nips nips2006 nips2006-120 nips2006-120-reference knowledge-graph by maker-knowledge-mining
Source: pdf
Author: Piotr DollĂĄr, Vincent Rabaud, Serge J. Belongie
Abstract: We present a new algorithm, Locally Smooth Manifold Learning (LSML), that learns a warping function from a point on an manifold to its neighbors. Important characteristics of LSML include the ability to recover the structure of the manifold in sparsely populated regions and beyond the support of the provided data. Applications of our proposed technique include embedding with a natural out-of-sample extension and tasks such as tangent distance estimation, frame rate up-conversion, video compression and motion transfer. 1
[1] E. Di Bernardo, L. Goncalves and P. Perona.US Patent 6,552,729: Automatic generation of animation of synthetic characters., 2003.
[2] Y. Bengio and M. Monperrus. Non-local manifold tangent learning. In NIPS. 2005.
[3] Y. Bengio, J.F. Paiement, P. Vincent, O. Delalleau, N. Le Roux, and M. Ouimet. Out-of-sample extensions for LLE, isomap, MDS, eigenmaps, and spectral clustering. In NIPS, 2004.
[4] D. Beymer and T. Poggio. Face recognition from one example view. In ICCV, page 500, Washington, DC, USA, 1995. IEEE Computer Society.
[5] Volker Blanz and Thomas Vetter. Face recognition based on Ä?Ĺš tting a 3D morphable model. PAMI, 25(9):1063–1074, 2003.
[6] M. Brand. Charting a manifold. In NIPS, 2003.
[7] Christoph Bregler, Michele Covell, and Malcolm Slaney. Video rewrite: driving visual speech with audio. In SIGGRAPH, pages 353–360, 1997.
[8] E. Chuang, H. Deshpande, and C. Bregler. Facial expression space learning. In PaciÄ?Ĺš c Graphics, 2002.
[9] P. Doll´ r, V. Rabaud, and S. Belongie. Learning to traverse image manifolds. Technical Report CS2007a 0876, UCSD CSE, Jan. 2007.
[10] G. J. Edwards, T. F. Cootes, and C. J. Taylor. Face recognition using active appearance models. ECCV, 1998.
[11] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman. The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer, 2001.
[12] N. Jojic, B. Frey, and A. Kannan. Epitomic analysis of appearance and shape. In ICCV, 2003.
[13] D. Keysers, W. Macherey, J. Dahmen, and H. Ney. Learning of variability for invariant statistical pattern recognition. ECML, 2001.
[14] T. Moriyama, T. Kanade, J. Xiao, and J. F. Cohn. Meticulously detailed eye region model. PAMI, 2006.
[15] H. Murase and S.K. Nayar. Visual learning and recognition of 3D objects from appearance. IJCV, 1995.
[16] R. Rao and D. Ruderman. Learning Lie groups for invariant visual perception. In NIPS, 1999.
[17] L. K. Saul and S. T. Roweis. Think globally, Ä?Ĺš t locally: unsupervised learning of low dimensional manifolds. JMLR, 2003.
[18] A. Sch¨ dl, R. Szeliski, D.H. Salesin, and I. Essa. Video textures. In SIGGRAPH, 2000. o
[19] B. Sch¨ lkopf, A. Smola, and K. M¨ ller. Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. o u Neur. Comp., 1998.
[20] P. Simard, Y. LeCun, and J. S. Denker. EfÄ?Ĺš cient pattern recognition using a new transformation distance. In NIPS, 1993.
[21] P. Simard, Y. LeCun, J. S. Denker, and B. Victorri. Transformation invariance in pattern recognitiontangent distance and tangent propagation. In Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, 1998.
[22] J. B. Tenenbaum, V. de Silva, and J. C. Langford. A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290, 2000.
[23] Joshua B. Tenenbaum and William T. Freeman. Separating style and content with bilinear models. Neural Computation, 12(6):1247–1283, 2000.
[24] K. Q. Weinberger and L. K. Saul. Unsupervised learning of image manifolds by semideÄ?Ĺš nite programming. In CVPR04.
[25] Z. Zhang and Zha. Local linear smoothing for nonlinear manifold learning. Technical report, 2003.