nips nips2010 nips2010-107 nips2010-107-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

107 nips-2010-Global seismic monitoring as probabilistic inference


Source: pdf

Author: Nimar Arora, Stuart Russell, Paul Kidwell, Erik B. Sudderth

Abstract: The International Monitoring System (IMS) is a global network of sensors whose purpose is to identify potential violations of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT), primarily through detection and localization of seismic events. We report on the first stage of a project to improve on the current automated software system with a Bayesian inference system that computes the most likely global event history given the record of local sensor data. The new system, VISA (Vertically Integrated Seismological Analysis), is based on empirically calibrated, generative models of event occurrence, signal propagation, and signal detection. VISA exhibits significantly improved precision and recall compared to the current operational system and is able to detect events that are missed even by the human analysts who post-process the IMS output. 1


reference text

[1] Y. Bar-Shalom and T.E. Fortmann. Tracking and Data Association. Academic Press, 1988.

[2] P. M. Shearer. Improving local earthquake location using the L1 norm and waveform cross correlation: Application to the Whittier Narrows, California, aftershock sequence. J. Geophys. Res., 102:8269 – 8283, 1997.

[3] F. Waldhauser and W. L. Ellsworth. A double-difference earthquake location algorithm: method and application to the Northern Hayward Fault, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90:1353 – 1368, 2000. 8

[4] J. Pujol. Earthquake location tutorial: graphical approach and approximate epicentral location techniques. Seis. Res. Letter, 75:63 – 74, 2004.

[5] Stephen C. Myers, Gardar Johannesson, and William Hanley. A Bayesian hierarchical method for multiple-event seismic location. Geophysical Journal International, 171:1049–1063, 2009.

[6] L. Geiger. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicenters from the arrival time only. Bull. St. Louis Univ., 8:60 –71, 1912.

[7] D. A. Storchak, J. Schweitzer, and P. Bormann. The IASPEI standard seismic phase list. Seismol. Res. Lett., 74(6):761 – 772, 2003.

[8] Brian Milch, Bhaskara Marthi, Stuart J. Russell, David Sontag, Daniel L. Ong, and Andrey Kolobov. BLOG: Probabilistic models with unknown objects. In IJCAI, pages 1352–1359, 2005.

[9] A. Gelman, J. B. Carlin, H. S. Stern, and D. B. Rubin. Bayesian Data Analysis. Chapman & Hall, 2004.

[10] Lester Mackey, Ariel Kleiner, and Michael I. Jordan. Improved automated seismic event extraction using machine learning. Eos Trans. AGU, 90(52), 2009. Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract S31B-1714. 9