nips nips2007 nips2007-198 nips2007-198-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Hongjing Lu, Alan L. Yuille
Abstract: We describe a novel noisy-logical distribution for representing the distribution of a binary output variable conditioned on multiple binary input variables. The distribution is represented in terms of noisy-or’s and noisy-and-not’s of causal features which are conjunctions of the binary inputs. The standard noisy-or and noisy-andnot models, used in causal reasoning and artificial intelligence, are special cases of the noisy-logical distribution. We prove that the noisy-logical distribution is complete in the sense that it can represent all conditional distributions provided a sufficient number of causal factors are used. We illustrate the noisy-logical distribution by showing that it can account for new experimental findings on how humans perform causal reasoning in complex contexts. We speculate on the use of the noisy-logical distribution for causal reasoning and artificial intelligence.
[1] P. W. Cheng. From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367405. 1997.
[2] L.R. Novick and P.W. Cheng. Assessing interactive causal influence. Psychological Review, 111, 455-485. 2004.
[3] T. L. Griffiths, and J. B. Tenenbaum. Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 334-384, 2005.
[4] J. Pearl, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems. Morgan-Kauffman, 1988.
[5] C.N. Glymour. The Mind’s Arrow: Bayes Nets and Graphical Causal Models in Psychology. MIT Press. 2001.
[6] M. Liljeholm and P. W. Cheng. When is a Cause the ”Same”? Coherent Generalization across Contexts. Psychological Science, in press. 2007.
[7] M. J. Buehner, P. W. Cheng, and D. Clifford. From covariation to causation: A test of the assumption of causal power. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1119-1140, 2003.
[8] R. A. Rescorla, and A. R. Wagner. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black and W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century Crofts. 1972. 8