nips nips2009 nips2009-165 nips2009-165-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

165 nips-2009-Noise Characterization, Modeling, and Reduction for In Vivo Neural Recording


Source: pdf

Author: Zhi Yang, Qi Zhao, Edward Keefer, Wentai Liu

Abstract: Studying signal and noise properties of recorded neural data is critical in developing more efficient algorithms to recover the encoded information. Important issues exist in this research including the variant spectrum spans of neural spikes that make it difficult to choose a globally optimal bandpass filter. Also, multiple sources produce aggregated noise that deviates from the conventional white Gaussian noise. In this work, the spectrum variability of spikes is addressed, based on which the concept of adaptive bandpass filter that fits the spectrum of individual spikes is proposed. Multiple noise sources have been studied through analytical models as well as empirical measurements. The dominant noise source is identified as neuron noise followed by interface noise of the electrode. This suggests that major efforts to reduce noise from electronics are not well spent. The measured noise from in vivo experiments shows a family of 1/f x spectrum that can be reduced using noise shaping techniques. In summary, the methods of adaptive bandpass filtering and noise shaping together result in several dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) enhancement.


reference text

[1] Lewicki MS. A review of methods for spike sorting: the detection and classification of neural action potentials. Network Comput Neural Syst. 1998;9:53–78.

[2] Quian Quiroga R, Nadasdy Z, Ben-Shaul Y. Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Computation. 2004 Aug;16(8):1661–1687.

[3] Bar-Hillel A, Spiro A, Stark E. Spike sorting: Bayesian clustering of non-stationary data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 17. 2005;p. 105–112.

[4] Zumsteg ZS, Kemere C, O’Driscoll S, Santhanam G, Ahmed RE, Shenoy KV, et al. Power feasibility of implantable digital spike sorting circuits for neural prosthetic systems. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2005 Sep;13(3):272–279.

[5] Vargas-Irwin C, Donoghue JP. Automated spike sorting using density grid contour clustering and subtractive waveform decomposition. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;164(1).

[6] Yang Z, Zhao Q, Liu W. Neural signal classification using a simplified feature set with nonparametric clustering. Neurocomputing, doi:101016/jneucom200907013, in press;.

[7] Gasthaus J, Wood F, Dilan G, Teh YW. Dependent dirichlet process spike sorting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21. 2009;p. 497–504.

[8] Smith LS, Mtetwa N. A tool for synthesizing spike trains with realistic interference. J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Jan;159(1):170–180.

[9] Harris KD, Henze DA, Csicsvari J, Hirase H, Buzsaki G. Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements. J Neurophysiol. 2000;84:401–414.

[10] Yang Z, Zhao Q, Liu W. Spike feature extraction using informative samples. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21. 2009;p. 1865–1872.

[11] Yang Z, Zhao Q, Liu W. Improving Spike Separation Using Waveform Derivative. Journal of Neural Engineering, doi: 101088/1741-2560/6/4/046006. 2009 Aug;6(4).

[12] Davidsen J, Schuster HZ. Simple model for 1/f α noise. Phys Rev Lett 65, 026120(1)-026120(4). 2002;.

[13] Yu Y, Romero R, Lee TS. Preference of sensory neural coding for 1/f signals. Phys Rev Lett 94, 108103(1)-108103(4). 2005;.

[14] Bedard C, Kroger H, Destexhe A. Does the 1/f frequency scaling of brain reflect self-organized critical states? Phys Rev Lett 97, 118102(1)-118102(4). 2006;.

[15] Hassibi A, Navid R, Dutton RW, Lee TH. Comprehensive study of noise processes in electrode electrolyte interfaces. J Appl Phys. 2004 July;96(2):1074–1082.

[16] Razavi B. Design of Analog CMOS Integrated Circuits. Boston, MA:McGraw-Hill; 2001.

[17] Keener J, Sneyd J. Mathematical Physiology. New York: Springer Verlag; 1998.

[18] Manwani A, N Steinmetz P, Koch C. Channel noise in excitable neural membranes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 12. 2000;p. 142–149.

[19] Fall C, Marland E, Wagner J, Tyson J. Computational Cell Biology. New York: Springer Verlag; 2002.

[20] Keefer EW, Botterman BR, Romero MI, Rossi AF, Gross GW. Carbon nanotube-coated electrodes improve brain readouts. Nat Nanotech. 2008;3:434–439.

[21] Wiley JD, Webster JG. Analysis and control of the current distribution under circular dispersive. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1982;29:381–385. √

[22] Denison T, Consoer K, Kelly A, Hachenburg A, Santa W. A 2.2µW 94nV / Hz, chopper-stabilized instrumentation amplifier for EEG detection in chronic implants. IEEE ISSCC Dig Tech Papers. 2007 Feb;8(6).

[23] Ferrari G, Gozzini F, Sampietro M. A current-sensitive front-end amplifier for nano biosensors with a 2MHz BW. IEEE ISSCC Dig Tech Papers. 2007 Feb;8(7).

[24] Harrison RR. The design of integrated circuits to observe brain activity. Proc IEEE. 2008 July;96:1203– 1216.

[25] Kaiser JF. On a simple algorithm to calculate the energy of a signal. In Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoustic Speech and Signal Processing. 1990;p. 381–384.

[26] Vaseghi SV. Advanced Digital Signal Processing and Noise Reduction. Wiley-Teubner; 1996.

[27] Hosking J. Fractional differencing. Biometrika. 1981 Jan;68:165–176.

[28] Rubner Y. Perceptual metrics for image database navigation. In: Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University; 1999. . 9