nips nips2009 nips2009-107 nips2009-107-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining

107 nips-2009-Help or Hinder: Bayesian Models of Social Goal Inference


Source: pdf

Author: Tomer Ullman, Chris Baker, Owen Macindoe, Owain Evans, Noah Goodman, Joshua B. Tenenbaum

Abstract: Everyday social interactions are heavily influenced by our snap judgments about others’ goals. Even young infants can infer the goals of intentional agents from observing how they interact with objects and other agents in their environment: e.g., that one agent is ‘helping’ or ‘hindering’ another’s attempt to get up a hill or open a box. We propose a model for how people can infer these social goals from actions, based on inverse planning in multiagent Markov decision problems (MDPs). The model infers the goal most likely to be driving an agent’s behavior by assuming the agent acts approximately rationally given environmental constraints and its model of other agents present. We also present behavioral evidence in support of this model over a simpler, perceptual cue-based alternative. 1


reference text

[1] C. L. Baker, N. D. Goodman, and J. B. Tenenbaum. Theory-based social goal inference. In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 2008.

[2] C. L. Baker, J. B. Tenenbaum, and R. R. Saxe. Bayesian models of human action understanding. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 18, pages 99–106, 2006.

[3] P. W. Blythe, P. M. Todd, and G. F. Miller. How motion reveals intention: categorizing social interactions. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group, editors, Simple heuristics that make us smart, pages 257–286. Oxford University Press, New York, 1999.

[4] D. C. Dennett. The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.

[5] G. Gergely, Z. N´ dasdy, G. Csibra, and S. Bir´ . Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. a o Cognition, 56:165–193, 1995.

[6] J. K. Hamlin, Karen Wynn, and Paul Bloom. Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450:557–560, 2007.

[7] F. Heider and M. A. Simmel. An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57:243–249, 1944.

[8] V. Kuhlmeier, Karen Wynn, and Paul Bloom. Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14(5):402–408, 2003.

[9] J. Schultz, K. Friston, D. M. Wolpert, and C. D. Frith. Activation in posterior superior temporal sulcus parallels parameter inducing the percept of animacy. Neuron, 45:625–635, 2005.

[10] Wako Yoshida, Ray J. Dolan, and Karl J. Friston. Game theory of mind. PLoS Computational Biology, 4(12):1–14, 2008.

[11] Jeffrey M. Zacks. Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28:979–1008, 2004.

[12] P. D. Tremoulet and J. Feldman The influence of spatial context and the role of intentionality in the interpretation of animacy from motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 29:943–951, 2006. 9