nips nips2009 nips2009-154 nips2009-154-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

154 nips-2009-Modeling the spacing effect in sequential category learning


Source: pdf

Author: Hongjing Lu, Matthew Weiden, Alan L. Yuille

Abstract: We develop a Bayesian sequential model for category learning. The sequential model updates two category parameters, the mean and the variance, over time. We define conjugate temporal priors to enable closed form solutions to be obtained. This model can be easily extended to supervised and unsupervised learning involving multiple categories. To model the spacing effect, we introduce a generic prior in the temporal updating stage to capture a learning preference, namely, less change for repetition and more change for variation. Finally, we show how this approach can be generalized to efficiently perform model selection to decide whether observations are from one or multiple categories.


reference text

[1] Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008a). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the ”enemy of induction”? Psychological Science, 19, 585-592.

[2] Bahrick, H.P., Bahrick, L.E., Bahrick, A.S., & Bahrick, P.E. (1993). Maintenance of foreign language vocabulary and the spacing effect. Psychological Science, 4, 316321.

[3] Shea, J.B., & Morgan, R.L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 179187.

[4] Balleine, B. W. Espinet, A. & Gonzalez, F. (2005).Perceptual learning enhances retrospective revaluation of conditioned flavor preferences in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31(3): 341-50.

[5] Carew, T.J., Pinsker, H.M., & Kandel, E.R. (1972). Long-term habituation of a defensive withdrawal reflex in Aplysia. Science, 175, 451454.

[6] Daw, N., Courville, A. C, & Dayan, P. (2007). Semi-rational Models of Conditioning: The Case of Trial Order. In M. Oaksford and N. Chater (Eds.). The probabilistic mind: Prospects for rational models of cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[7] Dayan, P. & Kakade, S. (2000). Explaining away in weight space. In T. K. Leen et al., (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 13, pp. 451-457). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[8] Fried, L. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (1984). Induction of category distributions: A framework for classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 234-257.

[9] Kalman, R. E. (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transactions of the ASME-Journal of Basic Engineering, 82:35-45.

[10] Schubert, J., & Sidenbladh, H. (2005). Sequential clustering with particle filters: Extimating the number of clusters from data. 7th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION).

[11] Ho, Y-C & Lee, R.C.K. (1964). A Bayesian appraoch to problems in stochastic estimation and control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 9, 333-339.

[12] Honey, R. C., Bateson, P., & Horn, G. (1994). The role of stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: An investigation with the domestic chick. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47(B), 83103.

[13] Kording, K. P., Tenenbaum, J. B., and Shadmehr, R. (2007). The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body. Nature Neuroscience, 10:779-786.

[14] Anderson, J. R. And Schooler, L. J. (1991). Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science, 2, 395-408. 9