nips nips2008 nips2008-172 nips2008-172-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Matt Jones, Sachiko Kinoshita, Michael C. Mozer
Abstract: In most cognitive and motor tasks, speed-accuracy tradeoffs are observed: Individuals can respond slowly and accurately, or quickly yet be prone to errors. Control mechanisms governing the initiation of behavioral responses are sensitive not only to task instructions and the stimulus being processed, but also to the recent stimulus history. When stimuli can be characterized on an easy-hard dimension (e.g., word frequency in a naming task), items preceded by easy trials are responded to more quickly, and with more errors, than items preceded by hard trials. We propose a rationally motivated mathematical model of this sequential adaptation of control, based on a diffusion model of the decision process in which difficulty corresponds to the drift rate for the correct response. The model assumes that responding is based on the posterior distribution over which response is correct, conditioned on the accumulated evidence. We derive this posterior as a function of the drift rate, and show that higher estimates of the drift rate lead to (normatively) faster responding. Trial-by-trial tracking of difficulty thus leads to sequential effects in speed and accuracy. Simulations show the model explains a variety of phenomena in human speeded decision making. We argue this passive statistical mechanism provides a more elegant and parsimonious account than extant theories based on elaborate control structures. 1
Baum, C. W., & Veeravalli, V. (1994). A sequential procedure for multi-hypothesis testing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 40, 1994–2007. Bogacz, R, Brown, E, Moehlis, J, Holmes, P & Cohen JD (2006). The physics of optimal decision making: A formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced choice tasks. Psych. Rev., 113, 700–765. Bogacz, R. & Gurney, K. (2007). The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions. Neural Computation, 19, 442-477. Damian, M. F. (2003). Articulatory duration in single word speech production. JEP: LMC, 29, 416–431. Dorfman, D., & Glanzer, M. (1988). List composition effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. J. Mem. & Lang., 27, 633–648. Gold, J.I., & Shadlen, M.N. (2002). Banburismus and the brain: Decoding the relationship between sensory stimuli, decisions and reward. Neuron, 36, 299–308. Jones, A. D., Cho, R. Y., Nystrom, L. E., Cohen, J. D., & Braver, T. S. (2002). A computational model of anterior cingulate function in speeded response tasks: Effects of frequency, sequence, and conflict. Cogn., Aff., & Beh. Neuro., 2, 300–317. Kello, C. T. & Plaut, D. C. (2003). Strategic control over rate of processing in word reading: A computational investigation. J. Mem. & Lang., 48, 207–232. Kiger, J. I., & Glass, A. L. (1981). Context effects in sentence verification. JEP:HPP, 7, 688–700. Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., & Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines? JEP:LMC, 23, 570–590. Rabbitt, PMA, & Vyas, SM (1970). An elementary preliminary taxonomy for some errors in laboratory choice RT tasks. Acta Psych., 33, 56-76. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. JEP:HPP, 25, 482–503. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2007). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873–922. Ratcliff, R., Cherian, A., & Segraves, M. (2003) A comparison of macaque behavior and superior colliculus neuronal activity to predictions from models of two-choice decisions. J. Neurophys., 90, 1392–1407. Taylor, T. E., & Lupker, S. J. (2001). Sequential effects in naming: A time-criterion account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 117–138. 8