & likely downward for guy like Lehrer (who actually is a talented guy; so much for “unity of the virtues”). [sent-7, score-0.24]
3 I’m amused that Jonah Lehrer shares a last name with a man who wrote an entire song about plagiarism (see above clip). [sent-9, score-0.204]
4 I think the decisions we’ve seen involving misconduct make some sense if you consider the options and costs involved for the decision makers. [sent-14, score-0.171]
5 Similarly, nobody wants the embarrassment of paying $20K or whatever to hear the stylings of a fabricator, not is the New Yorker going to sell a lot of copies to people who have a burning desire to learn the latest in faked and recycled science. [sent-20, score-0.182]
6 I don’t know, but I feel that I recently got some insight into legal plagiarism after recently working as an expert witness in a court case (yup, I did it for the money). [sent-30, score-0.289]
7 I did some work and wrote it up, then the people at the law firm rewrote it to be in the standard format for an expert witness report. [sent-31, score-0.206]
8 I asked the lawyers if this was OK, and they said Yes, my name on it means that I stand behind it, not that I wrote every word. [sent-34, score-0.206]
9 Anyway, I assume that lawyers such as Tribe and Ayres have lots of experience putting their names on reports that they have not written, and this is standard practice. [sent-36, score-0.206]
10 And, to the extent that a lot of organizations are run by lawyers (or run things by lawyers), that might explain a general level of tolerance toward such offenses, especially in law schools. [sent-42, score-0.267]
11 Consider the perpetrator a much bigger scandal than those listed above, Jerry Sandusky, the football coach who molested kids and then was protected by his employers. [sent-44, score-0.208]
12 Much of the discussion of this case focused on the oversized influence of the football program at Penn State. [sent-45, score-0.186]
13 I suspect what’s going on is that, once these administrators realize for real that something is going on, they switch to legal-paranoid mode and are afraid of doing anything over the line in case the perp sues them. [sent-53, score-0.146]
14 Hence Sandusky’s and Paterno’s monster severance packages and various funny business I’ve seen elsewhere. [sent-55, score-0.219]
15 And, after all, Fischer and Wegman are pretty old, so why rock the boat, why not wait till they retire (perhaps with juicy severance packages to get rid of them faster)? [sent-56, score-0.42]
16 You have a bunch of organizations that have the alternative of (a) paying him real money, or (b) costlessly getting rid of him. [sent-58, score-0.195]
17 The administrators must feel that to get rid of these guys would be highly costly, either in the form of an expensive shut-up-and-bother-someone-else severance package of the Sandusky variety, or in the form of lawsuits, bad publicity, etc. [sent-62, score-0.518]
18 Laurence Tribe’s plagiarism might be a bigger deal if anyone anywhere cared about Laurence Tribe. [sent-82, score-0.143]
19 A science writer who makes stuff up is pretty bad, but I guess all these publications need copy, and motivational speaker series need motivational speakers. [sent-83, score-0.362]
20 If people want to pay to hear him speak it will be to hear what he has to say, not to hear from the boy wonder New Yorker writer. [sent-85, score-0.33]
wordName wordTfidf (topN-words)
[('lehrer', 0.305), ('wegman', 0.247), ('severance', 0.159), ('sandusky', 0.145), ('lawyers', 0.145), ('jonah', 0.145), ('plagiarism', 0.143), ('rid', 0.133), ('football', 0.124), ('ayres', 0.114), ('laurence', 0.114), ('tribe', 0.112), ('hear', 0.11), ('speaker', 0.105), ('fischer', 0.101), ('memos', 0.097), ('sanctions', 0.097), ('motivational', 0.091), ('ed', 0.09), ('consider', 0.089), ('protected', 0.084), ('witness', 0.084), ('paterno', 0.084), ('administrators', 0.084), ('misconduct', 0.082), ('factory', 0.08), ('scholars', 0.08), ('guy', 0.078), ('dan', 0.077), ('writer', 0.075), ('guys', 0.074), ('pulled', 0.072), ('wants', 0.072), ('penn', 0.071), ('publicity', 0.069), ('plagiarized', 0.069), ('get', 0.068), ('fire', 0.066), ('material', 0.066), ('penalty', 0.065), ('yorker', 0.064), ('kahan', 0.063), ('case', 0.062), ('behavior', 0.062), ('organizations', 0.062), ('stick', 0.061), ('standard', 0.061), ('wrote', 0.061), ('toward', 0.06), ('packages', 0.06)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 1.0000004 1442 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-03-Double standard? Plagiarizing journos get slammed, plagiarizing profs just shrug it off
Introduction: Dan Kahan writes on what seems to be the topic of the week : In reflecting on Lehrer , I [Kahan] have to wonder why the sanction is so much more severe — basically career “death penalty” subject to parole [I think he means "life imprisonment" --- ed.], I suppose, if he manages decades of “good behavior” — for this science journalist when scholars who stick plagiarized material in their “popular science” writing don’t even get slap on wrist — more like shrug of the shoulders. I do think the behavior is comparable; if anything, it’s probably “less wrong” to make up innocuous filler quotes (the Dylan one is, for sure), then to stick paragraphs of someone else’s writing into a book. But the cause is the same: laziness. (The plagarism I’m talking about is not the sort done by Wegman; its sort done by scholars who use factory production techniques to write popular press books — teams of research assistants who write memos, which the “author” then knits together & passes off as learne
2 0.24865009 728 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-24-A (not quite) grand unified theory of plagiarism, as applied to the Wegman case
Introduction: A common reason for plagiarism is laziness: you want credit for doing something but you don’t really feel like doing it–maybe you’d rather go fishing, or bowling, or blogging, or whatever, so you just steal it, or you hire someone to steal it for you. Interestingly enough, we see that in many defenses of plagiarism allegations. A common response is: I was sloppy in dealing with my notes, or I let my research assistant (who, incidentally, wasn’t credited in the final version) copy things for me and the research assistant got sloppy. The common theme: The person wanted the credit without doing the work. As I wrote last year, I like to think that directness and openness is a virtue in scientific writing. For example, clearly citing the works we draw from, even when such citing of secondary sources might make us appear less erudite. But I can see how some scholars might feel a pressure to cover their traces. Wegman Which brings us to Ed Wegman, whose defense of plagiari
Introduction: As regular readers of this blog are aware, I am fascinated by academic and scientific cheating and the excuses people give for it. Bruno Frey and colleagues published a single article (with only minor variants) in five different major journals, and these articles did not cite each other. And there have been several other cases of his self-plagiarism (see this review from Olaf Storbeck). I do not mind the general practice of repeating oneself for different audiences—in the social sciences, we call this Arrow’s Theorem —but in this case Frey seems to have gone a bit too far. Blogger Economic Logic has looked into this and concluded that this sort of common practice is standard in “the context of the German(-speaking) academic environment,” and what sets Frey apart is not his self-plagiarism or even his brazenness but rather his practice of doing it in high-visibility journals. Economic Logic writes that “[Frey's] contribution is pedagogical, he found a good and interesting
4 0.2220194 751 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-08-Another Wegman plagiarism
Introduction: At the time of our last discussion , Edward Wegman, a statistics professor who has also worked for government research agencies, had been involved in three cases of plagiarism: a report for the U.S. Congress on climate models, a paper on social networks, a paper on color graphics. Each of the plagiarism stories was slightly different: the congressional report involved the distorted copying of research by a scientist (Raymond Bradley) whose conclusions Wegman disagreed with, the social networks paper included copied material in its background section, and the color graphics paper included various bits and pieces by others that had been used in old lecture notes. Since then, blogger Deep Climate has uncovered another plagiarized article by Wegman, this time an article in a 2005 volume on data mining and data visualization. Deep Climate writes, “certain sections of Statistical Data Mining rely heavily on lightly edited portions on lectures from Wegman’s statistical data mining c
5 0.18565747 2057 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-10-Chris Chabris is irritated by Malcolm Gladwell
Introduction: Christopher Chabris reviewed the new book by Malcolm Gladwell: One thing “David and Goliath” shows is that Mr. Gladwell has not changed his own strategy, despite serious criticism of his prior work. What he presents are mostly just intriguing possibilities and musings about human behavior, but what his publisher sells them as, and what his readers may incorrectly take them for, are lawful, causal rules that explain how the world really works. Mr. Gladwell should acknowledge when he is speculating or working with thin evidentiary soup. Yet far from abandoning his hand or even standing pat, Mr. Gladwell has doubled down. This will surely bring more success to a Goliath of nonfiction writing, but not to his readers. Afterward he blogged some further thoughts about the popular popular science writer. Good stuff . Chabris has a thoughtful explanation of why the “Gladwell is just an entertainer” alibi doesn’t work for him (Chabris). Some of his discussion reminds me of my articl
6 0.18500023 1588 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-23-No one knows what it’s like to be the bad man
7 0.17296463 766 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-14-Last Wegman post (for now)
8 0.17135479 1867 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-22-To Throw Away Data: Plagiarism as a Statistical Crime
9 0.16725774 1266 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-16-Another day, another plagiarist
10 0.16220213 2234 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-05-Plagiarism, Arizona style
11 0.15725681 1236 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-29-Resolution of Diederik Stapel case
12 0.15550959 1484 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-05-Two exciting movie ideas: “Second Chance U” and “The New Dirty Dozen”
13 0.1519482 466 andrew gelman stats-2010-12-13-“The truth wears off: Is there something wrong with the scientific method?”
14 0.14983232 1568 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-07-That last satisfaction at the end of the career
15 0.14942524 2021 andrew gelman stats-2013-09-13-Swiss Jonah Lehrer
16 0.13982187 902 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-12-The importance of style in academic writing
17 0.1334516 1446 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-06-“And will pardon Paul Claudel, Pardons him for writing well”
18 0.13263759 400 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-08-Poli sci plagiarism update, and a note about the benefits of not caring
19 0.13263431 1448 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-07-Scientific fraud, double standards and institutions protecting themselves
20 0.12807339 2245 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-12-More on publishing in journals
topicId topicWeight
[(0, 0.245), (1, -0.135), (2, -0.052), (3, 0.024), (4, -0.027), (5, -0.01), (6, 0.123), (7, -0.028), (8, 0.044), (9, 0.012), (10, 0.006), (11, -0.036), (12, -0.017), (13, 0.006), (14, 0.001), (15, -0.037), (16, 0.035), (17, -0.021), (18, 0.11), (19, -0.056), (20, -0.024), (21, -0.028), (22, -0.004), (23, 0.019), (24, 0.013), (25, -0.063), (26, -0.028), (27, -0.015), (28, -0.091), (29, 0.02), (30, 0.097), (31, 0.068), (32, -0.009), (33, 0.102), (34, 0.06), (35, 0.048), (36, -0.051), (37, -0.128), (38, 0.033), (39, 0.036), (40, -0.045), (41, -0.008), (42, -0.014), (43, -0.025), (44, -0.003), (45, -0.002), (46, 0.025), (47, 0.019), (48, 0.011), (49, -0.057)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
1 0.94630051 1568 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-07-That last satisfaction at the end of the career
Introduction: I just finished reading an amusing but somewhat disturbing article by Mark Singer, a reporter for the New Yorker who follows in that magazine’s tradition of writing about amiable frauds. (For those who are keeping score at home, Singer employs a McKelway-style relaxed tolerance rather than Liebling-style pyrotechnics.) Singer’s topic was a midwestern dentist named Kip Litton who fradulently invented a side career for himself as a sub-3-hour marathoner. What was amazing was not so much that Litton lied about his accomplishments but, rather, the huge efforts that he undertook to support these lies. He went to faraway cities to not run marathons. He fabricated multiple personas on running message boards. He even invented an entire marathon and made up a list of participants. This got me thinking about Ed Wegman (sorry!), the statistician who got tangled in a series of plagiarism scandals . As with Litton, once Wegman was caught once, energetic people looked at the records and
same-blog 2 0.93641639 1442 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-03-Double standard? Plagiarizing journos get slammed, plagiarizing profs just shrug it off
Introduction: Dan Kahan writes on what seems to be the topic of the week : In reflecting on Lehrer , I [Kahan] have to wonder why the sanction is so much more severe — basically career “death penalty” subject to parole [I think he means "life imprisonment" --- ed.], I suppose, if he manages decades of “good behavior” — for this science journalist when scholars who stick plagiarized material in their “popular science” writing don’t even get slap on wrist — more like shrug of the shoulders. I do think the behavior is comparable; if anything, it’s probably “less wrong” to make up innocuous filler quotes (the Dylan one is, for sure), then to stick paragraphs of someone else’s writing into a book. But the cause is the same: laziness. (The plagarism I’m talking about is not the sort done by Wegman; its sort done by scholars who use factory production techniques to write popular press books — teams of research assistants who write memos, which the “author” then knits together & passes off as learne
3 0.93206596 400 andrew gelman stats-2010-11-08-Poli sci plagiarism update, and a note about the benefits of not caring
Introduction: A recent story about academic plagiarism spurred me to some more general thoughts about the intellectual benefits of not giving a damn. I’ll briefly summarize the plagiarism story and then get to my larger point. Copying big blocks of text from others’ writings without attribution Last month I linked to the story of Frank Fischer, an elderly professor of political science who was caught copying big blocks of text (with minor modifications) from others’ writings without attribution. Apparently there’s some dispute about whether this constitutes plagiarism. On one hand, Harvard’s policy is that “in academic writing, it is considered plagiarism to draw any idea or any language from someone else without adequately crediting that source in your paper.” On the other hand, several of Fischer’s colleagues defend him by saying, “Mr. Fischer sometimes used the words of other authors. . . ” They also write: The essence of plagiarism is passing off someone else’s work as
4 0.92584544 1236 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-29-Resolution of Diederik Stapel case
Introduction: A correspondent writes: A brief update on the Stapel scandal . It seems that the Dutch universities involved were really determined to get to the bottom of this. A first part of the outcomes of the investigations are online (in English). Several “commissions” or “committees” (I guess no proper English but this is the way scandals are sorted out in Dutch politics too) were established to investigate the matter. The first commission to report is the commissie Levelt: https://www.commissielevelt.nl/ The most interesting part is this I guess: https://www.commissielevelt.nl/levelt-committee/fraud-determined/ This concerns only the articles investigated by that commission. The others (Noort and Drenth) are expected to report in the coming months. I [the correspondent] feel sorry for Stapel, but the amount of fraud is sizeable. I like the way the universities handle this—especially that they are fairly transparent. Interesting. This all seems like overkill given how obvio
5 0.91125417 766 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-14-Last Wegman post (for now)
Introduction: John Mashey points me to a news article by Eli Kintisch with the following wonderful quote: Will Happer, a physicist at Princeton University who questions the consensus view on climate, thinks Mashey is a destructive force who uses “totalitarian tactics”–publishing damaging documents online, without peer review–to carry out personal vendettas. I’ve never thought of uploading files as “totalitarian” but maybe they do things differently at Princeton. I actually think of totalitarians as acting secretly–denunciations without evidence, midnight arrests, trials in undisclosed locations, and so forth. Mashey’s practice of putting everything out in the open seems to me the opposite of totalitarian. The article also reports that Edward Wegman’s lawyer said that Wegman “has never engaged in plagiarism.” If I were the lawyer, I’d be pretty mad at Wegman at this point. I can just imagine the conversation: Lawyer: You never told me about that 2005 paper where you stole from Bria
6 0.88478893 728 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-24-A (not quite) grand unified theory of plagiarism, as applied to the Wegman case
7 0.86870509 1266 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-16-Another day, another plagiarist
8 0.86234421 1324 andrew gelman stats-2012-05-16-Wikipedia author confronts Ed Wegman
9 0.8466208 751 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-08-Another Wegman plagiarism
10 0.8391223 2234 andrew gelman stats-2014-03-05-Plagiarism, Arizona style
11 0.83759928 2334 andrew gelman stats-2014-05-14-“The subtle funk of just a little poultry offal”
12 0.83529037 1210 andrew gelman stats-2012-03-12-Plagiarists are in the habit of lying
13 0.82844388 722 andrew gelman stats-2011-05-20-Why no Wegmania?
14 0.81847328 901 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-12-Some thoughts on academic cheating, inspired by Frey, Wegman, Fischer, Hauser, Stapel
15 0.81710613 1588 andrew gelman stats-2012-11-23-No one knows what it’s like to be the bad man
17 0.80577087 197 andrew gelman stats-2010-08-10-The last great essayist?
18 0.79808062 1867 andrew gelman stats-2013-05-22-To Throw Away Data: Plagiarism as a Statistical Crime
19 0.77545559 1484 andrew gelman stats-2012-09-05-Two exciting movie ideas: “Second Chance U” and “The New Dirty Dozen”
topicId topicWeight
[(15, 0.016), (16, 0.049), (21, 0.022), (22, 0.013), (24, 0.116), (28, 0.017), (29, 0.019), (30, 0.011), (36, 0.014), (44, 0.012), (45, 0.034), (53, 0.016), (55, 0.02), (57, 0.015), (59, 0.029), (63, 0.015), (65, 0.015), (76, 0.019), (79, 0.014), (86, 0.05), (88, 0.014), (89, 0.011), (96, 0.02), (98, 0.018), (99, 0.256)]
simIndex simValue blogId blogTitle
same-blog 1 0.97329634 1442 andrew gelman stats-2012-08-03-Double standard? Plagiarizing journos get slammed, plagiarizing profs just shrug it off
Introduction: Dan Kahan writes on what seems to be the topic of the week : In reflecting on Lehrer , I [Kahan] have to wonder why the sanction is so much more severe — basically career “death penalty” subject to parole [I think he means "life imprisonment" --- ed.], I suppose, if he manages decades of “good behavior” — for this science journalist when scholars who stick plagiarized material in their “popular science” writing don’t even get slap on wrist — more like shrug of the shoulders. I do think the behavior is comparable; if anything, it’s probably “less wrong” to make up innocuous filler quotes (the Dylan one is, for sure), then to stick paragraphs of someone else’s writing into a book. But the cause is the same: laziness. (The plagarism I’m talking about is not the sort done by Wegman; its sort done by scholars who use factory production techniques to write popular press books — teams of research assistants who write memos, which the “author” then knits together & passes off as learne
2 0.96878761 1266 andrew gelman stats-2012-04-16-Another day, another plagiarist
Introduction: This one isn’t actually new, but it’s new to me. It involves University of Michigan business school professor Karl Weick. Here’s the relevant paragraph of Weick’s Wikipedia entry (as of 13 Apr 2012): In several published articles, Weick related a story that originally appeared in a poem by Miroslav Holub that was published in the Times Literary Supplement. Weick plagiarized Holub in that he republished the poem (with some minor differences, including removing line breaks and making small changes in a few words) without quotation or attribution. Some of Weick’s articles included the material with no reference to Holub; others referred to Holub but without indicating that Weick had essentially done a direct copy of Holub’s writing. The plagiarism was detailed in an article by Thomas Basbøll and Henrik Graham. [5] In a response, Weick disputed the claim of plagiarism, writing, “By the time I began to see the Alps story as an example of cognition in the path of the action, I had lo
3 0.96807873 777 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-23-Combining survey data obtained using different modes of sampling
Introduction: I’m involved (with Irv Garfinkel and others) in a planned survey of New York City residents. It’s hard to reach people in the city–not everyone will answer their mail or phone, and you can’t send an interviewer door-to-door in a locked apartment building. (I think it violates IRB to have a plan of pushing all the buzzers by the entrance and hoping someone will let you in.) So the plan is to use multiple modes, including phone, in person household, random street intercepts and mail. The question then is how to combine these samples. My suggested approach is to divide the population into poststrata based on various factors (age, ethnicity, family type, housing type, etc), then to pool responses within each poststratum, then to runs some regressions including postratsta and also indicators for mode, to understand how respondents from different modes differ, after controlling for the demographic/geographic adjustments. Maybe this has already been done and written up somewhere? P.
4 0.96614707 811 andrew gelman stats-2011-07-20-Kind of Bayesian
Introduction: Astrophysicist Andrew Jaffe pointed me to this and discussion of my philosophy of statistics (which is, in turn, my rational reconstruction of the statistical practice of Bayesians such as Rubin and Jaynes). Jaffe’s summary is fair enough and I only disagree in a few points: 1. Jaffe writes: Subjective probability, at least the way it is actually used by practicing scientists, is a sort of “as-if” subjectivity — how would an agent reason if her beliefs were reflected in a certain set of probability distributions? This is why when I discuss probability I try to make the pedantic point that all probabilities are conditional, at least on some background prior information or context. I agree, and my problem with the usual procedures used for Bayesian model comparison and Bayesian model averaging is not that these approaches are subjective but that the particular models being considered don’t make sense. I’m thinking of the sorts of models that say the truth is either A or
5 0.96612006 288 andrew gelman stats-2010-09-21-Discussion of the paper by Girolami and Calderhead on Bayesian computation
Introduction: Here’s my discussion of this article for the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: I will comment on this paper in my role as applied statistician and consumer of Bayesian computation. In the last few years, my colleagues and I have felt the need to fit predictive survey responses given multiple discrete predictors, for example estimating voting given ethnicity and income within each of the fifty states, or estimating public opinion about gay marriage given age, sex, ethnicity, education, and state. We would like to be able to fit such models with ten or more predictors–for example, religion, religious attendance, marital status, and urban/rural/suburban residence in addition to the factors mentioned above. There are (at least) three reasons for fitting a model with many predictive factors and potentially a huge number of interactions among them: 1. Deep interactions can be of substantive interest. For example, Gelman et al. (2009) discuss the importance of interaction
6 0.96523947 324 andrew gelman stats-2010-10-07-Contest for developing an R package recommendation system
7 0.96463913 2058 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-11-Gladwell and Chabris, David and Goliath, and science writing as stone soup
8 0.96412623 2057 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-10-Chris Chabris is irritated by Malcolm Gladwell
9 0.96392512 1529 andrew gelman stats-2012-10-11-Bayesian brains?
10 0.96284378 35 andrew gelman stats-2010-05-16-Another update on the spam email study
11 0.96250689 2055 andrew gelman stats-2013-10-08-A Bayesian approach for peer-review panels? and a speculation about Bruno Frey
12 0.96225095 1117 andrew gelman stats-2012-01-13-What are the important issues in ethics and statistics? I’m looking for your input!
13 0.96224976 2161 andrew gelman stats-2014-01-07-My recent debugging experience
14 0.9618417 594 andrew gelman stats-2011-02-28-Behavioral economics doesn’t seem to have much to say about marriage
16 0.96178985 1981 andrew gelman stats-2013-08-14-The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making
17 0.96152258 1403 andrew gelman stats-2012-07-02-Moving beyond hopeless graphics
18 0.9614467 2223 andrew gelman stats-2014-02-24-“Edlin’s rule” for routinely scaling down published estimates
19 0.96122861 781 andrew gelman stats-2011-06-28-The holes in my philosophy of Bayesian data analysis
20 0.96114349 888 andrew gelman stats-2011-09-03-A psychology researcher asks: Is Anova dead?