nips nips2009 nips2009-183 nips2009-183-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Romain Brasselet, Roland Johansson, Angelo Arleo
Abstract: We study an encoding/decoding mechanism accounting for the relative spike timing of the signals propagating from peripheral nerve fibers to second-order somatosensory neurons in the cuneate nucleus (CN). The CN is modeled as a population of spiking neurons receiving as inputs the spatiotemporal responses of real mechanoreceptors obtained via microneurography recordings in humans. The efficiency of the haptic discrimination process is quantified by a novel definition of entropy that takes into full account the metrical properties of the spike train space. This measure proves to be a suitable decoding scheme for generalizing the classical Shannon entropy to spike-based neural codes. It permits an assessment of neurotransmission in the presence of a large output space (i.e. hundreds of spike trains) with 1 ms temporal precision. It is shown that the CN population code performs a complete discrimination of 81 distinct stimuli already within 35 ms of the first afferent spike, whereas a partial discrimination (80% of the maximum information transmission) is possible as rapidly as 15 ms. This study suggests that the CN may not constitute a mere synaptic relay along the somatosensory pathway but, rather, it may convey optimal contextual accounts (in terms of fast and reliable information transfer) of peripheral tactile inputs to downstream structures of the central nervous system. 1
[1] G. Bi and M. Poo. Distributed synaptic modification in neural networks induced by patterned stimulation. Nature, 401:792–796, 1999.
[2] E. Bienenstock, L. Cooper, and P. Munro. Theory for the development of neuron selectivity: orientation specificity and binocular interaction in visual cortex. J Neurosci, 2:32–48, 1982.
[3] S. Furukawa, L. Xu, and J.C. Middlebrooks. Coding of sound-source location by ensembles of cortical neurons. J Neurosci, 20:1216–1228, 2000.
[4] T.J. Gawne, T.W. Kjaer, and B.J. Richmond. Latency: another potential code for featurebinding in the striate cortex. J Neurophysiol, 76:1356–1360, 1996.
[5] W. Gerstner and W. Kistler. Spiking Neuron Models. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
[6] T. Gollisch and M. Meister. Rapid neural coding in the retina with relative spike latencies. Science, 319:1108–1111, 2008.
[7] P. Heil. First-spike latency of auditory neurons revisited. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 14:461–467, 2004.
[8] J.J. Hopfield. Pattern recognition computation using action potential timing for stimulus representation. Nature, 376:33–36, 1995.
[9] R.S. Johansson and I. Birznieks. First spikes in ensembles of human tactile afferents code complex spatial fingertip events. Nat Neurosci, 7:170 – 177, 2004.
[10] R.S. Johansson and J.R. Flanagan. Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks. Nat Rev Neurosci, 10:345–359, 2009.
[11] R.S. Johansson and A. Vallbo. Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand. Trends Neurosci, 6:27–32, 1983.
[12] E. Jones. Cortical and subcortical contributions to activity-dependent plasticity in primate somatosensory cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci, 23:1–37, 2000.
[13] P. Koenig, A.K. Engel, and W. Singer. Integrator or coincidence detector? The role of the cortical neuron revisited. Trends Neurosci, 19:130–137, 1996.
[14] Z.F. Mainen and T.J. Sejnowski. Reliability of spike timing in neocortical neurons. Science, 268:1503–1506, 1995.
[15] H. Markram, J. Luebke, M. Frotscher, and B. Sakmann. Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science, 275:213–215, 1997.
[16] I. Nelken, G. Chechik, T.D. Mrsic-Flogel, A.J. King, and J.W. Schnupp. Encoding stimulus information by spike numbers and mean response time in primary auditory cortex. J Comput Neurosci, 19:199–221, 2005.
[17] S. Panzeri, R.S. Petersen, S.R Schultz, M. Lebedev, and M.E. Diamond. The role of spike timing in the coding of stimulus location in rat somatosensory cortex. Neuron, 29:769–777, 2001.
[18] H.P. Saal, S. Vijayakumar, and R.S. Johansson. Information about complex fingertip parameters in individual human tactile afferent neurons. J Neurosci, 29:8022–8031, 2009.
[19] C.E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Sys Tech J, 27:379–423, 1948.
[20] T. Toyoizumi, J.-P. Pfister, K. Aihara, and W. Gerstner. Generalized Bienenstock-CooperMunro rule for spiking neurons that maximizes information transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 102(14):5239–5244, 2005.
[21] A. Vallbo and R.S. Johansson. Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation. Hum Neurobiol, 3:3–14, 1984.
[22] R. VanRullen, R. Guyonneau, and S.J. Thorpe. Spike time make sense. Trends Neurosci, 28:1–4, 2005.
[23] J.D. Victor and K.P. Purpura. Nature and precision of temporal coding in visual cortex: a metric-space analysis. J Neurophysiol, Vol 76:1310–1326, 1996. 9